Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The science on front-of-package food labels

  • Kristy L Hawley (a1), Christina A Roberto (a2), Marie A Bragg (a2), Peggy J Liu (a2), Marlene B Schwartz (a2) and Kelly D Brownell (a2)...
Abstract
Objective

The US Food and Drug Administration and Institute of Medicine are currently investigating front-of-package (FOP) food labelling systems to provide science-based guidance to the food industry. The present paper reviews the literature on FOP labelling and supermarket shelf-labelling systems published or under review by February 2011 to inform current investigations and identify areas of future research.

Design

A structured search was undertaken of research studies on consumer use, understanding of, preference for, perception of and behaviours relating to FOP/shelf labelling published between January 2004 and February 2011.

Results

Twenty-eight studies from a structured search met inclusion criteria. Reviewed studies examined consumer preferences, understanding and use of different labelling systems as well as label impact on purchasing patterns and industry product reformulation.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that the Multiple Traffic Light system has most consistently helped consumers identify healthier products; however, additional research on different labelling systems’ abilities to influence consumer behaviour is needed.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The science on front-of-package food labels
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The science on front-of-package food labels
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The science on front-of-package food labels
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email klhawley@gwu.edu
References
Hide All
1.White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity (2010) Solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation. http://www.letsmove.gov/pdf/TaskForce_on_Childhood_Obesity_May2010_FullReport.pdf (accessed October 2010).
2.US Food and Drug Administration (2010) New front-of-package labeling initiative. http://www.fda.gov/food/labelingnutrition/ucm202726.htm (accessed October 2010).
3.Wartella, EA, Lichtenstein, AH & Boon, CS (2010) Examination of front-of-package nutrition rating systems and symbols: Phase I report. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Examination-of-Front-of-Package-Nutrition-Rating-Systems-and-Symbols-Phase-1-Report.aspx (accessed February 2011).
4.Center for Science in the Public Interest (2010) Food labeling chaos: the case for reform. http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/food_labeling_chaos_report.pdf (accessed October 2010).
5.National Health Service (2010) Traffic light labeling. http://www.eatwell.gov.uk/foodlabels/trafficlights/ (accessed October 2010).
6.Vyth, EL, Steenhuis, IH, Mallant, SFet al. (2009) A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands. J Health Commun 14, 631645.
7.Switt, J (2007) Labeling around the globe: helping to direct food flow. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 199200.
8.Food Marketing Institute (2010) Food and beverage industry launches nutrition keys front-of-pack nutrition labeling initiative to inform consumers and combat obesity. http://www.fmi.org/news_releases/index.cfm?fuseaction=mediatext&id=1207 (accessed February 2011).
9.Grocery Manufacturers Association (2011) Nutrition Keys front-of-pack labeling initiative. http://www.gmaonline.org/issues-policy/health-nutrition/responsible-public-policy-solutions/nutrition-keys-front-of-pack-labeling-initiative/ (accessed February 2011).
10.Choinière, CJ, Lando, AM (2010) 2008 Health and Diet Survey. http://www.fda.gov/Food/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/ConsumerResearch/ucm193895.htm (accessed April 2010).
11.Schofield, H & Mullainathan, S (2008) The psychology of nutrition messages. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 19, 145172.
12.van Kleef, E, van Trijp, H, Paeps, Fet al. (2008) Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling. Public Health Nutr 11, 203213.
13.Malam, S, Clegg, S, Kirwin, Set al. (2009) Comprehension and use of UK nutrition signpost labelling schemes. http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/pmpreport.pdf (accessed October 2010).
14.Lando, AM & Labiner-Wolfe, J (2007) Helping consumers make more healthful food choices: consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point-of-purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants. J Nutr Educ Behav 39, 157163.
15.Feunekes, GI, Gortemaker, IA, Willems, AAet al. (2008) Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite 50, 5770.
16.International Food Information Council Foundation (2007) Global consumer perception and use of nutrition information on food labels. http://www.foodinsight.org/Newsletter/Detail.aspx?topic=Global_Consumer_Perceptions_and_Use_of_Nutrition_Information_on_Food_Labels (accessed July 2010).
17.Roberto, CA, Larsen, PD, Agnew, Het al. (2010) Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake. Am J Public Health 100, 312318.
18.Kim, WK & Kim, J (2009) A study on the consumer's perception of front-of-pack nutrition labeling. Nutr Res Pract 3, 300306.
19.Kelly, B, Hughes, C, Chapman, Ket al. (2009) Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. Health Promot Int 24, 120129.
20.Gorton, D, Ni Mhurchu, C, Chen, MHet al. (2009) Nutrition labels: a survey of use, understanding and preferences among ethnically diverse shoppers in New Zealand. Public Health Nutr 12, 13591365.
21.Möser, A, Hoefkens, C, Van Camp, Jet al. (2010) Simplified nutrient labelling: consumers’ perceptions in Germany and Belgium. J Verbrauch Lebensm 5, 169180.
22.Levy, AS, Mathews, O, Stephenson, Met al. (1985) The impact of a nutrition information program on food purchases. J Public Policy Mark 4, 113.
23.Borgmeier, I & Westenhoefer, J (2009) Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: a randomized-controlled study. BMC Public Health 9, 184.
24.Maubach, H & Hoek, J (2008) The effect of alternative nutrition information formats on consumers’ evaluations of a children's breakfast cereal. http://ro.uow.edu.au/insm08/1/ (accessed April 2011).
25.Andrews, JC, Burton, S & Kees, J (2012) Is simpler always better? Consumer evaluations of front-of-package nutrition symbols. J Public Policy Mark 30, 175190.
26.Jones, G & Richardson, M (2007) An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements. Public Health Nutr 10, 238244.
27.Vyth, EL, Steenhuis, IH, Vlot, JAet al. (2010) Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice. Public Health Nutr 13, 18821889.
28.Sacks, G, Rayner, M & Swinburn, B (2009) Impact of front-of-pack ‘traffic-light’ nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promot Int 24, 344352.
29.Chandon, P & Wansink, B (2007) The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. J Consum Res 34, 301314.
30.Steenhuis, IH, Kroeze, W, Vyth, ELet al. (2010) The effects of using a nutrition logo on consumption and product evaluation of a sweet pastry. Appetite 55, 707709.
31.Drichoutis, AC, Lazaridis, P & Nayga, RM (2009) Would consumers value food-away-from-home products with nutritional labels? Agribusiness 25, 550575.
32.Bialkova, S & van Trijp, H (2010) What determines consumer attention to nutrition labels? Food Qual Prefer 21, 10421051.
33.Lang, JE, Mercer, N, Tran, Det al. (2000) Use of a supermarket shelf-labeling program to educate a predominately minority community about foods that promote heart health. J Am Diet Assoc 100, 804809.
34.Jeffery, RW, Pirie, PL, Rosenthal, BSet al. (1982) Nutrition education in supermarkets: an unsuccessful attempt to influence knowledge and product sales. J Behav Med 5, 189200.
35.Katz, DL, Njike, VY, Rhee, LQet al. (2010) Performance characteristics of NuVal and the Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI). Am J Clin Nutr 91, issue 4, 1102S1108S.
36.Katz, DL, Njike, VY, Faridi, Zet al. (2009) The stratification of foods on the basis of overall nutritional quality: the overall nutritional quality index. Am J Health Promot 24, 133143.
37.Berning, JP, Chouinard, HH, Manning, KCet al. (2010) Identifying consumer preferences for nutrition information on grocery store shelf labels. Food Policy 35, 429436.
38.Sutherland, LA, Kaley, LA & Fischer, L (2010) Guiding stars: the effect of a nutrition navigation program on consumer purchases at the supermarket. Am J Clin Nutr 91, issue 4, 1090S1094S.
39.Grunert, KG, Wills, JM & Fernandez-Celemin, L (2010) Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK. Appetite 55, 177189.
40.Drewnowski, A, Moskowitz, H, Reisner, Met al. (2010) Testing consumer perception of nutrient content claims using conjoint analysis. Public Health Nutr 13, 688694.
41.Young, L & Swinburn, B (2002) Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand. Health Promot Int 17, 1319.
42.US Food and Drug Administration (2003) Guidance for industry: trans fatty acids in nutrition labeling, nutrient content claims, health claims; Small entity compliance guide. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/GuidanceDocuments/FoodLabelingNutrition/ucm053479.htm#fn1 (accessed October 2010).
43.Eckel, RH, Borra, S, Lichtenstein, AHet al. (2007) Understanding the complexity of trans fatty acid reduction in the American diet: American Heart Association Trans Fat Conference 2006: Report of the Trans Fat Conference Planning Group. Circulation 115, 22312246.
44.Vyth, EL, Steenhuis, IH, Roodenburg, AJet al. (2010) Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7, 65.
45.Philipson, T (2005) Government perspective: food labeling. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 1 Suppl., 262S264S.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed