Kadercan, Burak 2017. Territorial design and grand strategy in the Ottoman Empire. Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 158.
Anievas, Alexander and Nişancioğlu, Kerem 2017. How Did the West Usurp the Rest? Origins of the Great Divergence over the Longue Durée. Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 59, Issue. 01, p. 34.
COOPER, LUKE 2015. The international relations of the ‘imagined community’: Explaining the late nineteenth-century genesis of the Chinese nation. Review of International Studies, Vol. 41, Issue. 03, p. 477.
Tansel, Cemal Burak 2015. Deafening silence? Marxism, international historical sociology and the spectre of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 76.
Hoffmann, Clemens 2015. Imagining a Middle Eastern ‘International Society’? A reply to Ayla Göl. Global Discourse, Vol. 5, Issue. 3, p. 395.
The history of capitalism's origins is unmistakably Eurocentric, placing sixteenth-century developments in politics, economy, culture, and ideology squarely within the unique context of Europe. And while the disciplinary remit of International Relations (IR) should offer a way out of such European provincialism, it too has been built on largely Eurocentric assumptions. In Eurocentric approaches, the Ottoman Empire has been absent, passive, or merely a comparative foil against which the specificity and superiority of Europe has been defined. And yet, the Ottoman Empire was arguably the most powerful actor in the Early Modern period. In this article, I argue that any history of capitalism's origins must therefore account for the historical importance of the Ottomans. In doing so, this article seeks to address the non-European blind-spot, both in theorisations of capitalism's origins and in IR theory, by reincorporating the material significance of the Ottoman Empire in historical processes, which led to the transition to capitalism. I do so by utilising the theory of Uneven and Combined Development, and in the process seek to defend its credentials as a non-Eurocentric social theory on the one hand and as a sociologically and historically sensitive theory of international relations on the other.
1 Here and throughout the article, the term ‘Europe’ and ‘European’ is deployed with the problematic implications of anachronism and intra-European divisions firmly in mind. As such it is used, unless specified, in a basic geographical sense, predominantly (but not exclusively) denoting England, France, Low Countries, Portugal, Hapsburg Spain and Austria, Germanic principalities, Hungary, and Italian city-states.
2 Marx Karl, Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973), p. 157.
3 The ensuing interpretation is owed to the brilliant appraisal of The Ambassadors in Jardine Lisa, Worldly Goods: A New History of the Renaissance (London: Papermac Macmillan, 1996), pp. 425–36
4 Jardine Lisa and Brotton Jerry, Global Interests: Renaissance Art Between East and West (New York: Cornell University Press, 2000), p. 50.
5 Matar Nabil, Turks, Moors and Englishmen in the Age of Discovery (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), p. 3.
6 Harper James G., ‘Introduction’, The Turk and Islam in the Western Eye, 1450-1750, ed. Harper James G. (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), p. 3.
7 Goffman Daniel, The Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004), p. 225.
8 Matin Kamran, ‘Redeeming The Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations (iFirst: 2012).
9 Burckhardt Jacob, The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy (London: Penguin, 1990).
10 Anderson Perry, Lineages of the Absolutist State (London: New Left Books, 1974); Tilly Charles (ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975); Mann Michael, The Sources of Social Power, Volume 1: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
11 Wallerstein Immanuel, The Modern World-System 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century (London: Academic Press, 1974); Landes David S., The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Are Some So Rich and Some So Poor? (London: W. W. Norton and Company, 1998); Brenner Robert, ‘Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe’, in Aston T. H., et al., The Brenner Debate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987); Brenner Robert, ‘The Agrarian Roots of Capitalism,’ in Aston T. H., et al. (eds), The Brenner Debate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 213–328
12 Two giants of European historiography, Braudel and Ranke insisted on the inclusion of the Ottomans within the Europe in the age of Phillip II and Charles V respectively. Braudel Fernand, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II, volume II (London: Collins, 1973); Ranke Leopold, The Ottoman and the Spanish Empires in the Seventeenth Century (London: Whittaker & Co. 1843).
13 Anderson, Lineages, p. 397.
14 Bhambra Gurminder K., ‘Historical sociology, international relations and connected histories’, Cambridge Review Of International Affairs, 23:1 (2010), pp. 127–43.
15 Chernilo D., ‘Methodological nationalism and the domestic analogy: classical resources for their critique’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23:1 (2010), pp. 87–106; see also Matin, ‘Redeeming’.
16 Said Edward, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979).
17 Yapp Malcom E., ‘Europe in the Turkish Mirror’, Past and Present, 137:1 (1992), pp. 134–55.
18 Huntingdon Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996).
19 Bisaha Nancy, Creating East and West: Renaissance Humanists and the Ottoman Turks (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), p. 12.
20 Gruffyd-Jones Branwen, Decolonising International Relations (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006), p. 2.
21 Hobson John M., The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
22 Mattingly Garrett, Renaissance Diplomacy (New York: Dover Publications, 1988).
23 Teschke Benno, The Myth of 1648 (London: Verso, 2003).
24 See Hobson John M., ‘Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern Origins of Sovereignty’, International Politics, 46:6 (2009), pp. 671–90; Kayaoglu Turan, ‘Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory’, International Studies Review, 12:2 (2010), pp. 193–217.
25 For instance in the English School. See Wight Martin (ed.), Systems of States (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977); Bull Hadley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan Press, 1977); Watson Adam, The Evolution of International Society (New York: Routledge, 1992).
26 See Hobden Stephen, International Relations and Historical Sociology (London: Routledge, 1998); Hobden Stephen and Hobson John (eds), Historical Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002); Lawson George, ‘Historical sociology in international relations: open society, research programme and vocation’, International Politics, 44:4 (2007), pp. 343–68.
27 Bhambra, ‘Historical sociology’; Bhambra Gurminder K., ‘Talking Among Themselves? Weberian and Marxist Historical Sociologies as Dialogues Without “Others”’, Millenium, 39:1 (2011), pp. 667–81.
28 Blaut James, The Colonizer's Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993); Pomeranz Kenneth, The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000); Hobson John, The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Goody Jack, The Theft of History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007); Goldstone Jack, Why Europe? The Rise of the West in World History 1500-1850 (New York: McGraw Hill, 2008).
29 Bhaba Homi K., The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994); Subrahmanyam Sanjay, ‘Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia’, Modern Asian Studies, 31:3 (1997), pp. 735–62; Chakrabarty Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000); Barkawi Tarak and Laffey Mark, ‘The postcolonial moment in security studies’, Review of International Studies, 32 (2006), pp. 329–52; Shilliam Robbie (ed.), International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity (London: Routledge, 2010); Ancharya Amitav, ‘Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories Beyond the West’, Millennium, 39:3 (2011), pp. 619–37; B. Gruffyd Jones (ed.), Decolonizing; Bhambra, ‘Talking’; Bhambra, ‘Historical’.
30 Frank A. G., ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998).
31 Halperin Sandra, ‘International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Modernity’, in Gruffyd Jones B. (ed.), Decolonizing International Relations (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006), p. 43.
32 Cooper Frederick, Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005), p. 22.
33 Matin, ‘Redeeming’, p. 12.
34 Rosenberg Justin, ‘Why is There no International Historical Sociology?’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3 (2006), pp. 307–40; Rosenberg Justin, ‘Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II: Unevenness and Political Multiplicity’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23:1 (2010), 165–89; Matin Kamran, ‘Uneven and Combined Development in World History: The International Relations of State-formation in Premodern Iran’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:3 (2007), pp. 419–47; see also Davidson Neil, ‘Putting the Nation Back into the International’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22:1 (2009), pp. 9–28; Allinson Jamie and Anievas Alex, ‘Approaching the “international”: beyond Political Marxism’, in ed. Marxism Anievas and World Politics (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 197–214.
35 See Matin, ‘U&CD’; Matin ‘Redeeming’; Shilliam Robert, ‘The Atlantic as a Vector of Uneven and Combined Development’, Cambridge Review of International Relations, 22:1 (2009), pp. 69–88; Hobson John, ‘What's at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development’, Millennium, 40:1 (2011).
36 Hobson, ‘What's at Stake?’, p. 153.
37 Bhambra, ‘Talking’, p. 676.
38 Bhambra, ‘Talking’, pp. 668, 673; cf. Bhambra, ‘Historical’, pp. 128, 135; Cemal Burak Tansel, ‘Deafing Silence: Historical Materialism, International Relations, and the Question of the International’, Paper presented at ‘First Spectrum Conference on Global Studies: Historical Sociology, Historical Materialism and International Relations’ (2–3 November 2012), pp. 1–25, pp. 10–12.
39 Trotsky LeonThe History of the Russian Revolution (London: Pathfinder Press, 2007), p. 28.
40 Rosenberg, ‘Why?’, p. 313.
41 Trotsky, History, p. 28.
42 Luke Cooper, ‘Uneven and combined development in modern world history: Chinese economic reform in the longue durée of capitalist modernity’, Paper presented at ‘International Studies Association Annual Convention’, San Diego (1–4 April 2012), p. 6.
43 Trotsky, History, pp. 474–76..
44 Trotsky, History, p. 26.
45 Rosenberg, ‘Why?’, p. 313.
46 Trotsky, History, pp. 28, 477.
47 Trotsky, History, p. 27.
48 Trotsky, History, pp. 27, 476.
49 Trotsky, History, p. 26.
50 Trotsky, History, p. 27.
51 Anievas Alex and Nisancioglu Kerem, ‘What's at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the Rise of the West’, Millennium (forthcoming, 2014).
52 Anievas Alex ‘1914 in World Historical Perspective: The Uneven and Combined Origins of the First World War’, European Journal of International Relations (iFirst: 2013); see also Anievas and Nisancioglu, ‘What's at Stake’.
53 Ollman Bertell, Dance of the Dialectic: Steps in Marx's Method (University of Illinois Press, 2003), p. 110.
54 Blaut, Colonizer's Model.
55 Shilliam, ‘Atlantic’.
56 Banaji Jairus, Theory as History (Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2011), pp. 262–76.
57 Banaji, Theory, p. 253.
58 Harman Chris, A People's History of the World (London: Verso, 2008), p. 141; Hobson, ‘What's at Stake’, p. 148.
59 Hurewitz Jacob C., ‘Ottoman Diplomacy and the European States System’, The Middle East Journal, 15, Spring (1961), pp. 145–6; Lewis Bernard, The Emergence of Modern Turkey (London: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 30–2; Naff Thomas, ‘The Ottoman Empire and European States System’, in Bull Hadley and Watson Adam (eds), The Expansion of the International Society (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984), p. 144.
60 Bisaha, Creating, p. 162.
61 Soykut Mustafa, ‘Introduction’, in Soykut Mustafa (ed.), Historical Image of the Turk in Europe: Fifteenth Century to the Present (Istanbul: Isis Press, 2003), p. 26.
62 Fischer-Galati Stephen A., Ottoman Imperialism and German Protestantism 1521-1555 (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1959), p. 18.
63 Braudel, The Mediterranean, p. 683.
64 Rodinson Maxime, Europe and the Mystique of Islam (London: University of Washington Press: 1987), p. 37, fn. 82.
65 Birdal Mehmet S., The Holy Roman Empire and the Ottomans: From Global Imperial Power to Absolutism (London: I. B. Taurus, 2011), pp. 119–20.
66 Agoston Gabor, ‘Ottoman Warfare in Europe 1453–1826’, in Black Jeremy (ed.), European Warfare, 1453–1815 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999), pp. 118–44; Murphey Rhoads, Ottoman Warfare, 1500–1700 (London: UCL Press, 1999), pp. 85–104.
67 Teschke, Myth, pp. 43–4.
68 Hess Andrew C., ‘The Ottoman Conquest of Egypt (1517) and the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century World War’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 4:1 (1973), pp. 55–76, esp. pp. 72–4.
69 Coles Paul, The Ottoman Impact on Europe (London: Thames and Hudson, 1968), p. 100.
70 Rodinson, Europe and the Mystique of Islam, p. 73. See also Fischer-Galati, Ottoman Imperialism, p. 18; Murphey, Ottoman, p. 6; Bisaha, Creating, p. 162; Soykut, ‘Introduction’, p. 26; Artemel Süheyla, ‘The View of the Turks from the Perspective of the Humanists in Renaissance England’, in Soykut (ed.), Historical Image of the Turk in Europe (Istanbul: Isis Press, 2003), pp. 149–73, esp. pp. 161, 163; Faroqhi Suriaya, The Ottoman Empire and the World Around It (London: IB Taurus, 2004), p. 101.
71 Matar, Turks, p. 9.
72 Berktay Halil, ‘The feudalism debate: The Turkish end – is “tax – vs. – rent” necessarily the product and sign of a modal difference?’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 14:3 (1987), pp. 291–333, esp. p. 311.
73 Banaji, Theory, p. 23.
74 Keyder Caglar, ‘The Dissolution of the Asiatic Mode of Production’, Economy and Society, 5:2 (1976), pp. 178–96.
75 Inalcik Halil, ‘State Land and Peasant’, in Inalcik Halil and Quataert Donald (eds), An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 103–78, esp. p. 115.
76 Islamoglu-Inan Huri, State and Peasant in the Ottoman Empire: Agrarian Power Relations and Regional Economic Development in Ottoman Anatolia During the Sixteenth Century (Brill, 1994), p. 57.
77 Islamoglu-Inan, State, p. 8.
78 Islamoglu-Inan, State, pp. xiv–xv.
79 Faroqhi Suriaya, ‘Rural life’, in Faroqhi Suriaya (ed.), Cambridge History of Turkey Vol. III: The Cambridge History of Turkey: the Later Ottoman Empire 1603-1839 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 383.
80 Anderson, Lineages, p. 370.
81 Mardin Serif, ‘Power, Civil Society and Culture in the Ottoman Empire’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 11 (1969), pp. 258–81; Haldon John, The State and the Tributary Mode of Production (London: Verso, 1993), pp. 159–69.
82 Coles, Ottoman Impact, pp. 98–9.
83 Goffman, The Ottoman Empire, pp. 8–12.
84 Inalcik Halil, The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300-1600 (London: Phoenix, 2000), pp. 107–16; Griswold William J, The Great Anatolian Rebellion: 1000-1020/1591-1611 (Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1983), pp. 9–10.
85 Barkey Karen, Bandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route to State Centralization (London: Cornell University Press, 1994), pp. 58–9.
86 Barkey, Bandits, p. 212.
87 Barkey, Bandits, p. 192.
88 Barkey, Bandits, pp. 91, 241.
89 Teschke, Myth, pp. 43–4.
90 Mielants Eric H., The Origins of Capitalism and ‘Rise of the West’ (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2007), p. 70.
91 Tilly, Formation, pp. 73–4.
92 Mielants, Origins, p. 70.
93 Ibid., p. 79; see also Chirot Daniel, ‘The Rise of the West’, American Sociological Review, 50:2 (1985), pp. 181–95.
94 Inalcik Halil, ‘Capital Formation in the Ottoman Empire’, The Journal of Economic History, 29:1 (1969), pp. 97–140, esp. p. 104.
95 Inalcik, ‘Capital’, pp. 106.
96 Keyder, ‘Dissolution’.
97 Inalcik, ‘Capital’, pp. 104–5, esp. p. 107; Faroqhi Suriaya, ‘Trade: Regional Interregional and International’, in Inalcik Halil and Quataert Donald (eds), An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 474–531.
98 Islamoglu-Inan, State, p. 204.
99 Keyder, ‘Dissolution’, pp. 179, 184.
100 Hess Andrew C., ‘The Evolution of the Ottoman Seaborne Empire in the Age of Oceanic Discoveries 1453–1525’, The American Historical Review, 75:7 (1970), pp. 1892–919 esp. p. 1916; Hess, ‘Ottoman Conquest’, p. 75.
101 Brummett Palmira, Ottoman Seapower and Levantine Diplomacy in the Age of Discovery (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), p. 7.
102 Ozbaran Salih, ‘Expansion in the Southern Seas’, in Inalcik Halil and Kafadar Cemal (eds), Suleyman the Second (ie the First) and His Time (Istanbul: Isis Press, 1993), pp. 211–18, esp. p. 215.
103 Casale Giancarlo, ‘Global Politics in the 1580s: One Canal, Twenty Thousand Cannibals, and the Ottoman Plot to Rule the World’, Journal of World History, 18:3 (2007), pp. 267–96, esp. p. 291; Hess, ‘Conquest’, p. 69.
104 Faroqhi, Ottoman Empire, p. 12.
105 Curtin Philip, Cross-Cultural Trade and World History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 116, 128.
106 Findlay Ronald, ‘The Roots of Divergence: Western Economic History in Comparative Perspective’, American Economic Review, 82:2 (1992), pp. 158–61; Stavrianos Leften S., A Global History (New Jersey: Prentice Hall 1999).
107 What Trotsky would have called a ‘whip of external necessity’.
108 Fleet Kate, European and Islamic Trade in the Early Ottoman State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 123; Barendse R. J., ‘Trade and State in the Arabian Seas: A Survey from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century’, Journal of World History, 11:2 (2000), pp. 173–225, esp. p. 192; Casale Giancarlo, The Ottoman Age of Exploration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), p. 3.
109 Mather James, Pashas: Traders and Travellers in the Islamic World (London: Yale University Press, 2009), p. 26; Inalcik, ‘Capital’, p. 97, fn. 2; Stensgaard Niels, The Asian Trade Revolution in the Seventeenth Century: The East India Companies and the Decline of the Caravan Trade (London: University of Chicago, 1974), p. 62.
110 Pamuk Sevket, A Monetary History of the Ottoman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 23; Karsh Efraim, Islamic Imperialism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007), p. 93.
111 Gallant Thomas W., ‘Europe and the Mediterranean: a Reassessment’ in Delanty Gerard (ed.), Europe and Asia Beyond East and West (London: Routledge, 2006), p. 126.
112 Goody Jack, ‘Europe and Islam’, in Delanty Gerard (ed.), Europe and Asia Beyond East and West (London: Routledge, 2006), p. 144.
113 Jensen De Lamar, ‘The Ottoman Turks in the Sixteenth Century French Diplomacy’, The Sixteenth Century Journal, 16:4 (1985), pp. 451–70, esp. p. 464.
114 Cizakca Murat, ‘Price History and the Bursa Silk Industry: A Study in Ottoman Industrial Decline, 1550–1650’, in Islamoglu-Inan Huri (ed.), The Ottoman Empire and the World-Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 247–62, esp. pp. 253–54; Goody, ‘Europe’, p. 143; Banaji, Theory, pp. 270–73.
115 Darling Gillian, Factory (London: Reaktion, 2003), p. 104.
116 Scammell Geoffrey V., The World Encompassed: The First European Maritime Empires, c. 800-1650 (London: Methuen and Co. Ltd. 1981), p. 205.
117 Inalcik, ‘Capital’, pp. 100–1; Goody, ‘Europe’, p. 143.
118 Jardine, Worldy Goods.
119 Jardine and Brotton, Global, p. 42. Unsuccessful attempts were also made to tempt Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo to the Ottoman court. See Curtis Michael, Orientalism and Islam: European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009), p. 13.
120 Soykut, ‘Introduction’, p. 74.
121 Artemel, ‘View’, pp. 157–63.
122 Yapp, ‘Europe in the Turkish Mirror’, pp. 134–55; Coles, Ottoman Impact, pp. 148–9.
123 Yapp, ‘Europe’, p. 141.
124 Coles, Ottoman Impact, p. 148.
125 Halil Inalcik, Ottoman Empire, p. 35.
126 Scammell, World Encompassed, p. 132.
127 Coles, Ottoman Impact, p. 138; Hess, Forgotten Frontier, p. 125.
128 Brummett, Ottoman Seapower, p. 7; Hess, ‘Conquest’, p. 71; Inalcik, Ottoman Empire, pp. 129–33.
129 Fleet, European and Islamic Trade, pp. 132–3.
130 Agoston Gabor, ‘Information, ideology and the limits of imperial policy: Ottoman grand strategy in the context of Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry’, in Askan Virginia and Goffman Daniel (eds), The Early Modern Ottomans: Remapping the Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
131 Elliot John, ‘Ottoman-Habsburg Rivalry: The European Perspective’, in Inalcik Halil and Kafadar Cemal (eds), Suleyman the Second (ie the First) and His Time (Istanbul: Isis Press, 1993), pp. 153–62, esp. p. 155.
132 Fischer-Galati, Ottoman Imperialism.
133 Fischer-Galati, Ottoman Imperialism; Nexon Daniel H., The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe (Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2009), p. 169.
134 Elliot, ‘Ottoman-Habsburg Rivalry’, p. 155.
135 Coles, The Ottoman Impact, p. 128; Nexon, Struggle, p. 192; Hess Andrew C, The Forgotten Frontier: A History of the Sixteenth Century Ibero-African Frontier (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. 94.
136 See also Wallerstein World-System, p. 167; Chirot, ‘Rise’, p. 183; and Kennedy Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 31–70.
137 Benno Teschke, Myth, p. 104; Tilly, Formation, p. 18.
138 Scammell, World Encompassed, pp. 93–6; Hess, ‘Conquest’, p. 59.
139 Love Ronald S., Maritime Exploration in the Age of Discovery, 1415-1800 (London: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006), pp. 6–7.
140 Scammell, World Encompassed, p. 165.
141 Ibid., p. 170.
142 Coles, Ottoman Impact, p. 108; Issawi Charles, ‘The Ottoman Empire in the European World Economy, 1600–1914’, in Karpat K. (ed.), The Ottoman State and its Place in World History (Leiden: Brill, 1974), pp. 107–17, esp. p. 111.
143 Mielants, Origins, p. 85.
144 These were unilaterally granted Ottoman diplomatic agreements which provided non-Ottoman recipients with basic legal rights and privileges within the empire's territories while regulating trade relations through the establishment of ordinary customs, taxes, and dues. Bulut has compared capitulations to ‘most favoured nation’ trade agreements, Bulut Mehmet, Ottoman Dutch Economic Relations in the Early Modern Period 1571–1699 (Veloren: Hilversum, 2001), p. 108. See also Eldem, ‘Capitulations and Western Trade’, in Faroqhi (ed.), Cambridge History of Turkey Vol. II, I pp. 283–55.
145 Bulut, Ottoman Dutch, p. 168; McGowan Bruce, Economic Life in the Ottoman Empire: Taxation, Trade and the Struggle for Land (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 4.
146 Mather, Pashas, p. 154.
147 Mielants, Origins, p. 84.
148 Banaji, Theory, pp. 270–3.
149 Anderson, Lineages, p. 124.
150 Skocpol Theda, ‘Wallerstein's World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique’, American Journal of Sociology, 82:5 (1977), pp. 1075–90, esp. p. 1086; Braudel Fernand, Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism (London: John Hopkins University Press, 1977), pp. 101–2; Sayer Derek, ‘A Notable Administration: English State Formation and the Rise of Capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 97:5 (1992), pp. 1382–415, esp. p. 1391. Each of these authors emphasise on England's island geography as an explanation for its isolation. The prevalence of naval warfare by the sixteenth century suggests that such an explanation is severely limited; England was open to invasion should the will or compulsion have arisen. See Rose Susan, Medieval Naval Warfare, 1000-1500 (London: Routledge, 2002); Palmer Michael A., Command at Sea: Naval Command and Control Since the Sixteenth Century (London: Harvard University Press, 2007).
151 Kennedy, Rise, p. 56.
152 Anderson, Lineages, p. 125.
153 Skocpol, ‘Wallerstein's World’, p. 1086.
154 Brenner, ‘Agrarian Class’, p. 61.
155 Ellen Wood, The Origin of Capitalism, p. 53.
156 Skocpol, ‘Wallerstein's World’, p. 1086; cf. Brenner, ‘Agrarian Class’, p. 49.
157 Brenner, ‘Agrarian Roots’, p. 263.
158 Wood, Origin, p. 47; Brenner, ‘Agrarian Roots’, p. 256; Aylmer G. E., ‘The Peculiarities of the English State’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 3:2 (1990), pp. 91–108.
159 Sayer, ‘Notable’, p. 1394; Anderson, Lineages, p. 127.
160 Brenner, ‘The Agrarian Roots’, p. 252.
161 Brenner, ‘Agrarian Class’, p. 47.
162 For a more in depth critique of the limits of Brenner's account, see Anievas and Nisancioglu, ‘What's at Stake’.
* I would like to thank Jamie Allinson, Alex Anievas, Gurminder Bhambra, Kamran Matin, Justin Rosenberg, Cemal Burak Tansel, and four anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments and encouragement during the writing of this article. I am also grateful to the participants at the Historical Materialism Conference (2012), Millennium Conference (2012), and Spectrum Conference (2012). Any mistakes are, of course, my own.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.