Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:37:43.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advancements in Radiative Hydrodynamic Simulations of Early Phases of Type II Supernovae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

D. Kelly*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006

Abstract

Between the time when the shock approaches the outside of the progenitor star, when the shocked material is highly ionized, and a few months later, when the material has cooled and recombination is almost complete, details of the coupling of radiation and the hydrodynamics of the shock propagation may be significant, with a subsequent effect on the photosphere and thus spectra. I argue for the inadequacy of current analyses of shock breakout and of the customary adoption of self-similar expansion of an initial structure for spectral synthesis of the first few months, in place of a complete hydrodynamic simulation. Progress towards a full radiative hydrodynamic simulation including relativistic effects and detailed line opacities is discussed.

Type
Galactic and Stellar
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dorfi, E.A. and Drury, L., 1987, J. Comput. Phys., 69, 175.Google Scholar
Eastman, R.G. and Kirshner, R.P., 1989, Ap. J., 347, 777.Google Scholar
Falk, S.W. and Arnett, W.D., 1977, Ap. J. Suppl., 33, 515.Google Scholar
Hauschildt, P., 1991, PhD Thesis, Univ. of Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Hauschildt, P. and Wehrse, R., 1991, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 46, 81.Google Scholar
Hoflich, P., 1990, in Dr. rer. Habil. thesis, A quantitative analysis of type II supernovae atmospheres.Google Scholar
Korevaar, P., 1991, in Proc. 3rd International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems, Engquist, and Gustafsson, (eds), Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Mihalas, D. and Mihalas, B.W., 1984, Foundations of Radiation Hydrodynamics, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulder, W.A. and Van Leer, B., 1985, J. Comput. Phys., 59, 232.Google Scholar
Muller, E., Hillebrandt, W., Orio, M., Höflich, P., Monchmeyer, R., Fryxell, B.A. and Arnett, W.D., 1989, Astron. Astrophys., 220, 167.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. and Wehrse, R., 1987, in Numerical Radiative Transfer, Kalkofen, W. (ed), The University Press, Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
Sedov, L.I., 1959, Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, p.260.Google Scholar
Shaviv, G., Wehrse, R. and Wagoner, R., 1985, Ap. J., 289, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigeyama, T. and Nomoto, K., 1990, Ap. J., 360, 242.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E., 1988, Ap. J., 330, 218.Google Scholar