Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:20:08.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Productivity and profitability of manual and mechanized conservation agriculture (CA) systems in Eastern Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

W. Mupangwa*
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, P.O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
M. Mutenje
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, P.O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
C. Thierfelder
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, P.O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
M. Mwila
Affiliation:
Zambia Agriculture Research Institute, Msekera Research Station, P.O. Box 510089, Chipata, Zambia
H. Malumo
Affiliation:
Total Land Care, P O Box 95, Lusaka, Zambia
A. Mujeyi
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, P.O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
P. Setimela
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, P.O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
*
Author for correspondence: W. Mupangwa, E-mail: w.mupangwa@cgiar.org; mupangwa@yahoo.com

Abstract

Climate variability and declining soil fertility pose a major threat to sustainable agronomic and economic growth in Zambia. The objective of this study was to assess crop yield, land and labor productivity of conservation agriculture (CA) technologies in Eastern Zambia. On-farm trials were run from 2012–2015 and farmers were replicates of a randomized complete block design. The trials compared three CA systems against a conventional practice. Yield and net return ha−1 were determined for maize and legume yield (kg ha−1) produced by ridge and furrow tillage, CA dibble stick planting, CA animal traction ripping and direct seeding. The dibble stick, ripline and direct seeding CA systems had 6–18, 12–28 and 8–9% greater maize yield relative to the conventional tillage system, respectively. Rotation of maize with cowpea and soybean significantly increased maize yields in all CA systems. Intercropping maize with cowpea increased land productivity (e.g., the land equivalent ratio for four seasons was 2.01) compared with full rotations under CA. Maize/cowpea intercropping in dibble stick CA produced the greatest net returns (US$312-767 ha−1) compared with dibble stick maize-cowpea rotation (US$204-657), dibble stick maize monoculture (US$108-584) and the conventional practice (US$64-516). The net-return for the animal traction CA systems showed that maize-soybean rotations using the ripper were more profitable than the direct seeder or conventional ridge and furrow systems. Agronomic and economic benefits of CA-based cropping systems highlight the good potential for improved food security and agricultural productivity for smallholder farmers.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aagaard, P (2007) Conservation farming and conservation agriculture handbook for hoe farmers in agro-ecological regions I and IIa – Flat Culture. Conservation Farming Unit, June 2007. ZNFU House Agricultural Showgrounds, Lusaka, Zambia. ISBN 978-9982-52-0003.Google Scholar
Adiku, SGK, Dayanda, PWA, Rose, CW and Dowuona, GNN (1997) An analysis of the within-season rainfall characteristics and simulation of the daily rainfall in two savanna zones in Ghana. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 86, 5162.Google Scholar
Andersson, JA and D'souza, S (2013) From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: a literature review of conservation agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 187, 116132.Google Scholar
Banda, JSK (2016) Effects of conservation agriculture systems on selected soil chemical and biological properties in Chipata District. MSc Thesis, School of Agriculture Sciences, Department of Soil Science, University of Zambia, Zambia.Google Scholar
Baudron, F, Jaleta, M, Okitoi, O and Tegegn, A (2014) Conservation agriculture in African mixed crop-livestock systems: expanding the niche. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 187, 171182.Google Scholar
Baudron, F, Thierfelder, C, Nyagumbo, I and Gerard, B (2015) Where to target conservation agriculture for African smallholders? How to overcome challenges associated with its implementation? Experience from Eastern and Southern Africa. Environments 2, 338357.Google Scholar
Bonifacio, R (2015) Southern Africa growing season 2015–2016: Facing El Nino in Difficult Circumstances. What to Expect: Historical Evidence and Context. VAM Food Security Analysis. World Food Programme. Available from http://www.wfp.org (Accessed 14 May 2016).Google Scholar
Cairns, JE, Hellin, J, Sonder, K, Araus, JL, Macrobert, JF, Thierfelder, C and Prasanna, B (2013) Adapting maize production to climate change in sub- Saharan Africa. Food Security 5, 345360.Google Scholar
Chabala, LM, Kuntashula, E and Kaluba, P (2013) Characterization of temporal changes in rainfall, temperature, flooding hazard and dry spells over Zambia. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 1(4), 134144.Google Scholar
Chimonyo, VGP, Modi, AT and Mabhaudhi, T (2016) Water use and productivity of a sorghum–cowpea–bottle gourd intercrop system. Agricultural Water Management 165, 8296.Google Scholar
CIMMYT (1988) From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual, Completely revised edn. Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Cobo, JG, Gerd, D and Cadisch, G (2010) Nutrient balances in African land use systems across different spatial scales: a review of approaches, challenges and progress. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 136, 115.Google Scholar
Cook, C, Reason, CJ and Hewitson, BC (2004) Wet and dry spells within particularly wet and dry summers in the South African rainfall region. Climate Research 26, 1731.Google Scholar
Cooper, PJM, Dimes, J, Rao, KPC, Shapiro, B, Shiferaw, B and Twomlow, S (2008) Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub- Saharan Africa: an essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 126, 2435.Google Scholar
Dawson, TP, Perryman, AH and Tom, M (2016) Modelling impacts of climate change on global food security. Climate Change 134, 429440.Google Scholar
Dillon, JL and Anderson, JR (1990) The Analysis of Response in Crop and Livestock Production, 3rd edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dube, EDN, Madanzi, T, Kapenzi, A and Masvaya, E (2014) Root length density in maize/cowpea intercropping under a basin tillage system in a semi-arid area of Zimbabwe. American Journal of Plant Science 5, 14991507.Google Scholar
FAO (2015) Conservation Agriculture. Available online at http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/index.html (Accessed 14 May 2016).Google Scholar
Giller, KE (2001) Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems. New York: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Giller, KE, Witter, E, Corbeels, M and Tittonell, P (2009) Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretic's view. Field Crops Research 114, 2334.Google Scholar
Giller, KE, Murwira, MS, Dhliwayo, DKC, Mafongoya, PL and Mpepereki, S (2011) Soybeans and sustainable agriculture in southern Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9(1), 5058.Google Scholar
Giller, KE, Andersson, JA, Corbeels, M, Kirkegaard, J, Mortensen, D, Ernstein, O and Vanlauwe, B (2015) Beyond conservation agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 114.Google Scholar
Grabowski, P and Kerr, J (2014) Resource constraints and partial adoption of conservation agriculture by hand-hoe farmers in Mozambique. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 12(1), 3753.Google Scholar
Homann-Tui Kee, S, Bandason, E, Maute, F, Nkomboni, D, Mpofu, N, Tanganyika, J, Van Rooyen, AF, Gondwe, T, Dias, P, Ncube, S, Moyo, S, Hendricks, S and Nisrane, F (2013) Optimizing Livelihood and Environmental Benefits from Crop Residues in Smallholder Crop-livestock Systems in Southern Africa: Crop Residue Uses and Trade-offs, Exploring Options for Sustainable Intensification with Stakeholders. Patancheru, AP, India: International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), 60 pp.Google Scholar
Jeranyama, P, Hesterman, OB and Waddington, SR (1998) The impact of legumes relay intercropped into maize at Domboshawa, Zimbabwe. In Waddington, SR, Murwira, HK, Kumwenda, JDT, Hikwa, D and Tagwira, F (eds). Soil Fertility Research for Maize-Based Farming Systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Proceedings of the Soil Fert Net Results and Planning Workshop held from 7 to 11 July 1997 at Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Soil Fert Net and CIMMYT-Zimbabwe, pp. 3234, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Kagot, V, Okoth, S, Kanampiu, F, Okoth, P and Mageto, E (2014) Evaluation of fungal isolates as possible biocontrol agents against Striga hermonthica. Crop Protection 3(3), 305313.Google Scholar
Kumwenda, JDT and Gilbert, R (1998) Biomass production by legume green manures on exhausted soils in Malawi: a Soil Fertility Network Trial. In Waddington, S, Murwira, HK, Kumwenda, JDT, Hikwa, D and Tagwira, F (eds). Soil Fertility Research for Maize based Farming Systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Proceedings of the Soil Fertility Research Results and Planning Workshop, 7–11 July 1997, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Soil Fert Net and CIMMYT-Zimbabwe, pp. 8586, 312 pp. ISBN 970-648-006-4.Google Scholar
Kutu, FR (2012) Effect of conservation agriculture management practices on maize productivity and selected soil quality indices under South Africa dryland conditions. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(26), 38393846.Google Scholar
Lampkin, N (2001) Organic Farm Management Handbook, Organic Farming Research Unit, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales. Aberystwyth, Newbury: Organic Advisory Service, Elm Farm Research Centre.Google Scholar
Lobell, DB, Burke, MB, Tebaldi, C, Mastrandrea, MD, Falcon, WP and Naylor, RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319, 607610.Google Scholar
Lu, Y, Watkins, KB, Teasdale, JR and Abdul-Baki, AA (2000) Cover crops in sustainable food production. Food Review International 16(2), 121157.Google Scholar
Mafongoya, P, Jiri, O and Phophi, M (2016) Evaluation of tillage practices for maize (Zea mays L.) grown on different land-use systems in eastern Zambia. Sustainable Agriculture Research 5(1), 1023.Google Scholar
Mafongoya, PL and Kuntashula, E (2005) Participatory evaluation of Tephrosia species and provenances for soil fertility improvement and other uses using farmer criteria in eastern Zambia. Experimental Agriculture 41, 6980.Google Scholar
Manda, J, Alene, AD, Gardebroek, C, Kassie, M and Tembo, G (2015) Adoption and impacts of sustainable agricultural practices on maize yields and incomes: evidence from rural Zambia. Agricultural Economics 67(1), 130153.Google Scholar
Masikati, P, Manschadi, A, Van Rooyen, A and Hargreaves, J (2014) Maize–mucuna rotation: an alternative technology to improve water productivity in smallholder farming systems. Agricultural Systems 123, 6270.Google Scholar
Mazvimavi, K and Twomlow, S (2009) Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation agriculture by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 101, 2029.Google Scholar
McConnell, DJ and Dillon, JL (1997) Farm Management for Asia: A Systems Approach. Rome, Italy: FAO Farm management series.Google Scholar
Mhlanga, B, Cheesman, S, Maasdorp, B, Mupangwa, W, Munyoro, C, Sithole, C and Thierfelder, C (2016) Effects of relay cover crop planting date on their biomass and maize productivity in a sub-humid region of Zimbabwe under conservation agriculture. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 78, 93101.Google Scholar
Morris, ML (2007) Fertilizer use in AFRICAN AGRICULTURE: Lessons Learned and Good Practice Guidelines. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Muchabi, J, Lungu, OI and Mweetwa, AM (2014) Conservation agriculture in Zambia: effects on selected soil properties and biological nitrogen fixation in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr). Sustainable Agriculture Research 3(3), 2836.Google Scholar
Mupangwa, W and Thierfelder, C (2014) Intensification of conservation agriculture systems for increased livestock feed and maize production in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 12(4), 425439.Google Scholar
Mupangwa, W, Twomlow, S and Walker, S (2012) Reduced tillage, mulching and rotational effects on maize (Zea mays L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Walp) L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. (Moench)) yields under semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Research 132, 139148.Google Scholar
Mupangwa, W, Mutenje, M, Thierfelder, C and Nyagumbo, I (2016) Are conservation agriculture (CA) systems productive and profitable options for smallholder farmers in different agro-ecoregions of Zimbabwe? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32(1), 87103. doi: 10.1017/S1742170516000041.Google Scholar
Mutenje, M, Kassie, M, Alene, A, Malwa, H, Manda, J and Chikwekwete, P (2012) Characterization of maize-legume farming systems in Eastern Zambia: analysis of technology choice, resource use, gender, risk management, food security and poverty profiles. Baseline Survey Report (Unpublished). International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre, Southern Africa. 126p.Google Scholar
Ncube, B, Twomlow, SJ, Van Wijk, MT, Dimes, JP and Giller, KE (2007) Productivity and residual benefits of grain legumes to sorghum under semi-arid conditions in southwestern Zimbabwe. Plant and Soil 299, 115.Google Scholar
Ngwira, A, Johnsen, FH, Aune, JB, Mekuria, M and Thierfelder, C (2014) Adoption and extent of conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(2), 107119.Google Scholar
Ngwira, AR, Aune, JB and Mkwinda, S (2012a) On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crops Research 132, 149157.Google Scholar
Ngwira, AR, Thierfelder, C and Lambert, DM (2012b) Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28, 350363.Google Scholar
Ngwira, AR, Thierfelder, C, Eash, N and Lambert, DM (2013) Risk and maize-based cropping systems for smallholder Malawi farmers using conservation agriculture technologies. Experimental Agriculture 49, 483503.Google Scholar
Nyamangara, J, Masvaya, EN, Tirivavi, R and Nyengerai, K (2013) Effect of hand- hoe based conservation agriculture on soil fertility and maize yield in selected smallholder areas in Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research 126, 1925.Google Scholar
Nyamushamba, GB, Mapiye, C, Tada, O, Halimani, TE and Muchenje, V (2016) Conservation of indigenous cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa's smallholder areas: turning threats into opportunities. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0024.Google Scholar
Nyanga, PH (2012) Food security, conservation agriculture and pulses: evidence from smallholder farmers in Zambia. Journal of Food Research 1(2), 120138.Google Scholar
Nyanga, PH, Johnsen, FH, Aune, JB and Kalinda, TH (2011) Smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate change and conservation agriculture: evidence from Zambia. Journal of Sustainable Development 4(4), 7385.Google Scholar
Palm, C, Blanco-Canqui, H, Declerck, F, Gatere, L and Grace, P (2014) Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 187, 87105.Google Scholar
Pittelkow, CM, Liang, X, Linquist, BA, Van Groenigen, KJ, Lee, J, Lundy, ME, Van Gestel, N, Six, J, Venterea, RT and Van Kessel, C (2014) Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Research Letter, Nature 517, 365368.Google Scholar
Pretty, J, Toulmin, C and Williams, S (2011) Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9, 524.Google Scholar
Ram, H, Singh, Y, Saini, KS, Kler, DS, Timsina, J and Humphreys, J (2012) Agronomic and economic evaluation of permanent raised beds, no tillage and straw mulching for an irrigated maize-wheat system in north-western India. Experimental Agriculture 48(1), 2138.Google Scholar
Rusinamhodzi, L, Corbeels, M, Nyamangara, J and Giller, KE (2012) Maize–grain legume intercropping is an attractive option for ecological intensification that reduces climatic risk for smallholder farmers in central Mozambique. Field Crops Research 136, 1222.Google Scholar
Sanderson, MA, Archer, D, Hendrickson, J, Kronberg, S, Liebig, M, Nichols, K, Schemer, M, Tanaka, D and Aguilara, J (2013) Diversification and ecosystem services for conservation agriculture: outcomes from pastures and integrated crop– livestock systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28(2), 129144.Google Scholar
Simute, S, Phiri, CL and Tengnas, B (1998) Agroforestry Extension Manual for Eastern Zambia. Regional Land Management Unit (RELMA/Sida) ICRAF House, United Nations Avenue, Gigiri Nairobi, Kenya. 256pp.Google Scholar
Smith, A, Snapp, S, Dimes, J, Gwenambira, C and Chikowo, R (2016) Doubled-up legume rotations improve soil fertility and maintain productivity under variable conditions in maize-based cropping systems in Malawi. Agricultural Systems 145, 139149.Google Scholar
Statistix (2008) Statistix 9: analytical Software. Tallahassee USA Available from: http://www.statistix.com.Google Scholar
Tadross, M, Hewitson, BC and Usman, MT (2005) The inter-annual variability of onset of the maize growing season over South Africa and Zimbabwe. Journal of Climate 18, 33563372.Google Scholar
TerAvest, D, Carpenter-Boggs, L, Thierfelder, C and Reganold, JP (2015) Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till and conventional tillage in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 212, 285296.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C and Wall, PC (2009) Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research 105, 217227.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Cheesman, S and Rusinamhodzi, L (2012) A comparative analysis of conservation agriculture systems: benefits and challenges of rotations and intercropping in Zimbabwe. Field Crops Research 137, 237250.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Mwila, M and Rusinamhodzi, L (2013a) Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern provinces of Zambia: long-term effects on soil quality and maize productivity. Soil and Tillage Research 126, 246258.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Chisui, JL, Gama, M, Cheesman, S, Jere, ZD, Bunderson, WT, Eash, NS, Ngwira, AR and Rusinamhodzi, L (2013b) Maize-based conservation agriculture systems in Malawi: long-term trends in productivity. Field Crop Research 142, 4757.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Mutenje, M, Mujeyi, A and Mupangwa, W (2014) Where is the limit? Lessons learned from long-term conservation agriculture research in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe. Food Security 7(1), 1531.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Matemba-Mutasa, R and Rusinamhodzi, L (2015) Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa. Soil and Tillage Research 146, 230242.Google Scholar
Thierfelder, C, Matemba-Mutasa, R, Bunderson, WT, Mutenje, M, Nyagumbo, I and Mupangwa, W (2016) Evaluating manual conservation agriculture systems in southern Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 222, 112124.Google Scholar
Twomlow, S, Urolov, JC, Jenrich, M and Oldrieve, B (2008) Lessons from the field – Zimbabwe's conservation agriculture task force. Journal of Semi-Arid Tropics Agricultural Research 6(1), 111.Google Scholar
Wall, PC, Thierfelder, C, Ngwira, A, Govaerts, B, Nyagumbo, I and Baudron, F (2013) Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern Africa. In Jat, RA and Graziano de Silva, J (eds). Conservation Agriculture: Global Prospects and Challenges. Cambridge, USA: CABI. ISBN-13, 9781780642598.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Mupangwa et al supplementary material

Mupangwa et al supplementary material 1

Download Mupangwa et al supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 689 KB