Skip to main content
×
Home

Barriers and bridges to the adoption of biodegradable plastic mulches for US specialty crop production

  • Jessica R. Goldberger (a1), Robert Emmet Jones (a2), Carol A. Miles (a3), Russell W. Wallace (a4) and Debra A. Inglis (a5)...
Abstract
Abstract

Commercial farmers have been using polyethylene plastic mulch since the 1950s. Despite the affordability and effectiveness of polyethylene mulch, the disposal process is financially and environmentally costly. Biodegradable plastic mulches, an ecologically sustainable alternative to polyethylene mulch films, were introduced in the 1980s. Biodegradable plastic mulches can be tilled into the soil or composted at the end of the season, reducing the labor and environmental costs associated with plastic removal and disposal. However, research results are mixed as to the effectiveness, degradability and ease-of-use of biodegradable plastic mulches. In 2008–2012, researchers, funded by a USDA Specialty Crop Research Initiative grant, conducted surveys and focus groups in three different agricultural regions of the USA to better understand the barriers and bridges to the adoption of biodegradable plastic mulches for specialty crop production systems. Data on the experiences and views of specialty crop growers, agricultural extension agents, agricultural input suppliers, mulch manufacturers and other stakeholders showed that the major adoption barriers were insufficient knowledge, high cost and unpredictable breakdown. The major bridges to adoption were reduced waste, environmental benefits and interest in further learning. These findings are discussed with reference to the classic innovation diffusion model, specifically work on the innovation–decision process and the attributes of innovations. The study results can be used to guide the activities of those involved in the design, development and promotion of biodegradable plastic mulches for US specialty crop production systems.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: jgoldberger@wsu.edu
References
Hide All
1 Kasirajan S. and Ngouajio M. 2012. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32:501529.
2 Miles C., Wallace R., Wszelaki A., Martin J., Cowan J., Walters T., and Inglis D. 2012. Deterioration of potentially biodegradable alternatives to black plastic mulch in three tomato production regions. Horticultural Science 47(9):12701277.
3 Lamont W.J. 1993. Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. Horticultural Technology 3(1):3539.
4 Lamont W.J. 2005. Plastics: Modifying the microclimate for the production of vegetable crops. Horticultural Technology 15(3):477481.
5 Hill D.E., Hankin L., and Stephens G.R. 1982. Mulches: Their Effects on Fruit Set, Timing and Yields of Vegetables. Bulletin 805. The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT.
6 Schonbeck M.W. 1995. Mulching Practices and Innovations for Warm Season Vegetables in Virginia and Neighboring States. 1. An Informal Survey of Growers. Virginia Association for Biological Farming, Blacksburg, VA.
7 Schonbeck M.W. and Evanylo G.K. 1998. Effects of mulches on soil properties and tomato production. I. Soil temperature, soil moisture and marketable yield. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 13(1):5581.
8 Shogren R.L. and Hochmuth R.C. 2004. Field evaluation of watermelon grown on paper-polymerized vegetable oil mulches. Horticultural Science 39(7):15881591.
9 Hussain I. and Hamid H. 2003. Plastics in agriculture. In Andrady A.L. (ed.) Plastics and the Environment. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. p. 185209.
10 Shogren R.L. 2000. Biodegradable mulches from renewable resources. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 16(4):3347.
11 Hemphill D.D. 1993. Agricultural plastics as solid waste: What are the options for disposal? Horticultural Technology 3(1):7073.
12 Garthe J.W. and Kowal P.D. 1993. Recycling used agricultural plastics. Agricultural and Biological Engineering Fact Sheet C-8. Penn State University. Available at Web site http://extension.psu.edu/pubs/c-8 (verified February 18, 2013).
13 Hayes D.G., Dharmalingam S., Wadsworth L.C., Leonas K.K., Miles C., and Inglis D.A. 2012. Biodegradable agricultural mulches derived from biopolymers. In Khemani K. and Scholz C. (eds). Degradable Polymers and Materials: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. p. 201223.
14 ASTM D6400. 2004. International Standard Specification for Compostable Plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
15 ASTM D883. 2011. International Standard Terminology Relating to Plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
16 Briassoulis D. and Dejean C. 2010. Critical review of norms and standards for biodegradable agricultural plastics. Part I. Biodegradation in soil. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 18(3):384400.
17 Anzalone A., Cirujeda A., Aibar J., Pardo G., and Zaragoza C. 2010. Effect of biodegradable mulch materials on weed control in processing tomatoes. Weed Technology 24(3):369377.
18 Miles C., Klinger E., Nelson L., Smith T., and Cross C. 2007. Alternatives to Plastic Mulch in Vegetable Production Systems. Available at Web site http://vegetables.wsu.edu/MulchReport07 (verified February 14, 2013).
19 Ngouajio M., Auras R., Fernandez R.T., Rubino M., Counts J.W. and Kijchavengkul T. 2008. Field performance of aliphatic-aromatic copolyester biodegradable mulch films in a fresh market tomato market system. Horticultural Technology 18(4):605610.
20 Shogren R.L. and David M. 2006. Biodegradable paper/polymerized vegetable oil mulches for tomato and pepper production. Journal of Applied Horticulture 8(1):1214.
21 Waterer D. 2010. Evaluation of biodegradable mulches for production of warm season vegetable crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 90:737743.
22 Weber C.A. 2003. Biodegradable mulch films for weed suppression in the establishment year of matted-row strawberries. Horticultural Technology 13(4):665668.
23 Olsen J.K. and Gounder R.K. 2001. Alternatives to polyethylene mulch film—a field assessment of transported materials in capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41(1):93103.
24 Rangarajan A. and Ingall B. 2006. Biodegradable Mulch Product Testing 2006. Department of Horticulture, Cornell University. Available at Web site http://www.vegetables.cornell.edu/alt/Biodegradable%20Mulch%20Product%20Testing%2020063.pdf (verified March 4, 2013).
25 Schonbeck M.W. 1998. Weed suppression and labor costs associated with organic, plastic, and paper mulches in small-scale vegetable production. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 13(2):1333.
26 Sorkin L. 2006. New biodegradable mulch is cheaper than plastic when removal and disposal cost are also considered. Growing for Market 15(5):810.
27 Tullo A.H. 2012. Old plastics, fresh dirt. Chemical and Engineering News 90(12):1218.
28 Miles C. and Marsh T. 2012. Biodegradable plastic mulches: China, India and USA. In Tuinhof A., Van Steenbergen F., Vos P., and Tolk L. (eds). Profit from Storage: The Costs and Benefits of Water Buffering. 3R Water Secretariat, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 8084.
29 Corbin A., Cowan J., Miles C., Dorgan J., and Inglis D. 2013. Using Biodegradable Plastics as Agricultural Mulches. Washington State University Extension Fact Sheet FS103E. Available at Web site https://pubs.wsu.edu (verified February 4, 2013).
30 Agricultural Marketing Service. 2012. Final Recommendation: Biodegradable Mulch Film made from Bioplastics (Passed). Available at Web site http://www.ams.usda.edu/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5101277 (verified February 19, 2013).
31 Rogers E.M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press, New York.
32 Ryan B. and Gross N.C. 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology 13:273285.
33 Fliegel F.C. 1993. Diffusion Research in Rural Sociology: The Record and Prospects for the Future. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
34 Fliegel F.C. and Kivlin J.E. 1966. Attributes of innovations as factors in diffusion. American Journal of Sociology 72(3):235248.
35 Fliegel F.C. and Kivlin J.E. 1967. Differential perceptions of innovations and rate of adoption. Rural Sociology 32(1):7891.
36 Kremer K.S., Carolan M., Gasteyer S., Tirmizi S.N., Korsching P.F., Peter G., and Tong P. 2001. Evolution of an agricultural innovation: The N-Trak soil nitrogen test—adopt and discontinue, or reject? Technology in Society 23(1):93108.
37 Rogers E.M. and Shoemaker F.F. 1971. Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. Free Press, New York.
38 Carolan M. 2006. Do you see what I see? Examining the epistemic barriers to sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology 71(2):232260.
39 Dillman D.A., Smyth J.D., and Christian L.M. 2009. Internet, Mail, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
40 North Central Rural Sociology Committee (NCRSC). 1962. How Farm People Accept New Ideas. Special Report No. 15. Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 60 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 428 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.