No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
He was about five feet eight inches tall, rather thin, and for the last thirty or so years of his life sported a bushy beard and moustache, fashionable for the time. His pleasing low-pitched voice, ideal for conversation, did not carry well to large audiences, and although he was much in demand as a public speaker he rarely spoke from the floor at faculty or professional meetings. As a young man, within the family or with close friends, he was frequently the source and centre of fun, vying with his father in devising practical jokes or in generating lively argument. Like his father he was the victim of his moods, and his own wife and children had much to contend with; typically, he assigned the hour of his evening meal to student consultation, and would refuse to see invited guests if he suddenly felt antisocial. He hated what he called ‘loutish’ informality in dress, and the American way of eating boiled eggs; he loved bright neckties, animals and hill walking. He had no exotic tastes in food, avoided tea and coffee, and drank no alcohol—one of his brothers became an alcoholic, like their father in his younger days. From his early twenties until the end of his life he experienced, and perhaps savoured, a series of physical and mental depressions; remarkably, so did his father, his four brothers, and even more dramatically, his sister.
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 19: American Philosophy , March 1985 , pp. 43 - 68
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1985
References
1 The biographical sketch is derived mainly from Perry, , and LettersGoogle Scholar; but see also James, Henry, Autobiography, Dupee, F. W. (ed.) (London: W. H. Allen, 1956).Google Scholar
2 See Strouse, Jean, Alice James (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1980).Google Scholar
3 Perry, , I, 15.Google Scholar
4 ERM, 5Google Scholar: ‘I have often tried to imagine what sort of a figure my father might have made, had he been born in a genuinely theological age’. See also, Young, F. H., The Philosophy of Henry James, Sr. (New York: Bookman Associates, 1951)Google Scholar; and PU, 29.Google Scholar
5 Letters, I, 14.Google Scholar
6 Ibid., I, 10.
7 Ibid., I, 66.
8 Ibid., I, 78.
9 Ibid., I, 129.
10 Ibid., I, 147.
11 Perry, , I, 324.Google Scholar
12 Letters, II, 227Google Scholar; Perry, , I, 450, 442–443.Google Scholar
13 Letters, II, 165, 79.Google Scholar
14 Essays, 89.Google Scholar
15 Perry, , I, 331, 329.Google Scholar
16 Letters, I, 14Google Scholar; Perry, I, 407.Google Scholar On ‘over-sentimentalism’, see Talks, 258.Google Scholar
17 Perry, , II, 258Google Scholar: ‘The weight of the past world here is fatal,—one ends by becoming its mere parasite instead of its equivalent. This worship, this dependence on other men is abnormal. The ancients did things by doing the business of the day, not by gaping at their grandfathers’ tombs,—and the normal man today will do likewise' (1873, from Rome). See also Talks, 300Google Scholar: ‘those philosophers are right who contend that the world is a standing thing, with no progress, no real history. The changing conditions of history touch only the surface of the show. The altered equilibriums and redistributions only diversify our opportunities and open chances to us for new ideals’.
18 Letters, I, 131.Google Scholar He goes on to say: ‘The stoic feeling of being a sentinel obeying orders without knowing the general's plan is a noble one’.
19 WB, 70.Google Scholar The versions in WB and Essays differ: I refer to both.
20 Essays, 86, 84Google Scholar; WB, 92–93.Google Scholar
21 WB, 95.Google Scholar
22 Essays, 434.Google Scholar
23 Principles, I, 218, 104, 139, 224, 237; II, 3.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., I, 444, 463.
25 Ibid., I, 236, 237, 471. For apparent recognition of the chemical source of the model, ERE, 6.Google Scholar
26 Principles, II, 44Google Scholar; I, 221: II, 295: I, 402: II, 295: II, 319 and note.
27 Ibid., II, 677, 672; I, 134.
28 Ibid., II, 671.
29 On consciousness see Principles, I, 273, 275, 400Google Scholar; ERE, 3, 14, 23, 137Google Scholar: on classification see Principles, II, 335, 333.Google Scholar
30 Principles, I, 488.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., II, 672, 674.
32 WB, 184, 208, 177.Google Scholar
33 See my Philosophy and the Novel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975)Google Scholar, Ch. 4; cf. Principles, I, 291–292, 354, 360, 400.Google Scholar
34 Talks, 29, 52, 204–205, 206–207.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., 54–55. See Newman, J. H., ‘Discourses on the Scope and Nature of University Education’, in Newman, Tillotson, G. (ed.) (London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1957), 491, 442–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Ibid., 268–272.
37 Perry, , II, 195.Google Scholar
38 Talks, v.Google Scholar
39 Letters, II, 146.Google Scholar
40 Ibid., II, 127.
41 ERM, 4, 60Google Scholar: James regarded it ‘not only a filial but a philosophical duty’ to make public his father's ideas. See also a letter of 1891 to his sister: ‘These inhibitions, these split-up selves, all these new facts that are gradually coming to light about our organization, these enlargements of the self in trance, etc., are bringing me to turn for light in the direction of all sorts of despised spiritualistic and unscientific ideas. Father would find in me today a much more receptive listener—all that philosophy has got to be brought in’ (Letters, I, 310).Google Scholar
42 Letters, II, 165.Google Scholar
43 Ibid., II, 149–150.
44 Ibid., II, 155, 196.
45 Ibid., II, 213–215.
46 Varieties, 31, 18, 53, 109, 74.Google Scholar
47 Ibid., 329.
48 See my Hume's Sentiments (Edinburgh University Press, 1982) Ch. 2.Google Scholar
49 Varieties, 334.Google Scholar
50 Ibid., 379–380, 387, 428, 431.
51 Ibid., 485–486.
52 Ibid., 519, 444, 508, 458–461.
53 MT, 189–190 n.Google Scholar
54 Essays, 504–505.Google Scholar
55 Pragmatism, 12.Google Scholar
56 Ibid., 51, 53, 58.
57 Ibid., 59–61. See Quine, W. V. O., ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ (1951), in From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1961), 42.Google Scholar
58 Pragmatism, 159, 69, 169–170, 172, 178.Google Scholar
59 Ibid., 201, 207–208.
60 Ibid., 215, 245, 255.
61 MT, xii–xiiiGoogle Scholar
62 Ibid., 90, 117, 153.
63 Ibid., 182–215.
64 Ibid., 202, 204, 229, 243.
65 PU, 16–19.Google Scholar
66 Ibid., 235.
67 Ibid., 244, 248, 246, 253.
68 Ibid., 288–289; WB, 69.Google Scholar
69 ERM, 72.Google Scholar James's younger brother Garth Wilkinson (Wilky) was Adjutant of the 54th Massachusetts, and was wounded in the attack on Fort Wagner during which Shaw was killed.
70 ERM, 122–123, 170–172.Google Scholar
71 Letters, I, 66Google Scholar; Perry, , I, 297, 259.Google Scholar
72 Letters, I, 347.Google Scholar In 1883 he writes from London to his brother Henry: ‘Then the theatres, and the hippopotamus-like satisfaction of their audiences! … Then the determination on the part of all who write … to do it as amateurs, and never to use the airs and language of a professional; to be first of all a layman and a gentleman, and to pretend that your ideas came to you accidentally as it were, and are things you care nothing about’ (Perry, , 1, 387).Google Scholar
73 Letters, II, 152, 100Google Scholar; and 153—‘The eternal fight of liberalism has now to be fought by us on much the same terms as in the older countries’.
74 Talks, 212, 215Google Scholar; and 217—‘We must change ourselves from a race that admires jerk and snap for their own sakes … to one that, on the contrary, has calm for its ideal, and for their own sakes loves harmony, dignity, and ease’.
75 For James's first response to Eliot's election as President in 1869, see Perry, , I, 296Google Scholar; for background, Kuklick, B., The Rise of American Philosophy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977), esp. 131.Google Scholar
76 Problems, 6.Google Scholar
77 Perry, , I, 443.Google Scholar
78 Letters, II, 164.Google Scholar
79 Perry, , II, 418Google Scholar; Pragmatism, 197Google Scholar; also Letters, II, 164Google Scholar, and remarks on Boutroux's lectures at Harvard in the Nation, 1910Google Scholar (James, W., Essays in Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978), 167).Google Scholar
80 Perry, , II, 422.Google Scholar
81 Ayer, A. J., The Origins of Pragmatism (London, 1968), 184–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar On ‘technical interests’, see PU, 14.Google Scholar
82 Perry, , I, 128Google Scholar; II, 189–190. In 1905 he asserts that the humanism he supports ‘has to renounce sincerely rectilinear arguments and ancient ideals of rigour and finality’—ERE, 247.Google Scholar
83 See my Hume's Sentiments, passim.
84 ERE, 136Google Scholar; PU, 15.Google Scholar
85 James even quotes Cicero in his 1879 article, WB, 92.Google Scholar
86 Letters, II, 164.Google Scholar
87 Varieties, 20Google Scholar; Principles, I, 125—theGoogle Scholar first sentence is repeated, verbatim, Talks, 70Google Scholar; on the ‘anti-sexual instinct … of personal isolation’ (Ibid., II, 437).
88 Letters, II, 204Google Scholar; Talks, v.Google Scholar
89 Varieties, 45, 368, 46.Google Scholar
90 Letters, II, 105Google Scholar; cf. 305.
91 Talks, 143Google Scholar; PU, 15.Google Scholar
92 Essays, 435.Google Scholar
93 Hume, D., The Philosophical Works, Green, and Grose, (eds) (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1875), IV, 368Google Scholar; the quotation is from Hume's essay of 1742, ‘Of Essay Writing’.
94 Letters, II, 279.Google Scholar
96 Perry, , II, 256Google Scholar—‘the good thing about a work of art is that it tells all sorts of things to different spectators, of none of which the artist ever knew a word’. Perry surmises that James shrank from discussing aesthetic experiences precisely because he had them, but discussed religious experiences because he borrowed already verbalized versions (ibid.). But James certainly had experiences which he regarded as extra-ordinary, and possibly mystical.
97 Perry, , II, 328.Google Scholar