Skip to main content
×
×
Home

An alternative way to evaluate the environmental effects of integrated pest management: Pesticide risk indicators

  • Thomas J. Greitens (a1) and Esther Day (a2)
Abstract

This study examines whether pesticide risk indicators can be used to evaluate the environmental effects of pesticide applications within integrated pest management (IPM) projects. Pesticide risk indicators, commonly used in European countries, are mathematical equations that consider data inputs such as application rates, toxicity levels of a pesticide's active ingredient, meteorological data, the soil characteristics of farm fields, and other information to generate potential risk scores for pesticide applications. These potential risk scores represent the best estimate of a pesticide's impact on the surrounding environment. This project analyzed eight pesticide risk indicators, developed throughout Europe and the United States, with two years of pesticide application data from four farms using IPM. This two-year study allowed for a determination of the validity and reliability of pesticide risk indicators. The findings reveal that only three pesticide risk indicators performed consistently and gave valid results. These indicators are: the synoptic evaluation model for plant protection agents (SYNOPS) indicator from Germany, the multi-attribute toxicity factor from the United States, and the environmental impact quotient from the United States. As a result, the authors recommend these three indicators for future research and for IPM evaluative efforts that emphasize the environmental effects of pesticides.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: thomas.greitens@gmail.com or fripp_1@ameritech.net
References
Hide All
1 Potter, C. 1998. Against the Grain: Agri-environmental Reform in the United States and the European Union. CAB International, New York.
2 Cuperus, G., Mulder, P., and Royer, T. 2000. Implementation of ecologically-based IPM. In Rechcigl, J. and Recheigl, N. (eds). Insect Pest Management: Techniques for Environmental Protection. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. p. 171204.
3 Zalom, F. 2001. Pesticide use practices in integrated pest management. In Krieger, R. (ed.). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. p. 275283.
4 General Accounting Office. 2001. Agricultural Pesticides: Management Improvements Needed to Further Promote Integrated Pest Management. Report No. GAO-01-815. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC.
5 Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blumel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. 2002. Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 90:177187.
6 Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139:18.
7 Swanson, M., Davis, G., Kincaid, L., Schultz, T., Bartmess, J., Jones, S., and George, E. 1997. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 16:372383.
8 Gutsche, V. and Rossberg, D. 1999. Synoptisches bewertungsmodell furpflanzenschutzmittel (SYNOPS). In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 236257.
9 Nilsson, C. 1999. PERI. In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 121124.
10 Pussemier, L. 1999. A system for predicting the environmental impact of pesticides in Belgium. In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 131138.
11 Reus, J. and Leendertse, P. 1999. The environmental yardstick for pesticides (field crops). In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 5968.
12 Trevisan, M., Errera, G., Capri, E., Padovani, L., and Del Re, A.A.M. 1999. Environmental potential risk indicator for pesticides. In Reus, J., Leendertse, P., Bockstaller, C., Fomsgaard, I., Gutsche, V., Lewis, K., Nilsson, C., Pussemier, L., Trevisan, M., van der Werf, H., Alfarroba, F., Blümel, S., Isart, J., McGrath, D., and Seppala, T. (eds). Comparing Environmental Risk Indicators for Pesticides: Results of the European CAPER Project. Centre for Agriculture and the Environment, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p. 141147.
13 Day, E. and Greitens, T. 2002. Environmental Indicators Results. Center for Agriculture in the Environment, Dekalb, IL.
14 Benbrook, C., Sexon, D., Wyman, J., Stevenson, W., Lynch, S., Wallendal, J., Diercks, S., Van Haren, R., and Granadino, C. 2002. Developing a pesticide risk assessment tool to monitor progress in reducing reliance on high-risk pesticides. American Journal of Potato Research 79:183199.
15 Sorenson, A. 1994. Proceedings of the National Integrated Pest Management Forum. Center for Agriculture in the Environment, Dekalb, IL.
16 Lynch, S., Greene, C., and Kramer-LeBlanc, C. 1997. The Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop: broadening support for 21st century IPM. In Lynch, S., Greene, C., and Kramer-LeBlanc, C. (eds). Proceedings of the Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop. USDA–Economic Research Service (ERS) Miscellaneous Publication No. 1542. USDA–ERS, Washington, DC. p. 13.
17 Tomlin, C. 2000. The Pesticide Manual, 12th ed. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK.
18 Hatry, H. and Newcomer, K. 2004. Pitfalls of evaluation. In Wholey, J., Hatry, H., and Newcomer, K. (eds). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco, CA. p. 547570.
19 Chen, P. and Popovich, P. 2002. Correlation: Parametric and Nonparametric Measures. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20 Ruhl, J.B. 2000. Farms, their environmental harms, and environmental law. Ecology Law Quarterly 27:263349.
21 Falconer, K. 2002. Pesticide environmental indicators and environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Management 65:285300.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 330 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.