Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

IN HER OWN WORDS: THE SEMANTICS OF FEMALE AUTHORSHIP IN ANCIENT GREECE, FROM SAPPHO TO NOSSIS 1

  • Emily Hauser (a1)
Abstract

What we call things is important—it reveals what we think about the world. What we call ourselves, however, is even more important. It reveals ideas and assumptions about identity, gender, community. It helps us to see where we fit in in society; what we understand our purpose, our role to be; the kinds of activities we undertake. In a history where women have been largely barred from higher-paying, traditionally male occupations, the way in which women in particular use terminology to lay claim to skills and expertise in counterpoint to a generally male-dominant culture speaks volumes about the ways in which women see themselves and their relationship to their work. As Erica Jong puts it in her feminist essay, The Artist as Housewife, ‘naming is a form of self-creation’.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
1.

The idea for this article was developed after hearing a lecture given by Tim Whitmarsh at the Oxford TORCH Lecture on Gender, Literature and Culture, ‘What is Women's Writing?’, at Oxford University on 9 May 2014. My sincere thanks go to Emily Greenwood, Gregory Nagy, Tim Whitmarsh, Irene Peirano Garrison and Joshua Billings for their insightful comments and advice, as well as to the anonymous referees at Ramus for their extremely helpful feedback; any remaining errors are my own.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. Athanassaki , and E. Bowie (eds.) (2011), Archaic and Classical Choral Song (Berlin/ Boston).

J. Austin (1975), How to Do Things with Words 2 (Oxford).

R. Bagnall , and R. Cribiore (2006), Women's Letters From Ancient Egypt, 300 BC-AD 800 (Ann Arbor).

A. Beecroft (2010), Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China (Cambridge).

P. Bing (1988), The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets (Göttingen).

S. Black , and C. Juhn (2000), ‘The Rise of Female Professionals: Are Women Responding to Skill Demand?’, The American Economic Review 90, 450-55.

L. Bowman (1998), ‘Nossis, Sappho and Hellenistic Poetry’, Ramus 27, 39-59.

L. Bowman (2004), ‘The “Women's Tradition” in Greek Poetry’, Phoenix 58, 1-27.

F. Budelmann (ed.) (2009), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric (Cambridge).

J. Butler (1988), ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory’, Theatre Journal 40, 519-31.

P. Ceccarelli (2013), Ancient Greek Letter Writing: A Cultural History (600-150 BC) (Oxford).

J. Cheshire (1985), ‘A Question of Masculine Bias’, English Today 1, 22-26.

J. Cheshire (2008), ‘Still a Gender-Biased Language?’, English Today 24, 7-10.

H. Cixous (1976), ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’, Signs 1, 875-93.

S. Cole (2004), Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space (Los Angeles).

G. Corbett (1991), Gender (Cambridge).

M. Davies (1988), ‘Monody, Choral Lyric, and the Tyranny of the Hand-Book’, CQ 38, 52-64.

K. Dion (1983), ‘Names, Identity, and Self’, Names 31, 245-57.

D. Gentner , and S. Goldin-Meadow (2003), Language in Mind (Cambridge MA).

S. Gubar (1981), ‘“The Blank Page” and the Issues of Female Creativity’, Critical Inquiry 8, 243-63.

S. Gubar (1984), ‘Sapphistries’, Signs 10, 43-62.

M. Hellinger , and H. Bussmann (2001), Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men (Amsterdam).

G. Holst-Warhaft (1992), Dangerous Voices: Women's Laments and Greek Literature (London).

G. Hutchinson (2013), Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality (Oxford).

L. Kurke (2010), Aesopic Conversations (Princeton).

P. Murray (1981), ‘Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece’, JHS 101, 87-100.

G. Nagy (2007a), ‘Lyric and Greek Myth’, in R. Woodard (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology (Cambridge), 19-51.

I. Peirano (2014), ‘“Sealing” the Book: Sphragis as Paratext’, in L. Jansen (ed.) The Roman Paratext (Cambridge), 224-42.

S. Sczesny , F. Moser and W. Wood (2015), ‘Beyond Sexist Beliefs: How Do People Decide to Use Gender-Inclusive Language?’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41.7, 1-12.

E. Theodorakopoulos (1997), ‘Closure: The Book of Virgil’, in C. Martindale (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil (Cambridge), 155-66.

R. Thomas (1992), Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece (Cambridge).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ramus
  • ISSN: 0048-671X
  • EISSN: 2202-932X
  • URL: /core/journals/ramus
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 78 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 266 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th December 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.