Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:54:42.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consistent Forecasting vs. Anchoring of Market Stories: Two Cultures of Modeling and Model Use in a Bank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2014

Leon Wansleben*
London School of Economics E-mail:


It seems theoretically convenient to construe knowledge practices in financial markets and organizations as “applied economics.” Alternatively or additionally, one might argue that practitioners draw on economic knowledge in order to systematically orient their actions towards profit-maximization; models, then, are understood as devices that make calculative rationality possible. However, empirical studies do not entirely confirm these theoretical positions: Practitioners’ actual calculations are often not “framed” by models; organizations and institutions influence the choice and adoption of models; and different professional groups in financial markets have diverging attitudes towards model calculations. In order to account for this diversity, this article proposes the concept of cultures of economic and financial expertise; the concept focuses on the patterns of knowledge practices and knowledge-related self-definitions of groups within financial organizations and markets; it also facilitates an analysis of the relations between and, more specifically, the hierarchies among different practices and identities. The article then goes on to explore the process of foreign exchange forecasting in a particular bank. The description immediately reveals that two groups are involved in this process: economists and analysts. These groups maintain quite different practices and self-descriptions in relation to models: While the economists in the bank use the models as organizational resources for consistent forecasting procedures and observe data with the help of simple model structures, analysts approach model forecasts from the perspective of critics: They see limits in the variable-centered, as opposed to a “thematic” approach and they disregard a model's imposed temporality. Nevertheless, analysts use model forecasts as anchors for developing their own “paths” and stories about possible future expectation changes in the markets. The specific division of labor between economists and analysts, and specifically the dominant role of analysts in the forecasting process, fit into a larger picture: The rise of institutional investors in the foreign exchange markets and their demand for genuine market knowledge for speculative investment projects has contributed to the rise and dominance of analysts’ culture.

Topical Section: Models at Work – Models in Decision Making
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abbott, Andrew D. 1992. “What Do Cases Do? Some Notes on Activity in Sociological Analysis.” In What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, edited by Ragin, Charles C. and Becker, Howard S., 5382. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abolafia, Mitchell. 1996. Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, William. 2007. “The Global Foreign Exchange Market: Growth and Transformation.” Bank of Canada Review Autumn 2007:312.Google Scholar
Beunza, Daniel, and Garud, Raghu. 2007. “Calculators, Lemmings or Frame-Makers? The Intermediary Role of Securities Analysts.” In Market Devices, edited by Callon, Michel, Millo, Yuval, and Muniesa, Fabian, 1339. Malden MA: Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beunza, Daniel, and Stark, David. 2008. “Tools of the Trade: The Socio-Technology of Arbitrage in a Wall Street Trading Room.” In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by Pinch, Trevor J. and Swedberg, Richard, 253290. Cambridge MA and Oxford: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beunza, Daniel, and Stark, David. 2012. “From Dissonance to Resonance: Cognitive Interdependence in Quantitative Finance.” Economy and Society 41 (3):33833417.Google Scholar
BIS. 1995. Triennial Central Bank Survey Foreign Exchange. Basle: Bank for International Settlements,. URL <>, last accessed July 30, 2014.,+last+accessed+July+30,+2014.>Google Scholar
BIS. 2010. Triennial Central Bank Survey Foreign Exchange. Basle: Bank for International Settlements..URL <>, last accessed July 30, 2014.,+last+accessed+July+30,+2014.>Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction: critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar
Breslau, Daniel, and Yonay, Yuval. 1999. “Beyond Metaphor: Mathematical Models in Economics as Empirical Research.” Science in Context 12 (2):317332.Google Scholar
Brown, Brendan. 1996. Economists and the Financial Markets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruegger, Urs. 1999. “Wie handeln Devisenhändler? Eine ethnographische Studie über Akteure in einem globalen Markt.” Ph.D. thesis, University of St. Gallen.Google Scholar
Bruegger, Urs. 2000. “Speculating: Work in Financial Markets.” In Facts and Figures: Economic Representations and Practices, edited by Kalthoff, Herbert, Rottenburg, Richard, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, 229255. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1998. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics.” In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Callon, Michel, 157. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Say that Economics Is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Perrformativity of Economics, edited by MacKenzie, Donald A., 311357. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Calmfors, Lars, and Wihlborg, Clas. 1976. “General Discussion: What Have We Learned? Where Are the Fundamental Conflicts of Opinion?Scandinavian Journal of Economics 78 (2):386412.Google Scholar
CFA. 2008. CFA Program Curriculum. Boston MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 2008. “Actors’ and Analysts’ Categories in the Social Analysis of Science.” In Clashes of Knowledge, edited by Meusburger, Peter, Welker, Michael, and Wunder, Edgar, 101–10. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, Rudiger. 1976. “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics.” Journal of Political Economy 84 (6):11611176.Google Scholar
Evans, Robert. 1999. Macroeconomic Forecasting: A Sociological Appraisal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2006. “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics.” American Journal of Sociology 112 (1):145194.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A. 1993. On Exchange Rates. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A., and Rose, Andrew K.. 1995. “Empirical Research on Nominal Exchange Rates.” In Handbook of International Economics III, edited by Grossman, Gene M., 16891729. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Frenkel, Jacob. 1976. “A Monetary Approach to the Exchange Rate: Doctrinal Aspects and Empirical Evidence.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 78 (2):200224.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. [1967] 2008. Studies in Ethnomethdology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Sacks, Harvey. 1986. “On Formal Structures of Practical Actions.” In Ethnomethodological Studies of Work, edited by Garfinkel, Harold, 160–93. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1969. Strategic Interaction, 2nd ed.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hägglund, Peter. 2000. “The Value of Facts: How Analysts’ Recommendations Focus on Facts instead of Values.” In Facts and Figures: Economic Representations and Practices, edited by Kalthoff, Herbert, Rottenburg, Richard, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, 313337. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.Google Scholar
Kalthoff, Herbert. 2005. “Practices of Calculation: Economic Representations and Risk Management.” Theory Culture and Society 22 (2):6997.Google Scholar
Kalthoff, Herbert. 2011. “Un/doing Calculation: On Knowledge Practices of Risk Management.” Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 12 (1):321.Google Scholar
King, Michael R., and Rime, Dagfinn. 2010. “The $4 Trillion Question: What Explains FX Growth since the 2007 Survey?” In BIS Quarterly Review, December issue, edited by Bank for International Settlements, 27–42. URL <>, last accessed July 3, 2014.,+last+accessed+July+3,+2014.>Google Scholar
King, Michael R., Osler, Carol, and Rime, Dagfinn. 2011. “Foreign Exchange Market Structure, Players and Evolution.” Working Paper, issue 2011/10, edited by Norges Bank. URL <>, last retrieved July 30, 2014.,+last+retrieved+July+30,+2014.>Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2003. “From Pipes to Scopes.” Distinktion 7:723.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009a. “The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World.” Symbolic Interaction Journal of the Society for Study of Symbolic Interaction 32 (1):6188.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009. “What Is a Financial Market?” In Wirtschaftssoziologie, edited by Beckert, Jens and Deutschmann, Christoph, 326–43. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2011. “Financial Analysis: Epistemic Profile of an Evaluative Science.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Camic, Charles, Gross, Neill, and Lamont, Michèle, 405–42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Bruegger, Urs. 2002. “Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (4):905950.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Preda, Alex. 2007. “The Temporalization of Financial Markets: From Network to Flow.” Theory, Culture & Society 24:116–38.Google Scholar
Langenohl, Andreas. 2007. Finanzmarkt und Temporalität: Imaginäre Zeit und die kulturelle Repräsentation der Gesellschaft. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leigh Star, Susan. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (5):601617.Google Scholar
Leigh Star, Susan, and Griesemer, James R.. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3):387420.Google Scholar
Lépinay, Vincent A. 2011. Codes of Finance: Engineering Derivatives in a Global Bank. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Richard K. 2001. The Microstructure Approach to Exchange Rates. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maas, Harro, and Morgan, Mary S.. 2012. “Observation and Observing in Economics.” History of Political Economy 44(annual supplement):124.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 2008. “An Engine, Not a Camera:” How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 2011a. “The Credit Crisis as a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge.” American Journal of Sociology 116:17781841.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 2011b. “Evaluation Cultures? On Invoking ‘Culture’ in the Analysis of Behaviour in Financial Markets.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Edinburgh, URL <>, last accessed July 3, 2014.,+last+accessed+July+3,+2014.>Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald A., and Millo, Yuval. 2003. “Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (1):107145.Google Scholar
Mars, Frank. 1998. “‘Wir alle sind Seher’: Die Praxis der Aktienanalyse.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Meese, Richard A., and Rogoff, Kenneth. 1983. “Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Seventies: Do They Fit Out of Sample?Journal of International Economics 14 (1–2):324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W. 2010. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1):120.Google Scholar
Mikes, Anette. 2009. “Risk Management and Calculative Cultures.” Management Accounting Research 20 (1):1840.Google Scholar
Millo, Yuval, and MacKenzie, Donald. 2009. “The Usefulness of Inaccurate Models: Towards an Understanding of the Emergence of Financial Risk Management.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34:638653.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, Hirokazu. 2003. “The Temporalities of the Market.” American Anthropologist 105 (2):255265.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Muth, John F. 1961. “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.” Econometrica 29 (3):315335.Google Scholar
Phillips, Damon J., and Zuckerman, Ezra W.. 2001. “Middle-Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (2):379429.Google Scholar
Power, Michael. 2010. “Fair Value Accounting, Financial Economics and the Transformation of Reliability.” Accounting and Business Research 40 (3):197210.Google Scholar
Preda, Alex. 2009. Information, Knowledge, and Economic Life: An Introduction to the Sociology of Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pryke, Michael. 2010. “Money's Eyes: The Visual Preparation of Financial Markets.” Economy and Society 39:427–59.Google Scholar
Scott, William Richard. 2003. Organizations. Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 5th ed.Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. [1975] 2003. Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Shackley, Simon. 2001. “Epistemic Lifestyles in Climate Change Modeling.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by Miller, Clark and Edwards, Paul R., 107133. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jan, Millo, Yuval, Kellard, Neil, and Engel, Ofer. 2011. “Dangerous Connections: Hedge Funds, Brokers and the Construction of a Market Crisis.” Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics and Political Science. URL <>, last accessed July 3, 2014.,+last+accessed+July+3,+2014.>Google Scholar
Sombart, Werner. 1931. “Einführung in Begriff und Wesen des Wirtschaftssystems.” In Kapital und Kapitalismus: Vorlesungen, edited by Harms, Bernhard, 7784. Berlin: Reimar Hobbing Verlag.Google Scholar
Soros, George. 1994. The Alchemy of Finance: Reading the Mind of the Market. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2009. “Theoretical Models as Creative Resources in Financial Markets.” In Rationalität der Kreativität? edited by Jansen, Stephan A., Schröter, Eckhard, and Stehr, Nico, 121135. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2010. “Arriving at Right Decisions from Wrong Predictions.” Journal of Economic and Financial Practice 10 (1):101113.Google Scholar
Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2012. “On the Performative Power of Financial Models. Economy and Society 41 (3):117.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2):273286.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157):11241131.Google Scholar
Wansleben, Leon. 2012. “Financial Analysts.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Finance, edited by Cetina, Karin Knorr and Preda, Alex, 250271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wansleben, Leon. 2013. Cultures of Expertise in Global Currency Markets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. [1920] 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, 3rd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yonay, Yuval, and Breslau, Daniel. 2006. “Marketing Models: The Culture of Mathematical Economics.” Sociological Forum 21 (3):345386.Google Scholar
Zaloom, Caitlin. 2006. Out of the Pits: Traders and Technology from Chicago to London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar