Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 14

  • Get access
    Add to cart €30.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register

Mapping potential foodsheds in New York State by food group: An approach for prioritizing which foods to grow locally

  • Christian J. Peters (a1), Nelson L. Bills (a2), Arthur J. Lembo (a3), Jennifer L. Wilkins (a4) and Gary W. Fick (a5)...

Abstract

Public interest in local food continues to grow, but few analyses have examined the capacity for the US population to be supplied through local and regional food systems. This paper extends earlier work that demonstrated a method for mapping potential foodsheds and estimating the potential for New York to meet the food needs of the state's population centers. It provides a methodology for addressing the question, ‘If land is limited, which foods should be grown locally?’ A spatial model was developed to allocate the available agricultural land of New York State (NYS) to meet in-state food needs for six distinct food groups (grains, vegetables, fruits, dairy, meat and eggs) across the eight largest population centers. An optimization routine was used to allocate land to maximize economic land use value (LUV). Eleven scenarios were examined, ranging from a baseline level of consumption of New York produced foods to a 100% local diet. Across the 11 scenarios, the amount of food supplied, the LUV attained, and the area of land allocated increased as the ‘willingness’ to consume local products increased. This approach dictated that land was preferentially devoted to higher-value food groups relative to lower-value groups, and no scenario used all available land. Under the 100% local scenario, 69% of total food needs (on a fresh weight basis) were supplied in-state with an average food distance of 238 km. This scenario provided food from only four of the six groups, namely, dairy, eggs, fruit and vegetables. These results suggest that a much larger proportion of total food needs (on a weight basis) might be provided from in-state production than was found in previous work. LUV serves as a compelling optimization function, and future work should investigate the degree to which maximizing returns to land complements or conflicts with social and environmental goals of local and regional food systems.

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 2011

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: christian.peters@tufts.edu

References

Hide All
1Feenstra, G.W. 1997. Local food systems and sustainable communities. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12(1):28–36.
2Hinrichs, C.C. 2003. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies 19:33–45.
3Born, B. and Purcell, M. 2006. Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26:195–207.
4Schönhart, M., Penker, M., and Schmid, E. 2009. Sustainable local food production and consumption: Challenges for implementation and research. Outlook on Agriculture 38(2):175–182.
5Martinez, S., Hand, M., Da Pra, M., Pollack, S., Ralston, K., Smith, T., Vogel, S., Clark, S., Lohr, L., Low, S., and Newman, C. 2010. Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues. USDA Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report No. 97. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err97/ (verified August 1, 2010).
6Edwards-Jones, G., Milá i Canals, L., Hounsome, N., Truniger, M., Koerber, G., Hounsome, B., Cross, P., York, E.H., Hospido, A., Plassman, K., Harris, I.M., Edwards, R.T., Day, G.A.S., Tomos, A.D., Cowell, S.J., and Jones, D.L. 2008. Testing the assertion that ‘local food’ is best: the challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science and Technology 19:265–274.
7King, R.P., Gómez, M.I., and DiGiacomo, G. 2010. Can local food go mainstream? Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues. Available at Web site: http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/article.php?article=111 (verified February 2, 2011).
8Clancy, K., and Ruhf, K. 2010. Is local enough? Some arguments for regional food systems. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues. Available at Web site: http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/article.php?article=114 (verified August 1, 2010).
9Messing, P. 1981. The New York State Food System: Growing Closer to Home. Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania.
10Stephens, G.R., Fleming, J.G., Gacoin, L.T., and Bravo-Ureta, B.E. 1988. Better nutrition in Connecticut: opportunities for expanding fresh produce production and consumption. Bulletin 852. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT.
11Herrin, M. and Gussow, J.D. 1989. Designing a sustainable regional diet. Journal of Nutrition Education 21(6):270–275.
12Cowell, S.J. and Parkinson, S. 2003. Localization of UK food production: an analysis using land area and energy as indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 94:221–236.
13Peters, C.J., Wilkins, J.L., and Fick, G.W. 2007. Testing a complete-diet model for estimating the land resource requirements of food consumption and agricultural carrying capacity: The New York State example. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22(2):145–153.
14Thompson, E. Jr, Harper, A.E., and Kraus, S. 2008. Think Globally – Eat Locally: San Francisco Foodshed Assessment. Autumn Press, Berkeley, California. Available at Web site: http://www.farmland.org/programs/states/ca/Feature%20Stories/documents/ThinkGloballyEatLocally-FinalReport8-23-08.pdf (verified February 18, 2010).
15Timmons, D., Wang, Q., and Lass, D. 2008. Local foods: Estimating capacity. Journal of Extension 46(5). Available at Web site: http://www.joe.org/joe/2008october/a7.php (verified February 2, 2011).
16Peters, C.J., Bills, N.L., Lembo, A.J., Wilkins, J.L., and Fick, G.W. 2009. Mapping potential foodsheds in New York State: A spatial model for evaluating the capacity to localize food production. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24(1):72–84.
17Barlowe, R. 1986. Land Resource Economics: The Economics of Real Estate. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18Heimlich, R.E. and Anderson, W.D. 2001. Development at the Urban Fringe and Beyond: Impacts on Agriculture and Rural Land. USDA Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AER803/ (verified February 19, 2010).
19Wiebe, K. and Tegene, A. 1996. Partial Interests in Land: Policy Tools for Resource Use and Conservation. USDA Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 744. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AER744/ (verified February 19, 2010).
20Lubowski, R.N., Bucholtz, S., Claasen, R., Roberts, M.J., Cooper, J.C., Gueorguieva, A., and Johansson, R. 2006. Environmental Effects of Agricultural Land-Use Change: The Role of Economics and Policy. USDA Economic Research Service Economic Research Report No. 25. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/ERR25/ (verified February 19, 2010).
21Sullivan, P., Hellerstein, D., Hansen, L., Johansson, R., Koenig, S., Lubowski, R., McBride, W., McGranahan, D., Roberts, M., Vogel, S., and Bucholtz, S. 2004. The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America. USDA Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 834. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AER834/ (verified February 19, 2010).
22Heimlich, R.E., Wiebe, K.D., Claasen, R., Gadsby, D., and House, R.M. 1998. Wetlands and Agriculture: Private Interests and Public Benefits. USDA Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 765. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AER765/ (verified February 19, 2010).
23Peters, C.J., Bills, N.L., Wilkins, J.L., and Fick, G.W. 2009. Foodshed analysis and its relevance to sustainability. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24(1):1–7.
24U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 5th ed. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
25Peters, C.J. 2007. Mapping potential local foodsheds in New York State: A spatial analysis of the capacity to produce food closer to the point of consumption. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
26Dunne, J.F. and Lynk, C.L. 1981. Report on the Proposed 1981 Farmland Use Values for Agricultural Value Assessments in New York. State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Albany, NY.
27New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. 2009. Circular 1150, Article 25AA – Agricultural Districts, Agriculture and Markets Law. New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, NY. Available at Web site: http://www.agmkt.state.ny.us/AP/agservices/2008C115.pdf (verified September 14, 2010).
28USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1994. State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Database for New York State. Available at Web site: http://cugir.mannlib.cornell.edu/datatheme.jsp?id=150 (accessed April 2006).
29New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. 2006. Soil Group Numbers by County for 2006. Available at Web site: http://www.agmkt.state.ny.us/AP/agservices/SOILCOUNTY.htm (accessed April 2006).
30USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1994. State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) Data Base: Data Use Information. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Miscellaneous Publication No. 1492. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
31U.S. Geological Survey. 1997. 1992 National Land Cover Dataset. Available at Web site: http://landcover.usgs.gov/natllandcover.php (accessed April 2006).
32U.S. Geological Survey. 2000. Accuracy assessment of 1992 National Land Cover Data. Available at Web site: http://landcover.usgs.gov/accuracy/index.php
33U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Urbanized Area and Urban Cluster Census 2000 boundary files. Available at Web site: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/ua_bdfile.html (accessed April 2006).
34U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. Centers of population by block group. Available at Web site: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cenpop/blkgrp/bg_cenpop.html (accessed April 2006).
35U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. State-sorted corrected list of UAs. Available at Web site: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/ua_state_100302.txt (verified July 9, 2010).
36USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. 2005. Agricultural Refrigerated Truck Quarterly (Online). USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Programs, Transportation Services Branch. Available at Web site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/tmd2/rtq/ (accessed June 2006).
37USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. 2005. Grain Transportation Reports – Quarterly Updates (Online). USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Programs, Transportation Services Branch. Available at Web site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/tmdtsb/grain/ (accessed June 2006).
38Frontline Systems, Inc. 2005. Premium Solver Platform for use with Microsoft Excel®. Version 6.5. Frontline Systems, Inc., Incline Village, NV. Available at Web site: http://www.solver.com (verified October 8, 2008).
39Frontline Systems, Inc. 2005. Large-Scale LP/QP Solver Engine. Version 6.5. Frontline Systems, Inc., Incline Village, NV. Available at Web site: http://www.solver.com (verified October 8, 2008).
40Frontline Systems, Inc. 2005. Premium Solver Platform for use with Microsoft Excel®, User Guide. Frontline Systems, Inc., Incline Village, NV.
41Frontline Systems, Inc. 2005. Premium Solver Platform: Solver Engines, User Guide. Frontline Systems, Inc., Incline Village, NV.
42State of New York, Department of Agriculture and Markets. 2007. New York Agricultural Statistics, 2006–2007 Annual Bulletin. Available at Web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/New_York/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/2007/07-bulletin.htm (verified July 9, 2010).
43Bills, N.B. and Stanton, B.F. 1999. Trends in land use. In Hirschl, T.A. and Heaton, T.B.New York State in the 21st Century. Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT. p. 169–184.
44State of New York, Department of Agriculture and Markets. 2009. New York Agricultural Statistics, 2008–2009 Annual Bulletin. Available at Web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/New_York/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/2009/Bulletin2009.pdf (verified July 9, 2010).

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
  • Cited by 14

  • Get access
    Add to cart €30.00
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register

Mapping potential foodsheds in New York State by food group: An approach for prioritizing which foods to grow locally

  • Christian J. Peters (a1), Nelson L. Bills (a2), Arthur J. Lembo (a3), Jennifer L. Wilkins (a4) and Gary W. Fick (a5)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.