Skip to main content
×
Home

Fair Cuts? The Impact of British Public Service Pension Reform on Workers in the Main Occupations

  • Paul Bridgen (a1) and Traute Meyer (a2)
Abstract

Public service pensions have been a fundamental component of the British pension system in the post-war period and recent reform initiatives have caused political controversy. This article assesses the impact of the Conservative/Liberal government's public sector pension reform plans of 2011 for different public sector workers. It simulates their projected pension outcomes, assuming people contribute to the new system throughout their working lives. In particular, we examine the government's claim that the move away from final to average salary schemes will make pensions fairer for women and lower paid workers. The article shows that the reforms are indeed fair, if measured by the government's standards: retirement is delayed for all, but the lowest skilled and women lose least and some even gain higher pensions without paying proportionately more. Despite austerity, recent British pension reforms reflect a greater awareness of social inequality than many would expect and they have been built on more cross-party agreement than apparent at first sight.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bridgen P. (2010) ‘Towards a social democratic pension system? Assessing the significance of the 2007 and 2008 pension acts’, in Rummery K., Greener I. and Holden C. (eds.), Social Policy Review: 22 Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Bridgen P. and Meyer T. (2005) ‘When do benevolent capitalists change their mind? Explaining the retrenchment of defined benefit pensions in Britain’, Social Policy and Administration, 39, 4, 764–85.
Bridgen P. and Meyer T. (2007) ‘Private pensions versus social inclusion? Three patterns of provison and their impact’, in Meyer T., Bridgen P. and Riedmüller B. (eds.), Private Pensions versus Social Inclusion? Non-state Provision for Citizens at Risk in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bridgen P. and Meyer T. (2011) ‘Exhausted voluntarism – the evolution of the British liberal pension regime’, in Ebbinghaus B. (ed.), Varieties of Pension Governance: The Privatization of Pensions in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–91.
Chick M. (1998) Industrial Policy in Britain 1945–1951: Economic Planning, Nationalisation and Labour Governments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clasen J. (2005) Reforming European Welfare States: Germany and the United Kingdom Compared, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cutler T. and Waine B. (2010) Moral Outrage and Questionable Polarities: The Attack on Public Service Pensions, CRESC Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 80, Manchester: CRESC.
Department for Communities and Local Government (2006) Where Next? Options for a New-Look Local Government Pension Scheme in England and Wales, London: Department for Communities and Local Government, www.communities.gov.uk [accessed 15.01.2012].
Disney R., Emmerson C. and Tetlow G. (2009) ‘What is a public service pension worth?’, Economic Journal, 119, 541, F517F35.
Hannah L. (1986) Reinventing Retirement: The Development of Occupational Pensions in Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Treasury HM (2010) Budget 2010, London: HM Treasury, http://cdn.hm-treasury.gov.uk/junebudget_complete.pdf [accessed 28.01.2012].
Income Data Services (2006) Pension Scheme Design: An IDS Pensions Handbook, London: Income Data Services.
Independent Public Service Pensions Commission (IPSPC) (2010) Interim Report, 7 October, London: IPSPC.
Independent Public Service Pensions Commission (IPSPC) (2011) Final Report, 10 March, London: IPSPC.
Levy J. D. (1999) ‘Vice into virtue? Progressive politics and welfare reform in continental Europe’, Politics and Society, 27, 2, 239–73.
Leyland J. (2011) ‘RPI versus CPI – the definitive account’, Significance, www.significancemagazine.org/details/webexclusive/1314363/RPI-versus-CPI—The-Definitive-Account.html [10.04.2012].
Local Government Pension Scheme (2011) ‘Employers submit pension proposals to Secretary of State’, http://www.lgps.org.uk/lge/core/page.do?pageId=13757792 [accessed 15.04.2012].
Meyer T. (1997) Ungleich besser? Die ökonomische Unabhängigkeit von Frauen im Zeichen der Expansion sozialer Dienstleistungen, Berlin: edition sigma.
Meyer T. and Bridgen P. (2011) ‘Towards German liberalism and British social democracy: the evolution of two public-occupational pension regimes from 1945 to 2009’, in Clasen J. (ed.), Converging Worlds of Welfare? British and German Social Policy in the 21st Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–79.
NEST (2012) www.nestpensions.org.uk/schemeweb/NestWeb/public/home/contents/homepage.html [accessed 10.04.2012].
OECD (2007) Pensions at a Glance: Public Policies across OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2012) JOBS03 Employee Jobs by Industry (GB Totals), www.ons.gov.uk/ons/index.html [accessed 10.04.2012].
Pensions Commission (2005) A New Pensions Settlement for the Twenty-first Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission, London: The Stationery Office.
Pensions Policy Institute (2008) An Assessment of the Government's Reforms to Public Service Pensions, London: Pensions Policy Institute, www.pensionspolicyinstitute.org.uk [accessed 28.01.2012].
Russell A. (1991) The Growth of Occupational Welfare in Britain, Avebury: Aldershot.
Thurley D. (2010) Public Service Pension Reform – 1997–2010, London: House of Commons.
Thurley D. (2012a) Public Service Pension Contributions, London: House of Commons.
Thurley D. (2012b) Public Service Pension Reform – 2010 Onwards, London: House of Commons.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 24 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 171 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.