Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ‘re-turn’ to empire in IR: colonial knowledge communities and the construction of the idea of the Afghan polity, 1809–38

Abstract
Abstract

This article seeks to add to the exploration and development of Imperial History's contribution to the discipline of International Relations (IR). Focusing on British perceptions of Afghanistan in the period preceding the first Anglo-Afghan war the article considers colonial knowledge as a source of identity construction, but in a manner that avoids deploying anachronistic concepts, in this case that of the Afghan ‘state’. This approach, which draws on the insights brought to IR by historical sociology, shows that engaging with Imperial History within IR can encourage a more reflexive attitude to core disciplinary categories. This not only reveals alternative approaches to the construction of specific political communities but it also allows for a more historicist mode in the use of history by IR as a discipline. Furthermore, by moving away from material based purely on diplomatic history, Afghanistan's imperial encounter can be recovered from the dominance of ‘Great Game’ narratives, offering an account that is more appreciative of the Afghanistan context.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Stephen H. Haber, David M. Kennedy, and Stephen D. Krasner, ‘Brothers under the Skin: Diplomatic History and International Relations’, International Security, 22:1 (1997), pp. 3443

George Lawson, ‘The Eternal Divide? History and International Relations’, The European Journal of International Relations, 18:3 (2012), pp. 203–26

Christian Reus-Smit, ‘Reading History through Constructivist Eyes’, Millennium, 37:2 (2008), p. 395

George Lawson, ‘The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations’, International Studies Review, 8:3 (2006), p. 404

Daniel Jacobi, ‘On the “Construction” of Knowledge and the Knowledge of “Construction”’, International Political Sociology, 5:1 (2011), pp. 94–7

John Agnew, ‘The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory’, Review of International Political Economy, 1:1 (1994), pp. 5380

Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey, ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium, 31:1 (2002), pp. 109–27

Martin Shaw, ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’, Millennium, 31:2 (2002), pp. 327–36

Jordan Branch, ‘“Colonial reflection” and territoriality: The peripheral origins of sovereign statehood’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:2 (2012), pp. 277–97

Edward Keene, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)

Gerry Simpson, Great Powers and Outlaw States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)

Ulrike Hillemann, Asian Empire and British Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)

Bijan Omrani, ‘Charles Masson of Afghanistan: Deserter, Scholar, Spy’, Asian Affairs, 39:2 (2008)

Duncan Bell, ‘Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought’, The Historical Journal, 49:1 (2006), p. 283

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Review of International Studies
  • ISSN: 0260-2105
  • EISSN: 1469-9044
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-international-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×