Skip to main content Accessibility help

Disturbing Dogmas: Biologists and the History of Biology

  • Eva Jablonka (a1) and Marion J. Lamb (a1)


The attitude of biologists to the history of their discipline varies. For some, a hazy knowledge of the recent past is all that is necessary to provide an explanatory basis for their work. They take it for granted that everything of value from the less recent past has been appropriately incorporated into present-day thinking. Other biologists see history as an integral part of their research: the historical roots of accepted facts and theories help in the evaluation of present positions. These biologists bring to history their specialized knowledge, which can be an advantage, but often they also bring an agenda that biases what they investigate and how they present it. We illustrate this by describing our own foray into history, which was motivated by findings in cell biology that suggested that some accepted views about heredity and evolution were wrong.



Hide All
Bateson, Patrick, and Mameli, Matteo. 2007. “The Innate and the Acquired: Useful Clusters or a Residual Distinction from Folk Biology?Developmental Psychobiology 49:818831.
Birkhead, Tim. 2008. “Does it Matter that Researchers Miscite the Literature?” Times Higher Education Supplement, 4th January. <> (last accessed July 20, 2013).
Bowler, Peter J. 1989. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Buss, Leo W. 1983. “Evolution, Development, and the Units of Selection.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 80:13871391.
Cain, Arthur J. 1982. “Porcupine Biology.” Nature 297:707709.
Crick, Francis H. C. 1958. “On Protein Synthesis.” Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 12:138163.
Darlington, Cyril D. 1959. Darwin's Place in History. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, Leslie C. 1965. A Short History of Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fleck, Ludwik. [1935] 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, edited by Trenn, Thaddeus J. and Merton, Robert K., translated by Bradley, Fred and Trenn, Thaddeus J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Futuyma, Douglas J. 1982. “A Synthetic History of Biology.” Science 216:842844.
Gillispie, Charles C. 1958. “Lamarck and Darwin in the History of Science.” American Scientist 46:388409.
Greenberg, Steven A. 2009. “How Citation Distortions Create Unfounded Authority: Analysis of a Citation Network.” BMJ 2009:339:b2680.
Holliday, Robin. 1987. “The Inheritance of Epigenetic Defects.” Science 238:163170.
Jablonka, Eva. 1994. (In Hebrew) History of Heredity. Tel Aviv: Ministry of Defense Publishing House.
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 1989. “The Inheritance of Acquired Epigenetic Variations.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 139:6983.
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 1995. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. 2011: “Changing Thought Styles: The Concept of Soft Inheritance in the 20th Century.” In Vérité, Widerstand, Development: At Work with / Arbeiten mit / Travailler avec Ludwik Fleck, edited by Egloff, Rainer and Fehr, Johannes, 119156. Collegium Helveticum Heft 12. Zurich: Collegium Helveticum.
Jablonka, Eva, Lachmann, Michael, and Lamb, Marion J.. 1992. “Evidence, Mechanisms and Models for the Inheritance of Acquired Characters.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 158:245268.
Jacob, François. 1973. The Logic of Living Systems. London: Allen Lane.
Kirkwood, Thomas B. L., and Cremer, Thomas. 1982. “Cytogerontology since 1881: A Reappraisal of August Weismann and a Review of Modern Progress.” Human Genetics 60:101121.
Kottler, Malcolm J. 1974. “From 48 to 46: Cytological Technique, Preconception, and the Counting of Human Chromosomes.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48:465502.
Lawrence, Peter A. 2007. “The Mismeasurement of Science.” Current Biology 17:R583R585.
Lawrence, Peter A. 2008. “Lost in Publication: How Measurement Harms Science.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8:911.
Maynard Smith, John. 1966. The Theory of Evolution, 2nd edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Maynard Smith, John. [1982] 1993. “Storming the Fortress.” New York Review of Books 29 (8): 41–42. Reprinted in Did Darwin Get It Right? by John Maynard Smith, 814. London: Penguin.
Mayr, Ernst. 1959. “Where Are We?Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24:114.
Mayr, Ernst. 1972. “Lamarck Revisited.” Journal of the History of Biology 5:5594.
Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Medawar, Peter. [1963] 1991. “Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud?Listener 70, 12th September. Reprinted in The Threat and the Glory by Peter Medawar, 228233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Medawar, Peter. [1968] 1972. “Lucky Jim.” New York Review of Books 10 (6). Reprinted in The Hope of Progress by Peter Medawar, 101109. London: Methuen.
Olby, Robert. 1985. The Origins of Mendelism, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ruse, Michael. 1985. “Admayration.” Quarterly Review of Biology 60:183192.
Sen, George L., and Blau, Helen M.. 2006. “A Brief History of RNAi: The Silence of the Genes.” FASEB Journal 20:12931299.
Simpson, George Gaylord. 1982. “Autobiology.” Quarterly Review of Biology 57:437444.
Sirks, Marius J., and Conway Zirkle. 1964. The Evolution of Biology. New York: Ronald Press.
Watson, James D. 1968. The Double Helix. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Witkowski, Jan A. 1980. “Dr. Carrel's Immortal Cells.” Medical History 24:129142.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed