Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.358 Render date: 2021-10-22T20:57:59.406Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Oriental Metrology and the Politics of Antiquity in Nineteenth-Century Survey Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2017

Simon Schaffer*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge E-mail: sjs16@cam.ac.uk

Argument

Metrological techniques to establish shared quantitative measures have often been seen as signs of rational modernization. The cases considered here show instead the close relation of such techniques with antiquarian and revivalist programs under imperial regimes. Enterprises in survey sciences in Egypt in the wake of the French invasion of 1798 and in India during the East India Company's revenue surveys involved the promotion of a new kind of oriental metrology designed to represent colonizers’ measures as restorations of ancient values to be applied to current systems of survey and measurement. Surveyors’ practice and hardware help clarify the significance of the complex historical and political functions of scientific standards. The balance of the paper discusses the survey work of later nineteenth-century indigenous Egyptian astronomers at a conjuncture of major economic and political dislocation to explore the various versions of antiquity at stake in these metrological programs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, Jean-Pierre. 1994. Roman Building: Materials and Techniques. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Al-’Adl, Sabri. 2005. “The Study of Astronomy According to the Chronicle of al-Jabarti.” In Society and Economy in Egypt and the Eastern Mediterranean 1600–1900, edited by Hanna, Nelly and Abbas, Raouf, 181200. Cairo: American University in Cairo.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. 1995. “A Revolution to Measure: The Political Economy of the Metric System in France.” In The Values of Precision, edited by Wise, Norton, 3971. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. 2002. The Measure of All Things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Al-Jabarti, ’Abd al-Rahman. 1979. Journal d'un Notable du Caire durant l'Expédition Française 1798–1801. Edited by Cuoq, Joseph. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Alleaume, Ghislaine. 1989. “Linant de Bellefonds et le Saint-Simonisme en Égypte.” In Les Saint-Simoniens et l'Orient: Vers la Modernité, edited by Morsy, Magali, 113132. Aix-en-Provence: Édisud.Google Scholar
Andrews, John H. 2002. A Paper Landscape: The Ordnance Survey in Nineteenth-Century Ireland. Dublin: Four Courts Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1993. “Number in the Colonial Imagination.” In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament, edited by Breckenridge, Carol and van der Veer, Peter, 314339. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Ashworth, William J. 1994. “The Calculating Eye: Baily, Herschel, Babbage and the Business of Astronomy.” British Journal for the History of Science 27:409441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, William J. 2004. “Metrology and the State: Science, Revenue and Commerce.” Science 306:13141317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auckland, George Eden, 1st Earl of. 1839. Letter to Thomas Best Jervis, 31 December, Royal Geographical Society Archives, CB2, MS Jervis (oversize), no.11.Google Scholar
Balboni, Luigi Antonio. 1906. Gl'Italiani nella Civiltà Egiziana del Secolo XIX, 3 vols. Alexandria: Penasson.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher Alan. 1989. Imperial Meridian: The British Empire and the World 1780–1830. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bayly, Christopher Alan. 1996. Empire and Information: Intelligence Gathering and Social Communication in India 1780–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bohleke, Briant. 2002. “Amenemopet Panehsi, Direct Successor of the Chief Treasurer Maya.” Journal of the American Research Centre in Egypt 39:157172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, Hubert. 2010. History of the Suez Canal Company. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford Edward. 1977. “Al-Jabarti and the Frankish Archaeologists.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 8:229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourguet, Marie-Noëlle. 1999. “Des Savants à la Conquête de l’Égypte? Science, Voyage et Politique au Temps de l'Expédition Française.” In L'Expédition d’Égypte: une Entreprise des Lumières 1798–1801, edited by Bret, Patrice, 2136. Paris: Editions Technique & Documentation.Google Scholar
Brenni, Paolo. 1996. “The Brunners and Paul Gautier.” Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 49:38.Google Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 1990. “Les Oubliés de Polytechnique en Égypte: les Artistes-Mécaniciens de la Commission des Sciences et des Arts.” In des Sociétés savantes, Congrès, Scientifiques et Sociétés pendant la Révolution et l'Empire, 497514. Paris: CTHS, 1990.Google Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 1994. “Conté et ‘Les Arts de la France au Milieu des Déserts’: Vicissitudes d'un Transfert de Technologie Pendant l'Occupation Française.” In L'Egyptologie et les Champollion, edited by Dewachter, Michel and Fouchard, Alain, 331–45. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 1998. L’Égypte au Temps de l'Expédition de Bonaparte (1798-1801). Paris: Hachette Littératures.Google Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 2003. “L’Égypte de Jomard: la Construction d'un Mythe Orientaliste.” Romantisme 33:514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 2005. “Mesures et Démesures d'Ingénieurs: Coudée Royale, Canaux, Cadastre et Cartographie de l’Égypte 1798–1826.” In La Juste Mesure: Quantifier, Évaluer, Mesurer entre Orient et Occident (VIIIe – XVIIIe siècle), edited by Moulinier, Laurence, Sallmann, Line, Verna, Catherine and Weill-Parot, Nicolas, 175200. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Bret, Patrice. 2006. “Les Contingences Orientalistes de l'Expédition de Bonaparte. Pour une Typologie des Orientalismes.” In L'Orientalisme des Saint-Simoniens, edited by Levallois, Michel and Moussa, Sarga, 3352. Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose.Google Scholar
Brück, H.A. and Brück, M.T.. 1988. The Peripatetic Astronomer: The Life of Charles Piazzi Smyth. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Francis, 1801. “On the Religion and Literature of the Burmas.” Asiatic Researches 6:163308.Google Scholar
Buchwald, Jed, and Greco Josefowicz, Dianne. 2010. The Zodiac of Paris. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buckingham, James Silk. 1828. “Determinations of the Dimensions of the Ancient Egyptian Cubit.” Oriental Herald 16:142.Google Scholar
Carlini, Francesco. 1823. “Osservazioni della Lunghezza del Pendolo Semplice.” In Effemeridi Astronomiche di Milano per 1824, appendix, 2840. Milan: Regia Stamperia.Google Scholar
Champollion, Jean-François. 1824. Lettre à M. le Duc de Blacas d'Aulps. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Champollion, Jean-François. 1909a. Lettres et Journaux Écrits pendant le Voyage de l’Égypte. Edited by Hartleben, Hermine. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Champollion, Jean-François. 1909b. Lettres Écrites d'Italie. Edited by Hartleben, Hermine. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Champollion-Figeac, Jacques-Joseph. 1824. “Observations sur les Coudées Égyptiennes Trouvées dans les Ruines de Memphis.” Bulletin des Sciences Historiques, Antiquités, Philologie 1:281291.Google Scholar
Chauvin, Michael. 2004. Hokuloa: the British 1874 Transit of Venus Expedition to Hawai'i. Honolulu: Bishop Museum.Google Scholar
Chenevix, Richard. 1826. “History and Prospects of English Industry.” Quarterly Review 34:4599.Google Scholar
Cole, Juan. 1993. Colonialism and Revolution in the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colla, Elliot. 2007. Conflicted Antiquities: Egyptology, Egyptomania, Egyptian Modernity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordero di San Quintino, Giulio. 1823. “Notizie Intorno alla Collezione di Antichità Egiziane del Cav. Drovetti.” Giornale Arcadico 19:180208.Google Scholar
Crozet, Pascal. 1995. “La Trajectoire d'un Scientifique Égyptien au 19e Siècle: Mahmud al-Falaki (1815-1885).” In Entre Reforme Sociale et Mouvement National: Identité et Modernisation en Égypte 1882–1962, edited by Roussillon, Alain, 285305. Cairo: Cedej.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozet, Pascal, 2008. Les Sciences Modernes en Égypte: Transfert et Appropriation 1805–1902. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Curto, Silvio. 1976. Storia del Museo Egizio di Torino. Turin: Centro di Studi Piemontesi.Google Scholar
Davidson, David, 1893. Memories of a Long Life. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: David Douglas.Google Scholar
Décobert, Christian. 1989. “L'Orientalisme, des Lumières à la Révolution, selon Silvestre de Sacy.” Revue du Monde Musulman et de la Méditerranée 52:4962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Jonquière, Clément. 1899–1907. L'Expédition de l’Égypte, 5 vols. Paris: Charles-Lavauzelle.Google Scholar
Dhombres, Jean. 1999. “L'Esprit de Géométrie en Égypte.” In L'Expédition d’Égypte: une Entreprise des Lumières 1798–1801, edited by Bret, Patrice, 327349. Paris: Editions Technique & Documentation.Google Scholar
Dias, Nélia. 1998. “Une Science Nouvelle? La Géo-ethnographie de Jomard.” In L'Invention Scientifique de la Méditerranée, edited by Bourguet, Marie-Noëlle, Lepetit, Bernard, Nordman, Daniel, and Sinarellis, Maroula, 159183. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Dodson, Michael S. 2007. Orientalism, Empire and National Culture: India 1770–1880. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouin, Jean-Marc. 2001. “Analogies et Contrastes entre l'Expédition d’Égypte et le Voyage d'Humboldt et Bonpland.” História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos 8, supplement: 839–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drovetti, Bernadino. 1988. Epistolario. Edited by Curto, Silvi and Donatelli, Laura. Milan: Cisalpino-Goliardica.Google Scholar
Drovetti, Bernadino. 2003. Lettres. Edited by Guichard, Sylvie. Paris: Maisonneuve and Larose.Google Scholar
Drower, Margaret, ed. 2004. Letters from the Desert: Correspondence of Flinders and Hilda Petrie. Oxford: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar
Dupin, Charles. 1819. Essai Historique sur les Services et les Travaux Scientifiques de Gaspard Monge. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Dupin, Charles. 1825. Discours et Leçons sur l'Industrie, le Commerce, la Marine et sur les Sciences appliquées aux Arts. Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Dykstra, Darrell. 1994. “Pyramids, Prophets and Progress: Ancient Egypt in the Writings of ’Ali Mubarak.” Transactions of the American Oriental Society 114:5465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edney, Matthew. 1997. Mapping an Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India 1765–1845. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Élie de Beaumont, Jean-Baptiste. 1873. “Éloge Historique de Jean Plana.” Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences 38:cvii–clxxv.Google Scholar
Enfantin, Barthélémy-Prosper. 1865–78. Oeuvres de Saint-Simon et d'Enfantin. 41 vols. Paris: Dentu.Google Scholar
Faye, Hervé. 1861. “Rapport sur l'Observation de l’Éclipse du 18 Juillet 1860 faite en Nubie par Mahmoud-Bey.” Comptes Rendus des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences 53:133139.Google Scholar
Feyel, Christophe. 2001. “Antoine-Jean Letronne et l'Archéologie de son Temps.” In Rêver l'Archéologie au XIXe Siècle: de la Science à l'Imaginaire, edited by Perrin-Saminadayar, Éric, 6588. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l'Université de Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar
Forgeau, Annie. 1998. “Le Repérage des Sites de l’Égypte Pharaonique par les Membres de la Commission des Sciences et des Arts.” In L'Invention Scientifique de la Méditerranée, edited by Bourguet, Marie-Noëlle, Lepetit, Bernard, Nordman, Daniel, and Sinarellis, Maroula, 3352. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
Fourier, Jean-Baptiste. 1821. “Préface Historique.” In Description de l’Égypte, 2nd edn., 1:i-clv. Paris: Pancoucke.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert. 1985. “From Corfu to Caledonia: The Early Travels of Charles Dupin 1808–1820. In The Light of Nature, edited by North, John and Roche, John, 303320. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galland, Antoine. 1803. Tableau de l’Égypte pendant le Séjour de l'Armée Française. Paris: Cérioux.Google Scholar
Gange, David. 2013. Dialogues with the Dead: Egyptology in British Culture and Religion 1822–1922. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Pierre-Simon. 1810. “Introduction.” In Smeaton, John, Recherches Expérimentales sur l'Eau et le Vent, i–xxviii. Paris: Courcier.Google Scholar
Girard, Pierre-Simon. 1822a. “Mémoire sur le Nilomètre de l’Île d'Elephantine et les Mesures Égyptiens.” In Description de l’Égypte, 2nd edn., 6:196. Paris: Pancoucke.Google Scholar
Girard, Pierre-Simon. 1822b. Mémoire sur l'Agriculture, l'Industrie et le Commerce de l’Égypte. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Girard, Pierre-Simon. 1824. “Observations sur la Vallée de l’Égypte et et sur l'Exhaussement Séculaire du Sol qui la Recouvre.” In Description de l’Égypte, 2nd edn., 20:33160. Paris: Pancoucke.Google Scholar
Girard, Pierre-Simon. 1828. “Notice sur quelques Étalons de l'Ancienne Coudée Égyptienne Récemment Découverts.” Bulletin des Sciences Historiques, Antiquités, Philologie 9:3440.Google Scholar
Godlewska, Anne. 1988. “The Napoleonic Survey of Egypt: A Masterpiece of Cartographic Compilation and Early Nineteenth-Century Fieldwork.” Cartographica 25, numbers 1 and 2 (Monograph series 3839).Google Scholar
Godlewska, Anne. 1995. “Map, Text and Image. The Mentality of Enlightened Conquerors: A New Look at the Description de l’Égypte .” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20:528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godlewska, Anne. 1999. Geography Unbound: French Geographic Science from Cassini to Humboldt. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldingham, John. 1827. Madras Observatory Papers. Madras: College Press.Google Scholar
Gosselin, Pascal-François-Joseph. 1822. “Observations sur la Coudée Égyptienne Découverte Récemment à Memphis.” Journal des Savants 744–51.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert. 1835. Governor's Minute, 14 September, British Library, India Office Records, F/4/1624/65066, p.175.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit. 1982. A Rule of Property for Bengal: An Essay on the Idea of Permanent Settlement. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Günergun, Ferza. 1992. “Introduction of the Metric System to the Ottoman State.” In Transfer of Modern Science and Technology to the Muslim World, edited by Ihsanoglu, Ekmeleddin, 297316. Istanbul: IRCICA.Google Scholar
Günergun, Ferza. 1996. “Standardization in Ottoman Turkey.” In Introduction of Modern Science and Technology to Turkey and Japan, edited by Günergun, Ferza and Shigehisha, Kuriyama, 205225. Istanbul: International Centre for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
Herschel, John Jr. 1879. “On the Relation between the Indian Pendulum Operations and Those which Have Been Conducted Elsewhere.” In Account of the Operations of the Great Trigonometrical Survey volume 5, edited by Thomas Walker, James, appendix 2, 1184. Calcutta: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Heyworth-Dunne, James. 1938. An Introduction to the History of Education in Modern Egypt. London: Luzac.Google Scholar
Hinnells, John. 2008. “Changing Perceptions of Authority among Parsis in British India.” In Parsis in India and the Diaspora, edited by Hinnells, John and Williams, Alan, 100118. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Antoine. 2013. “Ancient Egyptian Cubits: Origin and Evolution.” PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Inalcik, Halil. 1983. “Introduction to Ottoman Metrology.” Turcica 15:311348.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Ismail Mustafa. 1864. Recherche des Coefficients de Dilatation et Étalonnage de l'Appareil à Mesurer les Bases Géodesqiues Appartenant au Gouvernment Égyptien. Paris: Goupy.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Ismail Mustafa. 1869. Letter to Urbain Leverrier, 15 June, Institut de France MS 3711, no. 226.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Maya. 2005. Edge of Empire: Conquest and Collecting in the East 1750–1850. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1835a. Records of Ancient Science Exemplified and Authenticated in the Primitive Universal Standard of Weights and Measures. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1835b. Letters to Bombay Government, 10 January and 21 May. British Library, India Office Records F/4/1624/65066, pp. 31, 66–67.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1835c. Letter to John Herschel, 19 October. Royal Society MS HS 10.317.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1836. The Expediency and Facility of Establishing the Metrological and Monetary Systems throughout India on a Scientific and Permanent Basis. Bombay: American Mission Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1837. Letter to Court of Directors. British Library MS Add 14380 fol. 6.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1838a. Address Delivered at the Geographical Section of the British Association. Torquay: Cockrem.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1838b. Letter to James Lushington, 16 June. British Library MS Add 14380, fol. 21.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1838c. Letter to James Cosmo Melvill, 15 August. British Library, India Office Records L/MIL/5/413/306, fols. 91–92.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1838d. Letter to John Washington, 4 September. Royal Geographical Society Archives CB2 MS Jervis, no. 3.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1838e. “On the Stade as a Linear Measure.” Athenaeum 580:878.Google Scholar
Jervis, Thomas Best. 1840. “Historical and Geographical Account of the Western Coast of India.” Transactions of the Bombay Geographical Society 4:1149.Google Scholar
Jervis, W.P. 1898. Thomas Best Jervis as Christian Soldier, Geographer and Friend of India. London: Elliot Stock.Google Scholar
Jollois, Prosper. 1904. Journal d'un Ingénieur attaché à l'Expédition d’Égypte 1798–1802. Edited by Lefèvre-Pontalis, P.. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1815. “Description d'une Règle à Calculer Précédée de quelques Réflexions sur l'Industrie Anglaise en Avril 1815.” Bulletin de la Société d'Encouragement 14:179–90.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1817. Mémoire sur le Système Métrique des Anciens Égyptiens. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1822. Description d'un Étalon Métrique Orné d'Hiéroglyphes Découvert dans les Ruines de Memphis par les Soins de M. le Chevalier Drovetti. Paris: Collège Royale.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1825. “Antiquités Égyptiennes.” Bulletin des Sciences Historiques, Antiquités, Philologie 3:225227.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1827. Lettre à Rémusat sur une Nouvelle Mesure de Coudée Trouvée à Memphis par M. le Chevalier Drovetti. Paris: De Bure and Merlin.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1840. “Institut de l’Égypte.” In Encyclopédie des Gens du Monde, 14:749764. Strasbourg: Treuttel and Würtz.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1841. Relation de l'Expédition Scientifique des Français en Égypte en 1798. Paris: Duverger.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1858. Letter to Urbain Leverrier, 1 July. Institut de France, MS 3711 no.228.Google Scholar
Jomard, Edmé. 1861. “Appendice.” In Bey, Mahmoud, Rapport sur l’Éclipse Totale du Soleil Observée à Dongolah. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier.Google Scholar
Kalin, Michael. 2006. “Hidden Pharaohs: Egypt, Engineers and the Modern Hydraulic.” M.Phil. diss., Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Kelly, Patrick. 1821. Universal Cambist, 2nd ed. London: The author.Google Scholar
Kelly, Patrick. 1832. Oriental Metrology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Koenig, Mathieu-Auguste. 1859. Letter to Edmé Jomard, 9 December. Institut de France, MS 3711 no. 229.Google Scholar
Kula, Witold. 1986. Measures and Men. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laissus, Yves. 1998. L’Égypte, une Aventure Savante 1798–1801. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Laissus, Yves. 2004. Jomard: le Dernier Égyptien. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Laplace, Pierre-Simon. 1796. Exposition du Système du Monde, 2 vols. Paris, Cercle-Social.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Richard. 1865. Die Alt-Aegyptische Elle und ihre Eintheilung. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Letronne, Jean-Antoine. 1845. Analyse Critique des Représentations Zodiacales de Dendera et d'Esné. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Letronne, Jean-Antoine. [1838]1863. Nouvelles Recherches sur le Calendrier des Anciens Égyptiens. Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.Google Scholar
Leverrier, Urbain. 1860. Letter to Gustave Rouland, 21 January. Observatoire de Paris MS 1060-I-A.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, Eivind. 1966. Technological Studies in Ancient Metrology. Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Ludden, David. 1993. “Orientalist Empiricism: Transformations of Colonial Knowledge.” In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament, edited by Carol Breckenridge and Peter van der Veer, 250–278. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Mahmud. 1861. Rapport sur l’Éclipse Totale du Soleil Observée à Dongolah. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Mahmud. 1862. “L’Âge et le But des Pyramides Lus dans Sirius.” Bulletin de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Art de Belgique 14:167186.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Mahmud. 1872. Mémoire sur l'Antique Aléxandrie. Copenhagen: Bianco Luno.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Mahmud. 1873. “Le Système Métrique Actuel d’Égypte.” Journal Asiatique 1:67110.Google Scholar
al-Falaki, Mahmud. 1882. “Sur la Possibilité de Prévoir les Hauteurs de la Crue du Nil.” Bulletin de la Société Khédiviale de Géographie 2:327330.Google Scholar
Michael, Bernardo. 2007. “Making Territory Visible: The Revenue Surveys of Colonial South Asia.” Imago Mundi 59:7885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David Philip. 1986. “The Revival of the Physical Sciences in Britain 1815–1840.” Osiris 2:107–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1988. Colonising Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Moir, Martin, and Zastoupil, Lynn. 2013. “Introduction.” In The Great Indian Education Debate, edited by Moir, Martin and Zastoupil, Lynn, 171. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Monnier, François, Petit, Jean-Pierre, and Tardy, Christophe. 2016. “The Use of the ‘Ceremonial’ Cubit as a Measuring Tool: An Explanation.” Journal of Ancient Egyptian Architecture 1:19.Google Scholar
Montel, Nathalie. 1998. Le Chantier du Canal de Suez (1859-1869). Paris: Éditions In Forma.Google Scholar
Moss, Rosalind, and Porter, Bertha. 1978. Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, 2nd ed. Edited by Malek, Jaromir, vol. 3, part 2. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
Murphy, Jane. 2010. “Locating the Sciences in Eighteenth-Century Egypt.” British Journal for the History of Science 43:557571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orde-Browne, Charles. 1873. Letter to Charles Piazzi Smyth. Royal Observatory Edinburgh Archives MS A.12.50.Google Scholar
Orde-Browne, Charles. 1874. Letters to George Airy, 6 November and 23 December. University Library Cambridge RGO MS 6/270/783 and 821.Google Scholar
Ortega, María Luisa. 1999. “La “Régénération” de l’Égypte: le Discours Confronté au Terrain.” In L'Expédition d’Égypte: une Entreprise des Lumières 1798–1801, edited by Bret, Patrice, 93101. Paris: Editions Technique & Documentation.Google Scholar
Papers . 1917. Papers Relating to the Joint Report of 1847 with the Measurement and Classification Rules of the Deccan, Gujerat, Konkan and Kannara Surveys. Selections from the Records of the Bombay Government, new series 532. Bombay.Google Scholar
Paucton, Aléxis. 1780. Métrologie, ou Traité des Mesures, Poids et Monnoies des Anciens Peuples et des Modernes. Paris: la veuve Desaint.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. Flinders. 1877. Inductive Metrology. London: Hargrove Saunders.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. Flinders. 1883. The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh. London: Field and Tuer.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. Flinders. 1931. Seventy Years in Archaeology. London: Sampson Low.Google Scholar
Phillimore, R.H. 1945–1968. Historical Records of the Survey of India, 5 vols. Dehra Dun: Survey of India.Google Scholar
Picon, Antoine. 2002. Les Saint-Simoniens: Raison, Imaginaire et Utopie. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Pierret, Paul. 1895. “La Coudée Royale du Musée Égyptien du Louvre.” Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology 17:208209.Google Scholar
Pochan, André. 1933. “Contribution à l’Étude de la Métrologie des Anciens Égyptiens.” Bulletin de l'Institut Égyptien 15:277314.Google Scholar
Prinsep, James. 1832. “Progress of the Indian Trigonometrical Survey.” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 1:7172.Google Scholar
Prinsep, James. 1834. Useful Tables, Part the First: Coins, Weights and Measures of British India. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Prinsep, James. 1858. Essays on Indian Antiquities, Historic, Numismatic and Palaeographic. Edited by Thomas, Edward, 2 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Quetelet, Adolphe. 1866. Letter to Charles Piazzi Smyth, 30 September. Royal Observatory Edinburgh Archives MS A.11.47.Google Scholar
Raj, Kapil. 2006. Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Scientific Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries. Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, Jessica. 2008. The Transit of Venus Enterprise in Victorian Britain. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Régnier, Philippe. 1989. Les Saint-Simoniens en Égypte. Cairo: Banque de l'Union Européenne.Google Scholar
Reid, Donald. 2002. Whose Pharaohs? Archaeology, Museums and Egyptian National Identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rennell, James. 1791. “On the Rate of Travelling as Performed by Camel and Its Application as a Scale to the Purposes of Geography.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 81:129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardi, Francesco. 1824. “Lettre 8.” Correspondance Astronomique de Baron de Zach 11:139143.Google Scholar
Ridley, Ronald. 1999. Napoleon's Proconsul in Egypt: The Life and Times of Bernadino Drovetti. London: Rubicon.Google Scholar
Rifaud, Jean-Jacques. 1830. Tableau de l’Égypte. Strasbourg: Treuttel & Würtz.Google Scholar
Rocher, Rosanne, and Rocher, Ludo. 2012. The Making of Western Indology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodenbach, Constantin. 1868. “Note sur quelques Signes Hiéroglyphiques de la Coudée.” Revue Archéologique 17:314317.Google Scholar
Society, Royal. 1838. Election Certificate for Thomas Best Jervis. Royal Society Archives MS EC/1838/17.Google Scholar
Romé de l'Isle, Jean-Baptiste. 1789. Métrologie, ou Tables pour Servir à l'Intelligence des Poids et Mesures des Anciens. Paris: Imprimerie de Monsieur.Google Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J.S. 2005. Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabine, Edward. 1825. Account of Experiments to Determine the Figure of the Earth by Means of the Pendulum Vibrating Seconds in Different Latitudes. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Sabine, Edward. 1827a. “Reply to Mr Henderson's Remarks on Captain Sabine's Pendulum Observations.” Philosophical Magazine 2:176–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabine, Edward. 1827b. “Account of Professor Carlini's Pendulum Experiments on Mont Cenis.” Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and the Arts, 153159.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1994. Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Savérien, Alexandre. 1753. Dictionnaire Universel de Mathématique et de Physique, 2 vols. Paris: Rollin/Jombert.Google Scholar
Sen, Joydeep. 2014. Astronomy in India, 1784–1876. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Shalev, Zur. 2002. “Measurer of all Things: John Greaves, the Great Pyramid and Early Modern Metrology.” Journal of the History of Ideas 63:555575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvera, Alain. 1971. “Edmé Jomard and Egyptian Reforms in 1839.” Middle Eastern Studies 7:301316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvestre de Sacy, Antoine Isaac. 1799. Traité des Poids et des Mesures Légales des Musulmans, Traduit de l'Arabe de Makrizi. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
Simpson, A.D.C. 1993. “The Pendulum as the British Length Standard: A Nineteenth-Century Legal Aberration.” In Making Instruments Count: Essays on Historical Scientific Instruments, edited by Godfrey, Robert Anderson, William, Arthur Bennett, James, and Francis Ryan, William, 174190. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Smyth, Charles Piazzi. 1867. Life and Work at the Great Pyramid, 3 vols. Edinburgh: Constable.Google Scholar
Smyth, Charles Piazzi. 1875. Letter to David Gill, 5 May, Royal Geographical Society MS DOG/164.Google Scholar
Smyth, Charles Piazzi. 1877. Our Inheritance in the Great Pyramid, 3rd ed. London: Daldy, Isbister.Google Scholar
Smyth, Ralph, and Thuillier, Henry. 1851. Manual of Surveying for India. Calcutta: Thacker.Google Scholar
Stolz, Daniel. Forthcoming. The Lighthouse and the Observatory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward Palmer. 1991. Customs in Common. London: Merlin.Google Scholar
Tissot, Eugène. 1869. Itinéraire pour l'Isthme de Suez et les Grandes Villes d’Égypte. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tresch, John. 2012. The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Jacobus. 2012. “Overseer of the Treasury Maya: A Biographical Sketch.” In The Tomb of Maya and Meryt, vol. 1: Reliefs, Inscriptions and Commentary, edited by Thorndike Martin, Geoffrey, 6369. London: Egyptian Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Vatin, François. 1993. Le Travail: Économie et Physique 1780–1830. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Vicziany, Marika. 1986. “Imperialism, Botany and Statistics in Early Nineteenth-century India: The Surveys of Francis Buchanan.” Modern Asian Studies 20:625660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiers du Terrage, Édouard de. 1899. Journal et Souvenirs sur l'Expédition d’Égypte. Edited by de Villiers du Terrage, Marc. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Volney, Constantin. 1787. Voyage en Syrie et en Égypte, 2 vols. Paris: Volland & Desenne.Google Scholar
Wagner, August. 1864. Letter to Charles Piazzi Smyth, 15 November. Royal Observatory Edinburgh Archives MS A.11.47Google Scholar
Walker, Anthony. 1997. “The Western Romance with the Todas.” In Blue Mountains Revisited: Cultural Studies on the Nilgiri Hills, edited by Hockings, Paul, 106135. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waring, Sophie. 2014. “Thomas Young, the Board of Longitude and the Age of Reform.” PhD diss., University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yerasimos, Stéphane. 2005. “Mesures d'Espace Ottomanes.” In La Juste Mesure: Quantifier, Évaluer, Mesurer entre Orient et Occident (VIIIe – XVIIIe siècle), edited by Moulinier, Laurence, Sallmann, Line, Verna, Catherine, and Weill-Parot, Nicolas, 4956. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Zeki, Ahmed. 1901. “Notice Biographique sur Ismail Pacha El-Falaki (l'Astronome).” Bulletin de la Société Khédiviale de Géographie 6:516.Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Oriental Metrology and the Politics of Antiquity in Nineteenth-Century Survey Sciences
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Oriental Metrology and the Politics of Antiquity in Nineteenth-Century Survey Sciences
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Oriental Metrology and the Politics of Antiquity in Nineteenth-Century Survey Sciences
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *