Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record in German toddlers

  • Guo Cheng (a1) (a2), Annett Hilbig (a1), Claudia Drossard (a1), Ute Alexy (a1) and Mathilde Kersting (a1)...

Abstract

Objective

To determine the relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record (EFR) used to assess energy and nutrient intakes in toddlers, using a 3 d weighed food record (WDR) as the reference method.

Design

Parents reported the food and beverage intakes of their children using an EFR concurrently with a WDR over three consecutive days. Estimation of mean differences, Spearman correlation coefficients, cross-classifications and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between the intakes of energy and fourteen nutrients obtained from the EFR and the WDR.

Setting

Data obtained from a representative sample of infants or toddlers in Germany.

Subjects

Sixty-seven toddlers aged 10–36 months who had completed an EFR for a 3 d recording period that corresponded to the WDR were included in the present analysis.

Results

Energy and nutrient intakes did not differ between the EFR and the WDR, except for linoleic acid and retinol. For all dietary intakes, Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the EFR and the WDR ranged from 0·35 to 0·80 (P ≤ 0·004). The proportion of participants correctly classified into quartiles ranged from 75 % for ascorbic acid intake to 96 % for Fe intake, and the percentage of misclassification was 9 % or less. The weighed κ values ranking the participants ranged from 0·23 for ascorbic acid intake to 0·59 for Fe intake. The Bland–Altman plots indicated a good agreement for all dietary intakes estimated from the EFR.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that this EFR is a valid assessment instrument for estimating the energy and nutrient intakes among toddlers at the group level.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record in German toddlers
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record in German toddlers
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record in German toddlers
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email cheng@fke-do.de

References

Hide All
1.Dietz, WH (1994) Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 955959.
2.Kleinman, RE (editor) (2009) Pediatric Nutrition Handbook, 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.
3.Marriott, LD, Robinson, SM, Poole, Jet al. (2008) What do babies eat? Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the diets of infants aged 6 months. Public Health Nutr 11, 751756.
4.Lande, B, Andersen, LF, Baerug, Aet al. (2003) Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first six months of life: the Norwegian infant nutrition survey. Acta Paediatr 92, 152161.
5.Marriott, LD, Inskip, HM, Borland, SEet al. (2009) What do babies eat? Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess the diets of infants aged 12 months. Public Health Nutr 12, 967972.
6.Subar, AF (2004) Developing dietary assessment tools. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 769770.
7.Cade, J, Thompson, R, Burley, Vet al. (2002) Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires – a review. Public Health Nutr 5, 567587.
8.Biro, G, Hulshof, KF, Ovesen, Let al. (2002) Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, Suppl. 2, S25S32.
9.Buzzard, M (1998) 24-Hour dietary recall and food record methods. In Nutritional Epidemiology, pp. 5073 [W Willett, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.Bingham, SA, Cassidy, A, Cole, TJet al. (1995) Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br J Nutr 73, 531550.
11.Kroke, A, Manz, F, Kersting, Met al. (2004) The DONALD Study. History, current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nutr 43, 4554.
12.Schoen, S, Sichert-Hellert, W & Kersting, M (2009) Validation of energy requirement equations for estimation of breast milk consumption in infants. Public Health Nutr 12, 23092316.
13.Sichert-Hellert, W, Kersting, M, Chahda, Cet al. (2007) German food composition database for dietary evaluations in children and adolescents. J Food Compost Anal 20, 6370.
14.Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8, 135160.
15.Bland, JM & Altman, DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307310.
16.Grouven, U, Bender, R, Ziegler, Aet al. (2007) Comparing methods of measurement. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132, Suppl. 1, e69e73.
17.Brunner, E, Stallone, D, Juneja, Met al. (2001) Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers. Br J Nutr 86, 405414.
18.Landis, JR & Koch, GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159174.
19.Masson, LF, McNeill, G, Tomany, JOet al. (2003) Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic. Public Health Nutr 6, 313321.
20.Marshall, TA, Eichenberger Gilmore, JM, Broffitt, Bet al. (2003) Relative validation of a beverage frequency questionnaire in children ages 6 months through 5 years using 3-day food and beverage diaries. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 714720.
21.Andersen, LF, Lande, B, Arsky, GHet al. (2003) Validation of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire used among 12-month-old Norwegian infants. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 881888.
22.Parrish, LA, Marshall, JA, Krebs, NFet al. (2003) Validation of a food frequency questionnaire in preschool children. Epidemiology 14, 213217.
23.Blum, RE, Wei, EK, Rockett, HRet al. (1999) Validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Native American and Caucasian children 1 to 5 years of age. Matern Child Health J 3, 167172.
24.Araujo, MC, Yokoo, EM & Pereira, RA (2010) Validation and calibration of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire designed for adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 11701177.
25.Bokhof, B, Gunther, AL, Berg-Beckhoff, Get al. (2010) Validation of protein intake assessed from weighed dietary records against protein estimated from 24 h urine samples in children, adolescents and young adults participating in the Dortmund Nutritional and Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study. Public Health Nutr 13, 826834.
26.Bingham, S, Nelson, M, Paul, Aet al. (1988) Methods for data collection at an individual level. In Manual on Methodology for Food Consumption Studies, pp. 53106 [M Cameron and W Van Staveren, editors]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Relative validity of a 3 d estimated food record in German toddlers

  • Guo Cheng (a1) (a2), Annett Hilbig (a1), Claudia Drossard (a1), Ute Alexy (a1) and Mathilde Kersting (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.