Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-2p87r Total loading time: 0.221 Render date: 2021-10-18T16:35:26.720Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Reversion from organic to conventional agriculture: A review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2012

Henriette Sahm*
Affiliation:
Universität Kassel, Fachgebiet Agrar- und Lebensmittelmarketing, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany.
Jürn Sanders
Affiliation:
Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.
Hiltrud Nieberg
Affiliation:
Institut für Betriebswirtschaft, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany.
Gesine Behrens
Affiliation:
Land und Markt, Heckscherstraße 28, 20253 Hamburg, Germany.
Heike Kuhnert
Affiliation:
Land und Markt, Heckscherstraße 28, 20253 Hamburg, Germany.
Renate Strohm
Affiliation:
RS Landkonzept, Dorfstr. 25, Zempow, Germany.
Ulrich Hamm
Affiliation:
Universität Kassel, Fachgebiet Agrar- und Lebensmittelmarketing, Steinstraße 19, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany.
*
*Corresponding author: h.sahm@uni-kassel.de

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, the organic sector has expanded continuously in Europe due to policy support and a growing market demand for organic products. In line with this development, many farmers converted to organic farming each year. Nevertheless, the total number of organic farms has not increased constantly in Europe. In several countries, the absolute number of organic farms actually decreased in some years of the past decade. Some of the deregistered farmers gave up completely; others reverted to conventional agriculture. Against this background, this article aims (i) to give an overview of the extent of reversion to conventional agriculture in Europe based on statistics, (ii) to conceptualize the decision to revert in the form of a theoretical model, (iii) to compare farmers’ reasons to revert to conventional farming based on existing studies, and (iv) to identify further research needs. The importance of reversions to conventional agriculture is difficult to determine with the existing data, especially as in most cases it is not recorded as to what happened to the farms after deregistering from organic certification. The data nevertheless show that there are large fluctuations in the organic sector with many farmers entering and exiting each year. In order to reveal the farmers’ reasons for deregistering, various qualitative as well as quantitative surveys have been carried out already. For most farmers, the decision to revert is a result of different factors. Reasons for the reversion of their farms can be classified into economic motives, difficulties regarding certification and control, problems with organic production techniques as well as the farms’ macro environment. In most cases, however, economic reasons played a main role. Suggestions for organic legislation bodies, advisory services and policy makers are derived out of the findings. A deeper understanding of the influencing aspects regarding reversions and the necessary changes in the organic sector to avoid them should be an important objective of forthcoming research.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Willer, H. and Kilcher, L. (eds) 2011. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistic and Emerging Trends 2011. IFOAM, Bonn FiBL, Frick.Google Scholar
2Eurostat 2011. Organic Farming Statistics. Number of Certified Registered Organic Operators [food_act2].Google Scholar
3Hamm, U., Poehls, A., and Schmidt, J. 1996. Analyse der Beratung von ökologisch wirtschaftenden Landwirten in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung aller Öko-Betriebe und Schlußfolgerungen für die Verbesserung des Beratungsangebotes. Schriftenreihe der Fachhochschule Neubrandenburg Reihe A, Neubrandenburg.Google Scholar
4Risgaard, M.-L., Langer, V., and Frederiksen, P. 2006. Organic Farming – Structure, Production and Nature Management. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, KVL; National Environmental Research Institute, DMU.Google Scholar
5Kirner, L. and Schneeberger, W. 2000. Österreich: Wie kann der biologische Landbau gesichert und ausgeweitet werden? Ökologie and Landbau 28:3033.Google Scholar
6Kirner, L., Vogel, S., and Schneeberger, W. 2005. Ausstiegsabsichten und tatsächliche Ausstiegsgründe von Biobauern und Biobäuerinnen in Österreich - Analyse von Befragungsergebnissen. In: Ende der Nische: Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. University Press, Kassel.Google Scholar
7Darnhofer, I., Eder, M., Schmid, J., and Schneeberger, W. 2005. Ausstieg aus der ÖPUL-Maßnahme biologische Wirtschaftsweise. In: Ende der Nische: Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. University Press, Kassel, p. 467470.Google Scholar
8Kaltoft, P. and Risgaard, M.-L. 2006. Has organic farming modernized itself out of business? Reverting to conventional methods in Denmark. In Holt, G.C. (ed.). Sociological Perspectives of Organic Agriculture. CABI, Wallingford, p. 126141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Läpple, D. 2010. Adoption and abandonment of organic farming: An empirical investigation of the Irish drystock sector. Journal of Agricultural Economics 61:697714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Flaten, O., Lien, G., Koesling, M., and Løes, A.-K. 2010. Norwegian farmers ceasing certified organic production: Characteristics and reasons. Journal of Environmental Management 91:27172726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Reissig, L., Ferjani, A., and Zimmermann, A. 2009. Ausstieg aus dem Biolandbau - steigende Tendenz in der Schweiz. AGRARForschung 16:124128.Google Scholar
12Rigby, D. and Young, T. 2000. Why Do Some Agricultural Producers Abandon Organic Production Systems? An Exploration of UK Data. Discussion Paper 0015. Centre for Agriculture Food and Resource Economics, School of Economic Studies, Victoria University, Manchester.Google Scholar
13Klonsky, K. and Smith, M.D. 2002. Entry and exit inCalifornia's organic farming sector. In Hall, D.C. and Moffitt, L.J. (eds). Economics of Pesticides, Sustainable Food Production, and Organic Food Markets. JAI, Amsterdam, p. 139165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Sierra, L., Klonsky, K., Strochlic, R., Brodt, S., and Molinar, R. 2008. Factors Associated with Deregistration among Organic Farmers in California. California Institute for Rural Studies.Google Scholar
15Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Théoret, A. 1976. The structure of unstructured decision processes. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 21:79104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Padel, S. 2001. Conversion to organic farming: A typical example of the diffusion of an innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 40:4061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Cranfield, J., Henson, S., and Holliday, J. 2010. The motives, benefits, and problems of conversion to organic production. Agriculture and Human Values 27:291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Mzoughi, N. 2011. Farmers adoption of integrated crop protection and organic farming: Do moral and social concerns matter? Ecological Economics 70:15361545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Koesling, M., Flaten, O., and Lien, G. 2008. Factors influencing the conversion to organic farming in Norway. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 7:78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Best, H. 2010. Environmental concern and the adoption of organic agriculture. Society and Natural Resources 23:451468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Dabbert, S., Häring, A.M., and Zanoli, R. 2004. Organic Farming. Policies and Prospects. Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
22Flaten, O., Lien, G., Ebbesvik, M., Koesling, M., and Valle, P.S. 2006. Do the new organic producers differ from the ‘old guard’? Empirical results from Norwegian dairy farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21:174182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Zander, K., Nieberg, H., and Offermann, F. 2008. Financial relevance of organic farming payments for Western and Eastern European organic farms. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 23:5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Daugbjerg, C., Tranter, R., Hattam, C., and Holloway, G. 2011. Modelling the impacts of policy on entry into organic farming: Evidence from Danish–UK comparisons, 1989–2007. Land Use Policy 28:413422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25De Cock, L. 2005. Determinants of organic farming conversion. In Proceedings of the XIth EAAE Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists. The Future of Rural Europe in the Global Agri-Food System, August 24–27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
26Mann, S. and Gairing, M. 2011. ‘Loyals’ and ‘Optimizers’: Shedding light on the decision for or against organic agriculture among Swiss farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. Available at Web site http://www.springerlink.com/content/c315246047412hp0/fulltext.pdf (accessed April 17, 2012).Google Scholar
27Schneeberger, W., Schachner, M., and Kirner, L. 2002. Gründe für die Aufgabe der biologischen Wirtschaftsweise in Österreich. Die Bodenkultur 53:127132.Google Scholar
28Kirner, L., Vogel, S., and Schneeberger, W. 2006. Intended and actual behavior of organic farmers in Austria after a five-year commitment period. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21:95105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Schermer, M. 2001. Gründe für den Bio-Ausstieg in Tirol. In: Von Leit-Bildern zu Leit-Linien: Beiträge zur 6. Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau. Köster, Berlin, p. 8790.Google Scholar
30Schermer, M. 2005. Die Motivation von Bauern zur Teilnahme an der ÖPUL - Maßnahme ‘biologischer Landbau’ am Beispiel Tirols. In: Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie: Beiträge der 10. ÖGA-Jahrestagung zum Thema ‘Agrarökonomie zwischen Vision und Realität’. Facultas, Wien, p. 7785.Google Scholar
31Schmid, J. 2005. Der Ausstieg aus dem Biolandbau in Österreich. Ergebnisse einer Befragung. Diplomarbeit. Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.Google Scholar
32Kaltoft, P. and Risgaard, M.-L. 2004. Notat til Det Økologiske Fødevareråd om økologiske landmænds tilbagelægning til konventionelt landbrug. Not published.Google Scholar
33Risgaard, M.-L., Kaltoft, P., and Frederiksen, P. 2005. Drivkræfter bag landmænds til- og fravalg af den økologiske driftsform. Available at Web site http://www.foejo.dk/enyt2/enyt/dec05/landmand.html (accessed April 17, 2012).Google Scholar
34Ploomi, A., Luik, A., and Kurg, A. 2006. Why do organic farmers quit in Estonia? Joint Organic Congress. Odense, Denmark, May 30, 2006.Google Scholar
35Gambelli, D. and Bruschi, V. 2010. A Bayesian network to predict the probability of organic farms’ exit from the sector: A case study from Marche, Italy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 71:2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Lien, G., Flaten, O., Koesling, M., and Løes, A.-K. 2008. Utmelding av norske øko-bønder - hva er årsakene? Resultater fra en spørreundersøkelse høsten 2007. Diskusjonsnotat Nr. 2008-1: NILF.Google Scholar
37Koesling, M., Loes, A.-K., Flaten, O., and Lien, G. 2008. Dropping organic certification—effects on organic farming in Norway. In Cultivating the Future Based on Science: Proceedings of the Second Scientific Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research (ISOFAR) held at the 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress, ISOFAR, Bonn, p. 378381.Google Scholar
38Koesling, M., Løes, A.-K., Flaten, O., and Lien, G. 2008. Structural changes in organic farming in Norway, and farmers’ reasons for opting out. In 1st Scientific Conference within the framework of the 8th European Summer Academy on Organic Farming, Lednice na Moravě, Czech Republic, September 3, 2008.Google Scholar
39Løes, A.-K., Koesling, M., Flaten, O., and Lien, G. 2008. Dropping Organic Certification—Effects on Organic Farming in Norway, Modena, Italy, June 16, 2008.Google Scholar
40Koesling, M. and Løes, A.-K. 2009. Ausstieg aus der zertifiziert ökologischen Landwirtschaft in Norwegen - Motivation und anschließende Wirtschaftsweise. In: Werte - Wege - Wirkungen: Biolandbau im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ernährungssicherung, Markt und Klimawandel: Beiträge zur 10. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Köster, Berlin.Google Scholar
41Løes, A.-K., Flaten, O., Lien, G., and Koesling, M. 2009. Noen økobønder slutter - hva er årsakene? [Some organic farmers opt out, what are the reasons?]. In Bioforsk-konferansen 2009. Mat, vann og klima, p. 253254.Google Scholar
42Reissig, L., Ferjani, A., and Mann, S. 2009. Bio-Landbau Schweiz – wer sind die Aussteiger, wer die Einsteiger? 32. Informationstagung Agrarökonomie, Ettenhausen, Switzerland, September 17, 2009.Google Scholar
43Ferjani, A., Reissig, L., and Flury, C. 2010. Warum steigen Bergbetriebe aus dem biologischen Landbau aus? Poster 5. Bioforschungstagung: Aktuelles zum Biorind, Posieux, Switzerland, April 22, 2010.Google Scholar
44Ferjani, A., Reissig, L., and Mann, S. 2010. Biolandbau in der Schweiz - wer steigt aus, wer steigt ein? Agrarforschung Schweiz 1:142147.Google Scholar
45Ferjani, A., Reissig, L., and Mann, S. 2010. Ein- und Ausstieg im Biolandbau. ART, Ettenhausen, ART-Schriftenreihe 13. Available at Web site http://www.gbv.de/dms/zbw/638848873.pdf (accessed April 17, 2012).Google Scholar
46Rigby, D., Young, T., and Burton, M. 2001. The development of and prospects for organic farming in the UK. Food Policy 26:599613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Harris, F., Robinson, G.M., and Griffiths, I. 2008. A study of the motivations and influences on farmers’ decisions to leave the organic farming sector in the United Kingdom. In Robinson, G.M. (ed.). Sustainable Rural Systems. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire, p. 99111.Google Scholar
48Strochlic, R. and Sierra, L. 2007. Conventional, Mixed and ‘Deregistered’ Organic Farmers: Entry Barriers and Reasons for Exiting Organic Production in California. California Institute for Rural Studies.Google Scholar
49Sierra, L., Klonsky, K., Strochlic, R., Brodt, S., and Molinar, R. 2008. Factors Associated with Deregistration Among Organic Farmers in California. Submitted to University of California SAREP.Google Scholar
50Koesling, M. and Løes, A.-K. 2009. Comparing Reasons for Opting Out in Austria, Denmark, Estonia and Norway. Presentation, Tartu, Estonia, August 25, 2009.Google Scholar
51Lampkin, N., Foster, C., and Padel, S. 1999. The Policy and Regulatory Environment for Organic Farming in Europe: Country Reports. Institut für Landwirtschaftl, Stuttgart (Hohenheim), Betriebslehre. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy 2.Google Scholar
52Padel, S. and Michelsen, J. 2001. Institutionelle Rahmenbedingungen der Ausdehnung des ökologischen Landbaus - Erfahrungen aus drei europäischen Ländern. Agrarwirtschaft 50:395399.Google Scholar
53Nieberg, H. and Kuhnert, H. 2006. Förderung des ökologischen Landbaus in Deutschland. Stand, Entwicklung und internationale Perspektive. FAL, Braunschweig, Landbauforschung Völkenrode Sonderheft 295.Google Scholar
54Schwarz, G., Nieberg, H., and Sanders, J. 2010. Organic farming support payments in the EU. Braunschweig: vTI. Landbauforschung Völkenrode Sonderheft 339.Google Scholar
55Gerrard, C.L. and Padel, S. 2011. Production costs across the EU in 2006. Organic Research Centre Bulletin 104:1213.Google Scholar
56Padel, S. (ed.) 2010. The European Regulatory Framework and its Implementation in Influencing Organic Inspection and Certification Systems in the EU. Deliverable 11. Organic Research Centre - Elm Farm, Newbury.Google Scholar
57Sanders, J., Offermann, F., and Nieberg, H. 2011. Wirtschaftlichkeit des ökologischen Landbaus in Deutschland unter veränderten agrarpolitischen Rahmenbedingungen. Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
58Midmore, P., Padel, S., McCalman, H., Isherwood, J., Fowler, S., and Lampkin, N. 2001. Attitudes towards conversion to organic production systems: A study of farmers in England. Institute of Rural Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
29
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Reversion from organic to conventional agriculture: A review
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Reversion from organic to conventional agriculture: A review
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Reversion from organic to conventional agriculture: A review
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *