Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A novel robotic knee device with stance control and its kinematic weight optimization for rehabilitation

  • Sanghun Pyo (a1), Junwon Yoon (a1) and Min-Kyun Oh (a2)
Abstract
SUMMARY

It is important to develop a robotic orthosis or exoskeleton that can provide back-drivable and good assistive performances with lightweight structures for overground gait rehabilitation of stroke patients. In this paper, we describe a robotic knee device with a five-bar linkage to allow low-impedance voluntary knee motion within a specified rotation range during the swing phase, and to assist knee extension during the stance phase. The device can provide free motion through the five-bar linkage with 2-degree-of-freedom (DOF) actuation via the patient's shank using a linear actuator, and can assist knee extension at any controlled knee angle while bearing weight via a geared five-bar linkage with 1 DOF actuation of the linear actuator. The kinematic transition between the two modes can be implemented by contact with a circular structure and a linear link, and the resultant range of motion can be determined by the linear actuator. The kinematic weight of the device was optimized using the simple genetic algorithm to reduce the mass. The optimization cost function was based on the sum of the total link lengths and the actuator power. The optimization results reduced the total link length and motor power by 47% and 43%, respectively, compared to the initial design. We expect that the device will facilitate rehabilitation of stroke patients by allowing safe and free overground walking while providing support for stumbling.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A novel robotic knee device with stance control and its kinematic weight optimization for rehabilitation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A novel robotic knee device with stance control and its kinematic weight optimization for rehabilitation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A novel robotic knee device with stance control and its kinematic weight optimization for rehabilitation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jwyoon@gnu.ac.kr
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.G. B. Prange, M. J. Jannink, G. G. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, H. J. Hermens, M. J. Ijzerman, “Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43 (2), 171184 (2006).

3.J. Yoon, B. Novandy, C. Yoon and K. Park, “A 6-DOF gait rehabilitation robot with upper and lower-limb connections that allows walking velocity updates on various terrains,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 15 (2), 201215 (2010).

4.A. V. Nene, H. J. Hermens and G. Zilvold, “Paraplegic locomotion: A review,” Spinal Cord 34 (9), 507524 (1996).

6.R. Kobetic, C. S. To, J. R. Schnellenberger, M. L. Audu and T. C. Bulea, “Development of hybrid orthosis for standing, walking, and stair climbing after spinal cord injury,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 46 (3), 447462 (2009).

7.M. Y. Zarrugh and C. W. Radcliffe, “Simulation of swing phase dynamics in above-knee prostheses,” J. Biomech. 9 (5), 283292 (1976).

8.D. Jin, R. Zhang, H. O. Dimo, R. Wang and J. Zhang, “Kinematic and dynamic performance of prosthetic knee joint using six-bar mechanism,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 40 (1), 3948 (2003).

9.J. E. Pratt, B. T. Krupp, C. J. Morse and S. H. Collins, “The RoboKnee: An Exoskeleton for Enhancing Strength and Endurance During Walking”, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, LA, USA (Apr. 26–May 01, 2004) pp. 24302435.

11.S. Mefoued, S. Mohammed and Y. Amirat, “Knee Joint Movement Assistance Through Robust Control of an Actuated Orthosis,” 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, September 25–30, San Francisco, CA, USA (2011).

13.G. Belforte, L. Gastaldi and M. Sorli, “Pneumatic active gait orthosis,” Mechatronics 11, 301323 (2001).

14.J. F. Veneman, R. Ekkelenkamp, R. Kruidhof, F. C. T. van der Helm and H. van der Kooij, “A series elastic- and Bowden-cable-based, actuation system for use as torque actuator, in exoskeleton-type robots,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 25 (3), 261281 (Mar. 2006).

16.J. S. Sulzer, R. A. Roiz, M. A. Peshkin and J. L. Patton, “A highly backdrivable, lightweight knee actuator for investigating gait in stroke,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 25 (3) 539548 (Jun. 2009).

17.P. W. Duncan, K. J. Sullivan, A. L. Behrman, S. P. Azen, S. S. Wu, S. E. Nadeau, B. H. Dobkin, D. K. Rose, J. K. Tilson, S. Cen, S. K. Hayden, “Body-weight–supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke,” New England J. Med. 364 (21), 20262036 (2011).

18.T. G. Hornby, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, T. Demott, J. L. Moore and H. R. Roth, “Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study,” Stroke 39 (6), 17861792 (2008).

19.T. Yakimovich, E. D. Lemaire and J. Kofman, “Engineering design review of stance-control knee-ankle-foot orthoses,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 46 (2), 257268 (2009).

23.Y. Hwang, J. Yoon Christiand and J. Ryu, “The Optimum Design of a 6-DOF Parallel Manipulator with Large Orientation Workspace,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2007), Rome, Italy (Apr. 10–14, 2007), pp. 163168.

25.S. Hassan and J. Yoon, “Virtual Maintenance System with a Two-Staged Ant colony Optimization Algorithm”, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2011), Shanghai International Conference Center, Shanghai, China (May 9–13, 2011), pp. 931936.

27.M. Arsenault and R. Boudreau, “The synthesis of three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel mechanisms with revolute joints (3-RRR) for an optimal singularity-free workspace,” J. Robot. Syst. 21 (5), 259274 (2004).

28.K. Y. Tsai and K. D. Huang, “The design of isotropic 6-DOF parallel manipulators using isotropy generators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 38, 11991214 (2003).

29.B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelstein, C. Diels and M. Aisen, “A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation,” Neurology 54 (10), 1983–1944 (2000).

30.B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs and N. Hogan, “Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option?,” Curr. Option Neurology 14, 745752 (2001).

31.G. G. Fluet and J. E. Deutsch, “Virtual reality for sensorimotor rehabilitation post-stroke: The promise and current state of the field,” Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep. 1, 920 (2013).

32.B. B. Johansson, “Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation: The will is lecture,” Stroke 31, 223230 (2000).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Robotica
  • ISSN: 0263-5747
  • EISSN: 1469-8668
  • URL: /core/journals/robotica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: