Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cowen, Nick 2016. Millian Liberalism and Extreme Pornography. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 509.


    LANDES, XAVIER and NIELSEN, MORTEN EBBE JUUL 2012. Intra-Family Inequality and Justice. Dialogue, Vol. 51, Issue. 03, p. 437.


    ×

LIBERALISM'S DIVIDE, AFTER SOCIALISM AND BEFORE

  • Jacob T. Levy (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052503201126
  • Published online: 01 January 2003
Abstract

For most of the century and a half that began roughly with the later works of John Stuart Mill, the most important divide within liberal political thought was that between classical (or market, or libertarian) liberalism and welfare (or new, or redistributionist) liberalism. The questions that were important to the socialist/liberal debate also became important for debates within liberalism: What is the relationship between property and freedom? Between free trade and freedom? Is freedom of commercial activity on a moral par with other sorts of freedom? Is the alleviation of poverty or material need a more important political goal than freedom? How do freedom and equality fit together in a liberal understanding of justice? What degree of state economic planning, or state taxation and expenditure, is compatible with liberal freedom?

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×