Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Fair Conditions and Fair Consequences? Exploring New Labour, Welfare Contractualism and Social Attitudes

  • Daniel Sage (a1)
Abstract

This article explores the intention and effects of New Labour's ‘conditional’ welfare-to-work strategy. Conditionality has been the subject of substantive debate, with New Labour distinguishing its own contractualist welfare reforms from alternative strategies, often associated with ‘punitive’ US workfare. This article assesses whether New Labour's attempt to fashion what is described as ‘reciprocal responsibility’ in welfare arrangements avoided the commonly cited by-products of workfare. To achieve this, evidence is presented from the British Social Attitudes series, which shows a profound hardening of attitudes towards the unemployed. In light of these findings, the evidence supports arguments about the adverse effects that welfare contractualism can have for wider social relations.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Driver and L. Martell (1997) ‘New Labour's communitarinisms’, Critical Social Policy, 17, 52, 2746.

P. Dwyer (2004) ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements?’, Canadion Journal of Sociology, 29, 2, 265–87.

N. Fitzpatrick (2003) After the New Social Democracy: Social Welfare for the Twenty-First Century, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

E. Heron and P. Dwyer (1999) ‘Doing the right thing: Labour's attempt to forge a New Welfare deal between the individual and the state’, Social Policy and Administration, 33, 1, 91104.

K. Jayasuriya (2002) ‘The new contractualism: neo-liberal or democratic?’, Political Quarterly, 73, 3, 309–20.

D. King (1999) In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the USA and Britain, New York: Oxford University Press.

I. Lødemel and H. Trickey (eds.) (2001), An Offer You Can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: The Policy Press.

C. Oppenheim (2001) ‘Enabling participation? New Labour's welfare-to-work policies’, in S. White (ed.), New Labour: The Progressive Future?, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

M. Mann (1986) ‘Work and the work ethic’, in R. Jowell , S. Witherspoon and L. Brook (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 1986 Report, Aldershot: Gower Press.

R. Plant (2003), ‘Citizenship and social security’, Fiscal Studies, 24, 2, 153–66.

P. Taylor-Gooby and C. Hastie (2002) ‘Support for state spending: has New Labour got it right?’, in A. Park (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 19th Report, London: Sage Publications.

P. Taylor-Gooby (2004) ‘The work-centred welfare state’, in A. Park (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 21st Report, London: Sage Publications.

R. Walker and M. Wiseman (2003) ‘Making welfare work: UK activation policies under New Labour’, International Social Security Review, 56, 1, 329.

S. White (2000) ‘Social rights and the social contract: political theory and the new welfare politics’, British Journal of Political Science, 30, 3, 507–32.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 46 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 211 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.