Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-569ts Total loading time: 0.424 Render date: 2022-10-05T08:58:04.879Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: Pesticide risk indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2007

Thomas J. Greitens*
Affiliation:
American Farmland Trust, Center for Agriculture in the Environment, 148 N. Third Street, Dekalb, IL 60115, USA.
Esther Day*
Affiliation:
135 Francisco Terrace, Oak Park, IL 60302, USA.

Abstract

This study examines whether pesticide risk indicators can be used to evaluate the environmental effects of pesticide applications within integrated pest management (IPM) projects. Pesticide risk indicators, commonly used in European countries, are mathematical equations that consider data inputs such as application rates, toxicity levels of a pesticide's active ingredient, meteorological data, the soil characteristics of farm fields, and other information to generate potential risk scores for pesticide applications. These potential risk scores represent the best estimate of a pesticide's impact on the surrounding environment. This project analyzed eight pesticide risk indicators, developed throughout Europe and the United States, with two years of pesticide application data from four farms using IPM. This two-year study allowed for a determination of the validity and reliability of pesticide risk indicators. The findings reveal that only three pesticide risk indicators performed consistently and gave valid results. These indicators are: the synoptic evaluation model for plant protection agents (SYNOPS) indicator from Germany, the multi-attribute toxicity factor from the United States, and the environmental impact quotient from the United States. As a result, the authors recommend these three indicators for future research and for IPM evaluative efforts that emphasize the environmental effects of pesticides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Potter, C. 1998. Against the Grain: Agri-environmental Reform in the United States and the European Union. CAB International, New York.Google Scholar
2 Cuperus, G., Mulder, P., and Royer, T. 2000. Implementation of ecologically-based IPM. In Rechcigl, J. and Recheigl, N. (eds). Insect Pest Management: Techniques for Environmental Protection. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. p. 171204.Google Scholar
3 Zalom, F. 2001. Pesticide use practices in integrated pest management. In Krieger, R. (ed.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. p. 275283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 General Accounting Office. 2001. Agricultural Pesticides: Management Improvements Needed to Further Promote Integrated Pest Management. Report No. GAO-01-815. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5 Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blumel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. 2002. Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 90:177187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139:18.Google Scholar
7 Swanson, M., Davis, G., Kincaid, L., Schultz, T., Bartmess, J., Jones, S., and George, E. 1997. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16:372383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Gutsche, V. and Rossberg, D. 1999. Synoptisches bewertungsmodell furpflanzenschutzmittel (SYNOPS). In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 236257.Google Scholar
9 Nilsson, C. 1999. PERI. In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 121124.Google Scholar
10 Pussemier, L. 1999. A system for predicting the environmental impact of pesticides in Belgium. In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 131138.Google Scholar
11 Reus, J. and Leendertse, P. 1999. The environmental yardstick for pesticides (field crops). In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 5968.Google Scholar
12 Trevisan, M., Errera, G., Capri, E., Padovani, L., and Del Re, A.A.M. 1999. Environmental potential risk indicator for pesticides. In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 141147.Google Scholar
13 Day, E. and Greitens, T. 2002. Environmental Indicators Results. Center for Agriculture in the Environment, Dekalb, IL.Google Scholar
14 Benbrook, C., Sexon, D., Wyman, J., Stevenson, W., Lynch, S., Wallendal, J., Diercks, S., Van Haren, R., and Granadino, C. 2002. Developing a pesticide risk assessment tool to monitor progress in reducing reliance on high-risk pesticides. American Journal of Potato Research 79:183199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Sorenson, A. 1994. Proceedings of the National Integrated Pest Management Forum. Center for Agriculture in the Environment, Dekalb, IL.Google Scholar
16 Lynch, S., Greene, C., and Kramer-LeBlanc, C. 1997. The Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop: broadening support for 21st century IPM. In Lynch, S., Greene, C., and Kramer-LeBlanc, C. (eds). Proceedings of the Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop. USDA–Economic Research Service (ERS) Miscellaneous Publication No. 1542. USDA–ERS, Washington, DC. p. 13.Google Scholar
17 Tomlin, C. 2000. The Pesticide Manual, 12th ed. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
18 Hatry, H. and Newcomer, K. 2004. Pitfalls of evaluation. In Wholey, J., Hatry, H., and Newcomer, K. (eds). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco, CA. p. 547570.Google Scholar
19 Chen, P. and Popovich, P. 2002. Correlation: Parametric and Nonparametric Measures. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Ruhl, J.B. 2000. Farms, their environmental harms, and environmental law. Ecology Law Quarterly 27:263349.Google Scholar
21 Falconer, K. 2002. Pesticide environmental indicators and environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Management 65:285300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: Pesticide risk indicators
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: Pesticide risk indicators
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: Pesticide risk indicators
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *