Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    ALLARD-TREMBLAY, YANN 2015. Human rights, specification and communities of inquiry. Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 4, Issue. 02, p. 254.


    Deplazes-Zemp, Anna Gregorowius, Daniel and Biller-Andorno, Nikola 2015. Different Understandings of Life as an Opportunity to Enrich the Debate About Synthetic Biology. NanoEthics, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 179.


    Hoffmann, Michael H. G. 2015. Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing. Argumentation,


    Williams, Evan G. 2015. The Possibility of an Ongoing Moral Catastrophe. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 971.


    Espindola, Juan 2014. The Case for the Moral Permissibility of Amnesties: An Argument from Social Moral Epistemology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 5, p. 971.


    Caney, Simon 2012. Addressing Poverty and Climate Change: The Varieties of Social Engagement. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 26, Issue. 02, p. 191.


    Koppl, Roger G. Kurzban, Robert and Kobilinsky, Lawrence 2008. Epistemics for Forensics. Episteme, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 141.


    Peart, Sandra J and Levy, David M 2008. Introduction to the Symposium on Ethics. Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 101.


    Peart, Sandra J. and Levy, David M. 2008. Darwin's unpublished letter at the Bradlaugh–Besant trial: A question of divided expert judgment. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 343.


    Talisse, Robert B. 2008. Toward a Social Epistemic Comprehensive Liberalism. Episteme, Vol. 5, Issue. 01, p. 106.


    Hourdequin, Marion 2007. Reclaiming the Mundane: Comments on Albert Borgmann’s Real American Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 65.


    Clarke, Simon 2005. Two models of ethics committees. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 41.


    Hessler, Kristen 2005. Resolving Interpretive Conflicts in International Human Rights Law*. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 29.


    Benatar, Solomon R. 2003. Bioethics: Power and Injustice: Iab Presidential Address. Bioethics, Vol. 17, Issue. 5-6, p. 387.


    ×

SOCIAL MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY

  • Allen Buchanan (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052502192065
  • Published online: 01 July 2002
Abstract

The distinctive aim of applied ethics is to provide guidance as to how we ought to act, as individuals and as shapers of social policies. In this essay, I argue that applied ethics as currently practiced is inadequate and ought to be transformed to incorporate what I shall call social moral epistemology. This is a branch of social epistemology, the study of the social practices and institutions that promote (or impede) the formation, preservation, and transmission of true beliefs. For example, social epistemologists critically evaluate the comparative advantages of adversarial versus inquisitorial criminal proceedings as mechanisms for the discovery of truth.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×