Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

  • Michael W Long (a1), Cindy W Leung (a1), Lilian WY Cheung (a1), Susan J Blumenthal (a2) and Walter C Willett (a1)...

Abstract

Objective

To determine public attitudes towards federal spending on nutrition assistance programmes and support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Design

Participants answered survey questions by telephone assessing support for SNAP spending and proposed programme policy changes.

Setting

USA.

Subjects

Survey of 3024 adults selected by random digit dialling conducted in April 2012, including 418 SNAP participants.

Results

A majority (77 %; 95 % CI 75, 79 %) of all respondents supported maintaining or increasing SNAP benefits, with higher support among Democrats (88 %; 95 % CI 86, 90 %) than Republicans (61 %; 95 % CI 58, 65 %). The public supported policies to improve the nutritional impact of SNAP. Eighty-two per cent (95 % CI 80, 84 %) of respondents supported providing additional benefits to programme participants that can only be used on healthful foods. Sixty-nine per cent (95 % CI 67, 71 %) of respondents supported removing SNAP benefits for sugary drinks. A majority of SNAP participants (54 %; 95 % CI 48, 60 %) supported removing SNAP benefits for sugary drinks. Of the 46 % (95 % CI 40, 52 %) of SNAP participants who initially opposed removing sugary drinks, 45 % (95 % CI 36, 54 %) supported removing SNAP benefits for sugary drinks if the policy also included additional benefits to purchase healthful foods.

Conclusions

The US public broadly supports increasing or maintaining spending on SNAP. The majority of respondents, including SNAP participants, supported policies to improve the nutritional impact of SNAP by restricting the purchase of sugary drinks and incentivizing purchase of healthful foods with SNAP benefits.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email wwillett@hsph.harvard.edu

References

Hide All
1. Congressional Budget Office (2012) S. 3240: Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2012, CBO Cost Estimate. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/s3240.pdf (accessed June 2012).
2. Congressional Budget Office (2012) Agricultural Reconciliation Act of 2012, CBO Cost Estimate. http://cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/HouseAgricultureReconciliation.pdf (accessed June 2012).
3. Institute of Medicine (2012) Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention: Solving the Weight of the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
4. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (2012) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation and Costs. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/SNAPsummary.htm (accessed June 2012).
5. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (2012) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). http://www.fns.usda.gov/cga/FactSheets/SNAP_Quick_Facts.htm (accessed June 2012).
6. Tiehen, L, Jolliffe, D & Gundersen, C (2012) Alleviating Poverty in the United States: The Critical Role of SNAP Benefits. Economic Research Report no. ERR-132. Washington, DC: USDA, Economic Research Service.
7. US Department of Agriculture & US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
8. Shenkin, JD & Jacobson, MF (2010) Using the Food Stamp Program and other methods to promote healthy diets for low-income consumers. Am J Public Health 100, 15621564.
9. Brownell, KD & Ludwig, DS (2011) The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, soda, and USDA policy: who benefits? JAMA 306, 13701371.
10. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (2012) Healthy Incentives Pilot (HIP) – Basic Facts. http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/hip/qa-s.htm (accessed June 2012).
11. Shahn, J (2011) Letter from Jessica Shahn, Associate Administrator, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, US Department of Agriculture to Elizabeth Berlin, Executive Deputy Commissioner, New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance. http://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/SNAP-Waiver-Request-Decision.pdf (accessed June 2012).
12. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (2011) Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 7th ed. Deerfield, IL: AAPOR; available at http://www.aapor.org/Content/NavigationMenu/AboutAAPOR/StandardsampEthics/StandardDefinitions/StandardDefinitions2011.pdf
13. Kohut, A, Keeter, S, Doherty, C et al. (2012) Assessing the Representativeness of Public Opinion Surveys. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press; available at http://www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-the-representativeness-of-public-opinion-surveys/
14. Keeter, S, Kennedy, C, Dimock, M et al. (2006) Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opin Q 70, 759779.
15. Blendon, RJ, Benson, JM, Desroches, CM et al. (2003) Using opinion surveys to track the public's response to a bioterrorist attack. J Health Commun 8, Suppl. 1, 8392.
16. Food Research and Action Center (2012) FRAC releases new polling data showing overwhelming support for efforts to end hunger. http://frac.org/frac-releases-new-polling-data-showing-overwhelming-support-for-efforts-to-end-hunger/ (accessed June 2012).
17. Cooper, M (2012) Poll: Mixed views on health care, farm bill. National Journal, 4 June issue. http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/poll-mixed-views-on-health-care-farm-bill-20120604 (accessed June 2012).
18. US Department of Agriculture (2012) The Food Stamp Act of 1964. http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/rules/Legislation/pdfs/PL_88-525.pdf (accessed June 2012).
19. Sheehan, A & Sykes, B (2011) HRA Research Notes, Results from a Survey of Food Stamp Recipients’ Food Shopping and Eating Habits. New York, NY: Human Resources Administration, Office of Evaluation and Research.
20. Barnhill, A (2011) Impact and ethics of excluding sweetened beverages from the SNAP program. Am J Public Health 101, 20372043.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed