Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Disciplining Physiological Psychology: Cinematographs as Epistemic Devices in the Work of Henri Bergson and Charles Scott Sherrington

  • Tom Quick (a1)
Argument

This paper arrives at a normative position regarding the relevance of Henri Bergson's philosophy to historical enquiry. It does so via experimental historical analysis of the adaptation of cinematographic devices to physiological investigation. Bergson's philosophy accorded well with a mode of physiological psychology in which claims relating to mental and physiological existence interacted. Notably however, cinematograph-centered experimentation by British physiologists including Charles Scott Sherrington, as well as German-trained psychologists such as Hugo Münsterberg and Max Wertheimer, contributed to a cordoning-off of psychological from physiological questioning during the early twentieth century. Bergson invested in a mode of intellectual practice in which psychological claims had direct relevance to the interpretation of physiological nature. The in-part cinematograph-inspired breakdown of this mode had significance for subsequent interpretations of his philosophy. It is suggested that this experimental particularization of Bergson's contentions indicates that any adaptation of his thought for historical enquiry must be disciplinarily specific.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Disciplining Physiological Psychology: Cinematographs as Epistemic Devices in the Work of Henri Bergson and Charles Scott Sherrington
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Disciplining Physiological Psychology: Cinematographs as Epistemic Devices in the Work of Henri Bergson and Charles Scott Sherrington
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Disciplining Physiological Psychology: Cinematographs as Epistemic Devices in the Work of Henri Bergson and Charles Scott Sherrington
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Amad, Paula. 2010. Counter-Archive: Film, The Everyday, and Albert Kahn's Archives de la Planète. New York: Colombia University Press.
Anon. 1922. “La Théorie de la relativité: séance du 6 avril 1922.” Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie 22:91113.
Antliff, Mark. 1993. Inventing Bergson: Cultural Politics and the Parisian Avant-Garde. Princeton: University Press.
Araujo, Saulo de Freitas. 2016. Wundt and the Philosophical Foundations of Psychology. New York: Springer.
Ash, Mitchell G. 1995. Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity. Cambridge: University Press.
Banks, Erik C. 2001. “Ernst Mach and the Episode of the Monocular Depth Sensations.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 37:237348.
Barkan, Diana Kormos. 1999. Walter Nernst and the Transition to Modern Physical Science. Cambridge: University Press.
Benschop, Ruth. 1998. “What is a Tachistoscope? Historical Explorations of an Instrument.” Science in Context 11:2350.
Bergson, Henri-Louis. [1889] 1910. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Data of Consciousness. Translated by Pogson, F. L.. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Bergson, Henri-Louis. [1896] 1988. Matter and Memory. Translated by Paul, Nancy M. and Scott Palmer, W.. New York: Zone Books.
Bergson, Henri-Louis. [1907] 1911. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchell, . New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Bergson, Henri-Louis. [1922] 1999. Duration and Simultaneity: Bergson and the Einsteinian Universe. Translated by Jacobson, Leon. Manchester: Clinamen Press.
Bergson, Henri-Louis. [1934] 1946. “The Perception of Change.” In The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics, translated by Andison, Mabelle L., 153186. New York: The Philosophical Library.
Bianco, Guiseppe. 2011. “Experience v's Concept? The Role of Bergson in Twentieth-Century French Philosophy.” The European Legacy 16:855872.
Bianco, Guiseppe. 2015. Après Bergson: Portrait de group avec philosophe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Biagioli, Francesca. 2016. Space, Number, and Geometry from Helmholtz to Cassirer. New York: Springer.
Black, Sandra Elizabeth. 1981. ““The Osler Medal Essay”: Pseudopods and Synapses: The Amoeboid Theories of Neuronal Mobility and the Early Formation of the Synapse Concept.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 55:3458.
Blatter, Jeremy. 2015. “Screening the Psychological Laboratory: Hugo Münsterberg, Psychotechnics, and the Cinema, 1892–1916.” Science in Context 28:5376.
Bloch, Adolph-Moïse. 1885. “Expériences sur la vision.” Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de biologie 37:493495.
Bordogna, Francesca. 2008. William James at the Boundaries: Philosophy, Science, and the Geography of Knowledge. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Brain, Robert Michael. 2009. “Protoplasmania.” In The Art of Evolution: Darwin, Darwinisms, and Visual Culture, edited by Larson, Barbara and Brauer, Fae, 92123. Hanover NH: Dartmouth College Press.
Brain, Robert Michael. 2012. “Self-Projection: Hugo Münsterberg on Empathy and Oscillation in Cinema Spectatorship.” Science in Context 25:329353.
Brain, Robert Michael. 2013. “Materialising the Medium: Ectoplasm and the Quest for Supra-Normal Biology in Fin-de-Siècle Science and Art.” In Vibratory Modernism, edited by Enns, Anthony and Trower, Shelley, 115144. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brain, Robert Michael. 2015. The Pulse of Modernism: Physiological Aesthetics in fin-de-siècle Europe. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
Brain, Robert Michael and Wise, Matthew Norton. 1994. “Muscles and Engines: Indicator Diagrams and Helmholtz's Graphical Methods.” In Universalgenie Helmholtz: Rückblick nach 100 Jahren, edited by Krüger, Lorenz, 124148. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Bruno, Guiliana. 2009. “Film, Aesthetics, Science: Hugo Münsterberg's Laboratory of Moving Images.” Grey Room 36:88113.
Breidbach, Olaf. 1996. “The Controversy over Stain Technologies: An Experimental Reexamination of the Dispute on the Cellular Nature of the Nervous System around 1900.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18:195212.
Bull, Lucien. 1910. “La chronophotographie des mouvement rapides,” Travaux de l'association l'Institut Marey 2:5175.
Canales, Jimena. 2009. A Tenth of a Second: A History. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
Canales, Jimena. 2011. “Desired Machines: Cinema and the Word in its Own Image.” Science in Context 24:329359.
Canales, Jimena. 2015. The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate That Changed Our Understanding of Time. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Cannon, Walter B. 1915. Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage: An Account of Recent Researches into the Function of Emotional Excitement. New York and London: D. Appleton and Company.
Carroy, Jacqueline, and Schmidgen, Henning. 2002. “Psychologies Experimentales: Leipzig-Paris (1890-1910).” Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte Preprint 206. Berlin Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte.
Cartwright, Lisa. 1995. Screening the Body: Tracing Medicine's Visual Culture. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Cat, Jordi. 2013. Maxwell, Sutton and the Birth of Colour Photography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Chadarevian, Soraya. 1993. “Graphical Method and Discipline: Self-Recording Instruments in Nineteenth-Century Physiology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24: 267291.
Chapman, Mark D. 2001. Ernst Troeltsch and Liberal Theology: Religion and Cultural Synthesis in Wilhelmine Germany. Oxford: University Press.
Chapman, Mark D. 2017. Theology at War and Peace: English Theology and Germany in the First World War. Abingdon: Routledge.
Charpentier, Augustin. 1890. “Recherches sur la persistence des impressions rétiniennes et sur les excitations lumineuses de courte durée.” Archives d'Opthalmologie 10: 10, 108135, 212–230, 340–356, 406–429, and 522–537.
Clarke, Edwin, and Stephen Jacyna, L.. 1987. Nineteenth-Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts. Berkeley and Los Angeles CA and London: University of California Press.
Crary, Jonathan. 1999. Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
CSlide Ver. 1.0 2014. Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford. 4 January 2017. https://cslide.medsci.ox.ac.uk/.
Daston, Lorraine. 1978. “British Responses to Psycho-Physiology, 1860–1900.” Isis 69:192208.
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
De Palma, Armando, and Pareti, Germana. 2011. “Bernstein's Long Path to Membrane Theory: Radical Change and Conservation in Nineteenth-Century Electrophysiology.” Journal of the History of the Neuroscoiences 20:306337.
Deigh, John. 2014. “William James and the Scientific Study of Emotion.” Emotion Review 6:412.
Dercum, Francis Xavier. 1896. “The Functions of the Neuron.” Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 23:513523.
Dixon, Thomas. 2003. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge: University Press.
Douglass, Paul. 1999. “Bergson and Cinema: Friends or Foes?” In The New Bergson, edited by Mullarky, John, 209227. Manchester: University Press.
Dror, Otneil E. 1999a. “The Affect of Experiment: The Turn to Emotions in Anglo-American Physiology, 1900–1940.” Isis 90:205237.
Dror, Otniel E. 1999b. “The Scientific Image of Emotion: Experience and Technologies of Inscription.” Configurations 7:355401.
Dror, Otniel E. 2006. “Fear and Loathing in the Laboratory and Clinic.” In Medicine, Emotion, and Disease, 1700–1950, edited by Bound Alberti, Fay, 125143. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dror, Otniel E. 2011. “Seeing the Blush: Feeling Emotions.” In Histories of Scientific Observation, edited by Daston, Lorraine and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, 326348. Chicago: Universtiy Press.
Dror, Otniel E. 2014. “The Cannon-Bard Thalmic Theory of Emotions: A Brief Genealogy and Reappraisal.” Emotion Review 6:1320.
During, Elie 2015. “Notes on the Bergsonian Cinematograph.” Translated by le Gac, Franck. In Cine-Dispositives: Essays in Epistemology across Media, edited by Albera, François and Tortajada, Maria, 115128. Amsterdam: University Press.
Engstrom, Eric J. 2003. Clinical Psychiatry in Imperial Germany: A History of Psychiatric Practice. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Fearing, Franklin. [1930] 1970. Reflex Action: A Study in the History of Physiological Pscyhology. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Finkelstein, Gabriel. 2013. Emil du Bois-Reymond: Neuroscience, Self, and Society in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Des, Fitzgerald, and Callard, Felicity. 2015. “Social Science and Neuroscience beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements.” Theory, Culture & Society 32:332.
Friedman, Michael, and Nordmann, Alfred, eds. 2006. The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Garson, Justin. 2015. “The Birth of Information in the Brain: Edgar Adrian and the Vacuum Tube.” Science in Context 28:3152.
Geison, Gerald L. 1978. Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology: The Scientific Enterprise in Late Victorian Society. Princeton: University Press.
Giovanelli, Marco. “The Sensation and the Stimulus: Psychophysics and the Prehistory of the Marburg School.” Perspectives on Science 25:287323.
van Gieson, Ira. 1899. The Correlation of Sciences in the Investigation of Nervous and Mental Disease. Utica NY: State Hospitals Press.
Gilles, Mary Ann. 1996. Henri Bergson and British Modernism. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Gordon, Peter E. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Green, Christopher D. 2010. “Scientific Objectivity and E. B. Titchener's Experimental Psychology.” Isis 101:697721.
Grogin, Robert C. 1988. The Bergsonian Controversy in France, 1900–1914. Calgary: University Press.
Grünbaum, Otto Fritz Frankeau. 1897– 1898. “On Intermittent Stimulation of the Retina.” Parts I and II, Journal of Physiology 21:396402 and 22:433-450.
Gunning, Tom. [1986] 2006. “The Cinema of Attraction[s]: Early Film, The Spectator, and the Avant Garde.” In The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded, edited by Strauven, Wanda, 381388. Amsterdam: University Press.
Hatfield, Gary. 1990. The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Hayward, Rhodri. 2007. Resisting History: Religious Transcendence and the Invention of the Unconscious. Manchester: University Press.
Heidelberger, Michael. [1993] 2004. Nature from Within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and His Psychophysical Worldview. Translated by Klohr, Cynthia. Pittsburgh PA: University Press.
Hering, Ewald. 1900. “On the Theory of Nerve Activity.” The Monist 10:167187.
Jacyna, L. Stephen. 1981. “The Physiology of Mind, the Unity of Nature, and the Moral Order in Victorian Thought.” British Journal for the History of Science 14:109132.
James, William. 1884. “What is an Emotion?Mind 9:188205.
James, William. 1894. “The Physical Basis of Emotion.” Psychological Review 1:516529.
Kerslake, Christian. 2008. “Becoming Against History: Toynbee, Deleuze, and Vitalist Historiography.” Parrhesia 4:1748.
Landecker, Hannah. 2006. “Microcinematography and the History of Science and Film.” Isis 97:121132.
Landecker, Hannah. 2011. “Creeping, Drinking, Dying: The Cinematic Portal and the Microscopic World of the Twentieth-Century Cell.” Science in Context 24:381416.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. “Trains of Thought: The Fifth Dimension and its Fabrication.” In Thinking Time: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Time, edited by Perret-Clermont, Anne-Nelly, et. al., 173187. Cambridge MA: Hogrefe and Hupher.
Lawrence, Christopher. 2009. “Degeneration under the Microscope at the fin de siècle .” Annals of Science 66:455471.
Leary, David E. 1982. “Immanuel Kant and the Development of Modern Psychology.” In The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Thought, edited by Woodward, William Ray and Ash, Mitchell G., 1742. New York: Praeger.
Lefebvre, Alexandre, and White, Melanie, eds. 2012. Bergson, Politics and Religion. Durham NC and London: Duke University Press.
Lenoir, Timothy. 1986. “Models and Instruments in the Development of Electrophysiology.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 17:154.
Lenoir, Timothy. 1987. “Social Interests and the Organic Physics of 1847.” In Science in Reflection. The Israel Colloquium: Studies in History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science 3, edited by Ullmann-Margalit, Edna, 169191. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer.
Lenoir, Timothy. 1993. “‘The Eye as Mathematician: Clinical Practices, Instrumentation, and Helmholtz's Construction of an Empiricist Theory of Vision.” In Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Cahan, David, 109153. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
Lesch, John E. 1984. Science and Medicine in France: The Emergence of Experimental Physiology, 1790–1855. Cambridge MA, and London: Harvard University Press.
Leys, Ruth. 2011. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry 37:434472.
Loerzer, Barbara. 2014. “William James, the French Tradition, and the Incomplete Transposition of the Spiritual into the Aesthetic.” In William James and the Transatlantic Conversation: Pragmatism, Pluralism, and the Philosophy of Religion, edited by Halliwell, Martin and Rasmussen, Joel D. S., 6580. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luchins, Edith H. and Luchins, Abraham S.. 1979. “Introduction to the Einstein-Wertheimer Correspondence.” Methodology and Science 12:165202.
Lundy, Craig. 2013. “Bergson, History and Ontology.” In Bergson and the Art of Immanence: Painting, Photography, Film, Performance, edited by Mullarky, John and de Mille, Charlotte, 1731. Edinburgh: University Press.
McDougall, William. 1898. “A Contribution towards Improvement in Psychological Method.” Parts I and III, Mind (New Series) 7:15-33, and Mind (New Series) 7:364-387.
McDougall, William. 1901a. “Some New Observations in Support of Thomas Young's Theory of Light- and Colour-Vision.” Parts I and II, Mind (New Series) 10:52-97 and Mind (New Series) 10:210-245.
McDougall, William. 1901b. “On the Seat of the Psycho-Physical Processes.” Brain 24:579630.
McDougall, William. 1903. “The Nature of Inhibitory Processes within the Nervous System.” Brain 26:153191.
McDougall, William. 1908. An Introduction to Social Psychology. London: Methuen & Co.
McDougall, William. 1911. Body and Mind: A History and Defence of Animism. New York: Macmillan.
McDougall, William. 1961. “William McDougall.” In A History of Psychology in Autobiography, vol. I, edited by Murchison, Carl, 191223. New York: Russell and Russell.
McGrath, Larry. 2015. “Confronting the Brain in the Classroom: Lycée Policy and Pedagogy in France, 1874–1902.” History of the Human Sciences 28:324.
Macdonald, John Smyth. 1900. “The Demarcation Current of Mammalian Nerve. (Preliminary Communication), II: The Source of the Demarcation Current Considered as a Concentration Cell.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 67:315324.
Mannoni, Laurent. [1994] 2000. The Great Art of Light and Shadow: Archaeology of the Cinema. Translated by Crangle, Richard. Exeter University Press.
Marbe, Karl. 1898. “Die stroboskopischen Erscheinungen.” Philosophische Studien 14:376401.
Massey, Heath. 2014. “Bergsonian Intuition: Getting Back into Duration.” In Rational Intuition: Philosophical Roots, Scientific Investigations, edited by Osbeck, Lisa M. and Held, Barbara S., 151173. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moruno, Dolores Martin. 2016. “Pain as Practice in Paolo Mantegazza's Science of Emotions.” Osiris 31:137162.
Mullarky, John, ed. 1999. The New Bergson. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Mullarky, John, and de Mille, Charlotte, eds. 2013. Bergson and the Art of Immanence: Painting, Photography, Film, Performance. Edinburgh: University Press.
Mussell, James. 2009. “Private Practices and Public Knowledge: Science, Professionalization and Gender in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies 5 (2) November 2016 http://www.ncgsjournal.com/issue52/mussell.htm.
Münsterberg, Hugo. 1916. The Photoplay: A Psychological Study. New York and London: D. Appleton.
Nawrotski, Kristen, and Dougherty, Jack, eds. 2013. Writing History in the Digital Age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Normandin, Sebastian, and Wolfe, Charles T., eds. 2013. Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010. Dordrecht: Springer.
O'Connor, Walter J. 1991. British Physiologists 1885–1914: A Biographical Dictionary. Manchester: University Press.
Oldfield, Richard. Charles, . 1950. “Psychology in Oxford – 1898–1949.” Part II, Quarterly Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 1:382387.
Otis, Laura. 2001. Networking: Communicating with Bodies and Machines in the Nineteenth Century. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pickstone, John V. 2000. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester: University Press.
Ramalingam, Chitra. 2013. “The Most Transitory of Things: Talbot and the Science of Instantaneous Vision.” In William Henry Fox Talbot: Beyond Photography, edited by Brusius, Mirjam, Dean, Katrina, and Ramalingam, Chitra, 245268. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ramalingam, Chitra. 2015. “Dust Plate, Retina, Photograph: Imaging on Experimental Surfaces in Early Nineteenth-Century Physics.” Science in Context 28:317355.
Rees, Danny. 2014. “Down in the Mouth: Faces of Pain.” In Pain and Emotion in Modern History, edited by Gregory Boddice, Robert, 164186. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: University Press.
Ricci, Gabriel R. 2012. The Tempo of Modernity. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction.
Rood, Ogden N. 1893. “On a Photometric Method which is Independent of Color.” American Journal of Science 46:173176.
Russell, Douglas. 2015. “Toward a Pragmatist Epistemology: Arthur O. Lovejoy's and H. S. Jenning's Biophilosophical Responses to Neovitalism.” Journal of the History of Biology 48:3766.
Schäfer, Edward A. 1900. “'The Nerve Cell.” In Textbook of Physiology, edited by Schäfer, Edward A., 592615. London and Edinburgh: Young J. Pentland.
Schaffer, Simon. 2004. “A Science Whose Business is Bursting: Soap Bubbles as Commodities in Classical Physics.” In Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science, edited by Daston, Lorraine, 147192. New York: Zone Books.
Schenck, Freidrich Wilhelm Julius. 1896. “Ueber intermittirende Netzhautreizung.” Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere 64:165178.
Schickore, Jutta. 2006. “Misperception, Illusion and Epistemological Optimism: Vision Studies in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain and Germany.” British Journal for the History of Science 39:383405.
Schloegel, Judy Johns, and Schmidgen, Henning. 2002. “General Physiology, Experimental Psychology, and Evolutionism: Unicellular Organisms as Objects of Psychophysiological Research, 1877–1918.” Isis 93:614645.
Schmidgen, Henning. 2008. ‘Münsterberg's Photoplays: Instruments and Models in his Laboratories at Freiburg and Harvard (1891-1893)’, at The Virtual Laboratory, Max Planck Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. http://vlp.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/essays/data/art71? p=1(last accessed November 18, 2016).
Schmidgen, Henning. 2012. “Cinematography Without Film: Architectures and Technologies of Visual Instruction in Biology around 1900.” In The Educated Eye: Visual Culture and Pedagogy in the Life Sciences, edited by Anderson, Nancy and Dietrich, Michael R., 94120. Hanover: Dartmouth College Press.
Schmidgen, Henning. [2009] 2014. The Helmholtz Curves: Tracing Lost Time. Translated by Schott, Nils F.. New York: Fordham University Press.
Seyfarth, Ernst-August. 2006. “Julius Bernstein (1839-1917): Pioneer Neurologist and Biophysicist.” Biological Cybernetics 94:28.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. 1893. “Note on the Spinal Portion of Some Ascending Degenerations.” Journal of Physiology 14:255302.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. 1894. “On the Anatomical Constitution of Nerves of Skeletal Muscles; with Remarks on Recurrent Fibres in the Ventral Spinal Nerve-Root.” Journal of Physiology 17: 210254.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. 1899– 1900. “Experiments on the Vascular and Visceral Factors for the Genesis of Emotion.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 66:390403.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. 1900. “Experimentation on Emotion.” Nature 62:328331.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. 1904. “On Binocular Flicker and the Correlation of Activity of ‘Corresponding’ Retinal Points.” Journal of Psychology 1:2660.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. [1906] 1947. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. Cambridge: University Press.
Sherrington, Charles Scott. 1921. “Break-Shock Reflexes and ‘Supramaximal’ Contraction-Response of Mammalian Nerve-Muscle to Single Shock Stimuli.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 92:245258.
Sidis, Boris. 1919. The Psychology of Suggestion: A Research into the Subconscious Nature of Man and Society. New York: D. Appleton.
Smith, Roger. 1973. “The Background of Physiological Psychology in Natural Philosophy.” History of Science 11:75123.
Smith, Roger. 1992. Inhibition: History and Meaning in the Sciences of Mind and Brain. London: Free Association Books.
Smith, Roger. 2000. “The Embodiment of Value: C.S. Sherrington and the Cultivation of Science.” British Journal for the History of Science 33:283311.
Smith, Roger. 2001a. “Physiology and Psychology, or Brain and Mind, in the Age of Sherrington.” In Psychology in Britain: Historical Essays and Personal Reflections, edited by Geoff, C. Bunn Lovie, A. D., and Richards, Graham D., 223242. Leicester: BPS Books.
Smith, Roger. 2001b. “Representations of Mind: C.S. Sherrington and Scientific Opinion, c.1930-1950.” Science in Context 14:511539.
Smith, Roger. 2003. “Biology and Values in Interwar Britain: C.S. Sherrington, Julian Huxley, and the Vision of Progress.” Past & Present 178:210242.
Smith, Roger. 2011. “‘The Sixth Sense’: Towards a History of Muscular Sensation.” Gesnerus 68: 218271.
Smith, Roger. 2013. Free Will and the Human Sciences in Britain, 1870–1910. London: Pickering and Chatto.
Swazey, Judith P. 1969. Reflexes and Motor Integration: Sherrington's Concept of Integrative Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Turner, R. Stephen. 1994. In The Eye's Mind: Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tortajada, Maria. 2011. “Technique/Discourse: When Bergson Invented His Cinematograph.” Semiotic Inquiry 31:131151.
Valentine, Elizabeth R. 1999. “The Founding of the Psychological Laboratory, University College London: ‘Dear Galton. . . Yours truly, J. Sully’.” History of Psychology 2:204218.
Valentine, Elizabeth R. 2012. “Spooks and Spoofs: Relations Between Psychical Research and Academic Psychology in Britain in the Inter-War Period.” History of the Human Sciences 25:6990.
The Virtual Laboratory: Essays and Resources on the Experimentalization of Life. Ver 1.0. c.2001. Max Planck Institut für Wissengeschaftsgeschichte. http://vlp.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/index_html (last accessed 28 October 2016).
Wade, Nicholas J. 2005. Perception and Illusion: Historical Perspectives. New York: Springer.
Wassmann, Claudia. 2009. “Physiological Optics, Cognition and Emotion: A Novel Look at the Early Work of Wilhelm Wundt.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 64:213249.
Wassmann, Claudia. 2014. “‘Picturesque Incisiveness’: Explaining the Celebrity of James's Theory of Emotion.” Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences 50:166188.
Winter, Alison. “Screening Selves: Sciences of Memory and Identity on Film.” History of Psychology 7:367401.
Young, Jacy L.Test or Toy? Materiality and the Measure of Infant Intelligence.” History of Psychology 18:103118.
Young, Robert Maxwell. [1970] 1990. Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century: Cerebral Localization and its Biological Context from Gall to Ferrier. Oxford: University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed