Regulation of Foods and Drugs and Libertarian Ideals: Perspectives of a Fellow-Traveler*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2009
For one with libertarian sympathies, the official regulation of foods and drugs is presumptively a bad thing. One is most accustomed to seeing the argument in debates about legalizing marijuana and other hedonic drugs. And it remains a very good if by now well-trafficked question, which will be more well-trafficked still by the time this essay ends, why government should be in the business of telling people what sorts of chemical moodenhancers they may take. But as the criminologist James Jacobs has pointed out, to ask this question is to put in play matters far larger and more important than marijuana. What business is it of government to say what medicines may be sold and by whom they may be sold? Why should certain chemical agents be available to willing buyers only with a doctor's scrip, and other agents, such as unproved drugs or devices, forbidden to all, even with medical permission? If libertarians answer these questions impatiently, then admirers of the administrative welfare state (“statists”) will be happy to play rope-a-dope with them, chattering on about the endearing eccentricities of libertarians' assumptions and avoiding the challenge to articulate and defend their own increasingly shabby-looking principles. Those principles are much in need of defense. Food and drug laws are among the most well-established offices of regulatory government. They are complicated, hypertechnical, mysterious, and expensive to administer and maintain. One is entitled to suspect that a number of them are carried on more out of habit and routine than out of any authentic conviction that they are the best way, or among the better ways, to provide for the welfare of citizens.
- Research Article
- Copyright © Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 1998
1 Jacobs, James B., “Imagining Drug Legalization,” The Public Interest, vol. 101 (1990), p. 31.Google Scholar
6 Pope, N. C. and Katz, D. L., “Affective and Psychotic Symptoms Associated with Anabolic Steroid Use,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 145 (1988)Google ScholarPubMed; Perry, P., Anderson, K., and Yates, W., “Illicit Anabolic Steroid Use in Athletes: A Case Series Analysis,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 18 (1990)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Brower, K., Blow, F., Young, J., and Hill, E., “Symptoms and Correlates of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Dependence,” British Journal of Addiction, vol. 86 (1990)Google Scholar; Pope, N. C. and Katz, D. L., “Homicide and Near Homicide by Anabolic Steroid Users,” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 51 (1990)Google ScholarPubMed; see also Buckley, W. E. et al. , “Estimated Prevalence of Anabolic Steroid Use among Male High School Seniors,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 260 (1988), pp. 3441–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Hence, an “anabolic steroid” defense against a charge of assault would probably be useless.
9 Because of her work on thalidomide, Dr. Kelsey was awarded the President's Gold Medal for Distinguished Service. See Kazman, Sam, “Deadly Overcaution: FDA's Drug Approval Process,” Journal of Regulation and Social Costs, vol. 1 (1990), p. 36.Google Scholar
10 Thalidomide still remains a substantial mystery. One researcher has stated: “There were 800 studies after the thalidomide disaster, but teratologists still do not know how that one drug causes limb reduction in the human embryo. They haven't even found the active part of the molecule in thalidomide or determined where it strikes during gestation.” Dowie, Mark, “Teratology: The Loneliest Science,” American Health, 06, 1990, p. 58.Google Scholar
11 Some abnormalities in boys were also reported. DES has spawned a great deal of litigation and made some important law on the subject of joint causation and liability. See, e.g., Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P.2d 924 (California Supreme Court, 1980)Google Scholar; and Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co., 539 N.E.2d 1069 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989).Google Scholar
13 Otherwise, occasions for governmental intervention in any person's behavior would multiply without limit, on the ground that a given regulation was nothing more than a protection for the rights of persons unborn and unbegotten.
15 See generally Blumberg, Henry, Rimland, David, Carroll, Donna, Terry, Pamela, and Wachsmuth, Kaye, “Rapid Development of Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Methicillin-Susceptable and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 163 (1991)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Cohen, Mitchell, “Epidemiology of Drug Resistance: Implications for a Post-Microbial Era,” Science, vol. 257 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Neu, Harold, “The Crisis in Antibiotic Resistance,” Science, vol. 257 (1992).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed See also, among many other authorities, Muder, Robert, Brennen, Carole, Goetz, Angella, Wagener, Marilyn, and Rihs, John, “Association with Prior Fluoroquinolone Therapy of Widespread Ciprofloxacin Resistance among Gram-Negative Isolates in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 35 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gaynes, Robert, Weinstein, Robert, Chamberlin, William, and Kabins, Sherwin, “Antibiotic-Resistant Flora in Nursing Home Patients Admitted to the Hospital,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 145 (1985)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Murray, Barbara, “New Aspects of Antimicrobial Resistance and the Resulting Therapeutic Dilemmas,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 163 (1991)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; and O'Brien, Thomas et al. , “Resistance of Bacteria to Antibacterial Agents: Report of Task Force 2,” Reviews of Infectious Diseases, vol. 9 (1987).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 In discussion.
18 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
19 Elster, Jon, ed., The Multiple Self (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 3.Google Scholar
20 Schelling, Thomas, “The Intimate Contest for Self-Command,” The Public Interest, vol. 60 (1980).Google Scholar
22 However, the FDA has suspended its policy of seizing nonapproved drugs imported from other countries, so a patient with sufficient resources may be able to obtain the desired medication from abroad. Hutt, Peter, “The Regulation of Pharmaceutical Products in the U.S.A.,” in Pharmaceutical Medicine, ed. Burley, Denis M. et al. , 2d ed (London and Boston: E. Arnold, 1993), pp. 216–17.Google Scholar
24 Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1995 National Data Book (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1995), p. 92, table 125.Google Scholar
25 Shapiro, Eben, “Fat Substitutes: The Long, Hard Quest for Foods That Fool the Palate,” New York Times, 09 29, 1991, p. C5.Google Scholar
26 Burros, Marian, “FDA Advisory Panel Backs Approval of a Fat Substitute,” New York Times, 11 18, 1995, p. A11.Google Scholar
28 Wardell, William M., “A Close Inspection of the ‘Calm Look’,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 239 (1978), p. 2010.Google Scholar
29 Wardell, William M. and Lasagna, Louis, Regulation and Drug Development (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1975), p. 77.Google Scholar
30 Schwartz, H., “A ‘Miracle’ Drug That Languished among the Worms,” Wall Street Journal, 07 18, 1989, p. A22.Google Scholar
36 When a class of victims is organized and alert, as AIDS victims have been and cancer patients have become, they can, of course, often win special, fast-track concessions from the agency. See generally Larson, Elizabeth, “Unequal Treatments,” Reason, 04 1992, p. 48Google Scholar; Kolata, Gina, “Trial of Experimental AIDS Drug to Be Continued, with Revisions,” New York Times, 03 9, 1990, p. 1.Google Scholar It is an unusual situation when a disease strikes largely at a class of people who have pre-constituted themselves into a vocal, well-funded interest group, but lucky for those who have that disease rather than some other, equally serious or more serious disease whose victims have no political juice. See Kondracke, Morton, “How Diabetes Plan Was Hatched—And Why It Is Not Enough,” Roll Call Online, http://www.rollcall.com/commentary/kondracke.html.Google Scholar
38 The high research-and-development costs mandated by government approval have been cited as a reason for market consolidation and merger activity. See ibid., p. 108. During the late 1980s, several mergers within the pharmaceutical industry occurred, including SmithKline-Beecham, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Merrell Dow-Marion Laboratories. See ibid., p. 108, n. 5.
39 Both of these comparisons probably understate the FDA's inefficiency, since they are comparisons against other bureaucratic monopolies rather than against competitive reviewing agencies.
41 See Crout, J. R., “Objectives and Achievements of Regulations in the U.S.A.,”Google Scholar and Griffin, J. P., “Objectives and Achievements of Regulations in the U.K.,” in International Medicines Regulations: A Forward Look to 1992, ed. Walker, Stuart R. and Griffin, John P. (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989), pp. 73, 87, 117, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Statement of FDA Commissioner David Kessler, Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on Labor and Human Resources, 104th Congress, 1st Session (1995).
45 Kaitlin, et al. , “The Drug Lag: An Update of New Drug Introductions in the United States and in the United Kingdom, 1977 through 1987,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 46 (1989).Google Scholar The differences in speed of approval were the same for the first period in the study (1977–1982) as they were for the second period (1983–1987), indicating that the FDA was not improving relative to its British counterpart. See ibid., p. 135.
47 This is not hyperbole, unfortunately. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991).Google Scholar
48 See, e.g., the front-page story in the Sunday edition of the Montgomery (Alabama) Advertiser, 02 11, 1996.Google Scholar
49 The Clinton administration has requested $16 billion for the war on drugs for the 1998 fiscal year, an increase of $800 million over the 1997 appropriation. Chicago Tribune, 02 26, 1997, section 1, p. 14.Google Scholar
50 1995 Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1995), p. 492.Google Scholar
51 Admittedly the foregoing numbers are not solid. Significant portions of the nominal budgets go toward dual-purpose items; for example, coastal-surveillance assets paid for by the war on drugs are useful in other budget lines without being reflected in them. Most of the criminals serving time for drug offenses are in prison on negotiated pleas, so that we cannot be certain what, exactly, they actually did to get into trouble. Few of them are Boy Scouts in any event, and might be locked up for something else if not for this. But though we should discount the numbers somewhat, they do give at least a rough feel for the edge of hysteria that this subject seems to provoke.
52 720 F.Supp. 1424 (N.D.Cal. 1989).
53 29 U.S.C. sections 701–795(i).
54 680 F.Supp. 590, 600 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).
55 29 U.S.C. section 1201, et seq.
56 See generally 22 ALR Fed 111 (1997).
57 539 N.Y.Supp.2d 876 (1989).