Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-xklcj Total loading time: 0.223 Render date: 2021-09-28T05:45:50.990Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2017

Virginia Sánchez*
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Noelia Muñoz-Fernández
Universidad de Sevilla (Spain)
Rosario Ortega-Ruiz
Universidad de Córdoba (Spain)
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Virginia Sánchez Jiménez. Departmento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Universidad de Sevilla. C/ Camilo José Cela, s/n. 41018. Seville (Spain). Phone: +34–954557650. Fax: +34–954557650. E-mail:


Recent studies suggest that the online and offline behaviors young people display in romantic relationships are closely related. However, the differential effects of the dimensions of couple quality in the online context have not yet been explored in depth. The aim of this study was to explore online couple quality in young-adult relationships, and its association with romantic relationship satisfaction, also looking at effects of gender, age, and length of the relationship. 431 university students currently in a romantic relationship (68.2% females; mean age = 21.57) participated in this study. They completed different self-report measures to tap the online quality of their romantic relationships (online intimacy, control, jealousy, intrusiveness, cyberdating practices, and communication strategies) and level of satisfaction with those relationships. Results showed that participants more often reported online intimacy (M men = 2.49; M women = 2.38) than the negative scales of online quality (mean ranged from .43 to 1.50), and all the online quality scales decreased with age (correlations ranged from –.12 to –.30) and relationship length (correlations ranged from –.02 to –.20). Linear regression analyses indicated that online intimacy (b = .32, p = .001) and intrusiveness (b = .11, p = .035) were positively related to relationship satisfaction, while cyberdating practices (b = –.20, p = .001) and communication strategies (b = –.34, p = .001) were negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction. Moreover, gender and relationship length moderated some of these associations. Results indicate that while online quality and relationship satisfaction are related, the impact of different online quality dimensions on relationship satisfaction differs depending on a participant’s sex, age, and relationship length.

Research Article
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 11811190. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships II: A substantive review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 217233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and newer media: Patterns of use and effects on adolescents’ health and well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 95113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, C. J., & Spottswood, E. L. (2013). Exploring romantic relationships on social networking sites using the self-expansion model. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 15311537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873893. Google Scholar
Clayton, R. B. (2014). The third wheel: The impact of Twitter use on relationship infidelity and divorce. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 425430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 717720. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connolly, J., Craig, W., Goldberg, A., & Pepler, D. (2004). Mixedgender groups, dating, and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 185207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Zuniga, De, , H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, J. D., Leckie, K. R., & Whiting, J. B. (2013). Facebook infidelity: When poking becomes problematic. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(1), 7490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhariwal, A., Connolly, J., Paciello, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Adolescent peer relationships and emerging adult romantic styles: A longitudinal study of youth in an Italian community. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 579600. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durán-Segura, M., & Martínez-Pecino, R. (2015). Ciberacoso mediante teléfono móvil e Internet en las relaciones de noviazgo entre jóvenes [Cyberharassment via cell phone and Internet in youth dating relationships]. Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 22, 159167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631635. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Espinoza, A. V., Correa, F. E., & García, L. F. (2014). Percepción social de la infidelidad y estilos de amor en la pareja [Social perception of infidelity and love styles in relationships]. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 19(1), 135147.Google Scholar
Ferrer, V., Bosch, E., Ramis, M. C., & Navarro, C. (2006). Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja: Determinantes sociodemográficos, familiares y formativos [Beliefs and attitudes about intimate partner violence against women: Sociodemographic, family, and educational determinants]. Anales de Psicología, 22, 251259.Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Warber, K. M. (2013). Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: An exploratory study of emerging adults’ perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 37. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63(1), 103115. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7, 207230.Google Scholar
Hurley, L., & Reese-Weber, M. (2012). Conflict strategies and intimacy: Variations by romantic relationship development and gender. Interpersona. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6, 200210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2013). Intrusiveness from an attachment theory perspective: A dyadic diary study. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 972977. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2009). Intrusiveness in romantic relationships: A cross-cultural perspective on imbalances between proximity and autonomy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 9891008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the Internet, and social media: How American couples use digital technology to manage life, logistics, and emotional intimacy within their relationships. New York, NY: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Madsen, S. D., & Collins, W. A. (2011). The salience of adolescent romantic experiences for romantic relationship qualities in young adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 789801. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, J. N., Gentzler, A. L., Creasy, B., Oberhauser, A. M., & Westerman, D. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 17711778. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2014). “Creeping” or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 3550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahaman, H. M. S. (2015). Romantic relationship length and its perceived quality: Mediating role of Facebook-related conflict. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11, 395405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauer, A. J., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49, 21592171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohman, E., Führer, A., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2016). Relationship satisfaction across European cultures: The role of love styles. Cross-Cultural Research, 50, 178211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, V., Muñoz, N., Nocentini, A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Menesini, E. (2014). Online intrusiveness, online jealousy and dating aggression in young adults: A cross-national study (Spain-Italy). Maltrattamento e Abuso all’Infanzia, 3, 4765. Google Scholar
Sánchez, V., Muñoz-Fernández, N., & Ortega-Ruíz, R. (2015). “Cyberdating Q_A”: An instrument to assess the quality of adolescent dating relationships in social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 7886. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 2739. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzberg, B. H., & Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media & Society, 4(1), 7192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. C., Dainton, M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27(1), 1326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawhun, J., Adams, N., & Huss, M. T. (2013). The assessment of cyberstalking: An expanded examination including social networking, attachment, jealousy, and anger in relation to violence and abuse. Violence and Victims, 28, 715730. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Digital youth. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705713. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utz, S., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 511527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *