Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Explaining the resurgence of regionalism in world politics*

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a resurgence of regionalism in world politics. Old regionalist organizations have been revived, new organizations formed, and regionalism and the call for strengthened regionalist arrangements have been central to many of the debates about the nature of the post-Cold War international order. The number, scope and diversity of regionalist schemes have grown significantly since the last major ‘regionalist wave’ in the 1960s. Writing towards the end of this earlier regionalist wave, Joseph Nye could point to two major classes of regionalist activity: on the one hand, micro-economic organizations involving formal economic integration and characterized by formal institutional structures; and on the other, macro-regional political organizations concerned with controlling conflict. Today, in the political field, regional dinosaurs such as the Organization of African Unity (OAU) and the Organization of American States (OAS) have re-emerged. They have been joined both by a large number of aspiring micro-regional bodies (such as the Visegrad Pact and the Pentagonale in central Europe; the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in the Middle East; ECOWAS and possibly a revived Southern African Development Community (SADC, formerly SADCC) led by post-apartheid South Africa in Africa), and by loosely institutionalized meso-regional security groupings such as the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE, now OSCE) and more recently the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). In the economic field, micro-regional schemes for economic cooperation or integration (such as the Southern Cone Common Market, Mercosur, the Andean Pact, the Central American Common Market (CACM) and CARICOM in the Americas; the attempts to expand economic integration within ASEAN; and the proliferation of free trade areas throughout the developing world) stand together with arguments for macro-economic or ‘bloc regionalism’ built around the triad of an expanded European Union (EU), the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) and some further development of Asia-Pacific regionalism. The relationship between these regional schemes and between regional and broader global initiatives is central to the politics of contemporary regionalism.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Aaron L. Friedberg , ‘Ripe for Rivalry. Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia’, International Security, 18, 3 (Winter1993/1994), p. 5

Richard Rosecrance , ‘Regionalism and the Post-Cold War Era’, International Journal, 46 (Summer1991)

Bjorn Hettne , ‘Neo-Mercantilism: The Pursuit of Regionness’, Cooperation and Conflict, 28, 3 (September 1993)

Simon Hix , ‘Approaches to the Study of the EC: The Challenge to Comparative Polities’, West European Politics, 17, 1 (January 1994)

Clive Archer , International Organizations (London: Routledge, 2nd edn, 1992), especially chapter 3

William Thompson , ‘The Regional Subsystem: A Conceptual Explication and a Propositional Inventory’, International Studies Quarterly, 17, 1 (1973)

Raimo Vayrynen , ‘Regional Conflict Formations: An Intractable Problem of International Relations’, Journal of Peace Research, 21, 4 (1984)

David Grigg , ‘The Logic of Regional Systems’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 55 (1965)

Anthony Smith , ‘National Identity and the Idea of European Unity’, International Affairs, 68 1 (January 1992)

Iver B. Neumann and Jennifer Welsh , ‘The other in European self-definition: an addendum to the literature on international society’, Review of International Studies, 17, 4 (October 1991)

Mark W. Zacher , ‘The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for Order and Governance’, in James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds.), Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: CUP, 1992)

Iver B. Neumann , ‘A Region-Building Approach to Northern Europe’, Review of International Studies, 20, 1 (January 1994)

Kenneth Waltz , ‘The Emerging Structure of International Polities’, International Security, 18, 2 (Fall1993)

Donald Crone , ‘Does Hegemony Matter? The Reorganization of the Pacific Political Economy’, World Politics 45, 4 (July 1993)

Andrew Hurrell , ‘Latin America and the New World Order: A Regional Bloc in the Americas?’, International Affairs, 68, 1 (January 1992)

Wayne Sandholtz and John Zysman , ‘1992: Recasting the European Bargain’, World Politics, 42, 1 (October 1989)

J. H. H. Weiler , ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31, 4 (December 1993)

Andrew Moravcsik , ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31, 4 (December 1993), especially pp. 474–80

Jeppe Tranholm-Mikkelsen , ‘Neo-functionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? A Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the EC’, Millennium, 20, 1 (1991)

Helen Milner , ‘International Theory of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’, World Politics, 44 (April 1992)

Alexander Wendt , ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review, 88, 2 (June 1994)

Ole Waever , ‘Three Competing Europes: German, French and Russian’, International Affairs, 66, 3 (1990)

R. J. Rummel , ‘Libertarian Propositions on Violence Within and Between Nations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29 (1985)

Zeev Maoz and Bruce Russett , ‘Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986’, American Political Science Review, 87 (1993)

Anne-Marie Burley , ‘Law among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine’, Columbia Law Review, 92 (December 1992)

Raymond Cohen , ‘Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the theory that “Democracies do not go to War with each other”’, Review of International Studies, 20, 3 (July 1994)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 307 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1393 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.