Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Engaging older people in decisions about their healthcare: the case for shared decision making

  • Joanne Lally (a1) and Ellen Tullo (a2)

Summary

Shared decision making in clinical practice involves both the healthcare professional, an expert in the clinical condition and the patient who is an expert in what is important to them. A consultation involving shared decision making enables an examination of the options available, consideration of the risks and benefits whilst incorporating the values of the patient into the decision making process. A decision is aimed at, which is both clinically appropriate and is congruent with the patient's values.

Older people have been shown to value involvement, to varying degrees, in decisions about their care and treatment. The case of atrial fibrillation shows the opportunities for, and benefits of, sharing with older people decision making about their healthcare.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Dr Joanne Lally, SDM Programme Lead, Clinical Governance and Risk Department, 3rd Floor, Peacock Hall, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP. Email: j.e.lally@ncl.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Sci Med 1999; 49: 651–61.
2Charles, C, Whelan, T, Gafni, A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ 1999; 319: 780–82.
3Dudley, N. Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper. Qual Saf Health Care 2001; 10: i1922.
4Charles, C, Gafni, A, Whelan, T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Sci Med 1997; 44: 681–92.
5Edwards, A, Elwyn, G (eds). Shared decision making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
6Department of Health. Liberating the NHS. London 2010.
7Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health; 2001.
8Weinstein, JN, Clay, K, Morgan, TS. Informed patient choice: patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. Health Affairs 2007; 26: 726–30.
9Coulter, A. The autonomous patient: ending paternalism in medical care. London: Stationery Office for the Nuffield Trust 2002.
10British Geriatrics Society. Standards of Medical Care for Older People. British Geriatrics Society; 2011 (cited 4 October 2011); available at: http://www.bgs.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=35:gpgstandardsofcare&catid=12:goodpractice&Itemid=106.
11Wennberg, J, Gittlesohn, A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am 1982; 246: 120–34.
12Anderson, N, Fuller, R, Dudley, N. ‘Rules of thumb’ or reflective practice? Understanding senior physicians’ decision-making about anti-thrombotic usage in atrial fibrillation. QJM: Int J Med 2007; 100: 263–69.
13Mulley, AG. Inconvenient truths about supplier induced demand and unwarranted variation in medical practice. BMJ 2009; 339: 1007–9.
14Barry, M, Fowler, F, Mulley, A, Henderson, J, Wennberg, J. Patient reaction to a program to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med Care 1995; 33: 771–82.
15Hingorani, A, Vallance, P. A simple computer program for guiding management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing. BMJ 1999; 318: 101–5.
16Mulley, AG. Assessing patients’ utilities: can the ends justify the means? Med Care 1989; 27: S26981.
17Coulter, A. Do patients want a choice and does it work? BMJ 2010; 341: c4989.
18Bastiaens, H, Van Royen, P, Pavlic, DR, Raposo, V, Baker, R. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Counsel 2007; 68: 3342.
19Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. 2001 (cited September 2010); available at: http://www.expertpatients.nhs.uk/index.aspx.
20Edwards, A, Elwyn, G (eds). Evidence based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
21European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the task force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2369–429.
22O’Connor, A, Bennett, C, Stacey, D, Barry, M, Col, N, Eden, K et al. . Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Collaboration 2006, Contract No. 3.
23Elwyn, G, O’Connor, A, Stacey, D, Volk, R, Edwards, A, Coulter, A et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006; 333: 417–23.
24Barnato, AE, Llewellyn-Thomas, H, Peters, E, Siminoff, L, Collins, E, Barry, M. Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients decision aids. Medical Decision Making 2007; 27: 626–34.
25Barry, M, Cherkin, D, Chang, Y, Fowler, F, Skates, S. Randomised trial of a multimedia shared decision making program for men facing a treatment decision for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Disease Management Clin Outcomes 1997; 1: 514.
26Murray, E, Davis, H, Tai, S, Coulter, A, Grey, A, Haines, A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. BMJ 2001; 323: 493–96.
27Stacey, D, Bennett, CL, Barry, MJ, Col, NF, Eden, KB, Holmes-Rovner, M, Llewellyn-Thomas, H, Lyddiatt, A, Légaré, F, Thomson, R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (10): CD001431.
28Frosch, D, Kaplan, R, Felitti, V. A randomised controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Internal Med 2003; 18: 781–87.
29Gattellari, M, Ward, J. Does evidence based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision making? A randomised controlled trial. J Medical Screening 2003; 10: 2739.
30Gattellari, M, Ward, J. A community based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Counsel 2005; 57: 168–82.
31Myers, R, Daskalakis, C, Cocroft, J, Kunkel, E, Delmoor, E, Liberatore, M. Preparing African American men in community primary care practices to decide whether or not to have prostate cancer screening. J Nat Med Assoc 2005; 97: 1143–54.
32Partin, M, Nelson, D, Radosevich, D, Nugent, S, Flood, A, Dillon, N. Randomised trial examining the effects of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences and behaviours. J Gen Internal Med 2004; 19: 835–42.
33Schapira, M, Van Ruiswyk, K. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Family Practice 2000; 49: 418–24.
34Volk, R, Cass, A, Spann, S. A randomised controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Archives Family Med 1999; 8: 333–40.
35Wolf, A, Nasser, J, Schorling, J. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. Archives Internal Med 1996; 156: 1333–36.
36Krist, AH, Woolf, SH, Johnson, RE, Kerns, JW. Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making. Annals Family Med 2007; 5: 112–19.
37Watson, E, Hewitson, P, Brett, J, Bukach, C, Evans, R, Edwards, A et al. Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested. Patient Educ Counsel 2006; 63: 367–79.
38Lalonde, L, O’Connor, A, Duguay, P, Brassard, J, Drake, ER, Grover, S. Evaluation of a decision aid and a personal risk profile in a community pharmacy for patients considering options to improve cardiovascular health. J Pharmacy Prac 2006; 14: 5162.
39Montgomery, A, Fahey, T, Peters, T. A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an infomation video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Br J Gen Prac 2003; 53: 446–53.
40Sheridan, SL, Shadle, J, Simpson, RJ, Pignone, MP. The impact of a decision about heart disease prevention on patients’ discussions with their doctor and their plans for prevention: a pilot randomised trial. BMC Health Services Res 2006; 6: 121.
41Bernstein, S, Skarupski, K, Grayson, C, Starling, M, Bates, E, Eagle, K. A randomised controlled trial of information giving to patients referred for coronary angiography: effects on outcomes of care. Health Expectations 1998; 1: 5061.
42Morgan, M, Deber, R, Llewellyn-Thomas, H, Gladstone, P, Cusimano, R, O’Rourke, K. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Internal Med 2000; 15: 685–93.
43Dolan, J, Frisina, S. Randomised controlled trial of a patient decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Medical Decision Making 2002; 22: 125–39.
44Pignone, M, Harris, R, Kinsinger, L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial. Annals Internal Med 2000; 133: 761–69.
45Wolf, A, Schorling, J. Does informed consent alter elderly patients’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening? Results of a randomised controlled trial. J Gen Internal Med 2000; 15: 2430.
46Ruffin, MT, Fetters, MD, Jimbo, M. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomised controlled trial. Preventative Med 2007; 45: 267–73.
47Trevena, LJ, Irwig, L, Barratt, A. Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. J Medical Screening 2008; 15: 7682.
48Wakefield, CE, Meiser, B, Homewood, J, Ward, R, O’Donnell, S, Kirk, J. Randomized trial of a decision aid in individuals considering genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer risk. Cancer 2008; 113: 956–65.
49Fraenkel, L, Rabidou, N, Wittink, D, Fried, T. Improving informed decision-making for patients with knee pain. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1894–98.
50Man-Son-Hing, M, Laupacis, A, Gage, B, Montgomery, A, Howitt, A, Thomson, R et al. Preference-based antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: Implications for clinical decision making. Medical Decision Making 2005; 25: 548–59.
51McAlister, FA, Man-Son-Hing, M, Straus, SE, Ghali, WA, Anderson, D, Majumdar, SR, Gibson, P, Cox, JL, Fradette, M; Decision Aid in Atrial Fibrillation (DAAFI) Investigators. Impact of a patient decision aid on care among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. CMAJ 2005; 173: 496501.
52Man-Song-Hing, M, Laupacis, A, O’Connor, AM, Biggs, J, Drake, E, Yetisir, E et al. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 1999; 282: 737–43.
53Thomson, RG, Eccles, MP, Steen, IN, Greenaway, J, Stobbart, L, Murtagh, MJ et al. A patient decision aid to support shared decision-making on anti-thrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 216–23.
54Oakley, S, Walley, T. A pilot study assessing the effectiveness of a decision aid on patient adherance with oral bisphosphonate medication. Pharmaceutical J 2006; 276: 536–38.

Keywords

Engaging older people in decisions about their healthcare: the case for shared decision making

  • Joanne Lally (a1) and Ellen Tullo (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed