Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

God vs. Westphalia: radical Islamist movements and the battle for organising the World


This article presents the operation of al-Qaeda and Hizb ut-Tahrir, two of the most radical Islamist movements, through the lens of the relationship between religion as an organising principle for world politics and the state-based logic. It examines these groups in the context of repeated attempts by religious actors throughout history to render religion the dominant and constitutive element in world politics. Prior to the Peace of Westphalia, religion had a critical role in shaping the political landscape, but Westphalia relegated religion to a secondary position. While it accepted religion's role in the domestic affairs of the units in the international system, the Westphalian order kept religion subordinated to the logic of the state system. But religion maintained its ability to provide an alternative organisation for world politics. While al-Qaeda and Hizb ut-Tahrir are highly unlikely to bring about systemic change, their ascendance should remind scholars that the existing order is not inevitable and that the resurgence of religion in international politics also involves the resurrection of interpretations of religion that compete with and challenge the logic of the state-based system.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Turan Kayaoglu , ‘Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory’, International Studies Review, 12 (2010), pp. 193217

Adam Watson , The Evolution of International Society (London: Routledge, 1992)

Jonathan Fox and Shmuel Sandler , Bringing Religion into International Relations (New York: Palgrave, 2004)

Samuel Makinda , ‘Global Governance and Terrorism’, Global Change, Peace and Security, 15:1 (2003), p. 48

Hedley Bull , The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York, Columbia University Press, 1977)

Janice E. Thomson , ‘State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research’, International Studies Quarterly, 39 (1995), pp. 213–34

David Armstrong , Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)

John G. Ruggie , ‘Territoriality at Millennium's End’, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (London: Routledge, 1998)

Jack Miles , ‘Religion and American Foreign Policy’, Survival, 46:1 (2004), pp. 2337

Zeyno Baran , ‘Fighting the War of Ideas’, Foreign Affairs, 84:6 (2005), pp. 6878

Bassam Tibi , ‘Political Islam as a Forum of Religious fundamentalism and the Religionisation of Politics: Islamism and the Quest for a Remaking of the World’, Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 10:2 (June2009), pp. 97120

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 82
Total number of PDF views: 524 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1131 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.