Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-xbgml Total loading time: 0.432 Render date: 2022-08-17T02:16:40.108Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The energy efficiency of organic agriculture: A review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

Laurence G. Smith
Affiliation:
The Organic Research Centre, Newbury, RG20 0HR, UK
Adrian G. Williams*
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK
Bruce. D. Pearce
Affiliation:
The Organic Research Centre, Newbury, RG20 0HR, UK
*
*Corresponding author: adrian.williams@cranfield.ac.uk

Abstract

Growing populations and a constrained fossil-manufactured energy supply present a major challenge for society and there is a real need to develop forms of agriculture that are less dependent on finite energy sources. It has been suggested that organic agriculture can provide a more energy efficient approach due to its focus on sustainable production methods. This review has investigated the extent to which this is true for a range of farming systems. Data from about 50 studies were reviewed with results suggesting that organic farming performs better than conventional for nearly all crop types when energy use is expressed on a unit of area basis. Results are more variable per unit of product due to the lower yield for most organic crops. For livestock, ruminant production systems tend to be more energy efficient under organic management due to the production of forage in grass–clover leys. Conversely, organic poultry tend to perform worse in terms of energy use as a result of higher feed conversion ratios and mortality rates compared to conventional fully housed or free-range systems. With regard to energy sources, there is some evidence that organic farms use more renewable energy and have less of an impact on natural ecosystems. Human energy requirements on organic farms are also higher as a result of greater system diversity and manual weed control. Overall this review has found that most organic farming systems are more energy efficient than their conventional counterparts, although there are some notable exceptions.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Smil, V. 2000. Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. p. 360.Google Scholar
2Hall, C. 1984. The role of energy in world agriculture and food availability. In Pimental, D. and Hall, C. (eds). Food and Energy Resources. Academic Press, London, p. 4360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Trevors, J. and Saier, M. 2010. The legacy of oil spills. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 211(1):13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4McIntyre, B., Herren, H., Wakhungu, J., and Watson, R. 2008. Agriculture at a Crossroads: Global Report. Island Press for International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science, and Technology for Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5IFOAM. 2002. Basic Standards for Organic Production and Processing Approved by the IFOAM General Assembly. IFOAM, Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
6Lampkin, N., Measures, M., and Padel, S. 2011. 2011/12 Organic Farm Management Handbook. The Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm.Google Scholar
7Kukreja, R. and Meredith, S. 2011. Resource Use Efficiency and Organic Farming: Facing up to the Challenge. IFOAM EU Group, Brussels.Google Scholar
8Lampkin, N. 2002. Organic Farming. Old Pond Publishing Ltd., Ipswich.Google Scholar
9Soil Association. 2008. Soil Association Organic Standards. Soil Association, Bristol.Google Scholar
10European Commission. 2008. Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008, Laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labeling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
11United States Department of Agriculture. 1990. Organic Foods Production Act. USDA, Beltsville, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
12Darnhofer, I., Lindenthal, T., Bartel-Kratochvil, R., and Zollitsch, W. 2010. Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: From structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30(1):6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Lynch, D., MacRae, R., and Martin, R. 2011. The carbon and global warming potential impacts of organic farming: Does it have a significant role in an energy constrained world? Sustainability 3(2):322362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Gomiero, T., Paoletti, M.G., and Pimentel, D. 2008. Energy and environmental issues in organic and conventional agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 27(4):239254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Lampkin, N. 2007. Organic farming's contribution to climate change and agricultural sustainability. In Welsh Producer Conference, Builth Wells.Google Scholar
16Van der Werf, H.M., Tzilivakis, J., Lewis, K., and Basset-Mens, C. 2007. Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118(1):327338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17De Vries, M. and De Boer, I. 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128(1):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Cherubini, F. and Strømman, A.H. 2011. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology 102(2):437451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Foresight. 2011. The Future of Food and Farming. The Government Office for Science, London.Google Scholar
20Jones, M.R. 1989. Analysis of the use of energy in agriculture—approaches and problems. Agricultural Systems 29(4):339355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Cobb, D., Feber, R., Hopkins, A., Stockdale, L., O'Riordan, T., Clements, B., Firbank, L., Goulding, K., Jarvis, S., and Macdonald, D. 1999. Integrating the environmental and economic consequences of converting to organic agriculture: Evidence from a case study. Land Use Policy 16(4):207221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Alföldi, T., Schmid, O., Gaillard, G., and Dubois, D. 1999. IP und Bio-Produktion: Ökobilanzierung über eine Fruchtfolge. Agrarforschung 6(9):337340.Google Scholar
23British Standards Institute. 1997. BS EN ISO14040:1997 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. British Standards Institute, London.Google Scholar
24Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., and Sandars, D.L. 2006. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205.Google Scholar
25Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Kleijn, R., van Zeijts, H., Reus, J.A.W.A., Meeusen-van Onna, M.J.G., Leneman, H., and Sengers, H.H.W.J.M. 1996. Application of LCA to Agricultural Products. Leiden University, Leiden.Google Scholar
26British Standards Institute. 2006. BS EN ISO14044:2006 Environmental Management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and Framework. British Standards Institute, London.Google Scholar
27Pelletier, N., Audsley, E., Brodt, S., Garnett, T., Henriksson, P., Kendall, A., Kramer, K.J., Murphy, D., Nemecek, T., and Troell, M. 2011. Energy intensity of agriculture and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36:7.17.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Odum, H. 1996. Environmental Accounting Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
29Bakshi, B.R. 2002. A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering 26(2):269282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Brown, M. and Herendeen, R. 1996. Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: A comparative view. Ecological Economics 19:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Pizzigallo, A.C.I., Granai, C., and Borsa, S. 2008. The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. Journal of Environmental Management 86(2):396406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Halberg, N., Verschuur, G., and Goodlass, G. 2005. Farm level environmental indicators; are they useful? An overview of green accounting systems for European farms. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 105(1–2):195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Cassman, K.G. and Liska, A.J. 2007. Food and fuel for all: Realistic or foolish? Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1(1):1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Woods, J., Williams, A., Hughes, J.K., Black, M., and Murphy, R. 2010. Energy and the food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1554):29913006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Hoeppner, J.W., Entz, M.H., McConkey, B.G., Zentner, R.P., and Nagy, C.N. 2006. Energy use and efficiency in two Canadian organic and conventional crop production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21(1):6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Cormack, W. and Metcalfe, P. 2000. Energy Use in Organic Farming Systems. In Defra Final Project Report, 2000. Defra, UK.Google Scholar
37Venkat, K. 2012. Comparison of twelve organic and conventional farming systems: A life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36(6):29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Cederberg, C. and Mattsson, B. 2000. Life cycle assessment of milk production—a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(1):4960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Jørgensen, U., Dalgaard, T., and Kristensen, E.S. 2005. Biomass energy in organic farming—the potential role of short rotation coppice. Biomass and Bioenergy 28(2):237248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Leake, A.R. 2000. Climate change, farming systems and soils. Aspects of Applied Biology 62:6.Google Scholar
41Robertson, G.P., Paul, E.A., and Harwood, R.R. 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: Contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289(5486):19221925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Zentner, R.P., Lafond, G.P., Derksen, D.A., Nagy, C.N., Wall, D.D., and May, W.E. 2004. Effects of tillage method and crop rotation on non-renewable energy use efficiency for a thin Black Chernozem in the Canadian Prairies. Soil and Tillage Research 77(2):125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Snyder, C. and Spaner, D. 2010. The sustainability of organic grain production on the Canadian Prairies—A review. Sustainability 2(4):10161034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Clements, D.R., Weise, S.F., Brown, R., Stonehouse, D.P., Hume, D.J., and Swanton, C.J. 1995. Energy analysis of tillage and herbicide inputs in alternative weed management systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 52(2–3):119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Berner, A., Hildermann, I., Fließbach, A., Pfiffner, L., Niggli, U., and Mäder, P. 2008. Crop yield and soil fertility response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil and Tillage Research 101(1–2):8996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Crowley, O., Döring, T., and Measures, M. 2012. Using reduced tillage to improve the efficiency of ecosystem service delivery on organic farms. In McCracken, K. (ed.). Agriculture and the Environment IX, Valuing Ecosystems: Policy, Economic and Management Interactions. Proceedings of the SAC and SEPA Biennial Conference. SAC, Auchincruive, Scotland. p. 169174.Google Scholar
47Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D.H. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211(4482):540547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Bailey, A.P., Basford, W.D., Penlington, N., Park, J.R., Keatinge, J.D.H., Rehman, T., Tranter, R.B., and Yates, C.M. 2003. A comparison of energy use in conventional and integrated arable farming systems in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 97(1–3):241253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Locke, M.A., Reddy, K.N., and Zablotowicz, R.M. 2002. Weed management in conservation crop production systems. Weed Biology and Management 2(3):123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Tuesca, D., Puricelli, E., and Papa, J. 2001. A long term study of weed flora shifts in different tillage systems. Weed Research 41(4):369382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Lal, R., Reicosky, D., and Hanson, J. 2007. Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming. Soil and Tillage Research 93(1):112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Refsgaard, K., Halberg, N., and Kristensen, E.S. 1998. Energy utilization in crop and dairy production in organic and conventional livestock production systems. Agricultural Systems 57(4):599630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Ziesmer, J. 2007. Energy Use in Organic Food Systems. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
54Lobley, M., Reed, M., Butler, A., Courtney, P., and Warren, M. 2005. The Impact of Organic Farming on the Rural Economy in England. 2005, University of Exeter Centre for Rural Research.Google Scholar
55El-Hage Scialabba, N. and Hattam, C. 2002. Organic Agriculture, Environment and Food Security. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
56Pimentel, D., Berardi, G., and Fast, S. 1983. Energy efficiency of farming systems: Organic and conventional agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 9(4):359372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Nguyen, M.L. and Haynes, R.J. 1995. Energy and labor efficiency for 3 pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping (pasture arable) farms in Canterbury, New-Zealand. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 52(2–3):163172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Karlen, D., Duffy, M., and Colvin, T. 1995. Nutrient, labor, energy and economic evaluations of two farming systems in Iowa. Journal of Production Agriculture 8(4):9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Loake, C. 2001. Energy accounting and well-being— examining UK organic and conventional farming systems through a human energy perspective. Agricultural Systems 70(1):275294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60Dawson, C.J. and Hilton, J. 2011. Fertiliser availability in a resource-limited world: Production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food Policy 36(Suppl. 1):S14S22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Leifeld, J. and Fuhrer, J. 2010. Organic farming and soil carbon sequestration: What do we really know about the benefits? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment (39):14.Google ScholarPubMed
62Watson, C.A., Atkinson, D., Gosling, P., Jackson, L.R., and Rayns, F.W. 2002. Managing soil fertility in organic farming systems. Soil Use and Management 18:239247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Trewavas, A. 2004. A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture. Crop Protection 23(9):757781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Bolland, M., Gilkes, R., and Antuono, M. 1988. The effectiveness of rock phosphate fertilisers in Australian agriculture: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28(5):655668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65Agyin-Birikorang, S., Abekoe, M.K., and Oladeji, O.O. 2007. Enhancing the agronomic effectiveness of natural phosphate rock with poultry manure: A way forward to sustainable crop production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 79(2):113123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Evans, J., McDonald, L., and Price, A. 2006. Application of reactive phosphate rock and sulphur fertilisers to enhance the availability of soil phosphate in organic farming. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 75(1):233246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67Randhawa, P.S., Condron, L.M., Di, H.J., Sinaj, S., and McLenaghen, R.D. 2006. Phosphorus availability in soils amended with different phosphate fertilizers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37(1–2):2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68Pelletier, N., Arsenault, N., and Tyedmers, P. 2008. Scenario modeling potential eco-efficiency gains from a transition to organic agriculture: Life cycle perspectives on Canadian canola, corn, soy, and wheat production. Environmental Management 42(6):9891001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Alonso, A.M. and Guzman, G.J. 2010. Comparison of the efficiency and use of energy in organic and conventional farming in Spanish agricultural systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34(3):312338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70Rigby, D. and Cáceres, D. 2001. Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems 68(1):2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71El-Hage Scialabba, N., and Müller-Lindenlauf, M. 2010. Organic agriculture and climate change. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25(2):11.Google Scholar
72Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Rosales, M., and de Haan, C. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
73Shepherd, M., Pearce, B., Cormack, B., Philipps, L., Cuttle, S., Bhogal, A., Costigan, P., and Unwin, R. 2003. An assessment of the environmental impacts of organic farming. A review for Defra-funded Project OF0405, Defra.Google Scholar
74Tuomisto, H.L., Hodge, I.D., Riordan, P., and Macdonald, D.W. 2012. Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? A meta-analysis of European research. Journal of Environmental Management 112:309320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75Schader, C. 2009. Cost effectiveness of organic farming for achieving environmental policy targets in Switzerland. PhD thesis, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
76Haas, G., Wetterich, F., and Köpke, U. 2001. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83(1–2):4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77Thomassen, M.A., van Calker, K.J., Smits, M.C.J., Iepema, G.L., and de Boer, I.J.M. 2008. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agricultural Systems 96(1–3):95107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78Dalgaard, T., Halberg, N., and Porter, J.R. 2001. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 87(1):5165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79Castellini, C., Berri, C., Le Bihan-Duval, E., and Martino, G. 2008. Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and free-range poultry meat. World's Poultry Science Journal 64(04):500512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80Leinonen, I., Williams, A.G., Wiseman, J., Guy, J., and Kyriazakis, I. 2012. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: Broiler production systems. Poultry Science 91(1):825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81Leinonen, I., Williams, A.G., Wiseman, J., Guy, J., and Kyriazakis, I. 2012. Predicting the environmental impacts of chicken systems in the United Kingdom through a life cycle assessment: Egg production systems. Poultry Science 91(1):2640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82Basset-Mens, C. and van der Werf, H.M.G. 2005. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: The case of pig production in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105(1–2):127144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83van der Werf, H.M.G., Tzilivakis, J., Lewis, K., and Basset-Mens, C. 2007. Environmental impacts of farm scenarios according to five assessment methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118(1–4):327338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84Helander, C.A. and Delin, K. 2004. Evaluation of farming systems according to valuation indices developed within a European network on integrated and ecological arable farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy 21(1):5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
85Guzmán, G.I. and Alonso, A.M. 2008. A comparison of energy use in conventional and organic olive oil production in Spain. Agricultural Systems 98(3):167176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86Nguyen, M.L., Haynes, R.J., and Goh, K.M. 1995. Nutrient budgets and status in three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 52(2–3):149162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87Castellini, C., Bastianoni, S., Granai, C., Bosco, A.D., and Brunetti, M. 2006. Sustainability of poultry production using the emergy approach: Comparison of conventional and organic rearing systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114(2–4):343350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88La Rosa, A.D., Siracusa, G., and Cavallaro, R. 2008. Emergy evaluation of Sicilian red orange production. A comparison between organic and conventional farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(17):19071914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89Coppola, F., Haugaard-Nielsen, H., Bastianoni, S., and Østergård, H. 2008. Sustainability assessment of wheat production using Emergy. In Neuhoff, D., Halberg, H., Alföldi, T., Lockeretz, W., Thommen, A., Rasmussen, I., Hermansen, J., Vaarst, M., Lueck, L., Caporali, F., Jensen, H., Migliorini, P., and Willer, H., (eds). The Second Scientific Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR). ISOFAR, University of Bonn.Google Scholar
90Ghaley, B.B. and Porter, J.R. 2013. Emergy synthesis of a combined food and energy production system compared to a conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum) production system. Ecological Indicators 24:534542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91Hau, J.L. and Bakshi, B.R. 2004. Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecological Modelling 178(1–2):215225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
92Deike, S., Pallutt, B., and Christen, O. 2008. Investigations on the energy efficiency of organic and integrated farming with specific emphasis on pesticide use intensity. European Journal of Agronomy 28(3):461470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
93Reganold, J.P., Glover, J.D., Andrews, P.K., and Hinman, H.R. 2001. Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410(6831): 926930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
94Li, L., Lu, H., Campbell, D.E., and Ren, H. 2011. Methods for estimating the uncertainty in emergy table-form models. Ecological Modelling 222(15):26152622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95Hülsbergen, K.J., Feil, B., Biermann, S., Rathke, G.W., Kalk, W.D., and Diepenbrock, W. 2001. A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 86(3):303321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
96Topp, C.F.E., Stockdale, E.A., Watson, C.A., and Rees, R.M. 2007. Estimating resource use efficiencies in organic agriculture: A review of budgeting approaches used. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 87(15):27822790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
97Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485(7397):229232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98Williams, A., Audsley, E., and Sandars, D. 2010. Environmental burdens of producing bread wheat, oilseed rape and potatoes in England and Wales using simulation and system modelling. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15:13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99Küstermann, B., Kainz, M., and Hülsbergen, K.J. 2008. Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23(01):3852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100Coppola, F., Bastianoni, S., and Østergård, H. 2009. Sustainability of bioethanol production from wheat with recycled residues as evaluated by Emergy assessment. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(11):16261642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101Nemecek, T., Charles, R., Alföldi, T., Klaus, G., and Tschamper, D. 2005. Ökobilanzierung von Anbausystemen im schweizerischen Acker-und Futterbau, Agroscope FAL Reckenholz.Google Scholar
102Borin, M., Menini, C., and Sartori, L. 1997. Effects of tillage systems on energy and carbon balance in north-eastern Italy. Soil and Tillage Research 40(3–4):209226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103Pretty, J. 1998. The Living Land. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
104Connor, D. 2008. Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Research 106:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
105Powlson, D.S., Whitmore, A.P., and Goulding, K.W.T. 2011. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: A critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science 62(1):4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
106Lotter, D.W., Seidel, R., and Liebhardt, W. 2003. The performance of organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(03):146154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
107Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T.L., and Rickerl, D.H. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10(01):2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
108Godfray, H., Beddington, J., Crute, I., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S., and Toulmin, C. 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
109Crews, T. and Peoples, M. 2004. Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: Ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 102:279297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
110Piesse, J. and Thirtle, C. 2009. Three bubbles and a panic: An explanatory review of recent food commodity price events. Food Policy 34(2):119129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
111Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, 2005. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
112Tilman, D. 1999. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(11):59956000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
113Tuomisto, H.L., Hodge, I.D., Riordan, P., and Macdonald, D.W. 2012. Comparing energy balances, greenhouse gas balances and biodiversity impacts of contrasting farming systems with alternative land uses. Agricultural Systems 108:4249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
114Myers, R.J.K., van Noordwijk, M., and Vityakon, P. 1997. Synchrony of nutrient release and plant demand: plant litter quality, soil environment and farmer management options. In Cadisch, G. and Giller, K.E. (eds). Driven by Nature. CAB International, Wallingford. p. 215229.Google Scholar
115Cassman, K.G., Dobermann, A., and Walters, D.T. 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31(2):132140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
116Kumm, K. 2002. Sustainability of organic meat production under Swedish conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 88(1):95101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
117Bos, J., de Haan, J., Sukkel, W., and Schils, R. 2007. Comparing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional farming systems in the Netherlands. In Niggli, U., Leifert, C., Alfödi, T., Lück, L., and Willer, H. (eds). Proceedings of the Third QLIF Congress: Improving Sustainability in Organic and Low Input Food Production Systems. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Frick, Switzerland. p. 439442.Google Scholar
118Flessa, H., Ruser, R., Dörsch, P., Kamp, T., Jimenez, M.A., Munch, J.C., and Beese, F. 2002. Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91(1–3):175189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
119Geier, U., Frieben, B., Gutsche, V., and Köpke, U. 2000. Ökobilanz integrierter und ökologischer Apfelerzeugung in Hamburg. In Boos, M. (ed.). Internationaler Erfahrungsaustausch über Forschungsergebnisse zum Ökologischen Obstbau. Föko, Weinsberg, Germany. p. 130134.Google Scholar
120Grönroos, J., Seppälä, J., Voutilainen, P., Seuri, P., and Koikkalainen, K. 2006. Energy use in conventional and organic milk and rye bread production in Finland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117(2–3):109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
121Gündoğmuş, E., and Bayramoglu, Z. 2006. Energy input use on organic farming: A comparative analysis on organic versus conventional farms in Turkey. Journal of Agronomy 5(1):1622.Google Scholar
122Hoeppner, J.W., Entz, M.H., McConkey, B.G., Zentner, R.P., and Nagy, C.N. 2006. Energy use and efficiency in two Canadian organic and conventional crop production systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21(1):6067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
123Kaltsas, A.M., Mamolos, A.P., Tsatsarelis, C.A., Nanos, G.D., and Kalburtji, K.L. 2007. Energy budget in organic and conventional olive groves. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 122(2):243251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
124Kavargiris, S.E., Mamolos, A.P., Tsatsarelis, C.A., Nikolaidou, A.E., and Kalburtji, K.L. 2009. Energy resources’ utilization in organic and conventional vineyards: Energy flow, greenhouse gas emissions and biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(9):12391250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
125Klimeková, M. and Lehocká, Z. 2007. Comparison of organic and conventional farming system in term of energy efficiency. In Zikeli, S., Claupein, W., Dabbert, S., Kaufmann, B., Müller, T., and Zárate, A. Valle (eds). Zwischen Tradition und Globalisierung 9. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin. p. 883886.Google Scholar
126Küstermann, B., Kainz, M., and Hülsbergen, K.J. 2008. Modeling carbon cycles and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional farming systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23(1):3852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
127Mäder, P., Fließbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., and Niggli, U. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296(5573):16941697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
128Meisterling, K., Samaras, C., and Schweizer, V. 2009. Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(2):222230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
129Peters, G.M., Rowley, H.V., Wiedemann, S., Tucker, R., Short, M.D., and Schulz, M. 2010. Red meat production in Australia: Life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environmental Science and Technology 44(4):13271332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
130Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D., and Seidel, R. 2005. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55(7):573582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
131Wood, R., Lenzen, M., Dey, C., and Lundie, S. 2006. A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia. Agricultural Systems 89(2–3):324348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The energy efficiency of organic agriculture: A review
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The energy efficiency of organic agriculture: A review
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The energy efficiency of organic agriculture: A review
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *