Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Access
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Maxted, Nigel I. de Wilt, Phoebe Rowell, Gavin P. Nicholas, Brent P. Burton, Michael. G. Walsh, Andrew Fukui, Yasuo and Kawamura, Akiko 2016. Ammonia excitation imaging of shocked gas towards the W28 gamma-ray source HESS J1801−233. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 462, Issue. 1, p. 532.

    Sano, H. Reynoso, E.M. Mitsuishi, I. Nakamura, K. Furukawa, N. Mruganka, K. Fukuda, T. Yoshiike, S. Nishimura, A. Ohama, A. Torii, K. Kuwahara, T. Okuda, T. Yamamoto, H. Tachihara, K. and Fukui, Y. 2017. Interstellar gas and X-rays toward the Young supernova remnant RCW 86; pursuit of the origin of the thermal and non-thermal X-ray. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, Vol. 15, Issue. , p. 1.

    Maxted, Nigel I. Filipović, M. D. Sano, H. Allen, G. E. Pannuti, T. G. Rowell, G. P. Grech, A. Roper, Q. Wong, G. F. Galvin, T. J. Fukui, Y. Collier, J. D. Crawford, E. J. Grieve, K. Horta, A. D. Manojlović, P. and O’Brien, A. 2018. A Morphological Study of the Supernova Remnant Rx J0852.0–4622 (Vela Jr.). The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 866, Issue. 2, p. 76.

    Maxted, Nigel I Braiding, C Wong, G F Rowell, G P Burton, M G Filipović, M D Voisin, F Urošević, D Vukotić, B Pavlović, M Z Sano, H and Fukui, Y 2018. Searching for an interstellar medium association for HESS J1534 − 571. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 480, Issue. 1, p. 134.

    Abdalla, H. Abramowski, A. Aharonian, F. Benkhali, F. Ait Akhperjanian, A. G. Andersson, T. Angüner, E. O. Arrieta, M. Aubert, P. Backes, M. Balzer, A. Barnard, M. Becherini, Y. Tjus, J. Becker Berge, D. Bernhard, S. Bernlöhr, K. Blackwell, R. Böttcher, M. Boisson, C. Bolmont, J. Bordas, P. Bregeon, J. Brun, F. Brun, P. Bryan, M. Bulik, T. Capasso, M. Carr, J. Casanova, S. Cerruti, M. Chakraborty, N. Chalme-Calvet, R. Chaves, R. C.G. Chen, A. Chevalier, J. Chrétien, M. Colafrancesco, S. Cologna, G. Condon, B. Conrad, J. Cui, Y. Davids, I. D. Decock, J. Degrange, B. Deil, C. Devin, J. deWilt, P. Dirson, L. Djannati-Ataï, A. Domainko, W. Donath, A. Drury, L.O’C. Dubus, G. Dutson, K. Dyks, J. Edwards, T. Egberts, K. Eger, P. Ernenwein, J.-P. Eschbach, S. Farnier, C. Fegan, S. Fernandes, M. V. Fiasson, A. Fontaine, G. Förster, A. Fukuyama, T. Funk, S. Füßling, M. Gabici, S. Gajdus, M. Gallant, Y. A. Garrigoux, T. Giavitto, G. Giebels, B. Glicenstein, J. F. Gottschall, D. Goyal, A. Grondin, M.-H. Hadasch, D. Hahn, J. Haupt, M. Hawkes, J. Heinzelmann, G. Henri, G. Hermann, G. Hervet, O. Hinton, J. A. Hofmann, W. Hoischen, C. Holler, M. Horns, D. Ivascenko, A. Jacholkowska, A. Jamrozy, M. Janiak, M. Jankowsky, D. Jankowsky, F. Jingo, M. Jogler, T. Jouvin, L. Jung-Richardt, I. Kastendieck, M. A. Katarzyński, K. Katz, U. Kerszberg, D. Khélifi, B. Kieffer, M. King, J. Klepser, S. Klochkov, D. Kluźniak, W. Kolitzus, D. Komin, Nu. Kosack, K. Krakau, S. Kraus, M. Krayzel, F. Krüger, P. P. Laffon, H. Lamanna, G. Lau, J. Lees, J.-P. Lefaucheur, J. Lefranc, V. Lemière, A. Lemoine-Goumard, M. Lenain, J.-P. Leser, E. Lohse, T. Lorentz, M. Liu, R. López-Coto, R. Lypova, I. Marandon, V. Marcowith, A. Mariaud, C. Marx, R. Maurin, G. Maxted, N. Mayer, M. Meintjes, P. J. Meyer, M. Mitchell, A. M.W. Moderski, R. Mohamed, M. Mohrmann, L. Morå, K. Moulin, E. Murach, T. Naurois, M. de Niederwanger, F. Niemiec, J. Oakes, L. O’Brien, P. Odaka, H. Öttl, S. Ohm, S. Ostrowski, M. Oya, I. Padovani, M. Panter, M. Parsons, R. D. Pekeur, N. W. Pelletier, G. Perennes, C. Petrucci, P.-O. Peyaud, B. Piel, Q. Pita, S. Poon, H. Prokhorov, D. Prokoph, H. Pühlhofer, G. Punch, M. Quirrenbach, A. Raab, S. Reimer, A. Reimer, O. Renaud, M. los Reyes, R. de Rieger, F. Romoli, C. Rosier-Lees, S. Rowell, G. Rudak, B. Rulten, C. B. Sahakian, V. Salek, D. Sanchez, D. A. Santangelo, A. Sasaki, M. Schlickeiser, R. Schüssler, F. Schulz, A. Schwanke, U. Schwemmer, S. Settimo, M. Seyffert, A. S. Shafi, N. Shilon, I. Simoni, R. Sol, H. Spanier, F. Spengler, G. Spies, F. Stawarz, Ł. Steenkamp, R. Stegmann, C. Stinzing, F. Stycz, K. Sushch, I. Takahashi, T. Tavernet, J.-P. Tavernier, T. Taylor, A. M. Terrier, R. Tibaldo, L. Tiziani, D. Tluczykont, M. Trichard, C. Tuffs, R. Uchiyama, Y. van der Walt, D. J. Eldik, C. van Rensburg, C. van Soelen, B. van Vasileiadis, G. Veh, J. Venter, C. Viana, A. Vincent, P. Vink, J. Voisin, F. Völk, H. J. Volpe, F. Vuillaume, T. Wadiasingh, Z. Wagner, S. J. Wagner, P. Wagner, R. M. White, R. Wierzcholska, A. Willmann, P. Wörnlein, A. Wouters, D. Yang, R. Zabalza, V. Zaborov, D. Zacharias, M. Zdziarski, A. A. Zech, A. Zefi, F. Ziegler, A. and Żywucka, N. 2018. H.E.S.S. observations of RX J1713.7−3946 with improved angular and spectral resolution: Evidence for gamma-ray emission extending beyond the X-ray emitting shell. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 612, Issue. , p. A6.

    Supan, L. Castelletti, G. Peters, W. M. and Kassim, N. E. 2018. G51.04+0.07 and its environment: Identification of a new Galactic supernova remnant at low radio frequencies. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 616, Issue. , p. A98.




      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Dense Gas Towards the RX J1713.7–3946 Supernova Remnant
        Available formats

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Dense Gas Towards the RX J1713.7–3946 Supernova Remnant
        Available formats

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Dense Gas Towards the RX J1713.7–3946 Supernova Remnant
        Available formats
Export citation


We present results from a Mopra 7 mm-wavelength survey that targeted the dense gas-tracing CS(1-0) transition towards the young γ-ray-bright supernova remnant, RX J1713.7–3946 (SNR G 347.3−0.5). In a hadronic γ-ray emission scenario, where cosmic ray (CR) protons interact with gas to produce the observed γ-ray emission, the mass of potential CR target material is an important factor. We summarise newly discovered dense gas components, towards Cores G and L, and Clumps N1, N2, N3, and T1, which have masses of 1 – 104 M. We argue that these components are not likely to contribute significantly to γ-ray emission in a hadronic γ-ray emission scenario. This would be the case if RX J1713.7–3946 were at either the currently favoured distance of ~1 kpc or an alternate distance (as suggested in some previous studies) of ~6 kpc.

This survey also targeted the shock-tracing SiO molecule. Although no SiO emission corresponding to the RX J1713.7–3946 shock was observed, vibrationally excited SiO(1-0) maser emission was discovered towards what may be an evolved star. Observations taken 1 yr apart confirmed a transient nature, since the intensity, line-width, and central velocity of SiO(J = 1-0,v = 1,2) emission varied significantly.


RX J1713.7–3946 (G 347.3−0.5) is a supernova remnant (SNR) that is bright in X-ray emission (Pfeffermann et al. 1996; Cassam-Chenai et al. 2004; Acero et al. 2009) and is one of the brightest sources in the TeV γ-ray sky (Aharonian et al. 2006, 2007). This remnant is therefore ideal for investigating the possibility of acceleration of cosmic rays (CRs) in the shocks of SNRs.

Knowledge of the distribution of matter towards RX J1713.7–3946 is important to help distinguish between models of γ-ray emission that are dominated by high energy electrons (inverse-Compton scattering of photons) and models dominated by CR hadrons (p-p interactions). The latter scenario requires target material for CRs. CR target material may be in any chemical form, including molecular and atomic gas, which have been studied with CO (Fukui et al. 2003; Moriguchi et al. 2005; Fukui 2008) and HI (+CO) (Fukui et al. 2012), respectively.

We take particular interest in the study of dense molecular gas, which is well traced by CS(1-0) emission (critical density ~105 cm−3). This transition highlights gas mass possibly missed by other tracers (such as CO) and aids in the prediction of possible small-scale γ-ray emission features caused by energy-dependent CR diffusion into dense gas (e.g. Gabici, Aharonian, & Casanova 2009; Casanova et al. 2010; Fukui et al. 2012; Maxted et al. 2012a).

The latest Fermi-LAT observations (Abdo et al. 2011) towards RX J1713.7–3946 exhibit a low but hard-spectrum flux of 1–10 GeV γ-ray emission uncharacteristic of previous hadronic models (Porter, Moskalenko, & Strong 2006; Aharonian et al. 2007; Berezhko & Volk 2010; Ellison et al. 2010; Zirakashvili & Aharonian 2010). However, if one considers an inhomogeneous ISM into which the SNR shock has expanded, the existence of a hadronic component may still be plausible (Zirakashvili & Aharonian 2010; Inoue et al. 2012). There is also support for such a scenario when considering the existence of additional atomic gas together with the molecular (Fukui et al. 2012).

RX J1713.7–3946 exhibits a shell-like structure at keV X-ray and TeV γ-ray energies (see Figures 1 and 2), with the keV X-ray emission best corresponding to a void in molecular gas, bordering molecular cores at a kinematic distance of ~1 kpc (v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ ~ − 10 km s−1) (Fukui et al. 2003; Moriguchi et al. 2005). This distance is consistent with X-ray absorption modelling by Pfeffermann et al. (1996) for a plausible SNR-age (~1600 yrs old) that corresponds to a progenitor event observed by Chinese astronomers in 393 AD (Wang, Qu, & Chen 1997).

Figure 1. Integrated Nanten2 CO(2-1) emission image (Fukui 2008) of gas believed to be associated with RX J1713.7–3946 (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −18 to 0 km s−1) with overlaid HESS >1.4 TeV γ-ray photon excess count contours (Aharonian et al. 2007). Three square regions (one, the southern-most, from a previous investigation) indicate the extent of Mopra 7 mm mapping carried out in this study.

Figure 2. An XMM-Newton 0.5–4.5 keV X-ray image (Acero et al. 2009) with overlaid integrated Nanten2 CO(J = 2-1) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −18 to 0 km s−1) contours. CO(J = 2-1) contours span 5 K km s−1 to 40 K km s−1 in increments of 5 K km s−1. The XMM-Newton image has been exposure-corrected and smoothed with a Gaussian of FWHM = 30 arcsec. Three square regions (one, the southern-most, from a previous investigation) indicate the extent of Mopra 7 mm mapping carried out in this study.

Fessen et al. (2012) argue that if a SN 393 AD connection to RX J1713.7–3946 is assumed, the initial RX J1713.7–3946 SN explosion must have been optically subluminous for the ~1 kpc distance to hold. Irrespective of this, recent work still favours a ~1 kpc distance (e.g. Fukui et al. 2012; Inoue et al. 2012), and an examination of keV X-ray emission (Figure 2) suggests some degree of anticorrelation with CO(2-1) peaks at v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ ~ −10 km s−1 (a kinematic distance of ~1 kpc). Sano et al. (2010) note that peaks of synchrotron radiation on the boundary of the molecular clump, Core C, may suggest a compression triggered by the RX J1713.7–3946 shock. Similarly, the edge of Core D is coincident with an X-ray intensity peak, consistent with shock compression at a distance of ~1 kpc. Furthermore, the northern and western regions of RX J1713.7–3946, where cores D and C are located, correspond to peak fluxes of TeV γ-ray emission. Good gas-γ-ray overlap, like that seen towards RX J1713.7–3946 and the ~1 kpc gas, is indeed expected in a hadronic scenario for γ-ray emission.

In a previous study (Maxted et al. 2012a), we surveyed an 18 × 18 arcmin region centred on [l,b] = [346.99, −0.41] (southern-most region indicated in Figure 1), and found dense gas associated with molecular cores A, C, and D (see Figure 3). In this study we extend the dense gas survey with another two mapped regions, to encompass Core D and the northern peak in TeV γ-ray emission, and several bright keV X-ray emission features. CS(1-0) emission can probe the dense gas towards RX J1713.7–3946, which, as highlighted earlier, may be important in a hadronic scenario. The Mopra radio telescope spectrometer is capable of simultaneously recording CS(1-0) emission, while observing the shock-tracing transition SiO(1-0). This allows us to further test the ~1 kpc RX J1713.7–3946 kinematic distance solution through attempting to trace the SNR shock, while undertaking our survey of dense gas. The shock-tracing molecule, SiO, has been observed towards shocked gas associated with other (albeit older) SNRs (e.g. Ziurys, Snell, & Dickman 1989; Nicholas et al. 2012), so may possibly be present towards gas associated with RX J1713.7–3946.

Figure 3. Left panel: Colour image of integrated CS(1-0) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ = −12.5 to −7.5 km s−1) from Mopra overlaid with black contours of CO(2-1) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ = −18 to 0 km s−1) from Nanten2 (Fukui 2008), as well as solid blue contours of HESS >1.4 TeV excess emission (same levels as for Figure 1). Core names and the position of masers are indicated. CO(2-1) emission contour-levels are 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 K km s−1. Right panel: We also show spectral profiles of molecular emission towards locations of interest (indicated).

We also note the usefulness of other molecular lines simultaneously observed at 7 mm with the Mopra telescope. These include emission from isotopologues of CS, which are useful for probing optically thick regions, the vibrationally-excited modes of the SiO(1-0) rotational transition (v = 1,2,3), which can sometimes be emitted in association with star formation or evolved stars, and the CH3OH(7(0)-6(1)) transition that can highlight warm regions where CH3OH (methanol) is evaporated from dust grains.


In 2011 April, we recorded and co-added six Mopra OTF (on the fly) 19 × 19 arcmin area maps centred on [l, b] = [347.36, −0.09], and five Mopra OTF 16 × 16 arcmin area maps centred on [l, b] = [347.07, −0.11], to produce a data cube with two spatial (long/lat) and one spectral (velocity) dimension at 7 mm wavelengths. These maps were added to our map of an 18 × 18 arcmin region centred on [l, b] = [346.991, −0.408], from our previous investigation (Maxted et al. 2012a).

For all our Mopra mapping data, the cycle time is 2.0 s and the spacing between scan rows is 26 arcsec. The velocity resolution of the 7 mm zoom-mode data is ~0.2 kms−1. The beam FWHM and the pointing accuracy of Mopra at 7 mm are 59±2 arcsec and ~6 arcsec, respectively. The Mopra spectrometer, MOPS, was employed and is capable of recording 16 tunable, 4096-channel (137.5 MHz) bands simultaneously when in ‘zoom’ mode, as used here. A list of measured frequency bands, targeted molecular transitions, and achieved $\hbox{T$_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$}$ levels are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. The window set-up for the Mopra Spectrometer, MOPS, at 7 mm. The centre frequency, targeted molecular line, targeted frequency, and total mapping noise (T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ ) are displayed.

OTF-mapping and deep ON-OFF switched pointing data were reduced and analysed using the ATNF analysis programs, Livedata, Gridzilla, Kvis, Miriad, and ASAP 1 . We assumed the beam efficiencies presented in Urquhart et al. (2010) to convert antenna intensity into main-beam intensity (0.43 and 0.53 for point source CS(1-0) and SiO(1-0) emission, respectively).

In addition to mapping, two deep ON-OFF switched pointings were performed in response to a detection of SiO(J = 1-0, v = 2) emission (see Section 4.2.1). The first of these two pointings was interrupted after achieving a signal-noise ratio similar to mapping data, so a second pointing with a longer exposure-time was performed 12 d later.


We use the CS(1-0) analysis outlined in Maxted et al. (2012a), and we briefly summarise it here. Gaussian functions were first fitted to all CS(1-0) emission lines using a χ2 minimisation method. Generally one can estimate CS(1-0) optical depth by comparing the CS(1-0) intensity to the C34S(1-0) intensity, while assuming an abundance ratio, but of the new positions that exhibited CS(1-0) emission, none had corresponding C34S(1-0) detections. We constrain optical depth by placing an optically thin (optical depth, τ→0) lower limit and a conservative upper limit derived using the C34S(1-0)-band T $_{\textrm {{\sc {rms}}}}$ as an upper limit on C34S(1-0) intensity, and assuming a [CS]/[C34S] ratio of 22.5.

The calculated optical depth range is used to constrain the CS(J=1) column density (Equation 9, Goldsmith & Langer 1999), and with an assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) at a temperature of 10 K, we converted this to total CS column density, NCS , (CS column density ~ 3.5× CS J = 1 col. dens.). We note that a 50% error in the assumed temperature of 10 K would result in a 20–30% systematic uncertainty in the column density using this LTE method (Maxted et al. 2013).

Assuming an abundance of CS with respect to molecular hydrogen, [CS]/[H2]~10−9 (Frerking et al. 1980), a hydrogen column density is estimated, allowing the estimation of H2 mass. We use no beam-filling correction and assume spherical clumps of a size equal to the 7 mm beam FWHM (radius~30 arcsec). Where significant CS(1-0) emission extended beyond an approximate beam-area, sources were divided into segments (east and west in this study) for parameter calculations, and an additional large-scale region was used for an overall mass estimation of the full extent of the CS emission.


This investigation mapped regions indicated in Figures 1 and 2 in the CS(1-0) transition towards the RX J1713.7–3946 SNR. Significant detections at a velocity consistent with CO(1-0,2-1)-traced cores that are believed to be associated with RX J1713.7–3946 (line-of-sight velocity, v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ ~ −10 km s−1 according to Moriguchi et al.2005; Fukui 2008) were recorded. In addition to this, we found gas consistent with the background Norma arm (v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ ~ −70 km s−1) and the 3 kpc-expanding arm (v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ ~ −120 km s−1). For the latter arm, we also note the detection of the CH3OH(7-6) transition.

In addition to our CS and CH3OH detections, transient detections of the v=1 and 2 vibrational modes of the SiO(1-0) rotational transition were present towards one location (v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ ~ −5 km s−1).

4.1 CS(1-0) Emission

The CS(1-0) transition has a critical density for emission of ~105 cm−3 (at temperature ~10 K) and is ideal for probing the deep, inner regions of molecular clouds. The dense gas traced in this study is displayed in Figures 3, 6, and 7 and are discussed in the following sections. Table 2 is a compilation of spectral line fit parameters and gas parameters, including line-of-sight velocity, line-width, optical depth, H2 column density, and mass. These values are used as a basis for the discussion of dense gas towards RX J1713.7–3946.

Table 2. Parameters of CS(1-0) emission towards RX J1713.7–3946. Galactic coordinates, [l,b], line-of-sight velocity, v $_{\textrm {{\sc {lsr}}}}$ , assumed distance, line-width (full-width-half-maximum), Δv $_{\textrm {{\sc{fwhm}}}}$ , optical depth, average H column density, $\overline{N_{H_2}}$ , and mass of H, M, are indicated.

Statistical uncertainties are on the order of 20%, so errors are likely dominated by the systematics introduced by the analysis assumptions.

a Name convention from Moriguchi et al. (2005) and this work.

b Assuming [CS]/[C34S] = 22.5 and using the C34S(1-0)-band T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ to estimate upper limits where no C34S(1-0) emission is detected.

c Thermal Equilibrium (LTE) assumption at a temperature of 10 K. Averaged over beam size.

d Maxted et al. (2012a).

e Lower values favoured (see Section 4.1.1).

4.1.1 CS(1-0) emission between v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −12.5 and −7.5 km s−1

Figure 3 is an image of CS(1-0) emission between v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −12.5 and −7.5 km s−1, which features detections corresponding to cores believed to be associated with the RX J1713.7–3946 SNR.

The dense components of cores A, B, C, and D were previously studied in detail by us (Maxted et al. 2012a), revealing multiple detections of six species (and several isotopologues), including CS(1-0) emission towards Cores A, C, and D. This allowed the mass of the dense molecular gas to be estimated and these are re-stated (along with our new results) in Table 2.

In our new survey (this work), we revealed CS(1-0) emission towards Cores G and L, with peak intensities of ~1.5 T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ . After integration (between velocities, $\hbox{v$_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$} = -$ 12.5 and −7.5 km s−1), Cores G and L were detected at a pre-trial level of ~4-4.5σ. Since the CS(1-0) emission intensities in these two cores are very low, the resultant CS(1-0) optical depth estimates are poorly constrained. However, given that the CS(1-0) intensities of Cores G and L are relatively low compared to those of Cores A, C, and D (which have LTE masses in the range 12–120 M), we favour the optically thin solutions. It follows that dense molecular gas masses of Cores G and L are on the order of ~1 M, and do not represent a significant proportion of mass in the RX J1713.7–3946 field at v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −10 km s−1 (<0.1%), therefore they probably do not play an important role in the dynamics of the SNR-shock or the production of γ-ray emission.

Indeed, it appears that the total CS(1-0)-derived mass of all the surveyed cores represents only a fraction of the total gas mass in the region. The total CO(1-0)-derived mass of ~1 × 104 M towards RX J1713.7–3946 (Fukui et al. 2012) is significantly larger than the total CS(1-0)-derived mass (dense core) components of mass 80–200 M in our surveyed region (a subset containing the densest molecular gas of the CO-traced region).

Previous authors have noted a small-scale anticorrelation between CO emission peaks at ~1 kpc (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −18-0 km s−1) and X-ray emission (see Section 1), suggesting a SN shock interaction with gas. Indeed, two X-ray peaks lie on the outskirts of the CS(1-0) (and CO(4-3,7-6), Sano et al. 2010) emission corresponding to Core C (see Figure 4) and a similar X-ray peak lies coincident with Core D. The same cannot be said for Cores A, G, and L, but, although the densest regions of Cores G and A sit outside the RX J1713.7–3946 X-ray boundary, X-ray flux peaks do seem to correspond to regions directly adjacent to the CS(1-0) boundaries. This possibly indicates a shock-compression of the Core G and A gas, however we have previously noted that these features may alternatively be consistent with photoelectric absorption of X-rays emitted behind the molecular cores (Maxted et al. 2012a).

Figure 4. Colour image of integrated CS(1-0) emission, shown for three different ranges indicated in each panel, overlaid with XMM-Newton 0.5–4.5 keV X-ray contours from Acero et al. (2009). X-ray contours span 0.003–0.015 cm−2 s−1 in increments of 0.003 cm−2 s−1. Core names and the position of masers are indicated. The Mopra 7 mm and XMM-Newton beam FWHM are represented by the small circles next to the text on the picture.

Previous authors (e.g. Moriguchi et al. 2005) have noted indicators of star formation towards RX J1713.7 −3946, and new data from HOPS (H2O Plane Survey; Walsh et al. 2011) supports this picture. On examination of the HOPS catalogue, we found narrow (Δv $_{\textrm {{\sc{fwhm}}}}$ ~1.1 km s−1) 12 mm H2O maser emission at a velocity and position consistent with Core D (G347.32+0.2, v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −8.5 km s−1). The location of this maser is indicated in Figures 3 and 4.

Gas as CR Target Material:

The gas between v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −12.5 and −7.5 km s−1 may be acting as CR target material in a hadronic gamma-ray emission scenario for RX J1713.7–3946, so we investigate the effect of the mass of CS(1-0)-traced gas.

Aharonian et al. (1991) derived a relation to predict the hadronic flux of γ-rays above a given energy from the mass of CR-target material, assuming an E −1.6 integral power law spectrum. We can calculate the expected γ-ray flux above energy E γ,

(1) \begin{equation} F\left(\ge E_{\gamma } \right) = 2.85\times 10^{-13} E_{TeV}^{-1.6} \left( \frac{M_5}{d_{kpc} ^2 }\right) k_{CR} {\textrm {cm}^{-2}\rm {s}^{-1}}, \end{equation}
where M 5 is the gas mass in units of 105 M, dkpc is the distance in units of kpc, kCR is the CR enhancement factor above that is observed at Earth, ETeV is the lower γ-ray energy in units of TeV, and E γ = 1 TeV.

Given that in a hadronic scenario γ-ray flux is proportional to mass, one can assume that the dense CS(1-0)-traced component (~few per cent of the total mass) may only account for ~few per cent of the total γ-ray flux. In a lepton-dominated scenario, a hadronic component would comprise an even smaller proportion of the total flux (e.g. Zirakashvili & Aharonian 2010).

Figure 5 is a graph of the predicted hadronic γ-ray flux above 1 TeV from various gas components (traced using HI, CO, and CS) assumed to be acting as target material for CRs accelerated in the RX J1713.7–3946 shock at a distance of 1 kpc (using Equation 1). It is predicted that the CR enhancement would have to be as high as kCR ~1 000 for the RX J1713.7–3946 gamma-ray flux above 1 TeV, of ~6 × 10−11 cm−2 s−1, to be entirely from hadronic processes. In such a scenario, the dense gas components (as traced by CS(1-0) emission) would contribute to a gamma-ray flux of ~3 × 10−13 cm−2 s−1. This flux may be detectable with the current HESS sensitivity, but the HESS beam FWHM is too large to resolve molecular cores at a scale of ~1 arcmin. Future experiments such as the CTA gamma-ray telescope (The CTA Consortium 2010) may reach the arcminute resolution required to do this.

Figure 5. The predicted hadronic γ-ray flux as a function of CR-enhancement for gas components possibly associated with RX J1713.7–3946 (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −10 km s−1). The contributions from HI and CO-traced components towards the RX J1713.7–3946 region and CS(1-0) emission from five cores are included (this work). The total predicted hadronic γ-ray flux remains less than the measured RX J1713.7–3946γ-ray flux for CR enhancement values less than 1 000. A distance of 1 kpc was assumed.

A CR enhancement factor of kCR ~1 000 towards RX J1713.7–3946 is plausible, supported by work by Aharonian & Atoyan (1996). Figure 1b of this paper displays CR enhancement factors of the order kCR ~103 at a distance of 10 pc from a SNR of age 103 yr (similar to the RX J1713.7–3946 age). The source spectral index in these simulations was 2.2 and the CR diffusion coefficient was 1026 cm2 s−1 (slow diffusion like that seen towards, W28, e.g. Gabici et al. 2010).

We estimate the total cumulative kinetic energy of CRs above an energy of 1 GeV (assuming a pure E−2.6 power law down to 1 GeV) in the RX J1713.7–3946 region, to be,

(2) \begin{eqnarray} E_{CR\,tot} &=&E_p n_{CR}\,dV\,dE_P \nonumber \\ &&\sim \frac{4}{3}\pi r_{SNR}^3 \int _{1\,\textrm {GeV}} ^{\infty } E_P n _{CR}\,dE_P \nonumber \\ &&\sim (1.2\times 10^{59}\,\textrm {cm}^3) (5.6 \times 10 ^{-11}\,\textrm {GeV\,cm}^{-3})k_{CR}\nonumber \\ &&\sim k_{CR}\times 10^{46}\textrm {\,erg} \end{eqnarray}
where V is the SNR volume, EP is CR energy, nCR is the CR density, and rSNR is the radius of a spherical region of CR enhancement, kCR (assumed to be 10 pc, consistent with the RX J1713.7–3946 radius). Assuming a SN blast kinetic energy of 1051 erg, a CR enhancement of 1 000 would correspond to ~1% of the SN blast kinetic energy being injected into >1 GeV protons, so energetically, a hadronic scenario is consistent.

The presented CR enhancement factor values were calculated under the assumption that all the gas in the region is taken into account, well traced by the latest HI, CO, and CS studies (Fukui et al. 2012; Maxted et al. 2012b), which may not be entirely valid. A so-called ‘dark’ component of gas, where carbon is in atomic/ionic form (not in molecules such as CO or CS) and hydrogen is in molecular form (therefore does not emit the atomic H 21 cm line) exists and is not taken into account by the tracers considered in studies of RX J1713.7–3946. Wolfire, Hollenbach, & McKee (2010) predicted that this dark component may comprise ~30% of the total mass of an average cloud but could be even higher in regions with enhanced CR ionisation rates, as is likely around RX J1713.7–3946.

Our method also required the assumption of an E −1.6 integral power law CR spectrum, which is not supported by studies of the RX J1713.7–3946 high energy photon spectrum. The RX J1713.7–3946 γ-ray spectrum is consistent with an E −1.3 CR integral spectrum, reflective of a pure power law χ2-minimisation fit to the γ-ray spectrum (Aharonian et al. 2007). Using the fact that the total energy injected in CRs bewteen 1 GeV and 1 PeV is expected to be approximately fixed (~1050 erg), we can pivot the assumed CR energy spectrum about an energy of ~1 TeV. This would correspond to a pivot energy of ~0.1 TeV in the resultant hadronic gamma-ray spectrum. It follows that Equation 1 can be scaled to become F(≥E γ)~4.6 × 10−13 E −1.3 TeV (M 5/d 2 kpc )kCR . The resultant CR enhancement factors (for CR energy ≥1 TeV) presented in this paper would thus reduce by ~30%.

It is clear that in a hadronic scenario, the atomic and molecular mass traced by HI and CO would be the dominant contributor to γ-ray emission. Despite this, tell-tale signs of hadronic emission might feasibly be detected in the form of small-scale hardening and localisation of high-energy spectra correlated with dense gas components. Such phenomena would result from energy-dependent CR diffusion into dense gas in turbulent regions that experience a suppressed diffusion level. This might act to hinder the transport of lower energy CRs more than higher energy CRs and result in a harder than average spectrum (e.g. Gabici et al. 2009; Casanova et al. 2010; Fukui et al. 2012; Maxted et al. 2012a).

In a previous paper (Maxted et al. 2012a), we estimated the level of penetration of CRs of a range of energies (10 GeV to 102.5 TeV) into a homogenous molecular region (average density 300 cm−3) of radius 0.62 pc (similar to Core C) within a time equal to the RX J1713.7–3946 age (~1 600 yr). We found that for decreasing values for the diffusion-suppression coefficient, χ (see Equation ), the level of CR penetration into molecular cores may plausibly be decreased, particularly at lower energies.

For a plausible guide on the level of CR penetration into dense gas, we used the 3D random walk distance, $d=\sqrt{6\,D\,t}$ , where t is time and the diffusion coefficient, D, was parametrised as,

(3) \begin{equation} D(E_{P},B)=\chi D_{0} \left(\frac{E_{P}/{{\rm GeV}}}{B/3\,{{\mu {\rm G}}}}\right)^{0.5} {{\rm[{cm^{2}}\,{s^{-1}}]}}, \end{equation}
where D 0 is the galactic diffusion coefficient, assumed to be 3 × 1027 cm2 s−1 to fit CR observations (Berezinskii et al. 1990), and χ is the diffusion suppression coefficient (assumed to be <1 inside the core, 1 outside), a parameter invoked to account for possible deviations of the average galactic diffusion coefficient inside molecular clouds (Berezinskii et al. 1990; Gabici, Aharonian, & Blasi 2007). EP was the proton energy and B was the magnetic field, calculated to be consistent with Crutcher (1999).

We found that for χ = 10−4 and χ = 10−5, CR protons with energy <10 TeV were somewhat excluded from the central ~0.2 and ~0.5 pc radius, respectively. The total level of exclusion, however, is difficult to confidently constrain from such a simplistic approach, so we are currently working on diffusion models that numerically solve the diffusion equation to accurately predict the CR distribution, hence the change in CR enhancement inside dense gas (details to be presented in a future paper). It is expected that diffusion-dependent modelling will yield CR enhancement factors that are functions of not only CR energy, but also gas density, i.e. the CR enhancement factor, kCR , might decrease towards dense clumps, the effect lessening for increasing energy. The result would be harder-than-average hadronic γ-ray components correlated with dense gas. The prediction of features in γ-ray spectra will result from future diffusion analyses.

4.1.2 CS(1-0) emission at other velocities

In addition to the gas believed to be in association with RX J1713.7–3946 (see Section 4.1.1), dense gas components corresponding to background gas clouds were also detected. Prominent CS(1-0) emission from molecular clouds in the Norma arm and the 3 kpc-expanding arm are displayed in Figures 6 and 7, respectively.

Figure 6. Top left panel: Colour image of integrated CS(1-0) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −75 to −65 km s−1) from Mopra overlaid with black contours of CO(2-1) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −75 to −65 km s−1) from Nanten2 (Fukui 2008), as well as solid blue contours of HESS >1.4 TeV excess emission (same levels as for Figure 1). CO(2-1) emission contour-levels are 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 K km s−1. White contours indicate Clump N3 Nanten2 integrated CS(1-0) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −80 to −72.5 km s−1) with contour-levels of 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 K km s−1. The position of an H2O maser is indicated. Right/Bottom panels: We also show spectral profiles of molecular emission towards locations of interest (indicated).

Figure 7. Top left panel: Colour image of integrated CS(1-0) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −122 to −115 km s−1) from Mopra overlaid with black contours of CO(2-1) emission (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ = −122 to −115 km s−1) from Nanten2 (Fukui 2008), as well as solid blue contours of HESS >1.4 TeV excess emission (same levels as for Figure 1). CO(2-1) emission contour-levels are 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 K km s−1. Right panels: We also show spectral profiles of molecular emission towards locations of interest (indicated).

On the question of the RX J1713.7–3946 distance (currently thought to be ~1 kpc), some previous molecular gas surveys favoured an association with gas that featured broad CO emission components at a distance of ~6.3 kpc (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −90 km s−1). It was argued that an enhanced CO(2-1)/CO(1-0) intensity ratio is characteristic of shocked gas (Slane et al. 1999; Butt et al. 2001). The optically subluminous nature of the RX J1713.7–3946 progenitor event (see Section 1) may also be considered to support a larger distance (Fessen et al. 2012). For completeness, we consider these CS(1-0) detections in our analyses.

The Norma Arm (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −75 to −65 km s−1):

At a distance of ~6 kpc, in the northernmost regions of the surveyed field (Figure 6), are CS(1-0)-traced dense gas components. These components, labelled here as N1, N2, and N3, are within the Norma arm and are coincident with peaks in CO(2-1) emission. Due to the extended nature of N1, this region had previously been scrutinised in two sections N1-east and N1-west, with the calculated masses being of the order of a few × 103 M for both sides (Maxted et al. 2012b). Further scrutiny of spectral data resulted in the discovery of another coincident dense core component, N3. Clump N3, which is comparable in mass to both N1-east and west (~103 M), is apparent as one peak of the double-peaked profile in the bottom-right spectra of Figure 6 (whereas the other peak is an edge of N1), and is shown as white contours in the image. Clump N2, in the north-west of the image in Figure 6, has a mass on the order of ~103 M.

Clumps N1 and N3 are coincident with the boundary of the RX J1713.7–3946 HESS TeV γ-ray excess, so might feasibly be CR target material associated with RX J1713.7–3946 if RX J1713.7–3946 is associated with the Norma arm gas (rather than the currently favoured v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −10 km s−1/1 kpc-distance gas), and a hadronic scenario is applicable. In contrast, clump N2 lies outside of the RX J1713.7–3946 TeV γ-ray boundary, so cannot contribute to the total hadronic γ-ray flux for any distance solution.

The dense regions of Clumps N1 and N3 lie coincident with the northern boundary of the keV X-ray emission (see Figure 4), which may be consistent with an RX J1713–3946 shock-interaction with Norma-arm gas in the north, but this correspondence may be less convincing than the north-to-east shock-correspondence of the gas at v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −10 km s−1 (see Section 4.1.1). CS(1-0) spectral lines from Clumps N1 and N3 are quite broad (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~4.5-8 km s−1). Such broadening is consistent not only with a shock-gas interaction, but also with multiple components of warm, turbulent gas. The latter scenario is supported by 8 and 24 μm data (see Figure 10), which shows several peaks coincident with Clumps N1 and N3. Indeed, we note that narrow (Δv $_{\textrm {{\sc{fwhm}}}}$ ~1.2 km s−1) 12 mm H2O maser emission (G347.23+0.02, v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −77.8 km s−1; Walsh et al. 2011) is indicative of star formation within the N1 or N3 regions (see Figures 3 and 4), the velocity of the maser being closest to that of the clump N3 (the N3 component has velocity, v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −76.6±0.3 km s−1).

The 3 kpc-Expanding Arm (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −122 to −118 km s−1):

Also coincident with the northern boundary of RX J1713–3946 is molecular gas in the 3 kpc-expanding arm, at a distance of ~6.5 kpc (Figure 7). The T1 cloud has a mass on the order of ~103 M and contains a distinctive molecular core in the east, T1-east. A hot component in T1-east is evidenced by our detection of CH3OH(7-6) emission, which is emitted after CH3OH is evaporated from dust-grains in hot (Temperature ~100 K) conditions (van Dishoek & Blake 1998). This emission is possibly related to the coincident object, S9 of Churchwell et al. (2006), which appears as an incomplete ring of 8 μm emission (see Figure 10). The authors argue that such infrared ‘bubbles’ result from hot young stars in massive star formation regions. Our 7 mm results are consistent with T1-east being a hot star-forming core.

Background Gas as CR Target Material:

In Figure 8, we present the predicted hadronic γ-ray components from dense gas at distances near ~6 kpc (T1, N1, and N3), for the scenario where this gas is associated with RX J1713.7–3946.

Figure 8. The predicted hadronic γ-ray flux as a function of CR-enhancement if dense gas currently believed to be background to RX J1713.7–3946 (v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −70, −120 km s−1) were, in fact, associated with RX J1713.7–3946. Note that we only include contributions from CS(1-0) emission. Distances of 6 kpc and 6.5 kpc were assumed for N1/3 and T1, respectively.

The dense gas components in the Norma and 3 kpc-expanding arms would contribute hadronic γ-ray emission at a comparable level to that of the dense gas towards the ~1 kpc region for a given CR enhancement factor, so expected CR enhancement estimates are not likely to help in favouring a specific distance solution. Moriguchi et al. (2005) systematically compared the angular correlation between the RX J1713.7–3946 X-ray emission and CO(1-0) emission at a wide range of line of sight velocities, and concluded that gas in the ~1 kpc region had better angular correspondence than other line-of-sight gas components (including the Norma and 3 kpc-expanding arm gas), thus favouring the ~1 kpc distance for RX J1713.7–3946. In a hadronic scenario, correlation is expected between gas and γ-ray emission, so their argument can be extended to include the hadronic production of gamma-rays, in which case gamma-ray correspondence favours the ~1 kpc distance. Modelling by Inoue et al. (2012) found that the large-scale correlation between CO(1-0) and the HESS TeV γ-ray emission supported the ~1 kpc gas association, a model also supported by a small-scale gas-keV X-ray anticorrelation.

We note that the coincident dense gas components of these galactic arms, despite being significantly more massive than the ~1 kpc gas, would produce a flux of γ-rays (~4 × 10−13 cm−2 s−1 above 1 TeV) similar to the dense gas believed to be associated with RX J1713.7–3946, due to the greater distance involved.

We further note that CO(2-1) spectra towards N1-west and T1 (Figures 6 and 7, respectively) include a component at v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −85 km s−1, which does not appear to include a detectable dense gas component traced by CS(1-0) emission (above T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ ~0.16 K ch−1). This gas may correspond to ‘Cloud A’ (Slane et al. 1999; Butt et al. 2001) or gas traced by Moriguchi et al. (2005).

4.2 SiO(1-0) emission

A detection of vibrational modes (v = 1, 2) of the SiO(1-0) transition towards [l,b]~[347.05,−0.012] in 2011 April prompted follow-up observations that were carried out 1 yr later. The position of this detection is indicated in Figure 3 and spectra are displayed in Figure 9. Spectral characteristics from χ2-minimisation fits are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Line parameters for SiO transitions towards the detected SiO maser at [l,b]~[347.05, −0.012] for three observation periods (location indicated on Figure 3). Background noise, T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ , is shown. Velocity of peak, v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ , peak intensity, T $_{\textrm {{Peak}}}$ , and FWHM, Δv $_{\textrm {{\sc{fwhm}}}}$ , were found by fitting Gaussians before deconvolving with the MOPS velocity resolution.

a Spectral lines difficult to fit, so line-widths were fixed to be equal to those of the 2012 April 20 observations.

b Line deemed insignificant in post-trial analysis (see Section 4.2.1)

Figure 9. Spectra (Mopra and Nanten2) towards the SiO maser discovered at (l,b)~(347.05, −0.012). Data from 2011 April 23/24 were taken from OTF maps. Data from 2012 April are from follow-up pointing data.

4.2.1 2011 April

We measured SiO(J = 1-0,v = 2) emission that had an intensity greater than the intensity of the lower vibrational mode, v = 1, indicating the possible presence of an SiO population-inversion; thus the emission can be considered as a weak SiO maser. The v = 1 and v = 2 SiO(J = 1-0) transitions are at consistent velocities, but if a tentative SiO(J = 1-0, v = 0) detection is real, there is a discrepancy in rest velocity (offset from the v = 1 and 2 modes by 1.6 ± 0.14 km s−1 and 1.4 ± 0.1 km s−1, respectively). This, in fact, may have been a thermal component, unrelated to the SiO maser, but since this weak signal was only considered (and searched for) after the detection of the relatively prominent SiO(J = 1-0,v = 2) emission, we estimate the likelihood that it was noise. A naive post-trial analysis that considers the v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ range (9 km s−1) in the line-fitting process and the fitted line-width (1.5 km s−1) leads to an estimate of six trials. This decreases the significance from ~1.5 T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ to an insignificant ~0.65 T $_{\textrm {{\sc{rms}}}}$ (1.5/ $\sqrt{6}$ ). It follows that although a weak thermal SiO emission line may exist towards this location, we dismiss the 2011 SiO(J = 1-0,v = 0) detection displayed in Table 3.

We do not dismiss the 2011 SiO(J = 1-0,v = 1) detection using a similar argument since the chance probability of fitting a v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ consistent (within ~0.5 σ~± 0.2 km s−1) with the original SiO(J = 1-0,v = 2) detection is approximately ~5% (trials in a 9 km s−1 v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ -range).

4.2.2 2012 April

The deep 7 mm observations of 2012 April 20, allowed a ~2.5× reduction of spectral noise, and the previously tentative (and insignificant after post-trial analyses) SiO(1-0,v = 0) line was now absent. Interestingly, the peak intensities of the v = 1 and v = 2 SiO(J = 1-0) emission lines decreased by ~35% and ~75%, respectively, while the line-width increased by ~45% and ~100%, respectively.

When we consider the changes in integrated intensity (proportional to the changes in T $_{\textrm {{Peak}}}$ × Δv $_{\textrm {{FWHM}}}$ ), the variation may seem less dramatic and possibly partly due to a change in the velocity distribution of emitting SiO molecules. The v = 1 and v = 2 SiO(J = 1-0) integrated intensities decrease by ~10% and ~50%, respectively. Additionally, the rest velocity was observed to change by ~1.5 km s−1.

We note that χ2-minimisation Gaussian-fits for the April 8 SiO(1-0) observations were divergent, so the full width half maximum was set manually in order to achieve a χ2-minimisation fit for the other line parameters.

4.2.3 The SiO Maser Origin

SiO masers of this type are commonly associated with evolved stars, or, in very rare cases, star-forming molecular cores. As can be seen from Figure 9, no counterpart is detected in CO(2-1) or CS(1-0) bands towards the SiO maser discovered in this investigation, discrediting the molecular core scenario.

Towards the SiO maser, one midcourse space experiment (MSX) source (G347.0519−00.0100), 20 2MASS catalogue sources, and 31 Spitzer-Glimpse catalogue sources are present within a 30 arcsec radius 2 , so this maser may have an infrared counterpart (24, 8, and 5.8 μm; Figures 10 and 11), but a more thorough investigation of this source is beyond the scope of this paper.

Figure 10. Spitzer 5.8 μm (top), 8 μm (middle), and 24 μm (bottom) emission images. Objects of interest to this investigation (see Section 4.1) are indicated by circles and ellipses. Object S9 towards T1 (see text) is indicated in the middle picture (8 μm). Dashed squares indicate regions mapped in 7 mm wavelengths by Mopra.

Figure 11. Three colour image of Spitzer 5.8 μm, 8 μm, and 24 μm emission towards the SiO maser discovered in our survey. The Mopra 7 mm beam FWHM is displayed (white circle).


We carried out a 7 mm survey of the northern and western regions of RX J1713.7–3946, targeting the dense gas-tracing CS(1-0) transition and the shock-tracing SiO(1-0) transition. We report:

  1. (1) the discovery of dense components corresponding to Cores G and L at velocity v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −11 km s−1, as well as gas in the Norma arm at v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −70 km s−1 and the 3 kpc-expanding arm at v $_{\textrm {{\sc{lsr}}}}$ ~ −120 km s−1;

  2. (2) the discovery of a transient SiO(1-0) maser, in v=1 and 2 states, outside the western shell of the SNR, possibly generated by an evolved star;

  3. (3) the detection of dense gas and hot gas as indicated by CS(1-0) and CH3OH(7-6)-emission coincident with the infrared bubble S9 of Churchwell et al. (2006); and

  4. (4) that a hadronic scenario for the RX J1713.7–3946 SNR would require a CR enhancement above 1 TeV of ~1 000, with dense CS(1-0)-traced components only contributing a gamma-ray flux above 1 TeV of ~3 × 10−13 cm−2 s−1, a few per cent of the total hadronic flux. Systematic effects relating to the proportion of ‘hidden’ gas and the assumed local CR spectrum may be ~40% and ~40%, respectively.


This work was supported by an Australian Research Council grant (DP0662810, DP1096533). The Mopra Telescope is part of the Australia Telescope and is funded by the Commonwealth of Australia for operation as a National Facility managed by the CSIRO. The University of New South Wales Mopra Spectrometer Digital Filter Bank used for these Mopra observations was provided with support from the Australian Research Council, together with the University of New South Wales, University of Sydney, Monash University, and the CSIRO.


Abdo, A., et al. (Fermi Collab.) 2011, ApJ, 734, 28
Acero, F., Ballet, J., Decourchelle, A., Lemoine-Goumard, M., Ortega, M., Giacani, E., Dubner, G., & Cassam-Chenaï, G. 2009, A&A, 505, 157
Aharonian, F. 1991, Ap&SS, 180, 305A
Aharonian, F., & Atoyan, A. 1996, ApJ, 309, 917
Aharonian, F., et al. (HESS Collab.) 2006, A&A, 449, 223
Aharonian, F., et al. (HESS Collab.) 2007, A&A, 464, 235
Berezhko, E., & Volk, H. 2010, A&A, 511, A34
Berezinskii, V., Bulanov, S., Dogiel, V., Ginzburg, V., & Ptuskin, V. 1990, Astrophysics of Cosmic Rays (Amsterdam: North-Holland)
Butt, Y., Torres, D., Combi, J., Dame, T., & Romero, G. 2001, ApJ, 562, L167
Casanova, S., et al. 2010, PASJ, 62, 1127
Cassam-Chenai, G., Decourchelle, A., Ballet, J., Sauvageot, j.-l., Dubner, S., & Giacani, E. 2004, A&A, 427, 199
Churchwell, E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 759
Crutcher, R. 1999, ApJ, 520, 706
The CTA Consortium, 2010, arXiv:1008.3703
Ellison, D., Patnaude, D., Slane, P., & Raymond, J. 2010, ApJ, 712, 287
Fessen, R., Kremer, R., Patnaude, D., & Milisavljevic, D. 2012, ApJ, 143, 27
Frerking, M., Wilson, R., Linke, R., & Wannier, P. 1980, ApJ, 240, 65
Fukui, Y. 2008, AIP Conf Proc, 1085, 104
Fukui, Y., Sano, H., Sato, J., Horachi, H., Torii, K., McClure-Griffiths, N., Rowell, G., & Aharonian, F. 2012, ApJ, 746, 82
Fukui, Y., et al. 2003, PASJ, 55, L61
Gabici, S., Aharonian, F., & Blasi, P. 2007, Ap&SS, 309, 365
Gabici, S., Aharonian, F., & Casanova, S. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 1629
Gabici, S., Casanova, S., Aharonian, F., & Rowell, G. 2010, in Boissier, S., Heydari-Malayeri, M., Samadi, R., Valls-Gaband, D., eds, Proc. French Soc. Astron. Astrophys., SF2A, 313
Goldsmith, P., & Langer, W. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209
Inoue, T., Yamazaki, R., Inutsuka, S., & Fukui, Y. 2012, ApJ, 744, 71
Maxted, N., Rowell, G., Dawson, B., Burton, M., Nicholas, B., Fukui, Y., Walsh, A., Kawamura, A., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 2230
Maxted, N., Rowell, G., Dawson, B., Burton, M., Kawamura, A., Walsh, A., Sano, H., & Lazendic, J. 2012b, in AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 1505, High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy, eds. Aharonian, F. et al. (New York: American Institute of Physics) 253
Maxted, N., Rowell, G., Dawson, B., Burton, M., Fukui, Y., Walsh, A., Kawamura, A., Hirotaka, H., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2188
Moriguchi, Y., Tamura, K., Tawara, Y., Sasago, H., Yamaoka, T., Onishi, T., & Fukui, Y. 2005, ApJ, 631, 947
Nicholas, B., Rowell, G., Burton, M., Walsh, A., Fukui, Y., Kawamura, A., & Maxted, N. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 251
Pfeffermann, E., & Aschenbach, B. 1996, MPE, 263, 267
Porter, T., Moskalenko, I., & Strong, A. 2006, ApJ, 648, L29
Sano, H., et al. 2010, ApJ, 724, 59
Slane, P., Gaensler, B., Dame, T., Hughes, J., Plucinsky, P., & Green, A. 1999, ApJ, 525, 357
Urquhart, J., et al. 2010, PASA, 27, 321
van Dishoeck, E., & Blake, G. 1998, A&A, 36, 317
Walsh, A., Breen, S., Britton, T., Brooks, K., Burton, M., Cunningham, M., Green, J., & Harvey-Smith, L. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1764
Wang, Z., Qu, Q., & Chen, Y. 1997, A&A, 318, L5961
Wolfire, M., Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1191
Zirakashvili, V., & Aharonian, F. 2010, ApJ, 708, 965
Ziurys, L., Snell, R., & Dickman, R. 1989, ApJ, 341, 857