Skip to main content
×
Home

A technique for assessing environmental impact risks of agricultural systems

  • Olha Sydorovych (a1), Charles W. Raczkowski (a2), Ada Wossink (a3), J. Paul Mueller (a4), Nancy G. Creamer (a5), Shuijin Hu (a6), Melissa Bell (a4) and Cong Tu (a6)...
Abstract
Abstract

Conventional agriculture often aims to achieve high returns without allowing for sustainable natural resource management. To prevent environmental degradation, agricultural systems must be assessed and environmental standards need to be developed. This study used a multi-factor approach to assess the potential environmental impact risk of six diverse systems: five production systems and a successional system or abandoned agronomic field. Assessment factors were soil quality status, amount of pesticide and fertilizer applied and tillage intensity. The assessment identified the best management practices (BMP)–conventional tillage system as a high-risk system mostly because of extensive tillage. The certified organic system was also extensively tilled and was characterized by P build-up in the soil, but performed well based on other assessment factors. Conversely, the BMP–no tillage and the crop–animal integrated system were characterized as low risk mainly because of reduced tillage. The paper discusses assessment strengths and weaknesses, ways to improve indicators used, and the need for additional indicators. We concluded that with further development the technique will become a resourceful tool to promote agricultural sustainability and environmental stewardship and assist policy-making processes.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: obsydoro@ncsu.edu
References
Hide All
1Pacini C., Wossink A., Giesen G., Vazzana C., and Huirne R. 2003. Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: a farm and field-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 95:273288.
2Chandre Gowda M. and Jayaramaiah K. 1998. Comparative evaluation of rice production systems for their sustainability. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 69:19.
3Parra-Lopez C., Calatrava-Requena J., and De-Haro-Gimenez T. 2007. A multi-criteria evaluation of the environmental performances of conventional, organic and integrated olive-growing systems in the south of Spain based on experts' knowledge. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:189203.
4Rasul G. and Thapa G. 2004. Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: an assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives. Agricultural Systems 79:327351.
5Van Calker K., Berentsen P., Romero C., Giesen G., and Huirne R. 2006. Development and application of multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems. Ecological Economics 57:640658.
6Van Passel S., Nevens F., Mathijs E., and Van Huylenbroeck G. 2007. Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecological Economics 62:149161.
7Bockstaller C., Guichard L., Makowski D., Aveline A., Girardin P., and Plantureux S. 2008. Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28:139149.
8Jollands N., Lermit J., and Patterosn M. 2004. Aggregate eco-efficiency indices for New Zealand: a principal components analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 73:293305.
9Bockstaller C. and Girardin P. 2003. How to validate environmental indicators. Agricultural Systems 76:639653.
10Dale V. and Beyeler S. 2001. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators 1:310.
11Piorr H. 2003. Environmental policy, agri-environmental indicators and landscape indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 98:1733.
12Von Wiren-Lehr S. 2001. Sustainability in agriculture—an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 84:115129.
13Rigby D., Howlett D., and Woodhouse P. 2000. A review of agricultural and rural livelihood sustainability. Working Paper 1. Available at Web site http://www.livelihoods.org/lessons/project_summaries/agriIndicators_projsum.html
14Mueller J.P., Barbercheck M., Bell M., Brownie C., Creamer N., Hitt A., Hu S., King L., Linker H., Louws F., Marlow S., Marra M., Raczkowski C., Susko D., and Wagger M. 2002. Development and implementation of a long-term agricultural system study: Challenges and opportunities. HortTechnology 12:362368.
15Andrews S., Karlen D., and Cambardella C. 2004. The soil quality assessment framework: a qualitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68:19451962.
16Klute A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. In Klute A. (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 635686.
17Grossman R.B. and Reinsch T.G. 2002. Bulk density and linear extensibility. In Dane J.H. and Topp G.C. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 201225.
18Nimmo J.R. and Perkins K.S. 2002. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In Dane J.H. and Topp G.C. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 317327.
19Vance E.D., Brookes P.C., and Jenkinson D.S. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19:703707.
20Drinkwater L.E., Cambardella C.A., Reeder J.D., and Rice C.W. 1996. Potentially mineralizable nitrogen as an indicator for biologically active soil N. In Doran J.W. and Jones A.J. (eds). Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Special Publication No. 9. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 217230.
21Parkin T.B., Doran J.W., and Franco-Vizcaino E. 1996. Field and laboratory tests of soil respiration. In Doran J.W. and Jones A.J. (eds). Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Special Publication No. 9. SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 231246.
22Nelson G. and Bullock D. 2003. Simulating a relative environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Ecological Economics 45:189202.
23Gustafson D. 1989. Groundwater ubiquity score: a simple method for assessing pesticide leachability. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 8:339357.
24Becker R., Herzfeld D., Ostlie K., and Stamm-Kativich E. 1989. Pesticides: surface runoff, leaching, and exposure concerns. Minnesota Extension Services Bulletin No. AG-BU-3911.
25Sullivan P. 2004. Sustainable Soil Management: Soil Systems Guide. National Center for Appropriate Technology, ATTRA Publication. Available at Web site http://www.attra.ncat.org.
26Cassel K. and Raczkowski C.W. 1995. Tillage effects on corn production and soil physical conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59:14361443.
27Franzluebbers A.J., Langdale G.W., and Schomberg H.H. 1999. Soil carbon, nitrogen, and aggregation in response to type and frequency of tillage. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63:349355.
28Franzluebbers A.J. 2002. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth. Soil Tillage Research 66:197205.
29Raczkowski C.W., Reyes M.R., Reddy G.B., Buscher W., and Bauer P. 2009. Comparison of conventional and no-tillage corn and soybean production on runoff and erosion in the southeastern US Piedmont. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(1):5360.
30Diaz-Balteiro L. and Romero C. 2004. In search of a natural sustainability index. Ecological Economics 49:401405.
31Gomiero T. and Giampietro M. 2005. Graphical tools for data representation in integrated analysis of farming systems. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 5:264301.
32Krajnc D. and Glavic P. 2005. How to compare companies on relevant dimensions of sustainability. Ecological Economics 55:551563.
33Jones C.A. 1983. Effect of soil texture on critical bulk densities for root growth. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47:12081211.
34Vepraskas M.J. 1988. Bulk density values diagnostic of restricted root growth in coarse-textured soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52:11171121.
35Bell M. and Raczkowski C.W. 2007. Soil property indices for assessing short-term changes in soil quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:111.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
  • ISSN: 1742-1705
  • EISSN: 1742-1713
  • URL: /core/journals/renewable-agriculture-and-food-systems
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.