Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-pjp64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-08T12:11:05.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

People’s Contrasting Attitudes Towards Universal Basic Income in Sweden and South Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2024

Jae-jin Yang
Affiliation:
Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
Yonhyok Choe
Affiliation:
Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
Yunmin Nam*
Affiliation:
Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea
*
Corresponding author: Yunmin Nam; Email: yunmin.nam@kongju.ac.kr

Abstract

The discourse on universal basic income varies widely across countries. In Sweden, public opinion is generally negative even in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it is barely discussed on the public policy table. On the other hand, in South Korea, public opinion is not as negative as in Sweden, and basic income is actively raised as policy agenda. Our study based on survey results reaffirmed the contrasting attitudes of the Swedish and Suth Korean people regarding basic income and related tax increase. The basic income could appeal to the people in South Korea. On the contrary, there is little room for the introduction of basic income in Sweden. The analysis also revealed similarities within the difference. Those with high income, political-right orientation, high protection against income loss, and high tax burden would be more unfavourable toward introduction of basic income no matter which country they live in.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Yang supplementary material

Yang supplementary material
Download Yang supplementary material(File)
File 29.1 KB