Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Rondel, David 2016. Egalitarians, sufficientarians, and mathematicians: a critical notice of Harry Frankfurt’sOn Inequality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 145.


    Segall, Shlomi 2016. INCAS AND ALIENS: THE TRUTH IN TELIC EGALITARIANISM. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 32, Issue. 01, p. 1.


    Young, Robert 2016. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.


    Kohn, Margaret 2013. What is wrong with gentrification?. Urban Research & Practice, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 297.


    McKerlie, Dennis 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.


    Young, Robert 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.


    FREIMAN, CHRISTOPHER 2012. Why Poverty Matters Most: Towards a Humanitarian Theory of Social Justice. Utilitas, Vol. 24, Issue. 01, p. 26.


    Gosseries, Axel 2011. Qu’est-ce que le suffisantisme ?. Philosophiques, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 465.


    Fox, Dov 2007. Luck, Genes, and Equality. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 712.


    Schramme, Thomas 2007. The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 121.


    Silvestre, Joaquim 2007. Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability.


    ×

WHY JUSTICE REQUIRES TRANSFERS TO OFFSET INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITIES

  • Richard J. Arneson (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052502191084
  • Published online: 01 January 2002
Abstract

If an array of goods is for sale on a market, one's wealth, the tradable resources one owns, determines what one can purchase from this array. One's income is the increment in wealth one acquires over a given period of time. In any society, we observe some people having more wealth and income, and some having less. At any given time, some societies have a greater average wealth than others. Across time, we can observe societies becoming richer or poorer and showing more or less equal distributions of wealth among their members. Does it matter from an ethical standpoint whether some people have more income and wealth than others? Does securing a more equal distribution of income and wealth either constitute the achievement of something that is intrinsically morally desirable or serve as a reliable means to the achievement of some intrinsic moral value? If we suppose that justice demands, in many circumstances, the equalization of the income or wealth of persons, what principles of justice generate this demand?

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Philosophy and Policy
  • ISSN: 0265-0525
  • EISSN: 1471-6437
  • URL: /core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×