Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ethics of belief and Christian faith as commitment to assumptions

  • RIK PEELS (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034412509990199
  • Published online: 01 November 2009
Abstract
Abstract

In this paper I evaluate Brian Zamulinski's recent attempt to rebut an argument to the conclusion that having any kind of religious faith violates a moral duty. I agree with Zamulinski that the argument is unsound, but I disagree on where it goes wrong. I criticize Zamulinski's alternative construal of Christian faith as existential commitment to fundamental assumptions. It does not follow that we should accept the moral argument against religious faith, for at least two reasons. First, Zamulinski's Cliffordian ethics of belief is defective in several regards. Second, the truth of doxastic involuntarism and the possibility of doxastic excuse conditions can be used to demonstrate that the argument is unconvincing.

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: rik.peels@phil.uu.nl
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Brian Zamulinski Christianity and the ethics of belief’, Religious Studies, 44 (2008), 333346.

Brian Zamulinski A defence of the ethics of belief’, Philo, 7 (2004), 7996

Joshua L. Golding Toward a pragmatist conception of religious faith’, Faith and Philosophy, 7 (1990), 486503

Dana M. Radcliffe Nondoxastic faith: Audi on religious commitment’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 37 (1995), 7386.

Brian Zamulinski Religion and the pursuit of truth’, Religious Studies, 39 (2003), 4360

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Religious Studies
  • ISSN: 0034-4125
  • EISSN: 1469-901X
  • URL: /core/journals/religious-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×