Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:45:22.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Holocene Lacustrine Carbonate Formation; Old Ideas in the Light of New Radiocarbon Data from a Single Site in Central Hungary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

M Jenei
Affiliation:
University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u.2-6, Hungary
S Gulyás*
Affiliation:
University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u.2-6, Hungary
P Sümegi
Affiliation:
University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology, H-6722 Szeged, Egyetem u.2-6, Hungary
M Molnár
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-4026 Debrecen, Bern tér 18/c, Hungary
*
Corresponding author. Email: gubanc@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lacustrine carbonate deposition in Hungary has been traditionally interpreted as the outcome of the dry, hot climate prevailing between 7500 and 5000 14C yr BP (hereafter BP) (∼6400 and 3800 BC), triggering the partial desiccation of minor ponds and lakes. A comparative analysis of 5 14C results from the site of Csólyospálos, central Hungary, with those of other Hungarian lacustrine carbonates yielded stunning new results. According to these new dates, carbonate deposition must have initiated much earlier, possibly around 10,000–11,000 BP (9500–11,000 BC) in the Carpathian Basin. Furthermore, the formation of lacustrine carbonates must have come to an end at very different times in different parts of the basin, contrasting previous views on the uniform and synchronous cessation of lacustrine carbonate formation in Hungary. According to the newest results presented here, carbonate deposition in the southern and southeastern parts of the basin ceased around 6000 BP (∼4900 BC). Meanwhile, in the central parts, deposition continued as long as the terminal Bronze Age (∼1300 BC).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bálint, M. 2003. Landscape development and soil formation in the Danube: Tisza interfluve. In: Laszlovszky, J, Szabó, P, editors. People and Nature in Historical Perspective. Budapest: Archaeolingua Press. p 157–74.Google Scholar
Csányi, M, Sz Máthé, M, Tárnoki, J, Vicze, M. 1992. A bronzkori tell-kultúrák kutatástörténete Magyarországon. In: Raczky, P, editor. Dombokká vált évszázadok. Budapest-Szolnok: Pytheas Kiadó. p 515. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Frömming, E. 1954. Biologie der Mitteleuropäischen Landgastropoden. Berlin: Deucher et Humboldt. 541 p. In German.Google Scholar
Grime, JP, Blythe, GM. 1969. An investigation of the relationships between snails and vegetation at the Winnats Pass. Journal of Ecology 57(1):4566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertelendi, E, Csongor, É, Záborszky, L, Molnár, J, Gál, J, Gyorffy, M, Nagy, S. 1989. A counter system for high-precision 14C dating. Radiocarbon 31(3):399406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertelendi, E, Sümegi, P, Szöor, Gy. 1992. Geochronologic and paleoclimatic characterization of Quaternary sediments in the Great Hungarian Plain. Radiocarbon 34(3):833–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertelendi, E, Kalicz, N, Raczky, P, Horváth, F, Veres, M, Svingor, É, Futó, I, Bartosiewicz, L. 1996. Re-evaluation of the Neolithic in eastern Hungary based on calibrated radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 37(2):239–41.Google Scholar
Krolopp, E, Sümegi, P, Hertelendi, E, Kuti, L, Kordos, L. 1995. Szeged környéki löszképzodmények keletkezésének paleoökológiai rekonstrukciója. Földtani Közlöny 125:309–61. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Mucsi, M. 1963. Finomrétegtani vizsgálatok a kiskunsági édesvízi karbonát-képzodményeken. Földtani Közlöny 93:373–86. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Poroszlai, I. 1988. Preliminary report about the excavation at Nagykorös—Földvár (Vatya culture): stratigraphical data and settlement structure. Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 15:4556.Google Scholar
Poroszlai, I. 1992. Nagykorös—Földvár. In: Raczky, P, editor. Dombokká vált évszázadok. Budapest-Szolnok: Pytheas Kiadó. 59 p. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Preece, RC. 1991. Accelerator and radiometric radiocarbon dates on a range of materials from colluvial deposits at Holywell Coombe, Folkstone. In: Lowe, JJ, editor. Radiocarbon Dating: Recent Applications and Future Potential. Quaternary Proceedings 1. Cambridge: Quaternary Research Association. p 4553.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. IntCal98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sümegi, P. 1989. Hajdúság felso-pleisztocén fejlodéstörténete finomrétegtani (üledékföldtani, oslénytani, geokémiai) vizsgálatok alapján [PhD dissertation]. Debrecen: University of Debrecen. 96 p. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Sümegi, P. 1996. Az ÉK-magyarországi löszterületek összehasonlító oskórnyezeti és sztratigráfiai értékelése [unpublished PhD dissertation]. Debrecen: University of Debrecen. 120 p. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Sümegi, P. 2004. Preneolitizáció—egy Kárpát-medencei, késo-mezolitikum során bekövetkezett életmódbeli változás környezettörténeti rekonstrukciója [Preneolithization—on the environmental background of a social change observable during the Late Mesolithic in the Carpathian Basin]. MUMOSZ II. Konferencia anyaga. Szolnok: Museum of Szolnok. p 2132. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Sümegi, P, Gulyás, S, editors. 2004. The Geohistory of Bátorliget Marshland. Budapest: Archaeolingua Press. 354 p.Google Scholar
Sümegi, P, Lóki, J, Hertelendi, E, Szöor, Gy. 1992. A tiszaalpári magaspart rétegsorának szedimentológiai és sztratigráfiai elemzése. Alföldi Tanulmányok 14: 7587. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Sümegi, P, Mucsi, M, Fényes, J, Gulyás, S. 2005. First radiocarbon dates from the freshwater carbonates of the Danube-Tisza interfluve. In: Hum, L, Gulyás, S, Sümegi, P, editors. Environmental Historical Studies from the Late Tertiary and Quaternary of Hungary. Szeged: University of Szeged, Department of Geology and Paleontology. p 103–18.Google Scholar
Szöor, Gy, Balázs, É, Cserháti, Cs, Dinya, L, Hertelendi, E, Sümegi, P, Szanyi, J. 1992. Quarter és neogén Mollusca-héjak kemotaxonómiai és paleoökológiai elemzése. In: Szöor, Gy, editor. Fáciesanalitikai, Paleobiogeokémiai és Paleoökológiai Kutatások. Debrecen: MTA Debreceni Bizottsága. p 111–81. In Hungarian.Google Scholar