Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:20:07.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infrared and Submillimetre Observing Conditions on the Antarctic Plateau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Marton G. Hidas*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia
Michael G. Burton
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia
Matthew A. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia
John W. V. Storey
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Antarctic Plateau provides the best terrestrial sites for infrared (IR) and submillimetre (sub-mm) astronomy. In this paper we examine the relative importance of temperature, aerosol content and precipitable water vapour to determine which parameters have the greatest influence on atmospheric transmission and sky brightness. We use the atmospheric modelling program MODTRAN to model the observed sky spectrum at the South Pole from the near-IR to the sub-mm. We find that temperature and aerosol content determine the quality of near-IR observing conditions, aerosol content is the determining factor in the mid-IR up to 20 μm, while at longer wavelengths, including the sub-mm, it is the water vapour content that matters. Finding a location where aerosol levels are minimised is a key constraint in determining the optimum site on the Antarctic Plateau for an IR observatory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2000

References

Ade, P. A. R., Chamberlin, R. A., O'Kelly, M. J., Peterson, J. B., Radford, S. J. E., & Schartman, E. 2000, Comparison of the Submillimeter Opacity and Sky Stability at Mauna Kea, Chajnantor and South Pole, (in preparation)Google Scholar
AFRL/VSBM, 29 Randolph Road, Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-3010, USA, http://www-vsbm.plh.af.mil/ Google Scholar
Ashley, M. C. B., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 721 Google Scholar
Burton, M. G. 1998, in Astrophysics from Antarctica, ASP Conf. Ser. 141 (San Francisco: ASP), p. 3 Google Scholar
Chamberlain, M. A., Ashley, M. C. B., Burton, M. G., Phillips, A., Storey, J. W. V., & Harper, D. A. 2000, ApJ (in press)Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R. A., Lane, A. P., & Stark, A. A. 1997, ApJ, 476, 428 Google Scholar
CMDL/NOAO (Climate Monitoring & Diagnostics Laboratory/National Oceans Atmosphere Organisation), 325 Broadway R/E/CG, Boulder, CO 80303, USA, http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/spo/ Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. T., et al. 1996, PASP, 108, 718 Google Scholar
Phillips, A., et al. 1999, ApJ, 527, 1009 Google Scholar
Smith, C. H., & Harper, D. A. 1998, PASP, 110, 747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenziano, L., & Dall'Oglio, G. 1999, PASA, 16, 167 Google Scholar
Van Allen, R., Murcray, F. J., & Liu, X. 1996, Appl. Optics, 35, 1523 Google Scholar
Walden, V. P., Warren, S. G., & Murcray, F. J. 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 3825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar