Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:27:43.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vitamin D, sun, sunbeds and health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2011

Johan Moan
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, Montebello N-0310 Oslo, Norway Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Zivile Baturaite*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, Montebello N-0310 Oslo, Norway
Asta Juzeniene
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, Montebello N-0310 Oslo, Norway
Alina Carmen Porojnicu
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, Montebello N-0310 Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: Email Zivile.Baturaite@rr-research.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To review the health effects of solar radiation, sunbeds and vitamin D.

Design

The literature was searched in the electronic database MEDLINE to indentify published data between 1981 and 2011. Studies were included if they reported relative risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) associated with sunbed use, vitamin D and UV effects on human health.

Setting

Data from different time periods for populations at different latitudes.

Subjects

Persons of different ages and ethnic groups.

Results

UV from sun and sunbeds is the main vitamin D source. Young people with white or pigmented skin in northern Europe have a low vitamin D status. A number of health benefits from sufficient levels of vitamin D have been identified. However, UV exposure has been suspected of causing skin cancer, notably CMM, and authorities warn against it.

Conclusions

The overall health benefit of an improved vitamin D status may be more important than the possibly increased CMM risk resulting from carefully increasing UV exposure. Important scientific facts behind this judgement are given.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Vitamin D in the human body comes from two sources: diet and exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB; 280–315 nm) radiation. The systemic effect of vitamin D produced by UVB action on the skin was demonstrated by the fact that UVB exposure of one arm of a child with rickets could cure rickets in the other arm(Reference Holick1). Vitamin D is formed by UVB action on 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC) in skin, where the product previtamin D is transformed to vitamin D and transported to the liver bound to vitamin D-binding protein in the blood, as is dietary vitamin D. In the liver vitamin D is hydroxylated to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), which is transported to the kidneys and to many other tissues and hydroxylated to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), the active hormone, known for its classical role in bone ossification. A level of 25(OH)D in the blood of 20–30 nmol/l is needed to avoid rickets(Reference Holick2). Vitamin D gives many health benefits(Reference Holick2), beyond bone and muscle health, but they require higher blood levels(Reference Holick, Binkley and Bischoff-Ferrari3). Sun exposure produces vitamin D with high efficiency, making it the main source of vitamin D even at high latitudes. One minimal erythemal dose of UV radiation (a slight skin pinkness 24 h after exposure(Reference Holick, Binkley and Bischoff-Ferrari3)) gives about 250–625 μg of vitamin D(Reference Holick and Chen4).

Due to the fear of skin cancer(Reference Moan and Dahlback5Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback7), health authorities warn against sun and sunbed exposure. This policy, as well as the recommended vitamin D doses, may need revision.

UV from sun and sunbeds

The sun and sunbeds emit UVB and ultraviolet A (UVA). Sunbed tubes with high fluence rates of UVA are allowed for two reasons: (i) UVA wavelengths are not significantly absorbed by DNA and do not affect DNA directly(Reference Von Thaler, Kamenisch and Berneburg8); and (ii) UVA produces skin tanning, both immediate pigment darkening (IPD) and delayed tanning. Tanning is thought to protect DNA and reduce carcinogenesis as indicated by the low skin cancer risk of dark-skinned people(Reference Marks9). The positive effects of UVB are not known, only its carcinogenetic potential. Thus, UVB levels are restricted to those in solar radiation which are sufficient to increase the vitamin D levels in the blood(Reference Cicarma, Porojnicu and Lagunova10Reference Thieden, Jorgensen and Jorgensen13): 10 min of exposure to sunbeds, twice weekly, give similar vitamin D levels as a daily intake of 50 μg of vitamin D(Reference Moan, Lagunova and Cicarma11), or 5 teaspoons (25 ml) of cod-liver oil, and can bring a winter level of vitamin D up to a summer level (70–90 nmol/l), which may be optimal(Reference Holick, Binkley and Bischoff-Ferrari3).

Sun and cutaneous malignant melanoma

Sun exposure is commonly supposed to be the main cause of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) in most populations(Reference Marks9). However, the matter is disputed(Reference Shuster14), and we have reviewed the arguments for and against a causation(Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback7). Several factors are probably involved, as exemplified by a relationship sometimes found between gross domestic product and CMM incidence(Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback6).

Intermittent sun exposure and severe sunburn in childhood are associated with an increased risk of CMM(Reference Leiter and Garbe15). CMM incidence rates per unit skin area are larger on trunk (intermittently exposed) than on head and neck, while the opposite is true for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas(Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback7). Occupational exposure (farmers, fishermen) and regular weekend sun exposure are associated with decreased risk of CMM(Reference Newton-Bishop, Chang and Elliott16, Reference Pukkala, Martinsen and Lynge17). Sun exposure may even protect against CMM on shielded skin sites(Reference Cicarma, Juzeniene and Porojnicu18, Reference Moan, Cicarma and Setlow19), and CMM arising on skin with signs of large UV exposure has the best prognosis(Reference Berwick, Armstrong and Ben-Porat20). UV exposure earlier in life is related to reduced overall and breast cancer(Reference Yang, Veierod and Lof21). It has also been observed that patients with the highest blood levels of vitamin D have thinner CMM and better survival prognosis from CMM(Reference Newton-Bishop, Beswick and Randerson-Moor22).

Sunbeds and cutaneous malignant melanoma

A number of publications show conflicting results concerning the risk of CMM developing after sunbed use. Recent studies found that exposure to sunbeds has increased CMM risks(Reference Moan, Lagunova and Cicarma11, 23Reference Walter, King and Marrett29). These studies show that the use of sunbeds before 35 years of age significantly increases CMM risk. Some other studies show no increased CMM risk associated with sunbed use(Reference Bataille, Boniol and De30Reference Zanetti, Rosso and Faggiano34).

Discrepancies between different studies may be related to differences between UVA/UVB ratios and intensities of the sunbeds. People who are using sunbeds frequently may also have higher than average sun exposure and it may be difficult to separate the effects of the two factors. There has been a significant increase in the number of sunbed exposures in Norway after 1990, but CMM incidence rates among persons younger than 50 years have stabilized(Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback6, Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback7, Reference Moan, Baturaite and Porojnicu35, Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Dahlback36).

Figure 1 is an updated summary of the published studies on sunbed use and risk of CMM(23, Reference Cust, Armstrong and Goumas25, Reference Elliott, Suppa and Chan31, Reference Fears, Sagebiel and Halpern37Reference Westerdahl, Ingvar and Masback40). Some of the studies give conflicting results, such as an increased risk for women but not for men(Reference Fears, Sagebiel and Halpern37). A recent study, including persons who were 18 years or younger between 1957 and 1977, gave among the highest odds ratios(Reference Veierod, Weiderpass and Thorn28, Reference Veierod, Adami and Lund39). However, in this period there were very few sunbeds in Norway, so sunbed exposure cannot be the only risk factor for the increasing rates of CMM.

Fig. 1 Relative risks and 95 % confidence intervals for cutaneous malignant melanoma associated with sunbed use in different studies. For results to 2005, numbers are references from the International Agency for Research on Cancer work(23); for recent results (2010/2011), reference numbers are from the present study(Reference Cust, Armstrong and Goumas25, Reference Elliott, Suppa and Chan31, Reference Fears, Sagebiel and Halpern37Reference Veierod, Adami and Lund39)

Ultraviolet A and cutaneous malignant melanoma

UVA was reported to induce CMM with high efficiency in the small swordfish Xiphophorus (Reference Setlow, Grist and Thompson41). The opossum Monodelphis domestica also develops CMM-like lesions after UVA exposure, but with low potency compared with UVB(Reference Robinson, Hill and Kripke42). CMM are induced by UVB in a HGF/SF (hepatocyte growth factors/scatter factor) transgenic mouse model, but not by UVA(Reference Noonan, Dudek and Merlino43). Furthermore, it has recently been noted that UVA did not induce melanomas in Xiphophorus (Reference Mitchell, Fernandez and Nairn44), so the UVA involvement in CMM generation is not solved experimentally.

Epidemiological investigations suggest that the use of sunscreens that absorb only UVB, but transmit UVA, may contribute to the risk of CMM(Reference Gorham, Mohr and Garland45, Reference Nilsen, Aalerud and Hannevik46). Regular use of sunscreens absorbing both UVB and UVA perhaps reduces the CMM risk by approximately 50 %(Reference Green, Williams and Logan47).

All of these findings have not resulted in any reduction of the allowed UVA fluence rates in sunbeds, which still may emit five to ten times more UVA than noon summer sun in southern Europe(Reference Nilsen, Aalerud and Hannevik46). Most people get much more UVB and probably also more UVA from the sun than from sunbeds. This may not be true for frequent sunbed users.

The latitude gradient for CMM in Scandinavia, England, New Zealand and Australia is much lower than for non-melanomas(Reference Moan, Dahlback and Setlow48). Differences between Scandinavia and Australia are a factor of only two for CMM v. a factor of twenty to forty for non-melanomas(Reference Moan, Dahlback and Setlow48). The fact that the latitude gradient of ambient annual exposures is much smaller for UVA than for UVB (roughly a factor of 1·5 to 2·0 smaller) leads us to suggest that solar UVB is the main cause of non-melanomas and UVA may be CMM generating(Reference de Gruijl and Forbes49).

Sun and vitamin D

There is a seasonal variation of vitamin D status as the sun is its main source(Reference Moan, Porojnicu and Robsahm50). Latitude gradients for blood levels of vitamin D have been recorded in the UK(Reference Hypponen and Power51) and in France(Reference Chapuy, Preziosi and Maamer52), but international latitude gradients are not clearly documented. The reasons for this include varying methods of measuring vitamin D status(Reference Lai, Lucas and Banks53), varying skin types in different populations with less vitamin D produced in dark skin, and differences in intake of vitamin D-rich food in different countries. For example in Norway, people in the north eat more oily fish and consume more cod-liver oil than in the south(Reference Johansson and Solvoll54).

Young ethnic Norwegians and immigrants from southern countries in Norway have a low vitamin D status, notably in the winter(Reference Lagunova, Porojnicu and Lindberg55). This may be related to more indoor life. About 70 % of 15-year-old persons spend more than 4 h daily in front of a computer or television(56). They also spend more time on indoor activities and, therefore, less time out of doors during the day. Immigrants from South Asia usually cover their skin almost completely with clothes, and the women may cover their faces with veils. Compared with indigenous Norwegians they eat less vitamin D-containing oily fish and they have no tradition for cod-liver oil supplementation.

Benefits v. risks of UV exposure

Using the relationship between CMM risk and UV exposure and the results published by Giovanucci et al. (Reference Giovannucci, Liu and Rimm57), it can be estimated that increased sun exposure to the Norwegian population might at worst result in 200–300 more CMM deaths per year, but it would elevate the vitamin D status by about 25 nmol/l and might result in 4000 fewer internal cancers and about 3000 fewer cancer deaths overall(Reference Moan, Lagunova and Porojnicu58). The lack of sunlight exposure leads to more health problems than bone disease and increased risk for cancer(Reference Reichrath and Nurnberg59). Other benefits include protection against infectious diseases and non-cancerous diseases (diabetes, CVD, multiple sclerosis and mental disorders)(Reference Juzeniene, Brekke and Dahlback60). New trials assessing higher doses of vitamin D supplementation are in progress and future research may more clearly demonstrate the benefits of vitamin D(Reference Reichrath and Nurnberg59).

Acknowledgements

The present work was supported by the Norwegian Cancer Society (Kreftforeningen). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. J.M., Z.B., A.J. and A.C.P. wrote the paper; J.M. and A.C.P. designed and implemented review and J.M. had primary responsibility for the final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

1.Holick, MF (1994) Vitamin D: photobiology, metabolism and clinical application. In The Liver: Biology and Photobiology, pp. 543562 [IM Arias, JL Boyer, N Fausto et al., editors]. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
2.Holick, MF (2006) Resurrection of vitamin D deficiency and rickets. J Clin Invest 116, 20622072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Holick, MF, Binkley, NC, Bischoff-Ferrari, HA et al. (2011) Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96, 19111930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Holick, MF & Chen, TC (2008) Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr 87, issue 4, 1080S1086S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Moan, J & Dahlback, A (1993) Epidemiologic data from Scandinavia. In Environmental UV Photobiology, pp. 255293 [LO Bjørn, J Moan, W Nultsch et al., editors]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Moan, J, Porojnicu, AC & Dahlback, A (2006) Epidemiology of cutaneous malignant melanoma. In Skin Cancer Prevention, pp. 179201 [U Ringborg, Y Brandberg, EW Breitbart et al., editors]. New York: Informa Healthcare.Google Scholar
7.Moan, J, Porojnicu, AC & Dahlback, A (2008) Ultraviolet radiation and malignant melanoma. Adv Exp Med Biol 624, 104116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Von Thaler, AK, Kamenisch, Y & Berneburg, M (2010) The role of ultraviolet radiation in melanomagenesis. Exp Dermatol 19, 8188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Marks, R (2000) Epidemiology of melanoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 25, 459463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Cicarma, E, Porojnicu, AC, Lagunova, Z et al. (2009) Sun and sunbeds: inducers of vitamin D and skin cancer. Anticancer Res 29, 34953500.Google Scholar
11.Moan, J, Lagunova, Z, Cicarma, E et al. (2009) Sunbeds as vitamin D sources. Photochem Photobiol 85, 14741479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Porojnicu, AC, Bruland, OS, Aksnes, L et al. (2008) Sun beds and cod liver oil as vitamin D sources. J Photochem Photobiol B 91, 125131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Thieden, E, Jorgensen, HL, Jorgensen, NR et al. (2008) Sunbed radiation provokes cutaneous vitamin D synthesis in humans – a randomized controlled trial. Photochem Photobiol 84, 14871492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Shuster, S (2008) Is sun exposure a major cause of melanoma? No. BMJ 337, a764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Leiter, U & Garbe, C (2008) Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer – the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol 624, 89103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Newton-Bishop, JA, Chang, YM, Elliott, F et al. (2011) Relationship between sun exposure and melanoma risk for tumours in different body sites in a large case–control study in a temperate climate. Eur J Cancer 47, 732741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pukkala, E, Martinsen, JI, Lynge, E et al. (2009) Occupation and cancer – follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 48, 646790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Cicarma, E, Juzeniene, A, Porojnicu, AC et al. (2010) Latitude gradient for melanoma incidence by anatomic site and gender in Norway 1966–2007. J Photochem Photobiol B 101, 174178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Moan, J, Cicarma, E, Setlow, R et al. (2010) Time trends and latitude dependence of uveal and cutaneous malignant melanoma induced by solar radiation. Dermatoendocrinology 2, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Berwick, M, Armstrong, BK, Ben-Porat, L et al. (2005) Sun exposure and mortality from melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 97, 195199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Yang, L, Veierod, MB, Lof, M et al. (2011) Prospective study of UV exposure and cancer incidence among Swedish women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20, 13581367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Newton-Bishop, JA, Beswick, S, Randerson-Moor, J et al. (2009) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels are associated with Breslow thickness at presentation and survival from melanoma. J Clin Oncol 27, 54395444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.International Agency for Research on Cancer (2007) The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: a systematic review. Int J Cancer 120, 11161122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Adam, SA, Sheaves, JK, Wright, NH et al. (1981) A case–control study of the possible association between oral contraceptives and malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 44, 4550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Cust, AE, Armstrong, BK, Goumas, C et al. (2011) Sunbed use during adolescence and early adulthood is associated with increased risk of early-onset melanoma. Int J Cancer 128, 24252435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Dunn-Lane, J, Herity, B, Moriarty, MJ et al. (1993) A case control study of malignant melanoma. Ir Med J 86, 5759.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Holly, EA, Kelly, JW, Shpall, SN et al. (1987) Number of melanocytic nevi as a major risk factor for malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 17, 459468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Veierod, MB, Weiderpass, E, Thorn, M et al. (2003) A prospective study of pigmentation, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 95, 15301538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Walter, SD, King, WD & Marrett, LD (1999) Association of cutaneous malignant melanoma with intermittent exposure to ultraviolet radiation: results of a case–control study in Ontario, Canada. Int J Epidemiol 28, 418427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Bataille, V, Boniol, M, De, VE et al. (2005) A multicentre epidemiological study on sunbed use and cutaneous melanoma in Europe. Eur J Cancer 41, 21412149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Elliott, F, Suppa, M, Chan, M et al. (2011) Relationship between sunbed use and melanoma risk in a large case–control study in the United Kingdom. Int J Cancer (Epublication ahead of print version).Google Scholar
32.Naldi, L, Gallus, S, Imberti, GL et al. (2000) Sunlamps and sunbeds and the risk of cutaneous melanoma. Italian Group for Epidemiological Research in Dermatology. Eur J Cancer Prev 9, 133134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Osterlind, A, Tucker, MA, Stone, BJ et al. (1988) The Danish case–control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV-light exposure. Int J Cancer 42, 319324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Zanetti, R, Rosso, S, Faggiano, F et al. (1988) A case–control study of melanoma of the skin in the province of Torino, Italy. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 36, 309317.Google ScholarPubMed
35.Moan, J, Baturaite, Z, Porojnicu, AC et al. (2012) UVA, UVB and incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Norway and Sweden. Photochem Photobiol Sci (Epublication ahead of print version).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Moan, J, Porojnicu, AC, Dahlback, A et al. (2008) Addressing the health benefits and risks, involving vitamin D or skin cancer, of increased sun exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 668673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Fears, TR, Sagebiel, RW, Halpern, A et al. (2011) Sunbeds and sunlamps: who used them and their risk for melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 24, 574581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Lazovich, D, Vogel, RI, Berwick, M et al. (2010) Indoor tanning and risk of melanoma: a case–control study in a highly exposed population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19, 15571568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Veierod, MB, Adami, HO, Lund, E et al. (2010) Sun and solarium exposure and melanoma risk: effects of age, pigmentary characteristics, and nevi. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19, 111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Westerdahl, J, Ingvar, C, Masback, A et al. (2000) Risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma in relation to use of sunbeds: further evidence for UV-A carcinogenicity. Br J Cancer 82, 15931599.Google ScholarPubMed
41.Setlow, RB, Grist, E, Thompson, K et al. (1993) Wavelengths effective in induction of malignant melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90, 66666670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Robinson, ES, Hill, RH Jr, Kripke, ML et al. (2000) The Monodelphis melanoma model: initial report on large ultraviolet A exposures of suckling young. Photochem Photobiol 71, 743746.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Noonan, FP, Dudek, J, Merlino, G et al. (2003) Animal models of melanoma: an HGF/SF transgenic mouse model may facilitate experimental access to UV initiating events. Pigment Cell Res 16, 1625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Mitchell, DL, Fernandez, AA, Nairn, RS et al. (2010) Ultraviolet A does not induce melanomas in a Xiphophorus hybrid fish model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 93299334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Gorham, ED, Mohr, SB, Garland, CF et al. (2007) Do sunscreens increase risk of melanoma in populations residing at higher latitudes? Ann Epidemiol 17, 956963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Nilsen, LT, Aalerud, TN, Hannevik, M et al. (2011) UVB and UVA irradiances from indoor tanning devices. Photochem Photobiol Sci 10, 11291136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Green, AC, Williams, GM, Logan, V et al. (2011) Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. J Clin Oncol 29, 257263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Moan, J, Dahlback, A & Setlow, RB (1999) Epidemiological support for an hypothesis for melanoma induction indicating a role for UVA radiation. Photochem Photobiol 70, 243247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.de Gruijl, FR & Forbes, PD (1995) UV-induced skin cancer in a hairless mouse model. Bioessays 17, 651660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50.Moan, J, Porojnicu, AC, Robsahm, TE et al. (2005) Solar radiation, vitamin D and survival rate of colon cancer in Norway. J Photochem Photobiol B 78, 189193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Hypponen, E & Power, C (2007) Hypovitaminosis D in British adults at age 45 y: nationwide cohort study of dietary and lifestyle predictors. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 860868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Chapuy, MC, Preziosi, P, Maamer, M et al. (1997) Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in an adult normal population. Osteoporos Int 7, 439443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.Lai, JK, Lucas, RM, Banks, E et al. (2011) Variability in vitamin D assays impairs clinical assessment of vitamin D status. Intern Med J (Epublication ahead of print version).Google Scholar
54.Johansson, L & Solvoll, K (1999) Norwegian National Dietary Survey 1997, p. 45. Oslo: Statens råd for ernæring of fysisk aktivitet.Google Scholar
55.Lagunova, Z, Porojnicu, AC, Lindberg, FA et al. (2011) Vitamin D status in Norwegian children and adolescents with excess body weight. Pediatr Diabetes 12, 120126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56.Statistics Norway (2007) Tid brukt til TV, video/DVD, hjemme-PC og TV-spill sammenlagt på fritida en gjennomsnittsdag, etter kjønn og alder. 1994, 1998, 1999, 2003 og 2006. http://www.ssb.no/samfunnsspeilet/utg/200704/03/tab-2007-09-20-02.html (accessed October 2011).Google Scholar
57.Giovannucci, E, Liu, Y, Rimm, EB et al. (2006) Prospective study of predictors of vitamin D status and cancer incidence and mortality in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 98, 451459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58.Moan, J, Lagunova, Z & Porojnicu, AC (2006) Helse effekter av sol og solarium. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 126, 19451946.Google Scholar
59.Reichrath, J & Nurnberg, B (2009) Cutaneous vitamin D synthesis versus skin cancer development: the Janus faces of solar UV-radiation. Dermatoendocrinology 1, 253261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60.Juzeniene, A, Brekke, P, Dahlback, A et al. (2011) Solar radiation and human health. Rep Prog Phys 74, 6, 066701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Relative risks and 95 % confidence intervals for cutaneous malignant melanoma associated with sunbed use in different studies. For results to 2005, numbers are references from the International Agency for Research on Cancer work(23); for recent results (2010/2011), reference numbers are from the present study(25,31,3739)