Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cho, Hyeyoung 2016. Task dependency effects of collaboration in learners’ corpus consultation: An exploratory case study. ReCALL, Vol. 28, Issue. 01, p. 44.


    Karras, Jacob Nolen 2016. The effects of data-driven learning upon vocabulary acquisition for secondary international school students in Vietnam. ReCALL, Vol. 28, Issue. 02, p. 166.


    Luo, Qinqin 2016. The effects of data-driven learning activities on EFL learners’ writing development. SpringerPlus, Vol. 5, Issue. 1,


    Mizumoto, Atsushi and Chujo, Kiyomi 2016. Who is data-driven learning for? Challenging the monolithic view of its relationship with learning styles. System, Vol. 61, p. 55.


    Benavides, Carlos 2015. Using a Corpus in a 300-Level Spanish Grammar Course. Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 218.


    Lin, Ming Huei 2015. Effects of Corpus-Aided Language Learning in the EFL Grammar Classroom: A Case Study of Students' Learning Attitudes and Teachers' Perceptions in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, p. n/a.


    Luo, Qinqin and Liao, Ying 2015. Using Corpora for Error Correction in EFL Learners’ Writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 6, Issue. 6, p. 1333.


    ×

The effects of paper-based DDL on the acquisition of lexico-grammatical patterns in L2 writing

  • Zeping Huang (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000020
  • Published online: 31 March 2014
Abstract
Abstract

This paper examines whether and to what extent data-driven learning (DDL) activities can improve the lexico-grammatical use of abstract nouns in L2 writing. A topic-based corpus was compiled to develop concordance learning activities, and 40 Chinese students majoring in English were randomly assigned to a control group or an experimental group. At the prewriting stage, both groups were given a list of five abstract nouns: the experimental group was provided with paper-based concordance lines to study the collocations of the words, while the control group was allowed to consult dictionaries for the usage of the words. The written texts of the pre-test, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test were analysed and compared between and within groups. The results showed that the written output by the experimental group, as compared with the control group, contained a higher variety of collocational and colligational patterns and had fewer linguistic errors in using the target abstract nouns. The post-experiment learning journals and questionnaires administered to the experimental group further confirmed that concordance activities encouraged usage-based learning, helped students notice the lexical collocations and prepositional colligations of the target words, and thus improved accuracy and complexity in their productive language. Despite these positive findings, potential problems of using concordance activities for independent learning were also reflected in the students’ written output and reported in the learning journals.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Bernardini (2002) Exploring new directions for discovery learning. In Kettemann, B. and Marko, G. (eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis. New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 165182.

A. Boulton (2010) Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3): 534572.

A. Chambers and Í. O’Sullivan (2004) Corpus consultation and advanced learners’ writing skills in French. ReCALL, 16(1): 158172.

T. Cobb (1997) Is there any measurable learning from hands on concordancing? System, 25(3): 301315.

A. Coxhead (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34: 213238.

A. Coxhead and P. Byrd (2007) Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16: 129147.

A. Cresswell (2007) Getting to ‘know’ connectors? Evaluating data-driven learning in a writing skills course. In Hidalgo, E., Quereda, L. and Santana, J. (eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 267287.

R. Ellis (1993) The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27: 91113.

L. Flowerdew (2009) Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy: A critical evaluation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3): 393417.

D. Gaskell and T. Cobb (2004) Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32(3): 301319.

K. Hyland (2003) Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D. Lee and J. Swales (2006) A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1): 5675.

I. Leki and J. Carson (1994) Students’ perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28: 81101.

Í. O’Sullivan and A. Chambers (2006) Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1): 4968.

P. Pérez-Paredes , M. Sánchez-Tornel and J. M. Alcaraz Calero (2012) Learners’ search patterns during corpus-based focus-on-form activities. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(4): 483516.

P. Pérez-Paredes , M. Sánchez-Tornel , J. M. Alcaraz Calero and P. Aguado Jiménez (2011) Tracking learners’ actual uses of corpora: Guided vs non-guided corpus consultation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3): 233253.

J. Read (2004) Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24: 146161.

J. Thurstun and C. Candlin (1998) Concordancing and the teaching of the vocabulary of academic English. English for Specific Purposes, 17(3): 267280.

C. Tribble (2001) Small corpora and teaching writing: Towards a corpus-informed pedagogy of writing. In Ghadessy, M., Henry, A. and Roseberry, R. (eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT: Theory and practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 381408.

C. Tribble (2009) Writing academic English: A survey review of current published resources. ELT Journal, 63(4): 400417.

Y. Tseng and H. Liou (2006) The effects of online conjunction materials on college EFL students’ writing. System, 34: 270283.

J. Weber (2001) A concordance-and genre-informed approach to ESP essay writing. ELT Journal, 55(1): 1420.

C. Yoon (2011) Concordancing in L2 writing class: An overview of research and issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10: 130139.

H. Yoon and A. Hirvela (2004) ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13: 257283.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

ReCALL
  • ISSN: 0958-3440
  • EISSN: 1474-0109
  • URL: /core/journals/recall
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: