Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:38:35.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IVF and male infertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2009

Susan M Avery
Susan M Avery*
Affiliation:
Bourn Hall Clinic, Cambridge, UK
*
Susan M Avery, Bourn Hall Clinic, Bourn Hall, Bourn, Cambridge CB3 7TR, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Male infertility, while having a variety of causes, is generally discussed in terms of semen parameters. While the World Health Organization (WHO) have been able io set limits for semen parameters below which a male can be considered subfertile (20 million/ml; >50% motility; >50% morphologically normal forms), it is well documented that in vivo conceptions have been achieved where semen quality falls well outside these limits, and that infertile men may have normal semen parameters. Macleod and Gold in comparing 1000 fertile men and 1000 infertile men, found that significantly more infertile men had sperm densities below 20 million/ml, but also that 60% of infertile men had sperm densities of 60 million or more. Jouannet and Feneaux have shown that the conception rate in vivo only apparently falls significantly at sperm concentrations of less than five million/ml. Although the cause of subnormal semen analysis is unknown in the majority of cases, there is no reason to suppose that abnormal semen parameters on their own are the cause of infertility. Rather the problem may be caused by failure of sufficient numbers of sperm traversing the female tract and reaching the oocyte. Unfortunately, lack of defined diagnoses lead to a lack of direct treatment for subnormal semen parameters. The development of in vitro fertilization (IVF) resulted in a method that could be used to circumvent the problem since it requires relatively low numbers of sperm and these are placed in the immediate vicinity of the oocyte. It should also be pointed out that normal semen parameters do not imply fertility, since these parameters cannot directly identify dysfunction. IVF offers the advantage that sperm-oocyte interractions can be observed, and in cases of fertilization failure, the point at which sperm dysfunction manifests itself may potentially be identified – if not the nature of the dysfunction. Techniques have now been developed that may overcome certain types of dysfunction, using both biochemical and mechanical means.

Type
Articles
Information
Reproductive Medicine Review , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 151 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rehan, N, Sobrero, AJ, Fertig, JW. The semen of fertile men: statistical analysis of 1300 men. Fertil Steril 1975; 26: 492.Google Scholar
2 MacLeod, J, Gold, RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. II: Sperm counts in 1000 men of known fertility and in 1000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951; 66: 436.Google Scholar
3 Jouannet, P, Feneaux, D. Sperm analysis. Ann Biol Clin 1987; 45: 335–41.Google Scholar
4 Baker, HWG, Burger, HG, de Kretser, DM, Hudson, B. Relative incidence of etiological disorders in male infertility. In: Santen, RJ, Swerdloff, RS eds.Male reproductive dysfunction; diagnosis and management of hypogonadism, infertility and impotence. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1986: 341–72.Google Scholar
5 Mahadevan, MM, Trounson, AO. The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 400–405.Google Scholar
6 Van Uem, JFHM, Acosta, AA, Swanson, RJ et al. Male factor evaluation in in vitro fertilizaton: Norfolk experience. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 375–83.Google Scholar
7 Cittadini, E, Guastella, G, Comparetto, G, Gattuccio, F, Chianchiano, N. IVF/ET and GIFT in andrology. Hum Reprod 1988; 3: 101–104.Google Scholar
8 Riedel, HH, Hubner, F, Ensslen, SC, Bienek, KW, Grillo, M. Minimal andrological requirements for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 73–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Hinting, A, Comhaire, F, Vermeulen, L, Dhont, M, Vermeulen, A, Venderkerckhove, D. Possibilities and limitatons of assisted reproduction for the treatment of male infertility. Human Reprod 1990; 5: 544–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Barlow, P, Englert, Y, Puissant, F et al. Fertilization failure in IVF: why and what next. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 451–56.Google Scholar
11 Edwards, RG, Fishel, SB, Cohen, J et al. Factors influencing the success o. in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J IVF ET 1984; 1: 3–22.Google Scholar
12 Mahadevan, MM, Trounson, AO, Leeton, JF. The relationship of tubai blockage, infertility of an unknown cause, suspected male infertility and endometriosis to success of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 755–62.Google Scholar
13 Battin, D, Vargyas, JM, Sato, F, Brown, J, Marrs, RP. The correlation between in vitro fertilization of human oocytes and semen profile. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 835–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Acosta, AA, Chilik, CF, Brugo, S et al. In vitro fertilization and the male factor. Urology 1986; 28: 1–9.Google Scholar
15 Awadalla, SG, Friedman, CI, Schmidt, G, Chin, NO, Kim, MH. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer as a treatment of male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 1987; 44:835–38.Google Scholar
16 Matson, PL, Troup, SA, Lowe, B, Ibrahim, ZHZ, Burslem, RW, Lieberman, BA. Fertilization of human oocytes in vitro by spermatozoa from oligozoospermic and normospermic men. Int J Androl 1989; 12:117–23.Google Scholar
17 Avery, S, Elder, K, Edwards, RG. IVF as a treatment for oligospermia – experience of 300 cases. Abstracts of the Second Joint Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Sterility Congress Organization. Hum Reprod 1990; 5 (suppl 1): 22 (Abstract no. 70).Google Scholar
18 Drevius, LO. The sperm rise test. J Reprod Fert 1971;24:427–29.Google Scholar
19 Aitken, RJ. Assessment of sperm function for IVF. Hum Reprod 1988; 3: 89–95.Google Scholar
20 Jones, R, Mann, T, Sherins, R. Peroxidative breakdown of phospholipids by spermatozoa, spermicidal properties of fatty acid peroxides, and protective action of seminal plasma. Fertil Steril 1979; 31:531–37.Google Scholar
21 Mortimer, D. Sperm preparation and iatrogenic failures of in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 173–76.Google Scholar
22 Cohen, J, Edwards, RG, Fehilly, C et al. In vitro fertilization: a treatment for male infertility. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 422–32.Google Scholar
23 Purdy, JM. Methods for fertilization and embryo culture in vitro. In: Edwards, RG, Purdy, JM eds. Human conception in vitro. London: Academic Press, 1985:135–48.Google Scholar
24 Hull, MGR. Indications for assisted conception. Br Med Bull 1990; 46: 580–95.Google Scholar
25 Morales, P, Vantman, D, Barros, C, Vigil, P. Human spermatozoa selected by percoli gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 401–404.Google Scholar
26 Guerin, JF, Mathieu, C, Lornage, J, Pinatel, MC, Boulieu, D. Improvement of survival and fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa in an IVF programme by selection on discontinuous percoli gradients. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 798–804.Google Scholar
27 Van der Zwalmen, P, Bertin-Segal, G, Geerts, L, Debauche, C, Schoysman, R. Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 581–88.Google Scholar
28 Gorus, RK, Pipeleers, DG. A rapid method for the fractionation of human spermatozoa according to their progressive motility. Fertil Steril 1981; 35: 662–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Ord, T, Patrizio, P, Marello, E, Balmaceda, JP, Asch, RH. Mini-Percoll: a new method of semen preparation for IVF in severe male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 987–89.Google Scholar
30 Tanpaichitr, N, Agulnick, A, Siebel, M, Taymor, M. Comparison of the in vitro fertilization rate by human sperm capacitated by multiple tube swim up and percoll gradient centrifugation. J In Vitro Fen Embryo Transfer 1988; 5: 119–22.Google Scholar
31 Van der Ven, HH, Jeyendran, RS, Al-Hasani, S et al. Glass wool column filtration of human semen: relation to swim-up and outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod 1988; 3: 85–88.Google Scholar
32 Urry, RL, Middleton, RG, McNamara, I, Vikari, CA. The effect of single density bovine serum albumin columns on sperm concentration, motility and morphology. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 666–69.Google Scholar
33 Perrone, D, Testart, J. Use of bovine serum albumin column to improve selection for human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 839–41.Google Scholar
34 Tea, NT, Jondet, M, Scholler, RA. A migration gravity sedimentation method for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen. In: Harrison, RF, Bonnar, JR, Thompson, W eds.Studies infertility and sterility: in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer and early pregnancy. Lancaster: MTP Press, 1984: 117–20.Google Scholar
35 Lucena, E, Lucena, C, Gomez, M et al. Recovery of motile sperm using the migration-sedimentation technique in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 1989; 4:163–65.Google Scholar
36 Van der Ven, HH, Hoebbel, K, Al-Hasani, S, Diedrich, K, Krebs, D. Fertilization of human oocytes in capillary tubes with very small numbers of spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 72–76.Google Scholar
37 Mahadevan, MM, Trounson, AO. The influence of seminal characteristics on the success rate of human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 400–405.Google Scholar
38 Lavy, G, Boyers, SP, DeCherney, AH. Hyaluronidase removal of the cumulus oophorus increases in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988; 5: 257–60.Google Scholar
39 Rogers, BJ, Bentwood, BJ, Van Campen, H. Sperm morphology assessment as an indicator of human fertilizing capacity. J Androl 1983; 4: 119.Google Scholar
40 Appleton, TC, Fishel, SB. Morphology and X-ray probe analysis of spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men in in vitro fertilization. J IVF ET 1984; 1: 188–203.Google Scholar
41 Yovich, JL, Stanger, JD. The limitations of in vitro fertilization from males with severe oligospermia and abnormal sperm morphology. J IVF ET 1984; 1: 172–79.Google Scholar
42 Hirsch, I, Gibbons, WE, Lipschultz, LI et al. In vitro fertilization in couples with male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 659–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Jeulin, C, Feneux, D, Serres, C et al. Sperm factors related to failure of huma. in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fert 1986; 76: 735–44.Google Scholar
44 Jeyendran, RS, Schrader, SM, van der Ven, HH et al. Association of th. in vitro fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa with sperm morphology as assessed by three classification systems. Hum Reprod 1986; 1: 305–308.Google Scholar
45 Kruger, TF, Menkveld, R, Stander, FSH et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor i. in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118–23.Google Scholar
46 Marsh, SK, Bolton, VN, Braude, PR. The effect of morphology on the ability of human spermatozoa to penetrate zona free hamster oocytes. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 499–505.Google Scholar
47 Comhaire, FH, Vermeulen, L, Hinting, A. Accuracy of sperm characteristics in predicting the in vitro fertilizing capacity of semen. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988; 5: 326–31.Google Scholar
48 Lui, DY, Du Plessis, YP, Nayudu, PL, Johnston, WIH, Baker, HWG. The use of in vitro fertilization to evaluate putative tests of human sperm function. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 272–77.Google Scholar
49 Chan, SYW, Wang, C, Chan, STH et al. Predictive value of sperm morphology and movement characteristics in the outcome o. in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Trans 1989; 6: 142–48.Google Scholar
50 Rosenborg, L, Gustafson, O, Lunell, NO et al. Morphology of seminal and swim up spermatozoa and the outcome o. in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Andrologia 1990; 22: 369–75.Google Scholar
51 Ron-El, R, Nachum, H, Herman, A, Golan, A, Caspi, E, Soffer, Y. Delayed fertilization and poor embryonic development associated with impaired semen quality. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 338–44.Google Scholar
52 Moench, GL. Consideration of some aspects of sterility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1927; 13: 334.Google Scholar
53 Macleod, J. Effects of environmental factors and of anti spermatogenic compounds on the human testis as reflected in seminal cytology. In: Mancini, RE, Martini, L eds.Male fertility and sterility. London: Academic Press, 1974: 123–48.Google Scholar
54 Zaini, A, Jennings, MG, Baker, HWG. Are conventional sperm morphology and motility assessments of predictive value in subfertile men? Int J Androl 1985; 8: 427–35.Google Scholar
55 Kruger, TF, Acosta, AA, Simmons, KF, Swanson, RJ, Matta, JF, Oehninger, F. Predictive value of sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112–17.Google Scholar
56 Eliasson, R. Standards for investigation of human semen. Andrologie 1971; 4: 49.Google Scholar
57 Mortimer, D, Leslie, EE, Kelly, RW, Templeton, AA. Morphological selection of human spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 64: 391–99.Google Scholar
58 McDowell, JS, Veeck, LL, Jones, HW. Analysis of human spermatozoa before and after processing for in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Trans 1985; 2: 23–26.Google Scholar
59 Cohen, J, Talansky, BE, Malter, H et al. Microsurgical fertilization and teratospermia. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 118–23.Google Scholar
60 Williams, WW. Cytology of the human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1950; 1:201–15.Google Scholar
61 Soffer, Y, Bartoov, B, Eltes, F et al. A single ultrastructural investigation of the sperm head organelles predicts sperm egg in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1990; 5 (suppl 1): 36 (Abstract no. 115).Google Scholar
62 Bolton, VN, Braude, PR. Preparation of human spermatozoa for in vitro fertilization by isopycnic centrifugation on self-generating density gradients. Arch Androl 1984; 13: 167–76.Google Scholar
63 Berger, T, Marrs, RP, Moyer, DL. Comparison of techniques for selection of motile spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1983; 43: 268–73.Google Scholar
64 McClure, RD, Nunes, L, Tom, R. Semen manipulation: improved sperm recovery and function with a two layer percoll gradient. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 874–77.Google Scholar
65 Punjabi, U, Gerris, J, van Bijlen, J, Delbeke, K, Gielis, M, Buytaert, Ph. Comparison between different pretreatment techniques for sperm recovery prior to intrauterine insemination, GIFT or IVF. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 75–83.Google Scholar
66 Avery, S, Marriott, V, Mason, B, Riddle, A, Sharma, V. An assessment of the efficiency of various sperm preparation techniques. Vth World Congress on IVF and ET. Programme supplement, 1987; 58.Google Scholar
67 Clarke, GN, Lopata, A, McBain, JC, Baker, HW, Johnston, WI. Effect of antisperm antibodies in males on human in vitro fertilization. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol 1985; 8: 62–66.Google Scholar
68 Junk, SM, Matson, PL, Yovich, JM, Bootsma, B, Yovich, JL. The fertilization of human oocytes by spermatozoa from men with antispermatozoal antibodies in semen. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Trans 1986; 3: 350–52.Google Scholar
69 Bronson, RA, Cooper, GW, Phillips, DM. Effects of anti-sperm antibodies on human sperm ultrastructure and function. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 653–57.Google Scholar
70 Silber, SJ. Pregnancy after vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a study of factors affecting long-term return of fertility in 282 patients followed for 10 years. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 318–22.Google Scholar
71 Clarke, GN, Hyne, RV, du Plessis, Y, Johnston, WI. Sperm antibodies in human fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 1018–25.Google Scholar
72 Coombs, RRA, Rumke, Ph, Edwards, RG. Immunoglobulin classes reactive with spermatozoa in the serum and seminal plasma of vasectomised and infertile men. In: Bratanov, K, Edwards, RG, Vulchanov, VH, Dikov, V, Somlev, B eds. Immunology of reproduction. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Press, 1973: 354.Google Scholar
73 Shulman, S, Harlin, B, Davis, P, Reyniak, JV. Immune infertility and new approaches to treatment. Fertil Steril 1978; 29: 309–13.Google Scholar
74 Jeulin, C, Soumah, A, Da Silva, GD, De Almeida, M. In vitro processing of sperm with autoantibodies: analysis of sperm populations. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 44–48.Google Scholar
75 Harrison, KL, Hennessey, RF. Treatment of male sperm autoimmunity by in vitro fertilization with washed spermatozoa. Med J Aust 1984; 13: 498–99.Google Scholar
76 Kiser, GC, Alexander, NJ, Fuchs, EF, Fulgham, DL. In vitro immune absorption of antisperm antibodies with immunobead-rise, immunomagnetic and immunocolumn separation techniques. Fertil Steril 1987; 47: 466–67.Google Scholar
77 Fishel, SB, Edwards, RG. The essentials of fertilization. In: Edwards, RG, Purdy, JM eds. Human conception in vitro. London: Academic Press, 1982: 157.Google Scholar
78 Elder, KT, Wick, KL, Edwards, RG. Seminal plasma anti-sperm antibodies and IVF: the effect of semen sample collection into 50% serum. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 179–84.Google Scholar
79 Ver Meiden, JPW, Rhemrev, JPT, Bernadas, RE. Introduction of a new method for sperm penetration in male immunological factor. Fifth Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, 1989.Google Scholar
80 Fenichel, P, Donzeau, M, Farahifar, D, Basteris, B, Ayraud, N, Hsi, BL. Dynamics of human sperm acrosome reaction: relation with in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 158 (Abstract no. 143).Google Scholar
81 Senn, A, Germond, M, De Grandi, P. Immunofluorescence study of several sperm functional proteins prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 158 (Abstract no. 144).Google Scholar
82 Oehninger, S, Acosta, A, Kruger, T et al. Recurrent failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF): role of the hemizona assay (HZA) in the sequential diagnosis of specific sperm oocyte defects. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 131.Google Scholar
83 Cohen, J, Adler, A, Alikani, M, Malter, H, Reing, A, Talansky, B Sub-zonal sperm insertion and frequency of gamete fusion. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: suppl 1–132.Google Scholar
84 Cohen, J, Malter, H, Adler, A et al. Reduced implanting ability of microsurgical embryos from couples with normal semen analysis who failed to fertilize following standard IVF. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 132–33.Google Scholar
85 Jean, M, L'hermite, A, Lopes, P, Sagot, P, Barriere, P. Human assisted fertilization by zona drilling. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 382.Google Scholar
86 Gianaroli, L, Sakkas, D, Diotallevi, L, Ferraretti, A. The treatment of male factor infertility by sperm microinjection under the zona pellucida. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 383.Google Scholar
87 Imoedemhe, D, Sigue, A. Oocyte zona cutting in the treatment of male infertility in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 384–85.Google Scholar
88 Imoedemhe, D, Sigue, A. Preliminary experience with sub zonal sperm injection in the treatment of male infertility in IVF. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 385.Google Scholar
89 Metka, M, Haromy, T. Assisted fertilization in humans by micromanipulation. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 387.Google Scholar
90 Odawara, Y, Chida, S, Tachibana, I et al. Improving fertilization rate in vitro of male factor patients by zona opening methods with microhooks. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 388.Google Scholar
91 Wolf, JP, Escalier, D, Rodrigues, D, Frydman, R, Jouannet, P. Pregnancy after fertilization of human oocytes by subzonal insemination of sperm lacking outer dynein arms. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 391.Google Scholar
92 Cross, NL, Meizel, S. Methods for evaluating the acrosomal status of mammalian sperm. Biol Reprod 1987; 41: 635–41.Google Scholar
93 Fenichel, P, Donzeau, M, Farahir, D, Basteris, B, Ayraud, N, Hsi, BL. Dynamics of human sperm acrosome reaction: relation with in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 390.Google Scholar
94 Senn, A, Germond, M, De Grandi, P. Immunofluorescence study of several sperm functional proteins prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 390.Google Scholar
95 Irvine, DS, Aitken, RJ. Measurement of intracellular calcium in human spermatozoa. Gam Res 1986; 15: 57–72.Google Scholar
96 Cummins, JM, Pember, SM, Jequier, AM, Yovich, JL, Hartmann, PE. A test of the human sperm acrosome reaction following ionophore challenge – relationship to fertility and other seminal parameters. J Androl 1991; 12: 98–103.Google Scholar
97 Aitken, RJ, Thatcher, S, Glasier, AF, Clarkson, JS, Wu, FCW. Relative ability of modified versions of the hamster oocyte penetration test, incorporating hyperosmotic medium or the ionophore A23187, to predict IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 227–31.Google Scholar
98 Burkman, LJ, Coddington, CC, Franken, DR, Kruger, T, Rosenwaks, Z, Hodgen, G. The hemizona assay (HZA): development of a diagnostic test for the binding of human spermatozoa to human zona pellucida to predict fertilization potential. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 688–97.Google Scholar
99 Malter, HE, Cohen, J. Partial zona dissection of the human oocyte: a nontraumatic method using micromanipulation to assist zona pellucida penetration. Fertil Steril 1989; 51:139.Google Scholar
100 Tucker, MJ, Bishop, FM, Cohen, J, Wiker, SR, Wright, G. Routine application of partial zona dissection for male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 676–81.Google Scholar
101 Laws-King, A, Trounson, A, Sathananthan, H, Kola, I. Fertilization of human oocytes by microinjection of a single spermatozoan under the zona pellucida. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 637.Google Scholar
102 Ng, SC, Sathananthan, AH, Edirisinghe, WR et al. Fertilization of a human egg with sperm from a patient with immotile cilia syndrome: case report. In: Ratnam, SS, Teoh, ES, Anandkumar, C eds. Advances infertility and sterility. Lancaster: Parthenon Publishing, 1987: 71.Google Scholar
103 Fishel, S, Jackson, P, Antinori, S, Johnson, J, Grossi, S, Versaci, C. Subzonal insemination for the alleviation of infertility. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 828–35.Google Scholar
104 Talansky, BE, Adler, A, Alikani, M, Reing, A, Cohen, J. Timing of pronuclear formation and cleavage following microsurgical reinsemination. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 390.Google Scholar
105 Lanzendorf, SE, Maloney, MK, Veeck, LL, Slusser, J, Hodgen, GD, Rosenwaks, Z. A preclinical evaluation of pronuclear formation by microinjection of human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 835–42.Google Scholar
106 Ng, S-C, Bongso, TA, Chang, S-I, Sathananthan, H, Ratnam, S. Transfer of human sperm into the perivitelline space of human oocytes after zona drilling or zona puncture. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 73.Google Scholar
107 Menkveld, R, Oehninger, S, Franken, DR, Kruger, T, Hodgen, GD. Sperm selective capacity of the human zona pellucida under hemizona assay (HZA) conditions. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 313.Google Scholar
108 Garbers, DL, Kopf, OS. The regulation of spermatozoa by calcium and cyclic nucleotides. Adv Cyclic Nucleotide Res 1980; 13: 251–306.Google Scholar
109 Tash, JS, Means, AR. Regulation of protein phosphorylation and motility of sperm by cAMP and calcium. Biol Reprod 1982; 26: 745–63.Google Scholar
110 Yovich, JM, Edirisinghe, WR, Cummins, JM, Yovich, JL. Influence of pentoxifylline in severe male factor infertility. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 715–22.Google Scholar
111 Yovich, JL, Aitken, J, Yovich, JM, Edirisinghe, WR, Cummins, JM. In vitro pentoxifylline improves the fertilization rate for oligospermic and asthenospermic males. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 157–58.Google Scholar
112 Fuscaldo, G, Sobieszczuk, D, Trounson, AO. Improved fertlization rates following microinjection of human spermatozoa, pretreated with 2′deoxyadenosine and pentoxifylline. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 145–46.Google Scholar
113 Van Steirteghem, AC. Assessment of procedures enhancing recovery, capacitation and acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 157.Google Scholar
114 Tesarik, J. Appropriate timing of the acrosome reaction is a major requirement for the fertilizing capacity. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 957–61.Google Scholar
115 Stock, CE, Fraser, LR. The acrosome reaction in men of proven fertility. Hum Reprod 1987; 2:109–19.Google Scholar
116 Tomkins, PT, Houghton, JA. The rapid induction of the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa by electropermeabilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 329–36.Google Scholar
117 Temple-Smith, PD, Southwidck, GJ, Yates, CA, Trounson, AO, de Kretser, DM. Human pregnancy by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm aspirated from the epididymis. J In Vitro Fert, Embryo Trans 1985; 2: 119–22.Google Scholar
118 de Kretser, DM, Yates, CA, McDonald, J et al. The use of IVF in the management of male infertility. Proceedings of Vth Renier de Graf Symposium. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1985: 213–23.Google Scholar
119 Silber, SJ. Pregnancy with sperm aspiration from the proximal head of epididymis: a new treatment for congenital absence of the vas deferens. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 525–28.Google Scholar
120 Silber, SJ. Microsurgery and andrology. In Serio, M and Waites, G eds. Recent advances in andrology. Rome: Serono Symposia, 1989:103–21.Google Scholar
121 Berkeley, A, Schlegel, P, Alikani, M et al. Epididymal sperm aspiration and oocyte manipulation for male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 133.Google Scholar
122 Ayers, JWT, Moinipanah, R, Bennett, CJ, Randolph, JF, Peterson, EP. Successful combination therapy with electroejaculation and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in the treatment of a paraplegic male with severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:1089–90.Google Scholar
123 Blank, W, Hubert, G, Tran, C, Batzofin, J, Serafini, P. The application of electro ejaculation in reproductive medicine: a two year experience. Hum Reprod 1991; 6 (suppl 1): 289.Google Scholar
124 Shetland, Y, Kogosowski, A, Barak, Y et al. Pregnancy following electroejaculation and in vitro fertilization in a quadriplegic male. Hum Reprod 1991;6 (suppl 1): 313.Google Scholar
125 Leeton, J, Yates, C, Rawicki, B. Successful pregnancy using known donor oocytes fertilized in vitro by spermatozoa obtained by electro-ejaculation from a quadriplegic husband. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 384–85.Google Scholar
126 Aitken, RJ, Best, FSM, Richardson, DW, Djahanbakhch, O, Templeton, A, Lees, MM. An analysis of semen quality and sperm function in cases of oligozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 705–11.Google Scholar
127 Bedford, JM. Fertilization mechanisms in animals and man: current concepts. In: Edwards, RG ed.Establishing a successful human pregnancy. New York: Raven Press, 1990: 115–32.Google Scholar
128 Hartshorne, GM. A simple method for the morphological analysis of human ova:zona penetration in oocytes failing to fertilize or fertilizing abnormally in vitro. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 588–94.Google Scholar
129 Silber, SJ. The relationship of abnormal semen parameters to male fertility. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 947–53.Google Scholar