Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:17:33.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Augustinian faith rational?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2015

MARK BOESPFLUG
MARK BOESPFLUG*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Colorado at Boulder, 232 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0232, USA e-mail: mark.boespflug@colorado.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Augustinian conception of faith – according to which faith and belief precede knowledge and understanding – appears to entail an epistemic violation. For Augustine, faith is exercised when a testimonial report that P is believed on the basis of that report. This reconfigures the factors involved in assessing whether what is believed on faith is believed rationally. The specific goal of this article is, however, to determine whether believing specifically Christian testimony – and, thus, faith – is rational. Jonathan Adler identifies six forms of background evidence that constitute epistemic reasons for believing testimony. At least five of them appear to be fulfilled for Augustine in the case of believing Christian testimony. Thus, Augustinian faith is supported by epistemic reasons, and should be considered rational.

Type
Articles
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 63 - 79
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Jonathan (2012) ‘Epistemological problems of testimony’, in Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (URL=<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/testimony-episprob/>).Google Scholar
Audi, Robert (2001) The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, (1953) Augustine: Earlier Writings Vol. VI, Burleigh, John (tr.) (Philadelphia PA: Westminster).Google Scholar
Augustine, (1984) City of God, Bettenson, Henry (tr.) (New York: Penguin)Google Scholar
Augustine, (1991) Confessions, Chadwick, Henry (tr.) (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, (1993) On Free Choice of the Will, Williams, Thomas (tr.) (Indianapolis IN: Hackett Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Augustine, (2002) On the Trinity Books 8–15, McKenna, Stephen (tr.) (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Augustine, (2003) Letters 100–155, Teske, Roland (tr.) (Hyde Park NY: New City Press).Google Scholar
Brown, Peter (1969) Augustine of Hippo (Berkeley CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Cushman, Robert (1956) ‘Faith and reason’, in Battenhouse, Roy (ed.) A Companion to the Study of St. Augustine (New York: Oxford University Press), 287–314.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne (1960) The Christian Philosophy of Saint Augustine, Lynch, (tr.) (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Habermas, Gary (2001) ‘The late twentieth-century resurgence of naturalistic responses to Jesus’ resurrection’, Trinity Journal, 22, 179–196.Google Scholar
Hoitenga, Dewey (1991) Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga: An Introduction to Reformed Epistemology (Albany NY: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Hume, David (1961) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
King, Peter & Ballantyne, Nathan (2009) ‘Augustine on testimony’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9, 195–214.Google Scholar
Nash, Ronald (1969) The Light of the Mind: St. Augustine's Theory of Knowledge (Lexington KY: University of Kentucky Press).Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert (2000) ‘Plotting Augustine's Confessions’, Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture, 3, 77–106.Google Scholar
Twain, Mark (2010) A Tramp Abroad: Following the Equator (New York: Penguin).Google Scholar