Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    van der Sijpt, Erica 2014. The Unfortunate Sufferer: Discursive Dynamics around Pregnancy Loss in Cameroon. Medical Anthropology, Vol. 33, Issue. 5, p. 395.


    Wexler, Isaiah D. Johannesson, Marie Edenborough, Frank P. Sufian, Beth S. and Kerem, Eitan 2007. Pregnancy and Chronic Progressive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 175, Issue. 4, p. 300.


    ×

ABORTION, AUTONOMY, AND CONTROL OVER ONE'S BODY

  • John Martin Fischer (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052503202120
  • Published online: 01 July 2003
Abstract

It is often thought that if a developing human being is considered a “person” from the beginning, then it would follow that abortion (at any time) would be impermissible. For, after all, a person has a stringent right to life, and because life is a prerequisite for enjoying any other goods, it is plausible that the right to life is a “basic” or “fundamental” one, not easily overridden by other considerations. The right to life, it would seem, could not be outweighed by another individual's preferences, even preferences about what should happen in or to her body.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×