Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Facilitating second language learners’ listening comprehension with Second Life and Skype

  • Natasha Levak (a1) and Jeong-Bae Son (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Learning how to comprehend while listening to a second language is often considered by learners to be a difficult process that can lead to anxiety when trying to communicate (Graham, 2006; Graham & Macaro, 2008). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) can be used to assist in increasing access to native speakers and opportunities to listen. This study investigates the effectiveness of the use of Second Life and Skype as part of facilitation techniques and the affordances of these online tools for developing listening comprehension. Participants in the study were learning either English or Croatian and were located in Sydney and Brisbane in Australia, Split in Croatia, and Mostar in Bosnia and Hercegovina. A mixed-methods approach was utilised incorporating pre-tests and post-tests (quantitative data) to gain information on the effectiveness of the techniques for developing listening comprehension and in-depth interviews (qualitative data) to gain the participants’ views on the perceived effectiveness of the techniques and the affordances of Second Life or Skype. The results of the study indicate that both techniques resulted in positive gains in the development of listening comprehension. Based on the analysis of the interview data, a more in-depth perspective on the affordances of each online tool was developed, which informed the creation of a new facilitation technique utilising both tools. The study demonstrates how online tools can be used to facilitate interaction between learners and illustrates the need for the selection of online tools for language learning to be based on pedagogy. It is recommended that the selection of tools should be carefully considered in alignment with task aims and the affordances of online tools.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alenezi A. M. and Shahi K. K. (2014) Interactive e-learning through Second Life with Blackboard technology. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 176: 891897.
Antonacci D. M. and Modaress N. (2008) Envisioning the educational possibilities of user created virtual worlds. AACE Journal, 16(2): 115126.
Bueno Alastuey M. C. (2011) Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5): 419432. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.574639
Burbles N. C. (2006) Rethinking the virtual. In Weiss, J. (eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Netherlands: Springer, 133.
Chang W.-W. (2009) Schema adjustment in cross-cultural encounters: A study of expatriate aid service workers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33: 5768.
Chapelle C. A. (2001) Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carney N. (2008) Achieving communication though multi-modal language exchange. CALL-EJ Online, 10(1). http://callej.org/journal/10-1/carney.html.
Chen J. C. and Brown K. L. (2011) The effects of authentic audience on English as a second language writers: A task-based, computer-mediated approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5): 435454. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.606224.
Chen I.-J. and Chang C.-C. (2011) Content presentation modes in mobile language listening tasks: English proficiency as a moderator. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5): 451470. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.577749
Cooke-Plagwitz J. (2008) New directions in CALL: An objective introduction to Second Life. CALICO Journal, 25(3): 547557.
Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell J. W., Clark V. L. P., Gutmann M. L. and Hanson W. E. (2003) Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddies, C. (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. London: SAGE Publications, 209240.
Cziko G. A. (2004) Electronic tandem language learning (eTandem): A third approach to second language learning for the 21st century. CALICO Journal, 22(1): 2539.
Deutschmann M., Panichi L. and Molka-Danielsen J. (2009) Designing oral participation in Second Life: A comparative study of two language proficiency courses. ReCALL, 21(2): 206226.
Dieterle E. and Clarke J. (2008) Multi-user virtual environments for teaching and learning. In Pagani, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 10331041.
Ellis R. (2005) Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2): 209224.
Eroz-Tuga B. and Sadler R. (2009) Comparing six video chat tools: A critical evaluation by language teachers. Computers & Education, 53: 787798.
Fischer F., Kollar I., Haake J. M. and Mandl H. (2007) Perspectives on collaboration scripts. In Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H. and Haake, J. M. (eds.) (2007) Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. Berlin: Springer, 110.
Flick U. (2007) Managing quality in qualitative data. Singapore: SAGE.
Flood J. (2003) Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd edn.). London: Routledge.
Fulcher G. (2000) The “communicative” legacy in language testing. System, 28: 483497.
Goh C. C. M. (2000) A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problem. System, 28: 5575.
Graham S. (2006) Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2): 165182.
Graham S. and Macaro E. (2008) Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58: 747783.
Hauck M. and Youngs B. L. (2008) Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2): 87124.
Hedge T. (2002) Teaching and learning in the language classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Helgesen M. (2003) Listening. In Nunan, D. (ed.), Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill, 2635.
Henderson M., Huang H., Grant S. and Henderson L. (2009) Language acquisition is Second Life: Improving self-efficacy beliefs. Proceedings of ascilite Auckland 2009. http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/auckland09/procs/henderson.pdf.
Hernández-Serrano M. J., González-Sánchez M. and Muñoz-Rodríguez J. (2009) Designing learning environments improving social interactions: Essential variables for a virtual training space. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 1: 24112415.
Jauregi K., Canto S., Graaff R. D., Koenraad T. and Moonen M. (2011) Verbal interaction in Second Life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1): 77101.
Jauregi K., de Graaff R., van den Bergh H. and Kriz M. (2012) Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1): 19.
Jin L. and Erben T. (2007) Intercultural learning via instant messenger interaction. CALICO journal, 24(2): 291311.
Jones L. C. (2008) Listening comprehension technology: Building the bridge from analog to digital. CALICO Journal, 23: 400419.
Jones L. C. and Plass J. (2002) Supporting listening comprehension with multimedia andannotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4): 546561.
Karpova E., Correia A. and Baran E. (2009) Learn to use and use to learn: Technology in virtual collaboration experience. Internet and Higher Education, 12: 4552.
Kemp J. and Lingstone D. (2006) Putting a Second Life ‘Metaverse’ skin on learning management systems. In Livingstone, D. and Kemp, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the First Second Life Education Workshop: 2006 Second Life Community Convention. San Francisco: Fort Mason Centre, 1318.
Kessler G. (2010) Fluency and anxiety in self-access speaking tasks: The influence of environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4): 361375.
Krashen S. D. (1995) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Phoenix ELT.
Kuriscak L. M. and Luke C. L. (2009) Language learner attitudes toward virtual worlds: An investigation of Second Life. In Lomicka, L. and Lord, G. (eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning. San Marcos, TX: CALICO, 115144.
Lee L. (2007) Fostering second language oral communication through constructivist interaction in desktop videoconferencing. Foreign Language Annals, 40(4): 635649.
Lems. K., Miller D. and Soro M. T. M. (2010) Teaching reading to English language learners: Insights from linguistics. New York: Gilford Press.
Liaw M.-L. and Master S. B. (2010) Understanding telecollaboration through an analysis of intercultural discourse. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1): 2140.
Lin T-J., Wang S-Y., Grant S., Chein C-L. and Lan Y-J. (2014) Task-based teaching approach of Chinese as a foreign language in Second Life through teachers’ perspectives. Procedia Technology, 13: 1622.
Liou H.-S. (2011) The roles of Second Life in a college computer-assisted language learning (CALL) course in Taiwan, ROC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4): 365382. doi: 10.1080/095882211.2011.597766
Moyer Alene (2006) Language contact and confidence in second language listening comprehension: A pilot study of advanced learners of German. Foreign language annals, 39(2): 255275.
Nishida H. (1999) A cognitive approach to intercultural communication based on schema theory. International journal of intercultural relations, 23(5): 753777.
Nunan D. (2002) Listening in language learning. In Richards, J. C. and Renandya, W. A. (eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 238241.
Nunan D. (2004) Task-based language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Omale N., Hung W. C., Luetkehans L. and Cooke-Plagwitz J. (2009) Learning in 3-D multi-user virtual environments: Exploring the use of unique 3-D attributes for online problem-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3): 480495.
O’Malley M. and Chamot A. (1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pellas N. and Kazanidis I. (2014) Online and hybrid university-level courses with the utilisation of Second Life: Investigating the factors that predict student choice in Second Life supported online and hybrid university-level courses. Computers in Human Behaviour, 40: 3143.
Peterson M. (2006) Learner interaction management in an avatar and chat-based virtual world. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1): 79103.
Richards L. and Morse J. M. (2007) Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rost M. (2002) Teaching and researching listening. London, UK: Longman.
Sarandi H. (2010) Content related support and listening comprehension: Some limitations. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2: 56055611.
Schroeders U., Wilhelm O. and Bucholtz N. (2010) Reading, listening and viewing comprehension in English as a foreign language: One or more constructs? Intelligence, 38: 562573.
Schwarts D., Lin X. and Holmes J. (2003) Technologies for learning from intercultural reflections. Intercultural Education, 14(3): 291306.
Schwienhorst K. (2002) Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer-assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2): 196209.
Son J.-B. (2011) Online tools for language teaching. TESL-EJ, 15(1). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume15/ej57/ej57int/
Stevens V. (2006) Second Life in education and language learning. TESL-EJ, 10(3). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume10/ej39/ej39int/
Stockwell G. (2007) A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in CALL literature. ReCALL, 19(2): 105120.
Sykes. J. M. (2005) Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22: 399431.
Szedmina L. and Pinter R. (2010 Experiences from using Skype in language teaching. Paper presented at the IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Subotica, Serbia.
Taillefer L. and Munroz-Luna R. (2014) Developing oral skills through Skype: A language project analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Services, 141: 260264.
Tian J. and Wang Y. (2010) Taking language learning outside the classroom: Learners’ perspectives of eTandem learning via Skype. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3): 181197.
Turner P. (2005) Affordance as context. Interacting with Computers, 17(6): 787800.
Ur P. (2007) Teaching listening comprehension. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Vandergrift L. (2006) Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90(1): 618.
Warburton S. (2009) Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Education Technology, 40: 414426.
Warschauer M. and Grimes D. (2007) Audience, authorship, and artefact: The emergent semiotics of web 2.0. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27: 123.
Wehner K., Gump A. W. and Downey S. (2011) The effects of Second Life on the motivation of undergraduate students learning a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3): 277289.
Yanagawa K. and Green A. (2008) To show or not to show: The effects of item stems and answer options on performance on a multiple-choice listening comprehension test. System, 36(1): 107122.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 281 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 990 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th December 2016 - 25th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.