Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Technical efficiency of organic pasture farming in Germany: The role of location economics and of specific knowledge

  • S. Lakner (a1), S. von Cramon-Taubadel (a1) and B. Brümmer (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

We analyze the efficiency of organic pasture farming in Germany using data from 1994/95 to 2005/06. Five inputs and one output are analyzed by means of a stochastic frontier production function, allowing for heteroscedasticity and technical effects. Five sets of possible determinants of technical efficiency are considered in the model. These include: (1) farm structure and resources; (2) human capital and management capacities; (3) institutional choice; and (4) subsidies. To these factors that are commonly included in technical effects models, we add (5) a set of variables that capture localization and urbanization economies such as the share of organic farms in a region and the regional share of votes for the Green Party in recent elections. These regional effects are found to have a significant impact on the technical efficiency of organic farms. The evolution of efficiency on farms that are converting from conventional to organic farming is also analyzed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: slakner@gwdg.de
References
Hide All
1Organic Food Industry Federation 2011. Zahlen, Daten, Fakten: Die Bio-Branche 2011. Document yearly updated by the Organic Food Industry Federation (Bund Ökologische Lebensmittelwirtschaft (BÖLW)), Berlin, Germany. Available at Web site: http://www.boelw.de/zdf.html (accessed March 15, 2011).
2Research Institute of Organic Agriculture 2010. Development of organic agricultural land, share of total agricultural land, organic operators in Europe 2003–2009. Database continually updated by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland. Available at Web site: http://www.organic-europe.net (accessed July 5, 2010).
3Heß J. 1997. Systemimmanenter Zwang zu möglichst geschlossenen Nährstoffkreisläufen. Ökologie und Landbau 103:1013.
4Kumbhakar S.C., Tsionas E.G., and Sipiläinen T. 2009. Joint estimation of technology choice and technical efficiency: an application to organic and conventional dairy farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis 31:151161.
5Mayen C.D., Balagtas J.V., and Alexander C.E. 2009. Vertical economies of scope in dairy farming. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industry Organization 7(1). Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jafio/vol7/iss1/art8 (accessed March 14, 2011).
6Nieberg H. 2001. Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau: Wer profitiert? Ökologie und Landbau 118:69.
7Gerber A., Hoffmann V., and Klügler M. 1996. Das Wissenssystem im ökologischen Landbau in Deutschland - zur Entstehung und Weitergabe von Wissen im Diffusionsprozess. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 74:591627.
8Bichler B., Lippert C., Häring A., and Dabbert S. 2005. Die Bestimmungsgründe der räumlichen Verteilung des ökologischen Landbaus in Deutschland. Berichte über Landwirtschaft 83:5075.
9Battese G.E. and Coelli T.J. 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20:325332.
10Brümmer B. and Loy J.-P. 2000. The technical efficiency impact of farm credit programmes: a case study of northern Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics 53:405418.
11Balmann A. and Czasch B. 2001. Zur Effizienz landwirtschaftlicher Unternehmen in Brandenburg—Eine Data Envelopment Analysis. Agrarwirtschaft 50:198203.
12Curtiss J. 2002. Efficiency and Structural Changes in Transition—A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Czech Crop Production. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany.
13Davidova S. and Latruffe L. 2007. Relationships between technical efficiency and financial management for Czech Republic farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics 58:269288.
14Mayen C.D., Balagtas J.V., and Alexander C.E. 2010. Technology adoption and technical efficiency: organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92(1):181195.
15Oude Lansink A., Pietola K., and Bäckman S. 2002. Efficiency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland 1994–1997. European Review of Agricultural Economics 29:5165.
16Tzouvelekas V., Pantzios C.J., and Fotopoulos C. 2001. Technical efficiency of alternative farming systems: the case of Greek organic and conventional olive-growing farms. Food Policy 26:549569.
17Sipiläinen T. and Oude Lansink A. 2005. Learning in organic farming—an application on Finnish dairy farms. Contributed paper to the XI. EAAE Congress ‘The Future of Rural Europe in the Global Agri-Food System’ 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 122. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/24493 (accessed June 7, 2011).
18Gubi G. 2006. Analyse der erfolgs- und effizienzbestimmenden Faktoren im ökologischen Landbaus. PhD thesis, Institute for Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany. Available at Web site: http://eldiss.uni-kiel.de/macau/receive/dissertation_diss_00001845 (accessed June 7, 2011).
19Lohr L. and Park T. 2006. Technical effects of U.S. organic farmers: the complementary roles of soil management techniques and farm experience. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35:327338.
20Francksen T., Gubi G., and Latacz-Lohmann U. 2007. Empirische Untersuchungen zum optimalen Spezialisierungsgrad ökologisch wirtschaftender Marktfruchtbetriebe. Agrarwirtschaft 56:187200.
21Schulze Pals L. 1994. Ökonomische Analyse der Umstellung auf ökologischen Landbau. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministierum für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Series A, Vol. 436. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster, Germany.
22Destatis 2006. Statistical Yearbook Agriculture 2006. Federal Statistical Office Germany (Destatis), Wiesbaden, Germany.
23Destatis 2007. Regional database Germany—Online database. Federal Statistical Office Germany (Destatis), Wiesbaden, Germany.
24Burton M., Rigby D., and Young T. 1999. Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50:4763.
25Padel S. 2001a. Conversion to organic farming: a typical example of the diffusion of innovation? Sociologia Ruralis 41:4061.
26Padel S. 2001b. Conversion to organic milk production: the change process and farmers’ information needs. PhD thesis, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Wales.
27Ilbery B., Holloway L., and Arber R. 1999. The geography of organic farming in England and Wales in the 1990s. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 90:285295.
28Frederiksen P. and Langer V. 2004. Localization and concentration of organic farming in the 1990s – the Danish Case. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95(5):539549.
29Tveteras R. and Battese G.E. 2006. Agglomeration externalities, productivity and technical efficiency. Journal of Regional Science 46:605625.
30Jaenicke E.C., Goetz S.J., Wu P.C., and Dimitri C. 2009. Identifying and measuring the effect of firm clusters among certified organic processors and handlers. Contributed paper at the Annual Meeting of Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2009, AAEA, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/49205 (accessed March 15, 2011).
31Larue S. and Latruffe L. 2008. Agglomeration externalities and technical efficiency in pig production. Contributed paper at the 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists – EAAE 2008, Ghent, Belgium. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/44272 (accessed June 7, 2011).
32Nivievskiy O. 2009. Price support, efficiency and technology change of Ukrainian dairy farms: Spatial dependence in the components of productivity growth. Contributed paper at the IAAE 2009 Conference, Beijing, China. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/51403 (accessed June 7, 2011).
33Krugman P. 1991. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
34Maier G. and Tödtling F. 1995. Regional und Stadtökonomik—Standorttheorie und Raumstruktur, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
35Coelli T.J., Rao D.S., Prasada , O'Donnell C.J., and Battese G.E. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 2nd ed. Springer, New York, USA.
36Kumbhakar S. and Lovell K.C.A. 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. University Press, Cambridge, USA.
37Aigner D., Lovell K.C.A., and Schmidt P. 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6:2137.
38Meeusen W. and van den Broek J. 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18:435444.
39Jondrow J., Lovell K.C.A., Materov I.S., and Schmidt P. 1982. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19:233238.
40Caudill S.B., Ford J.M., and Gropper D.M. 1995. Frontier estimation and firm specific inefficiency measures in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13:105111.
41Kaufman L. and Rousseeuw P.J. 1990. Finding Groups in Data—An Introduction into Cluster Analysis. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
42Lakner S. 2010. Effizienzanalyse im ökologischen Landbau - Bestandsaufnahme, empirische Analyse und agrarpolitische Schlussfolgerungen. PhD thesis, Department for Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany. Available at Web site: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2010/lakner/ (accessed July 15, 2010).
43Offermann F. and Nieberg H. 2001. Wirtschaftliche Situation ökologischer Betriebe in ausgewählten Ländern Europas: Stand, Entwicklung und wichtige Einflussfaktoren. Agrarwirtschaft 50:421427.
44Karagiannias G., Salhofer K., and Sinabell F. 2006. Technical efficiency of conventional and organic farms: some evidence for milk production. Contributed paper at the 16 Conference of the Austrian Society of Agricultural Economics ‘Ländliche Betriebe und Agrarökonomie auf neuen Pfaden’. Wien, Austria.
45Leibenstein H. 1966. Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency. American Economic Review 56:392415.
46Giannakas K., Schones R., and Tzouvelekas V. 2001. Technical efficiency, technological change and output growth of wheat farms in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 49:135152.
47McCloud N. and Kumbhakar S.C. 2007. Does subsidy drive productivity? A cross-country analysis of Nordic Dairy Farms. In Chib S., Koop G., and Griffiths B. (eds). Advances in Econometrics: Bayesian Econometrics. Emerald Books, Bingley, England.
48Hemme T., Deeken E., and Faßbender W. 2004. Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ökologischen Milchproduktion und Verarbeitung in Deutschland, Report No 02OE059 at the von Thünen Institute, Institute for farm economics, Braunschweig, Germany. Available at Web site: http://orgprints.org/10743/ (accessed June 7, 2011).
49Brümmer B. 2001. Stochastic Frontier Analysis using SFAMB for Ox, Manual at the Institute for Agricultural Economics, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany.
50Kodde D.A. and Palm F.C. 1986. Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica 54:12431248.
51Wilson P., Hadley D., and Asby C. 2001. The influence of management characteristics on the technical efficiency of wheat farmers in Eastern England. Agricultural Economics 24:329338.
52Nivievskiy O., Brümmer B., and von Cramon-Taubadel S. 2010. A Note on Technical Efficiency, Productivity Growth and Competitiveness. Contributed paper at the Joint Annual Meeting of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA), Denver, Colorado, USA. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/61759 (accessed March 10, 2011).
53Darnhofer I., Eder M., Schmid J., and Schneeberger W. 2005. Ausstieg aus der ÖPUL- Maßnahme biologische Wirtschaftsweise. In Heß J. and Rahman G. (eds).Proceedings of the 8th Scientific Conference for Organic Farming ‘Ende der Nische’. Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin. p. 467470.
54Kantelhardt J., Eckstein K., and Hoffmann H. 2009. Assessing programmes for the provision of agri-environmental services – An efficiency analysis realized in Southern Germany. Contributed paper at the IAAE 2009 Conference, Beijing, China. Available at Web site: http://purl.umn.edu/51688 (accessed June 8, 2011).
55Lohr L. and Salomonsson L. 2000. Conversion subsidies for organic production: results from Sweden and lessons for the United States. Agricultural Economics 22:133146.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 46 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 215 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.