Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ross, Nicole M. V. and MacKay, Douglas P. 2016. Ending SNAP-Subsidized Purchases of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: The Need for a Pilot Project. Public Health Ethics, p. phw017.


    Cohen, Nevin and Ilieva, Rositsa T. 2015. Transitioning the food system: A strategic practice management approach for cities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 17, p. 199.


    Leung, Cindy W. Ryan-Ibarra, Suzanne Linares, Amanda Induni, Marta Sugerman, Sharon Long, Michael W. Rimm, Eric B. and Willett, Walter C. 2015. Support for Policies to Improve the Nutritional Impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in California. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 105, Issue. 8, p. 1576.


    Schultz, Daniel Joseph Byker Shanks, Carmen and Houghtaling, Bailey 2015. The Impact of the 2009 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Food Package Revisions on Participants: A Systematic Review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 115, Issue. 11, p. 1832.


    Schwartz, Marlene B. Gilstad-Hayden, Kathryn Henderson, Kathryn E. Luedicke, Joerg Carroll-Scott, Amy Peters, Susan M. McCaslin, Catherine and Ickovics, Jeannette R. 2015. The Relationship between Parental Behaviors and Children's Sugary Drink Consumption Is Moderated by a Television in the Child's Bedroom. Childhood Obesity, Vol. 11, Issue. 5, p. 560.


    Chaparro, M. Pia Harrison, Gail G. Pebley, Anne R. and Wang, May 2014. The Relationship Between Obesity and Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Is Mental Health a Mediator?. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 512.


    ×

Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

  • Michael W Long (a1), Cindy W Leung (a1), Lilian WY Cheung (a1), Susan J Blumenthal (a2) and Walter C Willett (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S136898001200506X
  • Published online: 06 December 2012
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To determine public attitudes towards federal spending on nutrition assistance programmes and support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Design

Participants answered survey questions by telephone assessing support for SNAP spending and proposed programme policy changes.

Setting

USA.

Subjects

Survey of 3024 adults selected by random digit dialling conducted in April 2012, including 418 SNAP participants.

Results

A majority (77 %; 95 % CI 75, 79 %) of all respondents supported maintaining or increasing SNAP benefits, with higher support among Democrats (88 %; 95 % CI 86, 90 %) than Republicans (61 %; 95 % CI 58, 65 %). The public supported policies to improve the nutritional impact of SNAP. Eighty-two per cent (95 % CI 80, 84 %) of respondents supported providing additional benefits to programme participants that can only be used on healthful foods. Sixty-nine per cent (95 % CI 67, 71 %) of respondents supported removing SNAP benefits for sugary drinks. A majority of SNAP participants (54 %; 95 % CI 48, 60 %) supported removing SNAP benefits for sugary drinks. Of the 46 % (95 % CI 40, 52 %) of SNAP participants who initially opposed removing sugary drinks, 45 % (95 % CI 36, 54 %) supported removing SNAP benefits for sugary drinks if the policy also included additional benefits to purchase healthful foods.

Conclusions

The US public broadly supports increasing or maintaining spending on SNAP. The majority of respondents, including SNAP participants, supported policies to improve the nutritional impact of SNAP by restricting the purchase of sugary drinks and incentivizing purchase of healthful foods with SNAP benefits.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email wwillett@hsph.harvard.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

8.JD Shenkin & MF Jacobson (2010) Using the Food Stamp Program and other methods to promote healthy diets for low-income consumers. Am J Public Health 100, 15621564.

9.KD Brownell & DS Ludwig (2011) The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, soda, and USDA policy: who benefits? JAMA 306, 13701371.

14.S Keeter , C Kennedy , M Dimock et al. (2006) Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opin Q 70, 759779.

15.RJ Blendon , JM Benson , CM Desroches et al. (2003) Using opinion surveys to track the public's response to a bioterrorist attack. J Health Commun 8, Suppl. 1, 8392.

20.A Barnhill (2011) Impact and ethics of excluding sweetened beverages from the SNAP program. Am J Public Health 101, 20372043.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: