Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Obligation and Sovereign Virtue in Hobbes's Leviathan

Abstract
Abstract

Debates regarding obligation in Hobbes have turned on either natural right or natural law interpretations. Both interpretations tend to take up the question of obligation from the perspective of teaching those who contend “for too great Liberty” “how to obey.” But Hobbes also has a second audience, and a second goal in mind: those who contend “for too much Authority” must be taught “how to govern.” From that perspective, a different discussion of obligation emerges. What is revealed is a contiguous set of reflections in Leviathan that pivot on the character of the sovereign and the citizens’ judgment thereof, all of which inform effective obligation and have little in common with received interpretations of obligation. It further reveals a relationship between the failure to manifest sovereign virtue and the natural punishment of pusillanimous and barbaric sovereigns. That is, it speaks to a sovereign virtue ethic in Leviathan.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Obligation and Sovereign Virtue in Hobbes's Leviathan
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Obligation and Sovereign Virtue in Hobbes's Leviathan
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Obligation and Sovereign Virtue in Hobbes's Leviathan
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Thomas Nagel , “Hobbes's Concept of Obligation,” Philosophical Review 68, no. 1 (1959): 6883

Peter J. Steinberger , “Hobbesian Resistance,” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 4 (2002): 856–65

Eleanor Curran , Reclaiming the Rights of the Hobbesian Subject (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)

A. E. Taylor , “The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes,” Philosophy 13, no. 52 (October 1938): 406–24

Quentin Skinner , “The Ideological Context of Hobbes's Political Thought,” Historical Journal 9, no. 3 (January 1966): 286317

Quentin Skinner , Visions of Politics: Hobbes and Civil Science, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)

Kinch Hoekstra , “The de Facto Turn in Hobbes's Political Philosophy,” in Leviathan after 350 Years, ed. Tom Sorell and Luc Foisneau (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 72

Hobbes on Law, Nature, and Reason,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41, no. 1 (2003): 111–20

Deborah Baumgold , “The Difficulties of Hobbes Interpretation,” Political Theory 36, no. 6 (2008): 827–55

Christopher Scott McClure , “War, Madness, and Death: The Paradox of Honor in Hobbes's Leviathan,” Journal of Politics 76, no. 1 (2014): 114–25

Quentin Skinner , Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 11

Julie E. Cooper , “Vainglory, Modesty, and Political Agency in the Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes,” Review of Politics 72, no. 2 (2010): 241–69

Andrew J. Corsa , “Thomas Hobbes: Magnanimity, Felicity, and Justice,” Hobbes Studies 26, no. 2 (January, 2013): 130–51

Bernard Gert , “The Law of Nature as the Moral Law,” Hobbes Studies 1, no. 1 (1988): 2644

Quentin Skinner , “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7, no. 1 (1999): 129

W. F. R. Hardie , “‘Magnanimity’ in Aristotle's Ethics,” Phronesis 23, no. 1 (1978): 6379

Jacob Howland , “Aristotle's Great-Souled Man,” Review of Politics 64, no. 1 (2002): 2756

Arash Abizadeh , “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory,” American Political Science Review 105, no. 2 (2011): 298315

Gabriella Slomp , “The Liberal Slip of Thomas Hobbes's Authoritarian Pen,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13, no. 2–3 (2010): 363

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Review of Politics
  • ISSN: 0034-6705
  • EISSN: 1748-6858
  • URL: /core/journals/review-of-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 209 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th January 2017 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.