Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Human Flourishing and the Appeal to Human Nature*

  • Douglas B. Rasmussen (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500002235
  • Published online: 13 January 2009
Abstract

If “perfectionism” in ethics refers to those normative theories that treat the fulfillment or realization of human nature as central to an account of both goodness and moral obligation, in what sense is “human flourishing” a perfectionist notion? How much of what we take “human flourishing” to signify is the result of our understanding of human nature? Is the content of this concept simply read off an examination of our nature? Is there no place for diversity and individuality? Is the belief that the content of such a normative concept can be determined by an appeal to human nature merely the result of epistemological naiveté? What is the exact character of the connection between human flourishing and human nature?

These questions are the ultimate concern of this essay, but to appreciate the answers that will be offered it is necessary to understand what is meant by “human flourishing.” “Human flourishing” is a relatively recent term in ethics. It seems to have developed in the last two decades because the traditional translation of the Greek term eudaimonia as “happiness” failed to communicate clearly that eudaimonia was an objective good, not merely a subjective good.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Scott MacDonald , “Ultimate Ends in Practical Reasoning: Aquinas's Aristotelian Moral Psychology and Anscombe's Fallacy,” Philosophical Review, vol. 100 (01 1991), pp. 3166.

Eric Mack , “Moral Individualism: Agent Relativity and Deontic Restraints,” Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 7, no. 1 (Autumn 1989), pp. 81111.

Jennifer Whiting , “Aristotle's Function Argument: A Defense,” Ancient Philosophy, vol. 8 (1988), p. 43

Kelly Rogers , “Aristotle on Loving Another for His Own Sake,” Phronesis, vol. 39, no. 3 (1994), pp. 291302

Joseph L. Lombardi , “James Rachels on Kant's Basic Idea,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 71 (Winter 1997), pp. 5358

Henry B. Veatch , “Modern Ethics, Teleology, and Love of Self,” The Monist, vol. 75 01 1992), pp. 5270.

T. H. Irwin , “Tradition and Reason in the History of Ethics,” Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 7, no. 1 (Autumn 1989), pp. 4568.

Douglas B. Rasmussen , “Quine and Aristotelian Essentialism,” The New Scholasticism, vol. 58 (Summer 1984), pp. 316–35

Rasmussen, “The Significance for Cognitive Realism of the Thought of John Poinsot,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 68 (Summer 1994), pp. 409–24

Allan Gotthelf , “Aristotle's Conception of Final Causality,” in Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology, ed. Allan Gotthelf and James Lennox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 204–42

Francisco J. Ayala , “The Autonomy of Biology as a Natural Science,” in Biology, History, and Natural Philosophy, ed. A. D. Breck and W. Yourgrau (New York: Plenum Press, 1972), pp. 116

Ayala, “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 37 (1970), pp. 115

Robert N. Brandon , “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanation,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 12 (1981), pp. 91105

P. Glassen , “A Fallacy in Aristotle's Function Argument about the Good,” Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 7 (1957), pp. 319–22.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×