Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Hermann von Helmholtz's Empirico-Transcendentalism Reconsidered: Construction and Constitution in Helmholtz's Psychology of the Object

  • Liesbet De Kock (a1)
Argument

This paper aims at contributing to the ongoing efforts to get a firmer grasp of the systematic significance of the entanglement of idealism and empiricism in Helmholtz's work. Contrary to existing analyses, however, the focal point of the present exposition is Helmholtz's attempt to articulate a psychological account of objectification. Helmholtz's motive, as well as his solution to the problem of the object are outlined, and interpreted against the background of his scientific practice on the one hand, and that of empiricist and (transcendental) idealist analyses of experience on the other. The specifically psychological angle taken, not only prompts us to consider figures who have hitherto been treated as having only minor import for Helmholtz interpretation (most importantly J.S. Mill and J.G. Fichte), it furthermore sheds new light on some central tenets of the latter's psychological stance that have hitherto remained underappreciated. For one thing, this analysis reveals an explicit voluntarist tendency in Helmholtz's psychological theory. In conclusion, it is argued that the systematic significance of Helmholtz's empirico-transcendentalism with respect to questions of the mind is best understood as an attempt to found his empirical theory of perception in a second order, normative account of epistemic subjectivity.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allik, Jüri, and Konstabel, Kenn. 2005. “G. F. Parrot and the Theory of Unconscious Inferences.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 41 (4):317330.
Araujo, Saulo de Freitas. 2012. “Why Did Wundt Abandon His Early Theory of the Unconscious?History of Psychology 15 (1):3349.
Bell, Charles. 1811. Idea of a New Anatomy of the Brain. London: C. Bell.
Bernfeld, Siegfried. 1944. “Freud's Earliest Theories and the School of Helmholtz.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 13:341362.
Boring, Edwin. 1950. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.
Bradley, Francis Herbert. 1876. Ethical Studies. London: Henry S. King.
Cahan, David, ed. 1993. Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cassedy, Steven. 2008. “A History of the Concept of Stimulus and the Role It Played in the Neurosciences.” Journal for the History of Neuroscience 174:405432.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. “The Concept of Group and the Theory of Perception.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (1):136.
Crary, Jonathan. 1992. Techniques of the Observer. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Darrigol, Olivier. 2003. “Number and Measure: Hermann von Helmholtz at the Crossroads of Mathematics, Physics and Psychology.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 34 (3):515573.
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
De Kock, Liesbet. 2014. “Voluntarism in Early Psychology: The Case of Hermann von Helmholtz.” History of Psychology 17 (2):105128.
DiSalle, Robert. 1993. “Helmholtz's Empiricist Philosophy of Mathematics: Between Laws of Perception and Laws of Nature.” In Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Cahan, David, 498521. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Disalle, Robert 2006. “Kant, Helmholtz, and the Meaning of Empiricism.” In The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Friedman, Michael and Nordmann, Alfred, 123140. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ferrari, Massimo. 1997. Retours à Kant. Paris: Editions du Cerf.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. [1794] 1997. Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1798. Das System der Sittenlehre. Leipzig: Christian Ernst Gabler.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1817. Die Thatsachen des Bewusstseins. Stuttgart: Gottaischen Buchhandlung.
Finger, Stanley, and Wade, Nicholas. 2001. “The Eye as an Optical Instrument: From Camera Obscura to Helmholtz's Perspective.” Perception 30:11571177.
Finger, Stanley, and Wade, Nicholas. 2002a. “The Neuroscience of Helmholtz and the Theories of Johannes Müller, Part 1: Nerve Cell Structure, Vitalism and the Nerve Impulse.” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 11 (2):136155.
Finger, Stanley, and Wade, Nicholas. 2002b. “The Neuroscience of Helmholtz and the Theories of Johannes Müller, Part 2: Sensation and Perception.” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 11 (3):234254.
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Stanford: CSLI publications.
Friedman, Michael. 2006. The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth-Century Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Friedman, Michael. 2009. “Einstein, Kant, and the Relativized A Priori.” In Constituting Objectivity, edited by Bitbol, Michel, et al., 253267. New York: Springer.
Fullinwider, Simon P. 1990. “Hermann von Helmholtz: the Problem of Kantian Influence.” Studies in the History of the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):4155.
Goldschmidt, Ludwig. 1898. Kant und Helmholtz. Hamburg: Leopold Voss.
Hallet, Dani. 2009. “On the Subject of Goethe: Hermann von Helmholtz on Goethe and Scientific Objectivity.” Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 31:178194.
Hamilton, William. 1859. Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, 2nd volume, edited by Mansel, Henry L.. Boston: Gould and Lincoln.
Hamner, Gail. 2003. American Pragmatism: a Religious Genealogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hatfield, Gary. 1990. The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. London: MIT Press.
Heidelberger, Michael. 1993. “Force, Law and Experiment. The Evolution of Helmholtz's Philosophy of Science.” In Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Cahan, David, 461497. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heidelberger, Michael. 1994. “Helmholtz’ Erkentniss- und Wissenschaftstheorie im Kontext der Philosophie und Naturwissenschaft des 19. Jahrhunderts.” In Universalgenie Helmholtz, edited by Krüger, Lorenz, 168185. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Heidelberger, Michael. 1997. “Beziehungen zwischen Sinnesphysiologie und Philosophy im 19. Jahrhundert.” In Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Formen und Prozesse ihrer Interaktion, edited by Sandkühler, Hans Jörg, 3758. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Helmholtz, Hermann. [1847] 1889. Uber die Erhaltung der Kraft. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1851] 1883. “Beschreibung einen Augenspiegels zur Untersuchung der Netzhaut im Lebenden Auge.” In Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. 2, 591609. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1852] 1883. “Ueber die Natur der menschlichen Sinnesempfindungen.” In Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, vol. 2, 591609. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1855] 1896. “Ueber das Sehen des Menschen.” In Vorträge und Reden, vol. 1, 85119. Braunschweig: Holzstiche.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1862] 1995. “On the Relation of Natural Science to Science in General.” In Science and Culture, edited and translated by Cahan, David, 7695. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1863] 1912. On the Sensations of Tone. Translated by Ellis, Alexander J.. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1856/66] 1924/25. Treatise on Physiological Optics, published in three volumes, translated by Southall, James P. C.. Menasha WI: George Banta Publishing Company.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1868] 1995. “The Recent Progress of the Theory of Vision.” In Science and Culture, edited by Cahan, David, 127203. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1870] 1995. “On the Origin and Significance of Geometrical Axioms.” In Science and Culture, edited and translated by Cahan, David, 226248. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1877] 1995. “On Thought in Medicine.” In Science and Culture, edited and translated by Cahan, David, 309327. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1878] 1995. “The Facts in Perception”. In Science and Culture, edited and translated by Cahan, David, 342380. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1891] 1995. “Hermann von Helmholtz. An Autobiographical Sketch.” In Science and Culture, edited and translated by Cahan, David, 381392. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. [1892] 1995. “Goethe's Presentiments of Coming Scientific Ideas.” In Science and Culture, edited and translated by Cahan, David, 393412. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. 1894. “Über den Ursprung der richtigen Deutung unserer Sinneseindrücke.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 7:8196.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. 1896. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik Zweite umgearbeitete Auflage. Hamburg: Leopold Voss.
Helmholtz, Hermann von. 1921. “The Facts in Perception.” In Hermann von Helmholtz. Epistemological Writings. Translated by Herz, Paul and Schlick, Moritz, 115185. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing.
Hochberg, Julian. 2007. In the Mind's Eye. Edited by Peterson, Maryet al.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, William. 1890. Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. London: Macmillan.
Jeannerod, Marc, et al. 1979. “Corollary Discharge: Its Possible Implications in Visual and Oculomotor Interaction.” Neuropsychologia 17:241258.
Kant, Immanuel. [1781/1787] 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koenigsberger, Leo. 1902/1903. Hermann von Helmholtz, 3 vols. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.
Kohls, Nico, and Benedikter, Roland. 2010. “The Origins of the Modern Concept of ‘Neuroscience’.” In Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives in Neuroethics, edited by Giordano, James and Gordijn, Bert, 3765. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krause, Albrecht. 1878. Kant und Helmholtz. Lahr: Moritz Schauenburg.
Lange, Friedrich A. 1881. History of Materialism, vol. 3. Translated by Thomas, Ernest C.. London: Trübner.
Leary, David E. 1980. “German Idealism and the Development of Psychology in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 18:299317.
Leibniz, Gottfried W. [1695] 2004. “Clarification of the ‘New System of the Nature of the Communication of Substances’.” In The Shorter Leibniz Texts, edited by Strickland, Lloyd, 7778. New York: Continuum.
Lenoir, Timothy. 1993. “The Eye as a Mathematician.” In Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Cahan, David, 109153. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lenoir, Timothy. 2006. “Operationalizing Kant: Manifolds, Models, and Mathematics in Helmholtz's Theories of Perception.” In The Kantian Legacy in Ninetheenth-Century Science, edited by Friedman, Michael and Nordmann, Alfred, 141210. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Liebmann, Otto. 1869. Ueber den objectiven Anblick. Stuttgart: Carl Schober.
Makkreel, Rudolf A., and Luft, Sebastian. 2010. Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
McCarty, David C. 2000. “Optics of Thought: Logic and Vision in Müller, Helmholtz, and Frege.” Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 41 (4):365378.
McDonald, Patrick J. 2003. “Demonstration by Simulation: The Philosophical Significance of Experiment in Helmholtz's Theory of Perception.” Perspectives on Science 11 (2):170207.
Meulders, Michel. 2010. Helmholtz: From Enlightenment to Neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mill, John S. 1865. “The Psychological Theory of the Belief in an External World.” In An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy, by Mill, John S., 234250. Boston: William V. Spencer.
Mill, John S. [1859] 1867. “Bain's Psychology.” In Dissertations and Discussions, by Mill, John S., 97152. London: Longmans.
Mill, John S. [1843] 1882. A System of Logic, 8th ed.New York: Harper & Brothers.
Müller, Johannes S. 1826. Zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtssinnes. Leipzig: Gnobloch.
Müller, Johannes. [1833/1840] 1843. Elements of Physiology. Translated by Baly, William. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard.
Neuber, Matthias. 2012. “Helmholtz's Theory of Space and Its Significance for Schlick.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):163180.
Olesko, Kathryn M., and Holmes, Frederic L.. 1993. “Experiment, Quantification and Discovery. Helmholtz's Early Physiological Researches 1843–1850.” In Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-Century Science, edited by Cahan, David, 50108. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Peterson, Mary A., Gillam, Barbara, and Sedgwick, H. A., eds. 2007. In the Mind's Eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Films, and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Post, Karl. 1905. Johannes Müllers Philosophische Anschauungen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Rachlin, Howard. 2005. “What Müller's Law of Specific Nerve Energies Says about the Mind.” Behavior and Philosophy 33:4154.
Richards, Robert J. 1980. “Wundt's Early Theories of Unconscious Inference and Cognitive Evolution in Their Relation to Darwinian Biopsychology.” In Wundt Studies. A Centennial Collection, by Bringman, Wolfgang G. and Tweney, Ryan D., 4270. Toronto: C.J. Hogrefe.
Rieber, Robert, and Robinson, David K.. 2001. Wilhelm Wundt in History. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Riehl, Alois. 1904. “Helmholtz in seinem Verhältnis zu Kant.” Kant Studien 9 (1):261285.
Robinson, Daniel. 1995. An Intellectual History of Psychology. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Scarre, Geoffrey. 1989. Logic and Reality in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scheerer, Eckhart. 1989. “On the Will: A Historical Perspective.” Advances in Psychology 62:3960. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Schiemann, Gregor. 2009. Hermann von Helmholtz's Mechanism: The Loss of Certainty. New York: Springer.
Schmidgen, Henning. 2003. “Wundt as Chemist? A Fresh Look at His Practice and Theory of Experimentation.” American Journal of Psychology 116 (3):469476.
Schmitz, Heinz. 1995. Physiologischer Neukantianismus und Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Steege, Benjamin. 2012. Helmholtz and the Modern Listener. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schultz, Reinhard. 2004. Naturwissenschaftshermeneutik. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen and Neumann.
Schwertschlager, Joseph. 1883. Kant und Helmholtz. Freiburg: Herder'sche Verlagshandlung.
Snyder, Laura. 2006. Reforming Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, Steven. 1977. “Hermann von Helmholtz and the Empiricist Vision.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 13:4858.
Turner, Steven. 1993. “Vision Studies in Germany: Helmholtz versus Hering.” Osiris 8:80103.
Turner, Steven. 1994. In the Eye's Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wade, Nicholas, and Brozek, Josef. 2001. Purkinje's Vision: The Dawning of Neuroscience. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
Westheimer, Gerald. 2008. “Was Helmholtz a Bayesian?Perception 39:642650.
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1862. Beiträge zur Theorie der Sinneswahrenehmung. Leipzig: C.F. Wintersche Verlagshandlung.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Science in Context
  • ISSN: 0269-8897
  • EISSN: 1474-0664
  • URL: /core/journals/science-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed