¹ Milton, J., Tetrachordon. In Mijuskovic, B. L., Loneliness in Philosophy, Psychology and Literature (Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1979), p. 3.Google Scholar

² Johnson, J. W., ‘The Creation’. In Dusenbury, W., ed., The Theme of Loneliness in Modern American Drama (Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press, 1960), p. 1.Google Scholar

³ Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae (Turin: Marietti, 1952), 1, 30, 3, p. 162.Google Scholar

⁴ Feuerbach, L., The Essence of Christianity, trans. Eliot, G. (New York: Harper and Row, 1957).Google Scholar

⁵ Lavelle, L., Evil and Suffering, trans. Murchland, B. (New York: Macmillan, 1963).Google Scholar

⁶ Nietzsche, F., in Jaspers, K., Nietzsche, trans. Wallroff, C. and Schmitz, F. (Tucson, Arizona: The University of Arizona Press, 1965), p. 86.Google Scholar

⁷ Sartre, J.-P., Being and Nothingness, trans. Barnes, H. (New York: Philosophical Library, 1956).Google Scholar

⁸ Satre, J.-P., Le Diable et le Bon Dieu (Paris: Gallimard, 1951), p. 213Google Scholar. The translation from the original French and all bracketed words are mine. For the distinctions between homonomy and autonomy, see Angyal's, A. Foundations for a Science of Personality (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1958)Google Scholar. As used in this essay autonomy and homonomy can be positive or negative. Moreover, each correlates with the other positively or negatively.

⁹ Baudelaire, P. C., The Eyes of the Poor. In R. Sayre, Solitude in Society (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 74.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Eliot, T. S., The Cocktail Party (London: Faber and Faber, 1950), p. 117.Google Scholar

¹¹ Bulwer-Lytton, E., The New Timon, in Dusenbury, p. 8.Google Scholar

¹² Hesse, H., Im Nebel. In Cowburn, J., The Person and Love (New York: Alba House, 1967), p. 102.Google Scholar

¹³ Mijuskovic, pp. 1–38.

¹⁴ Nietzsche, F., Ecce Homo, trans. Kaufmann, W. (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1989), p. 343Google Scholar. Kaufmann translates the German ‘Einsamkeit’ as solitude, but this German word can, like its English counterpart ‘solitude’, mean either an objective, physical condition or loneliness, a subjective condition, or both. Neitzsche often uses ‘Einsamkeit’ to signify either or both conditions simultaneously. The distinctions needed to be drawn between these two phenomena would require another essay. However, generally speaking, ‘solitude’ is used to indicate in se a positive way of being alone, whereas loneliness is in se a negative way of being and feeling alone. Of course, solitude can be employed negatively and loneliness can serve as a vehicle for personality development.

¹⁵ Nietzsche, F., in Harper, R., The Seventh Solitude (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1967), p. 13.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Nietzsche, F., in The New Nietzsche, ed. Allison, D. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1988), p. xxvi.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Zakahi, W. R. and Duran, R. L., ‘Loneliness, Communicative Competence, and Communication Apprehension: Extension and Replication’, Communication Quarterly, XXXIII, 1 (1985), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁸ Jones, W. and Moore, T., ‘Loneliness and Social Support’. In Hojat, M. and Crandall, R., eds., Loneliness: Theory, Research and Implications (San Rafael, California: Select Press, 1978), pp. 145–6.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Perlman, D. and Peplau, L., ‘Loneliness Research: A Survey of Empirical Findings’. In Peplau, L. and Goldston, S., eds., Preventing the Harmful Consequences of Severe and Persistent Loneliness (Rockville, Maryland: The United States National Institute of Mental Health, 1984), p. 24.Google Scholar

²⁰ Nietzsche, F., Human, All Too Human. In Clive, G., ed., The Philosophy of Nietzsche (Toronto: The New American Library of Canada, Mentor Books, 1965), p. 108.Google Scholar

²¹ Fromm-Reichmann, F., ‘Loneliness’. In Hartog, J. et al. , eds., The Anatomy of Loneliness (New York: International Universities Press, 1980), pp. 338–9, 348–51.Google Scholar

²² Ibid. p. 345.

²³ Ibid. pp. 345–8.

²⁴ Ibid. p. 345.

²⁵ Klein, M., ‘On the Sense of Loneliness’. In Hartog et al., pp. 362–76.Google Scholar

²⁶ Guntrip, H., ‘Sigmund Freud and Bertrand Russell’, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, IX, 35 (1973), 275.Google Scholar

²⁷ F. Fromm-Reichmann, pp. 350– See also Sangster, J. and Ellison, C., ‘Mental Illness, Loneliness and Helplessness: A Challenge for Research Therapy’, Mental Health and Society, V, 5–6 (1978), 284–95.Google Scholar

²⁸ D. Perlman and L. Peplau, ‘The Causes of Loneliness’. In Peplau and Goldston, p. 24.

²⁹ Laing, R. D., The Politics of Experience (New York: Ballantine Books, 1967), p. 130.Google Scholar

³⁰ Lynch, H., The Broken Heart: The Medical Consequences of Loneliness in America (New York: Basic Books, 1976).Google Scholar

³¹ Searles, H., Collected Papers on Schizophrenia and Related Subjects (New York: International Universities Press, 1965), p. 123.Google Scholar

³² Laing, R. D., The Divided Self (London: Penguin Books, 1969), pp. 45–6.Google Scholar

³³ F. Nietzsche, in Jaspers, p. 56.

³⁴ Laing, R. D., The Politics of Experience, p. 37.Google Scholar

³⁵ Kierkegaard, S., The Sickness unto Death, trans. Lowrie, W. (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books, 1954), p. 186.Google Scholar

³⁶ Ibid. p. 173.

³⁷ Sartre, J.-P., The Flies. In No Exit and Three Other Plays, trans. Gilbert, S. (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1955), p. 123.Google Scholar

³⁸ Ibid. pp. 124–5.

³⁹ Ibid. pp. 121–2.

⁴⁰ Sartre, J.-P., Existentialism and Humanism, trans. Mairet, P. (New York: Haskell House, 1977), pp. 26–30.Google Scholar

⁴¹ F. Nietzsche, in Harper, p. 12.

⁴² Nietzsche, F., Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Kaufmann, W., The Portable Nietzsche (New York: Viking Press, 1965), pp. 176–7, 190.Google Scholar

⁴³ Ibid. p. 175.

⁴⁴ Nietzsche, F., Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Cowan, M. (South Bend, Indiana; Gateway Editions, 1955), p. 35.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Nietzsche, F., Thus Spoke Zarathustra, p. 176.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Nietzsche, F., Untimely Meditations, trans. Hollingdale, R. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 139.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Camus, A., Caligula, trans. Gilbert, S. (New York: Random House, Vintage Books, 1958), p. 68.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Ibid. p. 37.

⁴⁹ Luke 12: 49–55.

⁵⁰ John 15: 18–25.

⁵¹ Jaspers, K., Philosophy, v. 2, trans. Ashton, E. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970)Google Scholar. See especially pp. 71–3, 177–215.

⁵² May, R., Man's Search for Himself (New York: W. W. Norton, 1953), p. 31.Google Scholar

⁵³ Arnold, M., To Marguerite. In Dilman, I., Love and Human Separateness (New York: Blackwell, 1987), p. 117.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ John 6: 47.

⁵⁵ John 10: 30.

⁵⁶ Matthew 27: 46.

⁵⁷ The names for the last four forms of loneliness delineated in this presentation are taken from two pioneers in the study of the taxonomy of loneliness: Sadler, W. A., ‘On the Verge of Loneliness’, Humanitas, X, 3 (1974), 255–76Google Scholar and Weiss, R., Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1973)Google Scholar. I am particularly indebted to Sadler for his division. It might be preferable to replace the terms ‘emotional’ and ‘social’ loneliness with, respectively, ‘eros’ and ‘friendship’ loneliness since the latter two are the paradigms for these two types of loneliness. However, the basis and rationale for using the names employed for any of the ten forms of loneliness would require another essay.

⁵⁸ Paloutzian, R. F. and Ellison, C. W., ‘Loneliness, Spiritual Well-Being and the Quality of Life’. In Peplau, L. and Perlman, D., eds., Loneliness: A Source Book of Current Theory, Research and Therapy (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1982), pp. 224–37.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ W. Jones, ‘Loneliness and Social Behavior’. In Peplau and Perlman, p. 239.

⁶⁰ Luke 9: 58.

⁶¹ John 1: 10.

⁶² John 4: 44.

⁶³ Hammarskjold, D., Markings. In Burke, C., ed., Loneliness (Winona, Minnesota: St Mary's College Press, 1977), p. 3.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Millay, E. St Vincent, Conversation at Midnight. In May, p. 202.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Marquis, D. R. in Clark, E., ‘Aspects of Loneliness: Toward a Framework of Nursing Intervention’. In Zderad, L. T. and Belcher, H. C., eds., Developing Behavioral Concepts in Nursing (Atlanta: Southern Regional Educational Board, 1968), p. 37.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Russell, B. in Satran, G., ‘Notes on Loneliness’, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, VI, 3 (1978), 286.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ For all his denunciation of the Christian religion, Nietzsche, nonetheless, extols it as the ‘best bit of ideal life’ he has ever known and that in his heart he believes he has never been ‘vicious against it’. On this see Jaspers, , Nietzsche, p. 434.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Sartre, J.-P., in a 1977 interview reported in Harper's Magazine, February, 1984, p. 38.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Fromm, E., The Art of Loving (New York: Harper and Row, 1956), pp. 6–8.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ John 14: 15–26.

⁷¹ St John of the Cross, Spiritual Canticle I, in M. Simpson, ‘Loneliness and Solitude’, The Way, XIV, 1 (1974), 23.Google Scholar

⁷² Kant, I., Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime, trans. Goldthwait, J. (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965), pp. 46–50.Google Scholar