Skip to main content Accessibility help

Choice and Voice – A Review

  • Ian Greener (a1)

‘Choice’ and ‘voice’ are two of the most significant means through which the public are able to participate in public services. Choice agendas position public service users as consumers, driving improvements by choosing good providers over bad, which then thrive through greater allocations of funds as money follows their selections (Le Grand, 2007). Choice-driven reforms tend to be about trying to make public services more locally responsive (Ferlie, Freeman, McDonnell, Petsoulas and Rundle-Smith, 2006). Voice-driven reforms, on the other hand, tend to position public service users as citizens, suggesting an emphasis on accountability mechanisms to drive service improvements through elections, with the possible removal of low regarded officials, or a greater involvement of local people in the running of services (Jenkins, 2006). Voice implies that citizens hold the right to participate in public services either through the political process, or through their direct involvement in the running or delivery of the services themselves. Of course, it is also possible to combine choice and voice mechanisms to try and achieve greater service responsiveness and accountability. In this review, choice reforms will be treated as those which are based upon consumer literature, and voice reforms those based upon attempting to achieve greater citizenship.

Citizenship and consumption are two areas with significant literatures in their own right, but whereas the citizenship literature is widely cited in the social policy literature, the consumption literature appears rather more selectively. This review examines each area in turn in terms of its application to social policy, and then presents a synthesis of commonalties in the two literatures, which represent particularly promising avenues for exploring the relationship between public services and their users.

Hide All
6, P. (2003), ‘Giving consumers of British public services more choice: what can be learned from recent history?’, Journal of Social Policy, 32, 2, 239270.
Abercrombie, N. (1994), ‘Authority and consumer society’, in Keat, R., Whiteley, N. and Abercrombie, N. (eds), The Authority of the Consumer, London: Routledge, pp. 4357.
Aldridge, A. (2005), The Market, Cambridge: Polity.
Ball, S., Bowe, R. and Gewirtz, S. (1995), ‘Circuits of schooling: a sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts’, The Sociological Review, 43, 1, 5278.
Barber, B. (2007), Consumed: How Markests Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults and Swallow Citizens Whole, London: W. W. Norton & Co.
Barber, M. (2007), Instruction to Deliver: Tony Blair, the Public Services and the Challenge of Achieving Targets, London: Portoco's Publishing.
Bauman, Z. (2007), Consuming Life, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beveridge, W. (1942), Social Insurance and Allied Services, London: HMSO.
Birchall, J. and Simmons, R. (2004), User Power: The Participation of Users in Public Services, London: National Consumer Council.
Callon, M. (1998), ‘An essay on framing and overflowing’, in Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 244269.
Callon, M., Meadel, C. and Rabeharisoa, V. (2002), ‘The economy of qualities’, Economy and Society, 31, 2, 194217.
Clarke, J. (2004), Changing Welfare, Changing Welfare States, London: Sage.
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997), The Managerial State, London: Sage.
Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E. and Westmarland, L. (2007), Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Daly, M. and Rake, K. (2003), Gender and the Welfare State, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dean, H. (2002), Welfare Rights and Social Policy, London: Pearson.
Dwyer, P. (2000), Welfare Rights and Responsibilities, Bristol: Policy Press.
Ferlie, E., Freeman, G., McDonnell, J., Petsoulas, C. and Rundle-Smith, S. (2006), ‘Introducing choice in the public services: some supply side issues’, Public Money and Management, 26, 1, 6372.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2001), Welfare Theory: An Introduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Flanders, J. (2007), Consuming Passions: Leisure and Pleasure in Victorian Britain, London: HarperPress.
Gabriel, Y. and Lang, T. (2006), The Unmanageable Consumer, London: Sage.
Galbraith, J. (1958), The Affluent Society, London: Penguin.
Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity.
Giddens, A. (2002), What Now for New Labour? Cambridge: Polity.
Giddens, A. (2007), Over to you, Mr Brown, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Greener, I. (2002), ‘Agency, social theory and social policy’, Critical Social Policy, 22, 43, 688706.
Harris, J. (1996), ‘“Contract” and “Citizenship”’ in Marquand, D. and Seldon, A. (eds), The Ideas that Shaped Post-War Britain, London: Fontana Press.
Hirschman, A. (1970), Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States, London: Harvard University Press.
Janoski, T. (1998), Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional And Social Democratic Regimes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, S. (2006), Thatcher and Sons: A Revolution in Three Acts, London: Allen Lane.
Jessop, B. (2002), The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Klein, R. (2003), ‘Governance for NHS foundation trusts’, British Medical Journal, 326, 174175.
Le Grand, J. (2003), Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights, Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Le Grand, J. (2007), The Other Invisible Hand, Woodstock: Princetown University Press.
Lee, S. and Woodward, R. (2002), ‘Implementing the Third Way: The Delivery of Public Services under the Blair Government’, Public Money and Management, 49–56.
Lister, R. (1997), Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, London: Palgrave.
Marshall, T. H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minister of State for Department of Health, Minister of State for Local and Regional Government, and Minister of State for School Standards (2005), The Case for User Choice in Public Services, London: Public Administration Select Committee into Choice, Voice and Public Services.
Mouzelis, N. (2001), ‘Reflexive modernization and the third way: the impasses of Giddens' social-democratic politics’, Sociological Review, 436–456.
Needham, C. (2003), Citizen-Consumers: New Labour's Marketplace Democracy, London: Catalyst Forum.
Paterson, M. (2006), Consumption and Everyday Life, London: Taylor & Francis.
Roche, M. (1992), Rethinking Citizenship: Welfare, Ideology and Change in Modern Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sayer, A. (2005), The Moral Significance of Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, B. (2004), The Paradox of Choice: Why Less is More, New York: Harper Collins.
Secretary of State for Health (2000), The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform, London: HMSO.
Stoker, G. (2006), Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work, London: Palgrave.
Veblen, T. (1970), The Theory of the Leisure Class, London: Unwin.
Welshman, J. and Walmsley, J. (eds) (2006), Community Care in Perspective: Care, Control and Citizenship, London: Palgrave.
Westergaard, J. (1999), ‘Where does the Third Way Lead?’ New Political Economy, 4 (3), 429436.
Wilmot, S. (2004), ‘Foundation trusts and the problem of legitimacy’, Health Care Analysis, 12, 2, 157169.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed