Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-wvfx2 Total loading time: 0.41 Render date: 2022-01-27T14:50:20.295Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Between a Rock and Hard Place: Combined Effects of Authentic Leadership, Organizational Identification, and Team Prototypicality on Managerial Prohibitive Voice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

Lucas Monzani*
Affiliation:
Western University (Canada)
Michael Knoll
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Chemnitz (Germany)
Steffen Giessner
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam (The Netherlands)
Rolf van Dick
Affiliation:
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt (Germany)
José María Peiró
Affiliation:
Universidad de Valencia (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lucas Monzani. Western University. Ivey Business School. 1255 Western road, N6G 0N1 London, Ontario (Canada). E-mail: lmonzani@ivey.ca

Abstract

Managers are installed by the organization’s stakeholders and shareholders to increase the organization’s value; at the same time, they depend on their subordinates’ acceptance to fulfill this leadership role. If the interest of the organization collides with the interest of their team, some managers act in the interest of their followers accepting potential disadvantages for their organizations and/or external stakeholders. In two experimental studies comprised mainly of German (N = 111) and US (N = 323) managers, we examined combined effects of authentic leadership, organizational identification, and self-perceived team prototypicality on managerial integrity operationalized as expressing work-related concerns to prevent organizations from harm (i.e., managerial voice). Our results show direct effects of authentic leadership and organizational identification on voice behavior across both studies. Furthermore, organizational identification increased voice for managers’ low in authentic leadership pointing at a compensation effect. Finally, leader team prototypicality decreased the effect of identification on voice for managers high in authentic leadership but increased voice for managers low in authentic leadership, but only if these managers identified with their organization. In sum, our findings complement prior research that focused mainly on safety and instrumentality concerns by emphasizing the relevance of self-related antecedents of managerial voice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study was jointly conducted by the research of Instituto de Investigación en Psicología de los RRHH, del Desarrollo Organizacional y de la Calidad de Vida Laboral (IDOCAL) of the Universidad de Valencia (Spain) and the Center for Leadership and Behavior in Organizations (CLBO) at Goethe-Universität Frankfurt. An early version of this work was presented at the 74th Academy of Management annual meeting. This study was funded by following research grants: ECD/3628/2011 available at BOE–A–2012–680; CICYT, PSI2012–36557 & PROMETEO 2012/048.

How to cite this article:

Monzani, L., Knoll, M., Giessner, S., van Dick, R., & Peiró, J. M. (2018). Between a rock and hard place: Combined effects of authentic leadership, organizational identification, and team prototypicality on managerial prohibitive voice. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21. e2. Doi:10.1017/SJP.2019.1

References

Aiken, L., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Algera, P. M., & Lips-Wiersma, M. (2012). Radical authentic leadership: Co-creating the conditions under which all members of the organization can be authentic. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 118131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 14231440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. Voice and silence in organizations. In Greenberg, J. & Edwards, M. S. (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations (1st Ed., pp. 175202). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 2039. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). The many faces of integrity. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 321. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20061615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: Toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8, 85104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, A. (1991). The Republic of Plato (2nd Ed.). NewYork, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., & Javidan, M. (2002). Leadership made in Germany: Low on compassion, high on performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16, 1629. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.6640111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Responses to voice in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 851875. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, R. D., & Jones, K. W. (1975). Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and Type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 713719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.60.6.713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70, 1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champoux, J. E., & Peters, W. S. (1987). Form, effect size and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 243255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1987.tb00257.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A. Y. L., Hannah, S. T., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Veritable authentic leadership: Emergence, functioning, and impacts. In Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O., (Eds.), Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins, effects and development (pp. 341). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Claxton, G., Owen, D., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2013). Hubris in leadership: A peril of unbridled intuition? Leadership, 11, 5778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715013511482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, M. F., & Platow, M. J. (2010). Deviance as adherence to injunctive group norms: The overlooked role of social identification in deviance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 827847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crossan, M. M., Byrne, A., Seijts, G. H., Reno, M., Monzani, L., & Gandz, J. (2017). Toward a framework of leader character in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 54 , 9861018. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 627647. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627Google Scholar
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 461488. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diddams, M., & Chang, G. C. (2012). Only human: Exploring the nature of weakness in authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 593603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, M. (2009). Authentic leadership: Practical reflexivity, self-awareness, and self-authorship. Journal of Management Education, 33, 747771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562909339307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego-defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 10131034. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 11201145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W., & Sleebos, E. (2013). Team-oriented leadership: the interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 658667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 152.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, M., van Yperen, N. W., van De Vliert, E., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Employees ’ reactions to problematic events: A circumplex structure of five categories of responses, and the role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 309321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199905)20:3<309::AID-JOB895>3.0.CO;2-P3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power . London & New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hernández, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 11651185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad. Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 4263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 387397. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
House, R. J., Hanges, P., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., & Gupta, V. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In Mobbley, W. H., Advances in Global Leadership (Vol. 1, pp. 171233). Boston, MA: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Hsiung, H.-H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 349361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1043-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, H. (2015). The authenticity paradox. Harvard Business Review, 93, 5359.Google Scholar
Janis, I. (1982). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascos. Boston; MA: Houghton - Mifflin.Google Scholar
Joosten, A., van Dijke, M.,van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2014). Being “in control” may make you lose control: The role of self-regulation in unethical leadership behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1686-2Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. A., & Anderson, C. (2017). Hierarchical rank and principled dissent: How holding higher rank suppresses objection to unethical practices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139 , 3049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 126. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, M., Lord, R. G., Petersen, L.-E., & Weigelt, O. (2016). Examining the moral grey zone: The role of moral disengagement, authenticity, and situational strength in predicting unethical managerial behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 6578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, M., Meyer, B., Kroemer, N. B., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2015). It takes two to be yourself. An integrated model of authenticity, its measurement, and its relationship to work-related variables. Journal of Individual Differences, 36, 3853. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, M., & van Dick, R. (2013). Authenticity, employee silence, prohibitive voice, and the moderating effect of organizational identification. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 346360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.804113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 127. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, B. & Farndale, E. (in press). Employee voice viewed through a cross-cultural lens. Human Resource Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.06.002Google Scholar
Lee, E.-S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 10491080. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leroy, H., Palanski, M. E., & Simons, T. (2012). Authentic leadership and behavioral integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 255264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1036-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 7192. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, R. G., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Identity, deep structure and the development of leadership skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 591615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, D. R., Chan, A. Y. L., Hodges, T. D., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 247260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(03)00032-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations (p. 312). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Monzani, L., Braun, S., & van Dick, R. (2016). It takes two to tango: The interactive effect of authentic leadership and organizational identification on employee silence intentions. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 30, 246266. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002216649896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monzani, L., Ripoll, P., & Peiró, J. M. (2014). Followers ’ agreeableness and extraversion and their loyalty towards authentic leadership. Psicothema, 26 , 6975. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.67Google Scholar
Moore, C., & Gino, F. (2013). Ethically adrift: How others pull our moral compass from true North, and how we can fix it. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 5377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 373412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25, 706725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moschandreas, M. (1997). The role of opportunism in transaction cost economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 31, 3958. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1997.11505890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murtha, B. R., Challagalla, G., & Kohli, A. K. (2011). The threat from within: Account managers’ concern about opportunism by their own team members. Management Science, 57, iv 1719. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9. Retrieved from https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=6Google Scholar
Packer, D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s Obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 301304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00080.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2009). Integrity and leadership: A multi-level conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 405420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, I., Bravo, M. J., Peiró, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). The Demands-Control-Support Model, locus of control and job dissatisfaction: A longitudinal study. Work & Stress, 15, 97114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370110066968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 5467. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 333). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Schyns, B., Maslyn, J. M., & Weibler, J. (2010). Understanding the relationship between span of control and subordinate consensus in leader–member exchange. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 388406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903146485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, B. (1991). Meaning, self, and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies, 12, 405424. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069101200304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). “What’s your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 395417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sturm, R. E., & Monzani, L. (2017). Leadership and power. In Antonakis, J. & Day, D. V. (Eds.), The nature of leadership. New York, NY: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross-level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61, 3768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 235–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dick, R., Grojean, M. W., Christ, O., & Wieseke, J. (2006). Identity and the extra mile: Relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behaviour. British Journal of Management, 17, 283301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00520.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dick, R., & Kerschreiter, R. (2016). The social identity approach to effective leadership: An overview and some ideas on cross-cultural generalizability. Frontiers in Business Research in China, 10, 363384.Google Scholar
van Dick, R., & Schuh, S. C. (2010). My boss’ group is my group: Experimental evidence for the leader-follower identity transfer. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31, 551563. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011070032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dick, R., Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., … Haslam, S. A. (2018). Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91, 697-728. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 13591392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors-In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215285.Google Scholar
van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Intergroup relations in organizations. In West, M. A., Tjosvold, D., & Smith, K. G. (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 381400). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 10781091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. In Kramer, R. M. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 245297). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Between a Rock and Hard Place: Combined Effects of Authentic Leadership, Organizational Identification, and Team Prototypicality on Managerial Prohibitive Voice
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Between a Rock and Hard Place: Combined Effects of Authentic Leadership, Organizational Identification, and Team Prototypicality on Managerial Prohibitive Voice
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Between a Rock and Hard Place: Combined Effects of Authentic Leadership, Organizational Identification, and Team Prototypicality on Managerial Prohibitive Voice
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *