Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:31:39.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14C Dating of Fire-Damaged Mortars from Medieval Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Alf Lindroos*
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Lior Regev
Affiliation:
Kimmel Center, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Markku Oinonen
Affiliation:
Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Finland
Åsa Ringbom
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Jan Heinemeier
Affiliation:
AMS Dating Laboratory, University of århus, Denmark
*
Corresponding author. Email: alindroo@abo.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study focuses on radiocarbon dating of mortars that have withstood city fires and display visible fire damage effects. Some fire-damaged and undamaged original Medieval mortars from the same site have also been tested. The mortars were heated at different temperatures and then analyzed using the same preparation procedures as in 14C dating of mortars to see what kind of changes the heating would introduce to the mineralogy, chemistry, and the carbon and oxygen isotope ratios. We found that decarbonation during heating starts at ∼600 ° and recarbonation starts as soon as the temperature drops. Already after a few days, most of the lost CO2 has been replaced with atmospheric CO2. The renewed carbonates are readily soluble in the acid hydrolysis process and their carbon and oxygen isotopes have a light signature. Fire-damaged historical mortars display the same features. If a long time has elapsed between hardening of the original mortar and the fire, the new carbonates have 14C concentrations that point to the fire event rather than to the building event. In several cases, the fire-damaged mortars have an easily soluble carbonate fraction with a 14C age that could be related to a major fire event, but still most of the soluble carbonate yields a 14C age that seems like a reasonable age for the original construction.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Boström, R. 1986. The history of the stone and mineral industry in Finland. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 336:273–98.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christidis, GE, Triantafyllou, G. 2007. Influence of particle size on the thermal decomposition of calcite. Acta Crystallographica A 63:265–66.Google Scholar
Friedman, I, O'Neil, JR. 1977. Compilation of stable isotope fractionation factors of geochemical interest. In: Data of Geochemistry. US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 440 KK, 6th edition.Google Scholar
Gardberg, CJ, Heininen, S, Welin, PO. 2000. Nationalhelgedomen Åbo Domkyrka 1300–2000. Helsingfors: Tammi Förlag. 384 p. In Swedish with English summary.Google Scholar
Gunasekaran, S, Anbalagan, G. 2007. Thermal decomposition of natural dolomite. Bulletin of Material Sciences 30(4):339–44. Indian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Hajdas, I, Trumm, J, Bonani, G, Biechele, C, Maurer, M, Wacker, L. 2012. Roman ruins as an experiment for radiocarbon dating of mortar. Radiocarbon, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Jungner, H, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, von Konow, T, Rud, N. 1997. AMS 14C dating of lime mortar. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123:487–95.Google Scholar
Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Lindroos, A, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, AE. 2010. Successful AMS 14C dating of non-hydraulic lime mortars from the medieval churches of the Aland Islands, Finland. Radiocarbon 52(1):171204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgins, GWL, Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, Heinemeier, J, Brock, F. 2011. 14C dating of Roman mortars – preliminary tests using diluted hydrochloric acid injected in batches. In: Ringbom, Å, Hohlfelder, R, editors. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, Societas Scientiarium Fennica. Proceedings from Building Roma Aeterna Conference in Rome, 23–25 March 2008. p 209–13.Google Scholar
Langley, MM, Maloney, SJ, Ringbom, Å, Heinemeier, J, Lindroos, A. 2011. A comparison of dating techniques at Torre de Palma, Portugal: mortars and ceramics. In: In: Ringbom, Å, Hohlfelder, R, editors. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum, Societas Scientiarium Fennica. Proceedings from Building Roma Aeterna Conference in Rome, 23–25 March 2008. p 242–56.Google Scholar
Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Ringbom, Å, Braskén, M, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, ÁE. 2007. Mortar dating using AMS 14C and sequential dissolution: examples from medieval, non-hydraulic lime mortars from the Åland Islands, SW Finland. Radiocarbon 49(1):4767.Google Scholar
Lindroos, A, Ringbom, Å, Kaisti, R, Heinemeier, J, Hodgins, G, Brock, F. 2011. The oldest parts of Turku cathedral. C-14 chronology of fire damaged mortars. In: Hansson, J, Ranta, H, editors. Archaeology and History of Churches in Baltic Region. County Administrative Board of Gotland and Gotland University. p 108–21.Google Scholar
MacLeod, G, Hall, AJ, Fallick, AE. 1990. An applied mineralogical investigation of concrete degradation in a major concrete road bridge. Mineralogical Magazine 54:637–44.Google Scholar
Nawrocka, D, Czernik, J, Goslar, T. 2009. 14C dating of carbonate mortars from Polish and Israeli sites. Radiocarbon 51(2):857–66.Google Scholar
O'Neil, JR, Barnes, I. 1971. C13 and O18 compositions in some fresh-water carbonates associated with ultra-mafic rocks and serpentinites: western United States. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 35(7):687–97.Google Scholar
Pesce, G, Quarta, G, Calcagnile, L, D'Elia, M, Cavaciocci, P, Lastrico, C, Guastella, R. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of lumps from aerial lime mortars and plasters. Radiocarbon 51(2):867–72.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Bartholin, T, Klein, P, Lindroos, A, Sveinbjörnsdóttir, ÀE, Heinemeier, J. 2005. Naturvetenskaplig datering. In: Ringbom, Å, Remmer, C, editors. Ålands Kyrkor, Volume III. Sund och Vårdö: Ålands Landskapsstyrelse/museibyrå. 336 p. In Swedish with English summary.Google Scholar
Ringbom, Å, Lindroos, A, Heinemeier, J, Gustavsson, K. 2011. Dating stone churches in the outer Åland archipelago. In: Hansson, J, Ranta, H, editors. Archaeology and History of Churches in Baltic Region. County Administrative Board of Gotland and Gotland University. p 141–70.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Agudo, E, Rodrígues-Navarro, C, Luque, A, Rodrígues-Navarro, A, Huertas, MO. 2008. A TEM and 2D-XRD study of the thermal decomposition of calcite. Macla [Revista de la Sociedad Española de Mineralogía] 9:223–4.Google Scholar
Tubbs, LE, Kinder, TN. 1990. The use of AMS for the dating of lime mortars. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 52(3–4):438–41.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Dupas, M, Keppens, E. 1989. Isotopic Fractionation of oxygen and carbon in lime mortar under natural environmental conditions. Radiocarbon 31(3):610–8.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, MJY, van der Borg, K, de Jong, AFM, Keppens, E. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of lime fractions and organic material from buildings. Radiocarbon 34(3):873–9.Google Scholar
Wyllie, PJ, Tuttle, OF. 1960. The system CaO-CO2-H2O and the origin of carbonatites. Journal of Petrology 1:146.Google Scholar